Abstract: Due to the excellent plasticity and strength properties, gradient nanocrystalline metal materials are suitable for the manufacture material of micro-nanometer systems and have gradually become a research hotspot in recent years. In order to study the processing and removal mechanism of gradient polycrystalline materials, the Poisson-Voronoi method is used to build a large-scale gradient polycrystalline copper molecular dynamics model and simulate the nano-cutting process of gradient polycrystalline copper. The cutting force, defect and stress of cutting fine crystal layer (process 1) between cutting coarse crystal layer (process 2) are compared and analyzed. The results show that the cutting force of process 1 is obviously less than that of process 2, and the cutting force of process 2 fluctuates greatly. Comparing the number and distribution of defects in the whole cutting process, it is found that the number of defects in process 2 is higher than that in process 1. The forming process of defects around the tool is analyzed in detail. It is found that the defects of process 1 are mainly formed and diffused before the tool, and the defects of process 2 are mainly formed and diffused before the tool and at the bottom of the tool. In stress analysis, it is found that the equivalent stress of process 2 is greater than that of process 1. The research has a certain reference value for nano-cutting process of gradient nano-crystalline copper.
1 Rossi C, Zhang K, Esteve D, et al. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems,2007,16(4),919. 2 Roncaglia A, Ferri M. Science of Advanced Materials,2011,3(3),401. 3 Embury D, Bouaziz O. Annual Review of Materials Research,2010,40(40),213. 4 Lu K. The Future of Metals Science,2010,328(5976),319. 5 Amada S. MRS Bulletin,1995,20(1),35. 6 Ghavami K, Rodrigues C S, Paciornik S. Asian Journal of Civil Enginee-ring,2003,4(1),1. 7 Meyers M A, Chen P Y, Lin A Y M, et al. Progress in Materials Science,2008,53(1),201. 8 Espinosa H D,Rim J E, Barthelat F, et al. Progress in Materials Science,2009,54(8),1059. 9 Yang L, Tao NR, Lu K, et al. Scripta Materialia,2013,68(10),801. 10 Wu Xiaolei, Jiang Ping, Chen Liu, et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2014,111(20),7197. 11 Li Wenbin, Yuan Fuping, Wu Xiaolei. AIPAdvances,2015,5(8),1. 12 Zhu Linli, Ruan Haihui, Chen Aiying, et al. Actamaterialia,2017,128,375. 13 Zhao Pengyue, Guo Yongbo.Computational Materials Science,2018,155,431. 14 Efschiotz J, Vegge T. Physical Review B,1999,60(17),11971. 15 Van S H, Derlet P M, Froseth A G. Acta Materialia,2006,54(7),1975. 16 Bitzek E, Brandl C, Derlet P M, et al. Physical Review Letters,2008,100(23),235501. 17 Yamakov V, Wolf D, Phillpot S R, et al. Nature Materials,2002,1,45. 18 Shabib I, Miller R E. Acta Materialia,2009,57(15),4364. 19 Rupert T J. Scripta Materialia,2014,81,44. 20 Babicheva R I, Dmitriev S V, Zhang Y, et al. Computational Materials Science,2015,98,410. 21 Purohit Y, Sang J, Irving D L, et al. Materials Science and Engineering: A,2008,493(1-2),97. 22 Lin Y, Pan J, Zhou H F, et al. Actamaterialia,2018,153,279.