Advances in Sulfide-based Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction
ZHANG Xiaojun1, MA Liang1,2, SUN Yinghui2
1 College of Chemical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China 2 College of Energy & Soochow Institute for Energy and Materials Innovations, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
Abstract: Hydrogen energy is considered as an ideal alternative energy for mankind to fundamentally solve global problems of energy and environment due to its advantages, such as clean and pollution-free properties. Electrochemical water splitting is an important method to produce high purity hydrogen. With the increasing of actual demand, the development of highly efficient and low-cost electrocatalysts has attracted significant attention in the field of green energy. Electrochemical water splitting is composed of two half reactions: cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Compared with HER, OER reaction kinetics is slow, which is considered as the bottleneck in water splitting. In order to improve the efficiency of hydrogen production, the development of efficient OER electrocatalysts is imperative but still challenging. Electrocatalysts based on transition metal have been extensively investigated as OER catalysts over the past years due to the special d-orbit structure and abundant reserves. However, the electrocatalytic efficiency of transition-metal-based electrocatalysts is still low compared with noble-metal-based catalysts. Therefore, the development of some electrocatalysts with high catalytic activity, high efficiency and stability has become the focus of people's research. Meanwhile, non-noble-metal-based OER electrocatalysts such as sulfide, selenide, phosphide and boride have been extensively further developed and with great success. Among them, sulfide electrocatalysts have not only cost advantages, but also are approaching or even surpassing RuO2 and IrO2 noble metal catalysts in terms of oxygen evolution overpotential and durability, and are sho-wing great potential application. This paper introduces the reaction mechanism of electrolytic water oxygen evolution reaction in different electrolytes, further discussing the unique physical and chemical properties of sulfide OER electrocatalysts. It has been proved that the sulfide OER electrocatalysts have unique advantages in oxygen evolution reaction. Finally, the progress of research on improvement strategies of sulfide OER catalysts is reviewed and discussed.
作者简介: 张晓君,东北电力大学高级实验师、硕士研究生导师。2014年在吉林大学物理化学专业取得博士学位,主要研究功能材料的制备及应用。以第一作者的身份发表论文十余篇,授权发明专利两项。 孙迎辉,2000年毕业于吉林大学化学学院,2005年毕业于吉林大学化学学院超分子结构与材料国家重点实验室,获博士学位。2006—2009年在德国明斯特大学物理系&纳米技术中心从事博士后研究,合作导师Luisa De Cola 教授。2009—2012年,在新加坡南洋理工大学材料工程与科学学院从事博士后研究,合作导师陈晓东教授。2012年9月加入苏州大学能源学院,任特聘副教授。主要研究方向是功能纳米材料设计与制备及其在能源转化中的应用。
引用本文:
张晓君, 马梁, 孙迎辉. 基于电催化析氧反应的硫化物催化剂研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(23): 23040-23049.
ZHANG Xiaojun, MA Liang, SUN Yinghui. Advances in Sulfide-based Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(23): 23040-23049.
1 Nie L, Mei D H, Datye A K, et al. Science, 2017, 358(6369), 1419. 2 Li W, Liu J, Zhao D Y, et al. Nature Reviews Materials, 2016,1(6), 16023. 3 Chhowalla M, Shin H S, Li J, et al. Nature Chemistry, 2013, 5(4), 263. 4 Chu S, Cui Y, Liu N. Nature Materials, 2017, 16, 16. 5 Jacobson M Z, Colella W G, Golden D M. Science, 2005, 5730, 1901. 6 Zheng X, Peng L, Li L, et al. Chemical Science, 2018, 9, 1822. 7 Peng L, Nie Y, Zhang L, et al. ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 1588. 8 Peng L, Shen J, Zhang L, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5, 23028. 9 Shi Y, Zhang B. Chemical Society Reviews, 2016, 45, 1529. 10 Chu S, Majumdar A. Nature, 2012, 488, 294. 11 Ursua A, Gandia L M, Sanchis P. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100, 410. 12 Kothari R, Buddhi D, Sawhney R L. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12, 553. 13 Lang Y, Arnepalli R R, Tiwari A. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotech-nology, 2011, 11, 3719. 14 Symes M D, Cronin L. Nature Chemistry, 2013, 5, 403. 15 Voiry D, Salehi M, Silva R, et al. Nano Letters, 2013, 13, 6222. 16 Suen N T, Hung S F, Quan Q, et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2017, 46, 337. 17 Surendranath Y, Kanan M W, Nocera D G. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132, 16501. 18 Chandrasekaran S, Yao L, Deng L, et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2019, 48, 4178. 19 Dong S, Chen X, Zhang X Y, et al. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2013, 257, 1946. 20 Wang H, Tang C, Li B Q, et al. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 2018, 5, 521. 21 Wang B, Tang C, Wang H F, et al. Small Methods, 2018, 2, 1800055. 22 Zhao X H, Fan D, Pattengale Brian, et al. ACS Energy Letters, 2018, 3, 2520. 23 Liu Y Q, Zhou J. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2018, 38(1), 82 (in Chinese). 刘艳群, 周静. 东北电力大学学报, 2018, 38(1), 82. 24 Chang K, Chen W X. ACS Nano, 2011, 5(6), 4720. 25 Liang Y, Feng R, Yang S, et al. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(5), 640. 26 Peng L, Wei Z, Shah S S A. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2018, 39, 1575. 27 Tahir M, Pan L, Idrees F, et al. Nano Energy, 2017, 37, 136. 28 Gong M, Dai H. Nano Research, 2015, 8, 23. 29 Li L, Shao Q, Huang X, et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2020, 49(10), 3072. 30 Li X, Hao X, Abudula A, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 4, 11973. 31 Bajdich M, García-Mota M, Vojvodic A, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013,135, 13521. 32 Fabbri E, Habereder A, Waltar K, et al. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2014, 4, 3800. 33 Lai C H, Lu M Y, Chen L J, et al. Journal of Material Chemistry, 2012, 22, 19. 34 Yin J, Jin J, Lin H H, et al. Advanced Science, 2020, 7(10), 1903070. 35 Zhu C R, Wang A L, Zhang H, et al. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(13), 1705516. 36 Chen Y G, Zhao S, Li Y D, et al. Journal of the American Chemical So-ciety, 2016, 138, 4286. 37 Rong Y M, He K, Warner J H, et al. ACS Nano, 2015, 9, 363. 38 Li X, Li T, Ma Y, et al. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8, 1801357. 39 Tang Y, Chen T, Yu S, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 295(72), 314. 40 Zhao J, Liu H, Zhang Q. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 392(39), 1097. 41 Wang J, Chao D, Liu J, et al. Nano Energy, 2014, 7(7), 151. 42 Zhou W, Lu J, Zhou K, et al. Nano Energy, 2016 (28), 143. 43 Wang S B, Guan B Y, Lou X W, et al. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(2), 306. 44 Yang J F, Lu Y, Lou X W, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(1), 172. 45 Wang W H, Cao W, Geng B Y, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(47), 14977. 46 Xu H J, Cao J, Cao J, Tang Y, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57, 8654. 47 Chen Y C, Lu A Y, Lu P, et al. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(44), 1703863. 48 Cai P W, Chen J X, Wen Z H, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 129(17), 4936. 49 Zhao S L, Wang Y, Li Y F, et al. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 2016, 3, 1501. 50 Ni S, Yang X, Li T, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22, 2395. 51 Yang J, Duan X, Qin Q, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2013, 1, 7880. 52 Sun X, Dou J, Xie F, et al. Chemical Communications, 2014, 50, 9869. 53 Li Y C, Kang H Y, Li Y, et al. Materials Horizons, 2016, 3, 402. 54 Wu X L, Yang B, Li Z J, et al. RSC Advances, 2015, 5, 32976. 55 Gao M G, Yang L, Dai B, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 191, 813. 56 Xu X B, Zhong W, Zhang L, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45, 17329. 57 Burda C, Chen X, Narayanan A R, et al. Chemical Reviews, 2005, 105(4), 1025. 58 Kulkarni P, Nataraj S K, Balakrishna R G, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(42), 22040. 59 Zhang H B, Lu X F, Lou X, et al. ACS Central Science, 2020, 6(8), 1288. 60 Wu X, Han X, Ma X, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(14), 12574. 61 Peng M, Jiang L, Liang Z, et al. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31, 1902930. 62 Kong D, Wang H, Cha J, et al. Nano Letters, 2013, 13(3), 1341. 63 Liu Y W, Xiao C, Lyu M, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 127(38), 11383. 64 Feng L L, Yu G, Wu Y, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137, 14023. 65 Chauhan M, Reddy K P, Gopinath C S, et al. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 7, 5871. 66 Ma X Y, Zhang W, Deng Y D, et al. Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 4816. 67 Liu Y, Cheng H, Xie Y, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136, 15670. 68 Song J, Wei C, Wang X, et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2020, 49, 2196. 69 Jiang H, Gu J, Li J, et al. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12, 322. 70 Wu X, Kang F, Li J, et al. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 2019, 29, 247. 71 Cheng N, Liu Q, Sun X, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3, 23207. 72 Li Q, Wang X, Tang K, et al. ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 12230. 73 Deng J, Li H, Li J, et al. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015, 8, 1594. 74 Liu H, He Q, Jiang H, et al. ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 11574. 75 Qiao B T, Wang A Q, Yang X F, et al. Nature Chemistry, 2011, 3, 634. 76 Yin P, Yao T, Li Y, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55, 10800. 77 Qi K, Chhowalla M, Voiry D, et al. Materials Today, 2020, 40, 173. 78 Chen Z X, Liu C B, Liu Z, et al. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32, 1906437.