Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2019, Vol. 33 Issue (23): 3876-3881    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.18040031
  材料与可持续发展(二)――材料绿色制造与加工* |
B30铜镍合金表面植酸转化膜的制备工艺研究
常钦鹏1, 陈友媛1,2,3, 安振东4, 王磊5
1 中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院,青岛 266100
2 中国海洋大学海洋环境与生态教育部重点实验室,青岛 266100
3 中国海洋大学山东省海洋环境地质工程重点实验室,青岛 266100
4 青岛双瑞海洋环境工程股份有限公司,青岛 266101
5 青岛市市政工程设计研究院有限责任公司,青岛 266061
Preparation Process of Phytic Acid Conversion Film on B30 Cu-Ni Alloy
CHANG Qinpeng1, CHEN Youyuan1,2,3, AN Zhendong4, WANG Lei5
1 College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100
2 Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology of Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100
3 Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Geological Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100
4 Sunrui Marine Environment Engineering Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266101
5 Qingdao Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266061
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 1900KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为提高B30铜镍合金表面植酸转化膜的耐蚀性,采用扫描电镜、动电位极化曲线、电化学阻抗谱等方法研究了浸泡时间、植酸浓度和钼酸盐浓度对B30铜镍合金表面植酸转化膜的表面形貌及在3.5% NaCl溶液中缓蚀率的影响。结果表明,植酸转化膜的缓蚀率随着浸泡时间的延长而逐渐增大,但浸泡时间超过12 h后植酸转化膜表面出现龟裂,破坏了转化膜表面覆盖的完整性,缓蚀率降低。植酸转化膜的缓蚀率随植酸浓度的增大而增大,当植酸浓度超过10 mmol/L时,植酸转化膜微观形貌疏松多孔,缓蚀率随植酸转化膜致密性的下降而降低。向植酸溶液中添加钼酸钠后转化膜的缓蚀率随着钼酸盐浓度的增大而增大,当钼酸钠浓度超过50 mg/L时,转化膜的缓蚀率开始降低。因此,不同浸泡时间和植酸浓度会对B30铜镍合金表面植酸转化膜的完整性和致密性产生影响,从而影响其耐蚀性。通过钼酸盐与植酸复配可以进一步提高植酸转化膜的耐蚀性。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
常钦鹏
陈友媛
安振东
王磊
关键词:  植酸  钼酸盐  转化膜  B30铜镍合金  耐蚀性    
Abstract: Aiming at improving the corrosion resistance of phytic acid conversion film on the surface of B30 Cu-Ni alloy, scanning electron microscope(SEM), potentiodynamic polarization method and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were employed to investigate the effects of immersion duration, phytic acid concentration and molybdate concentration on the microstructure of the conversion film on B30 Cu-Ni alloy and its corrosion inhibition efficiency in 3.5% NaCl solution. The results indicated that the corrosion inhibition efficiency of phytic acid conversion film increased gradually with the extension of immersion duration. While the immersion duration exceeded 12 h, cracks appeared on the surface of phytic acid conversion film, which destroyed the integrity of the film and leaded to the decrease of corrosion resistance. Moreover, the corrosion inhibition efficiency of phytic acid conversion film improved with the increasing phytic acid concentration. When the phytic acid concentration exceeded 10 mmol/L, the microstructure of phytic acid conversion film became loose and porous, and its corrosion inhibition efficiency declined because of the poor compactness of the film. Besides, with the addition of sodium molybdate, composite conversion film was formed and its corrosion inhibition efficiency enhanced with increasing molybdate concentration. However, when the concentration of sodium molybdate exceeded 50 mg/L, the corrosion inhibition efficiency of the composite conversion film began to decrease. Various immersion duration and phytic acid concentration can exert obvious impact on the corrosion resistance of the phytic acid conversion film on B30 Cu-Ni alloy by changing its integrity and compactness. The corrosion resistance of the phytic acid conversion film can be further improved by adding molybdate to the phytic acid solution.
Key words:  phytic acid    molybdate    conversion film    B30 Cu-Ni alloy    corrosion resistance
               出版日期:  2019-12-10      发布日期:  2019-09-30
ZTFLH:  TG172.5  
基金资助: 山东省重点研发计划(2017GSF17119)
作者简介:  常钦鹏,现为中国海洋大学博士生,本科及硕士毕业于中国海洋大学。2014年7月—2017年8月,就职于青岛水务集团,从事供水管道防护与管理工作。以第一作者身份在国内外学术期刊上发表论文4篇。研究工作主要围绕金属腐蚀与防护。参与了国家自然科学基金重点项目、国家自然基金委-山东省联合基金重点项目、山东省重点研发计划项目等。
陈友媛,中国海洋大学副教授,环境工程系主任。2006年博士毕业于中国海洋大学并留校至今。1998—1999年在瑞士苏黎世联邦高等理工学院访问、合作研究。在国内外学术期刊发表论文80余篇。其团队主要研究方向为海洋环境下金属材料的腐蚀与防护及环境保护。参与国家自然科学基金面上项目及国家水专项,主持山东省重点研发计划项目、山东省自然科学基金面上项目等。
引用本文:    
常钦鹏, 陈友媛, 安振东, 王磊. B30铜镍合金表面植酸转化膜的制备工艺研究[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(23): 3876-3881.
CHANG Qinpeng, CHEN Youyuan, AN Zhendong, WANG Lei. Preparation Process of Phytic Acid Conversion Film on B30 Cu-Ni Alloy. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(23): 3876-3881.
链接本文:  
http://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.18040031  或          http://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2019/V33/I23/3876
1 Wang F, Cai S, Shen S, et al. Journal of Materials Engineering & Performance,2017,26(9),4282.2 Zhang R, Cai S, Xu G, et al. Applied Surface Science,2014,313,896.3 Chidiebere M A, Oguzie E E, Liu L, et al. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2014,53(18),7670.4 Cui X, Jin G, Liu E, et al. Materials & Corrosion,2015,63(3),215.5 Rong J Y, Huang Q A, Yang X J, et al. Plating and Finishing,2018(1),31(in Chinese).戎家玥,黄清安,杨小俊,等.电镀与精饰,2018(1),31.6 Xu Q J, Wan Z Y, Fei L, et al. Corrosion Science and Protection Techno-logy,2009,21(2),167(in Chinese).徐群杰,万宗跃,费琳,等.腐蚀科学与防护技术,2009,21(2),167.7 Zhao L X, Zhang Q F, Wang M. Electroplating & Pollution Control,2015,35(5),32(in Chinese).赵立新,张庆芳,王明.电镀与环保,2015,35(5),32.8 Hao Y S, Luqman A S, Song L X, et al. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection,2016(6),549(in Chinese).郝永胜,Luqman A S,宋立新,等.中国腐蚀与防护学报,2016(6),549.9 Wang H R, Zhou Y, Qu J E, et al. Surface Technology,2013,42(4),83(in Chinese).王海人,周洋,屈钧娥,等.表面技术,2013,42(4),83.10 He L, Yao Y, Zhou Y. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials,2013,60(6),307.11 Cui X, Li Y, Li Q, et al. Materials Chemistry & Physics,2008,111(2),503.12 Cui X, Li Q, Li Y, et al. Applied Surface Science,2008,255(5),2098.13 Gao X, Li W, Yan R, et al. Surface and Coatings Technology,2017,325,248.14 Yang H, Yang Y, Yang Y, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta,2005,548(1-2),159.15 Hernández-Alvarado L A, Hernández L S, Lomelí M A, et al. Journal of Alloys & Compounds,2016,664,609.16 Hernández-Alvarado L A, Hernández L S, Garrido J, et al. Surface and Coatings Technology,2017,325,473.17 Pan F, Yang X, Zhang D. Applied Surface Science,2009,255(20),8363.18 Liu Y R, Zhou W Q, Wu S W, et al. Plating and Finishing,2010,32(12),10(in Chinese).刘艳荣,周婉秋,武士威,等.电镀与精饰,2010,32(12),10.19 Li L J, Lei J L, Yu S H, et al. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China),2008,59(5),1223(in Chinese).李凌杰,雷惊雷,于生海,等.化工学报,2008,59(5),1223.20 Shao Z, Zhang Q, Ming W, et al. Rare Metal Materials & Engineering,2015,44(8),1970.21 Guo X, Feng Z, Hurley B, et al. Journal of the Electrochemical Soociety,2016,163(6),260.22 Lin B L. Surface Technology,2016,45(3),115(in Chinese).林碧兰.表面技术,2016,45(3),115.23 Kong L P, Quan Z L. Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition),2010,31(2),133(in Chinese).孔令平,全贞兰.青岛科技大学学报(自然科学版),2010,31(2),133.24 Meng G Z, Sun F, Shao Y, et al. Electrochimica Acta,2010,55(20),5990.25 Zhang M, Cai S, Zhang F, et al. Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine,2017,28(6),82. 26 Liu R H, Liu B B, Yu X, et al. Surface Technology,2017,46(9),197(in Chinese).刘仁辉,刘斌斌,喻玺,等.表面技术,2017,46(9),197.27 Gao X, Zhao C, Lu H, et al. Electrochimica Acta,2014,150,188.28 Saremi M, Dehghanian C, Mohammadi Sabet M. Corrosion Science,2006,48(6),1404.29 Zhang Z C, Chen Y Y, Song F, et al. Materials Review B:Research Papers,2016,30(3),106(in Chinese).张镇川,陈友媛,宋芳,等.材料导报:研究篇,2016,30(3),106.
[1] 卢勇, 冯辉霞, 张晓芳. 金属表面植酸转化膜研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(9): 1455-1461.
[2] 毕凤琴, 周帮, 王勇. 合金化对不锈钢耐蚀性能影响的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(7): 1206-1214.
[3] 向红亮, 刘春育, 邓丽萍, 张伟, 任建斌. 固溶温度对节约型双相不锈钢组织及性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(16): 2759-2764.
[4] 王先, 于思荣, 赵严, 张鹏, 刘恩洋, 熊伟. 微弧氧化时间对TA15合金陶瓷膜表面形貌和性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(12): 2009-2013.
[5] 陈龙, 李文芳, 祝闻. 6063铝合金表面钛/锆/钼转化膜的制备及自愈性[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(10): 1691-1696.
[6] 马妞, 黄佳木, 苏俊, 尹凌毅. MgO纳米颗粒对AZ31B镁合金微弧氧化涂层耐磨和耐蚀性的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2018, 32(16): 2768-2772.
[7] 孙博,程江波,刘奇,冯源,梁秀兵. 高速电弧喷涂FePSiBNb纳米结构的涂层结构及电化学行为[J]. 《材料导报》期刊社, 2018, 32(12): 1978-1982.
[8] 吴长军, 陆龙飞, 杨威, 苏旭平, 王建华. Fe和Ce 含量对Galfan合金力学性能及耐蚀性的影响*[J]. 《材料导报》期刊社, 2017, 31(4): 56-59.
[9] 董鹏, 陈鼎, 陈振华, 章凯. 新型Mg-8Li-5Al-5Ca合金的微观组织、力学及耐腐蚀性能*[J]. 《材料导报》期刊社, 2017, 31(18): 64-71.
[10] 谢蔚, 张亚东, 周琼宇, 成祥, 胡安伟, 张路. 氢气气氛中热处理对Ni-W合金镀层组织和性能的影响*[J]. 《材料导报》期刊社, 2017, 31(16): 94-97.
[11] 温鑫, 金国, 庞学佳, 蔡召兵, 张子晗, 崔秀芳, 王海斗, 徐滨士. 热处理对真空热压烧结NiCrCoTiV高熵合金组织结构及耐腐蚀性能的影响*[J]. 《材料导报》期刊社, 2017, 31(12): 79-83.
[1] Dongyong SI, Guangxu HUANG, Chuanxiang ZHANG, Baolin XING, Zehua CHEN, Liwei CHEN, Haoran ZHANG. Preparation and Electrochemical Performance of Humic Acid-based Graphitized Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 368 -372 .
[2] Bingwei LUO,Dabo LIU,Fei LUO,Ye TIAN,Dongsheng CHEN,Haitao ZHOU. Research on the Two Typical Infrared Detection Materials Serving at Low Temperatures: a Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 398 -404 .
[3] Ming HE,Yao DOU,Man CHEN,Guoqiang YIN,Yingde CUI,Xunjun CHEN. Preparation and Characterization of Feather Keratin/PVA Composite Nanofibrous Membranes by Electrospinning[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 198 -202 .
[4] Huimin PAN,Jun FU,Qingxin ZHAO. Sulfate Attack Resistance of Concrete Subjected to Disturbance in Hardening Stage[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 282 -287 .
[5] Xu LI,Ziru WANG,Li YANG,Zhendong ZHANG,Youting ZHANG,Yifan DU. Synthesis and Performance of Magnetic Oil Absorption Material with Rice Chaff Support[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 219 -222 .
[6] XU Zhichao, FENG Zhongxue, SHI Qingnan, YANG Yingxiang, WANG Xiaoqi, QI Huarong. Microstructure of the LPSO Phase in Mg98.5Zn0.5Y1 Alloy Prepared by Directional Solidification and Its Effect on Electromagnetic Shielding Performance[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(6): 865 -869 .
[7] WANG Tong, BAO Yan. Advances on Functional Polyacrylate/Inorganic Nanocomposite Latex for Leather Finishing[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(1): 64 -71 .
[8] LI Jiawei, LI Dayu, GU Yixin, XIAO Jinkun, ZHANG Chao, ZHANG Yanjun. Research Progress of Regulating Anatase Phase of TiO2 Coatings Deposited by Thermal Spray[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(3): 26 -31 .
[9] HUANG Dajian, MA Zonghong, MA Chenyang, WANG Xinwei. Preparation and Properties of Gelatin/Chitosan Composite Films Enhanced by Chitin Nanofiber[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(8): 21 -24 .
[10] DU Wenbo, YAO Zhengjun, TAO Xuewei, LUO Xixi. High-temperature Anti-oxidation Property of Al2O3 Gradient Composite Coatings on TC11 Alloys[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(14): 57 -60 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed