Medical Dressing Prepared from Polylactic Acid Porous Nanofiber Loaded Chinese Drugs
LI Liang1,2,3, LIU Shuping1,2,3, PEI Feifei4, YANG Leifeng1, LIU Rangtong1,2,3,*
1 College of Textiles, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 451191, China 2 Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Textile Equipment, Zhengzhou 451191, China 3 Henan Province Key Laboratory of Functional Textile Materials, Zhengzhou 451191, China 4 The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
Abstract: In order to construct a medical dressing with the absorbability by human body, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory property, thin and soft characteristic for wound healing, polylactic acid (PLA) porous nanofibers dressings loaded with traditional Chinese medicines of radix isatidis (RI), bupleurum chinense (BC) and green tea polyphenols (GTP) were prepared by electrospinning technique, which used the mixture of chlo-roform and acetone as solvent system. By means of scanning electron microscope, infrared spectrometer, X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and contact angle tester, the microstructure, wettability, water retention and liquid absorption, antibacterial and in vitro degradation of the dressing were analyzed. The results show that the nanofibers of dressing loaded Chinese medicine prepared by chloroform and acetone two solvent system had porous characteristics, and the fiber diameter was about 747—1 550 nm. There was no negative modification reaction between Chinese medicine ingredients and polylactic acid. The antibacterial rates of the dressings loaded with radix isatidis, bupleuri chinense and green tea polyphenols against staphylococcus aureus were 79.2%, 82.5% and 75.7% respectively when the loading drug content was 3%, and the antibacterial rates against Escherichia coli were 79.1%, 80.2% and 73.9% respectively. At the same time, compared with pure polylactic acid dressings, the dres-sings loaded drug have better air permeability and in vitro degradation performance, and their water retention and liquid absorption properties are improved by more than 20%, which is suitable for use as wound dressings.
1 Wang X, Ding B, Sun G, et al. Progress in Materials Science, 2013, 58(8), 1173. 2 Gomaa S F, Madkour T M, Moghannem S, et al. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2017, 105(1), 1148. 3 Almeida I B, Luciana G, Fernanda O, et al. Advances in Skin & Wound Care, 2021, 34(2), 1. 4 Winter G D. Nature, 1962, 193, 293. 5 Munteanu B S, Aytac Z, Pricope G M, et al. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2014, 16(10), 1. 6 Li Yanfang, Slemming-Adamsen Peter, Wang Jing et al. Journal of Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine 2017, 11, 2411. 7 Yang Yutong, Du Yuzhang, Zhang Jie, et al. Advanced Fiber Materials 2021, 30(10), 2738. 8 Alisir S H, Ozdemir N, Burgaz E, et al. Fibers and Polymers 2021, 22(10), 2738. 9 Bita Darabian, Hamed Bagheri1, Soheila Mohammadi. Progress in Biomaterials 2020, 9 (1), 45. 10 Duygulu N E, Ciftci F, Ustundag C B. Journal of Polymer Research, 2020, 27(8), 1. 11 Ren X, Han Y, Wang J, et al. Acta Biomater, 2018, 70, 140. 12 Cejkova J, Cejka C, Trosan P, et al. Experimental Eye Research, 2016, 147, 128. 13 Fan T, Daniels R. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2021, 22(6), 1. 14 Niu Xiangrong. China Pharmacist, 2009, 12(9), 1310(in Chinese). 牛向荣. 中国药师, 2009, 12(9), 1310 15 Shao Shuli, Xu Xingjun, Ma Debin, et al. Acta Chinese Medicine and Pharmacology, 2002, 30 (4), 59(in Chinese). 邵淑丽, 徐兴军, 马德滨, 等. 中医药学报, 2002, 30(4), 59. 16 Huang Yuan, Dong Fuyue, Li Chuyuan. China Pharmaceuticals, 2020, 29(7), 150(in Chinese). 黄远, 董福越, 李楚源. 中国药业, 2020, 29(7), 150. 17 Chen Qing. Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs, 2009 (6), 607(in Chinese). 陈庆. 中国药事, 2009 (6), 607. 18 Yang Xiaoping, Qin Xiaoyan. Journal of Minzu University of China(Na-tural Sciences Edition) , 2013, 22(3), 24(in Chinese). 杨晓萍, 覃筱燕. 中央民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 22(3), 24. 19 Gong Yuqiang, Li Leiqing, Shi Xiaoyan. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 2006, 26(7), 540(in Chinese). 龚裕强, 李雷清, 施小燕. 中国急救医学, 2006, 26(7), 540. 20 Yin J, Xu L. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020, 160, 352. 21 Sharma K, Bullock A, et al. Burns, 2014, 40, 957. 22 Thomas M S, Pillai P K S, et al. Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine, 2018, 29, 137. 23 Park J Y, Lee I H. Journal of Polymer Research, 2011, 18(6), 1287. 24 Yin Jing. Xu Lan. Adnan Ahmed. Advanced Fiber Materials, 2022, 4(4), 832. 25 Wang Zhe, Pan Zhijuan. Journal of Textile Research, 2014, 35(11), 6(in Chinese). 王哲, 潘志娟. 纺织学报, 2014, 35(11), 6. 26 Liu Leigen, Lin Zhenfeng, Shen Zhongan, et al. Journal of Textile Research, 2018, 39(2), 7(in Chinese). 刘雷艮, 林振锋, 沈忠安, 等. 纺织学报, 2018, 39(2), 7. 27 Qing Xiaoyan, He Guanghua, Liu Zhongda, et al. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2021, 261, 117875. 28 Tmversa E, Mechefi B, Mandoli C, et al. Journal of Experimental Nanoscience, 2008, 3(2), 97 29 Ou Yang, Wu Qingyun, Wan Lingshu, et al. Acta Polymerica Sinica, 2013 (2), 248(in Chinese). 欧洋, 吴青芸, 万灵书, 等. 高分子学报, 2013 (2), 248. 30 Qu Weifeng, Yan Yurong. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2009 (10), 1766(in Chinese). 区炜锋, 严玉蓉. 化工进展, 2009 (10), 1766. 31 Alexa-Maria Croitoru, Yasin Karacelebi, Elif Saatcioglu, et al. Pharmaceutics, 2021, 13(7), 957. 32 Sajeev U S, Anand K A, Menon D, et al. Bulletin of Materials Science, 2008, 3l(3), 343.