Abstract: Spiro-OMeTAD is expensive, unfriendly to environment and difficult to be fabricated as it is used as a traditional hole transport material in perovskite solar cells. In this paper, GO is utilized as a replacement of Spiro-OMeTAD. The influence of concentration of the GO dispersed solution on the photoelectric performance of the device was investigated. Primarily, different film thickness is obtained by varying the concentration of the dispersed solution. It was found that GO substrates evidently influence on the perovskite grain size. Furthermore, a planar device was fabricated with a structure of ITO/GO/CH3NH3PbI3/PCBM/Ag. The effect of GO substrate on perovskite solar cell was analyzed by characterizing the photoelectric properties of the devices with different GO substrates. It illustrates that the grain size of perovskite crystal is up to 900 nm if the GO film is fabricated by a dispersion concentration of 0.25 mg/mL. In addition, the peak of PL for the perovskite thin film on the GO substrate is 2 000, and the charge transfer efficiency reaches to 52.8%. GO-based perovskite solar cell is finally optimized, and its photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) can be up to 8.69%.
索鑫磊, 刘艳, 张立来, 苏杭, 李婉, 李国龙. 基于氧化石墨烯空穴传输层的平面异质结钙钛矿太阳能电池[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(6): 6015-6019.
SUO Xinlei, LIU Yan, ZHANG Lilai, SU Hang, LI Wan, LI Guolong. A Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cell Based on Graphene Oxide Hole Transport Layer. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(6): 6015-6019.
1 Liu M, Johnston M B, Snaith H J. Nature,2013,501(7467),395. 2 Green M A, Ho-Baillie A, Snaith H J. Nature Photonics,2014,8(7),506. 3 Huo C X, Wang Z M, Li X M, et al. Chinese Journal of Lasers,2017,44(7),0703008(in Chinese). 霍成学,王子明,李晓明,等.中国激光,2017,44(7),0703008. 4 Liu Y Z, Cui Y X. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress,2018,55(10),102301(in Chinese). 刘艳珍,崔艳霞.激光与光电子学进展,2018,55(10),102301. 5 Liu Y Z, Li G H, Cui Y X, et al. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress,2019,56(1),010001(in Chinese). 刘艳珍,李国辉,崔艳霞,等.激光与光电子学进展,2019,56(1),010001. 6 Nguyen W H, Bailie C D, Unger E L, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society,2014,136(31),10996. 7 Salado M, Idigoras J, Calio L, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,2016,8(50),34414. 8 Gong G, Zhao N, Li J, et al. Organic Electronics,2016,35,171. 9 Ma S, Zhang H, Zhao N, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2015,3(23),12139. 10 Gong G, Zhao N, Ni D, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2016,4(10),3661. 11 Liu D, Kelly T L. Nature photonics,2014,8(2),133. 12 Burschka J, Dualeh A, Kessler F, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society,2011,133(45),18042. 13 Leijtens T, Lim J, Teuscher J, et al. Advanced Materials,2013,25(23),3227. 14 Tan H, Jain A, Voznyy O, et al. Science,2017,355(6326),722. 15 Chiang C H, Wu C G. Nature Photonics,2016,10(3),196. 16 You J, Meng L, Song T B, et al. Nature Nanotechnology,2016,11(1),75. 17 Ye S, Sun W, Li Y, et al. Nano Letters,2015,15(6),3723. 18 Wang D, Elumalai N K, Mahmud M A, et al. Organic Electronics,2018,53,66. 19 Chen W, Zhang G, Xu L, et al. Materials Today Energy,2016,1,1. 20 Li S S, Tu K H, Lin C C, et al. ACS Nano,2010,4(6),3169. 21 Li D, Cui J, Li H, et al. Solar Energy,2016,131,176. 22 Oh S H, Kim K R, Yun J M, et al. Physica Status Solidi (A),2015,212(2),376. 23 Ren Y K, Liu S D, Duan B, et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds,2017,705,205. 24 Pettersson L A A, Roman L S, Inganäs O. Journal of Applied Physics,1999,86(1),487. 25 Chung C C, Narra S, Jokar E, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2017,5(27),13957. 26 Wu Z, Bai S, Xiang J, et al. Nanoscale,2014,6(18),10505.