Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2020, Vol. 34 Issue (Z2): 212-216    
  无机非金属及其复合材料 |
微生物自修复混凝土中微胶囊修复剂尺寸及掺量对修复剂释放率的影响
朱康杰1,2, 钱春香1,2, 李敏1,2, 苏依林1,2
1 东南大学材料科学与工程学院,南京 211189
2 东南大学绿色建材技术研究所,南京 211189
Effect of the Size and Dosage of Microcapsule Healing Agent on the Release Rate of Healing Agent in Microbial Self-healing Concrete
ZHU Kangjie1,2, QIAN Chunxiang1,2, LI Min1,2, SU Yilin1,2
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
2 Research Institute of Green Construction Materials, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 5424KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在微生物自修复混凝土中,使用保护材料包裹微生物制成微胶囊修复剂能够有效降低微生物在混凝土搅拌、成型以及水化过程中的死亡率。微胶囊修复剂的尺寸及掺量会影响修复剂释放率,本实验研究微胶囊修复剂在不同尺寸以及不同掺量下的断面修复剂释放量以及单位成本释放量,并且使用MATLAB软件对试验进行数值模拟。结果表明,在1%(占砂的质量分数,下文中所说微胶囊的掺量均为占砂的质量分数)掺量下,三种粒径的微胶囊的断面修复剂释放量几乎相同,2.8~3.35 mm的微胶囊修复剂的单位成本释放量低于另外两种粒径的微胶囊修复剂。在3%和5%掺量下,粒径为3.35~4.0 mm的微胶囊修复剂的断面修复剂释放量与单位成本释放量均高于粒径为2.8~3.35 mm和4.0~4.75 mm的微胶囊修复剂。在1%掺量下,三种粒径的微胶囊修复剂的试验结果与模拟结果基本吻合;在3%和5%掺量下,粒径为2.8~3.35 mm的微胶囊修复剂的试验结果与模拟结果相差较大,粒径为3.35~4.0 mm和4.0~4.75 mm的微胶囊修复剂的试验结果与模拟结果基本吻合。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
朱康杰
钱春香
李敏
苏依林
关键词:  微生物自修复混凝土  微胶囊修复剂尺寸  微胶囊修复剂掺量  数值模拟    
Abstract: In the microbial self-healing concrete, the microcapsule healing agent made by wrapping microbe with protective material can effectively reduce the death rate of microbe in the process of concrete mixing, molding and hydration. The size and dosage of microcapsule healing agent will affect the release rate of the healing agent. In this paper, the release volume of the healing agent on cross-section and the unit cost release volume of the microcapsule healing agent under different size and dosage were studied, and the experiment was simulated by MATLAB software. The results showed that the release volume of the healing agent on cross-section was almost the same for the three sizes of microcapsules at 1%, and the unit cost release volume of 2.8—3.35 mm microcapsule healing agent was lower than that of the other two sizes of microcapsules. At 3% and 5% dosage, the release volume of the healing agent on cross-section and the unit cost release volume of 3.35—4.0 mm microcapsule is higher than that of 2.8—3.35 mm and 4.0—4.75 mm microcapsule. The experimental results of the three kinds of microcapsule healing agent were basically consistent with the simulation results at 1% dosage; at 3% and 5% dosage, the experimental results of 2.8—3.35 mm microcapsule hea-ling agent were significantly different from the simulation results, and the experimental results of 3.35—4.0 mm and 4.0—4.75 mm microcapsule healing agent were basically consistent with the simulation results.
Key words:  microbial self-healing concrete    size of microcapsule healing agent    dosage of microcapsule healing agent    numerical simulation
               出版日期:  2020-11-25      发布日期:  2021-01-08
ZTFLH:  TU528  
通讯作者:  cxqian@seu.edu.cn   
作者简介:  朱康杰,自 2016 年 9 月就读于东南大学材料科学与工程专业,主要从事微生物自修复混凝土的研究。钱春香,东南大学教授、东南大学绿色建材研究所所长,主要从事高性能混凝土与微生物智能混凝土、微生物水泥与其他低碳胶凝材料、绿色节能建筑材料的研究。
引用本文:    
朱康杰, 钱春香, 李敏, 苏依林. 微生物自修复混凝土中微胶囊修复剂尺寸及掺量对修复剂释放率的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(Z2): 212-216.
ZHU Kangjie, QIAN Chunxiang, LI Min, SU Yilin. Effect of the Size and Dosage of Microcapsule Healing Agent on the Release Rate of Healing Agent in Microbial Self-healing Concrete. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(Z2): 212-216.
链接本文:  
http://www.mater-rep.com/CN/  或          http://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2020/V34/IZ2/212
1 张鹏, 冯竟竟, 陈伟, 等. 材料导报:综述篇, 2018, 32(10), 3375.
2 Zhang D S, Mao M J, Zhang S R, et al. Construction and Building Ma-terials,2019(8),229.
3 任军, 高盼盼, 张智明, 等. 混凝土, 2019(7), 59.
4 潘建勋, 谢春燕, 杨莉莉, 等. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 44(12), 83.
5 徐晶, 王先志. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59(8), 601.
6 刘艳霞, 纪国晋, 刘晨霞. 大坝与安全, 2019(3), 71.
7 张艺, 钱春香, 张旋. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 50(1), 101.
8 Jonkers H M, Thijssen A, Muyzer G, et al.Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(2), 230.
9 Jonkers H M.Heron, 2011, 56(1), 195.
10 Wang J Y, Snoeck D, Van Vlierberghe S, et al. Construction and Buil-ding Materials, 2014, 68, 110.
11 Wang J Y, Belie N D, Verstraete W. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2012, 39(4), 567.
12 任立夫. 微生物修复水泥基材料早期裂缝研究. 硕士学位论文, 东南大学, 2015.
13 Alazhari M, Sharma T, Heath A, et al. Construction and Building Mate-rials, 2018, 160(5), 610.
14 钱春香, 张旋, 张耀明, 等. 中国专利, CN110386771A,2019-10-29.
15 黄沃成, 陈正, 梁伟英, 等. 混凝土, 2016(4), 103.
[1] 金泽康, 张旋, 李敏, 钱春香. 微生物自修复混凝土裂缝自修复动力学模型[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(Z2): 194-200.
[2] 刘轶伦. 高速铁路Cu-Cr-Zr合金承导线对连续挤压工艺的适应性[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(8): 8131-8135.
[3] 徐国财, 黎军顽, 左鹏鹏, 吴晓春. 热-机械载荷下H13钢力学响应行为实验和数值分析[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(8): 8159-8164.
[4] 周蕊, 刘众旺, 张建国, 刘兵飞, 杜春志. 基于DPC-CZM混合模型的金属粉末压坯裂纹三维数值模拟[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(6): 6151-6155.
[5] 何秋霖, 石少卿, 崔廉明, 孙建虎, 陈自鹏. 轻质材料构筑的蜂窝防护结构抗爆性能试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(24): 24023-24028.
[6] 赵颖, 裴久杨, 郭丽丽, 运新兵, 马怀超, 李冰. 宽厚比对双杆连续挤压6063铝合金焊合质量的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(24): 24114-24120.
[7] 朱军, 李姝, 王斌, 张驰, 李冬, 康敏. 钒氮合金制备过程温度场模拟[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(22): 22100-22104.
[8] 张淞凯, 袁鸿. 山棕纤维/天然乳胶复合材料床垫的横观各向同性参数研究[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(22): 22154-22161.
[9] 刘杭, 李明伟, 王鹏飞, 胡志涛, 尹华伟. 二维圆周平动法ADP单晶生长流动与传质数值模拟[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(20): 20022-20027.
[10] 方姚, 张勇, 冉真真. 中深层地热井固井导热水泥导热系数研究[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(20): 20028-20033.
[11] 郭丽丽, 苑菁茹, 汪建强, 李永兵. ZK60镁合金中空型材挤压成形的有限元模拟及组织和性能[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(2): 2072-2076.
[12] 赖家美, 阮金琦, 王森, 黄志超. 缝合泡沫复合材料弯曲性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(18): 18165-18170.
[13] 余为, 张雄博. 考虑界面的空心玻璃微珠/环氧树脂复合泡沫材料的力学性能仿真分析[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(16): 16161-16166.
[14] 权国政, 施瑞菊, 刘乔, 赵江, 周杰, 王月乔. 电弧熔丝单层单道积材残余应力模拟分析及锤击消除研究[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(14): 14154-14160.
[15] 郑晨, 白晓宇, 张明义, 王海刚. 玻璃纤维增强聚合物锚杆在地下结构抗浮工程中的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(13): 13194-13020.
[1] Ninghui LIANG,Peng YANG,Xinrong LIU,Yang ZHONG,Zheqi GUO. A Study on Dynamic Compressive Mechanical Properties of Multi-size Polypropylene Fiber Concrete Under High Strain Rate[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 288 -294 .
[2] WANG Tong, BAO Yan. Advances on Functional Polyacrylate/Inorganic Nanocomposite Latex for Leather Finishing[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(1): 64 -71 .
[3] GUO Hongjian, JIA Junhong, ZHANG Zhenyu, LIANG Bunu, CHEN Wenyuan, LI Bo, WANG Jianyi. Microstructure and Tribological Properties of VN/Ag Films Fabricated by Pulsed Laser Deposition Technique[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(2): 55 -59 .
[4] WANG Wenjin, WANG Keqiang, YE Shenjie, MIAO Weijun, CHEN Zhongren. Effect of Asymmetric Block Copolymer of PI-b-PB on Phase Morphology and Properties of IR/BR Blends[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(2): 96 -100 .
[5] HUANG Dajian, MA Zonghong, MA Chenyang, WANG Xinwei. Preparation and Properties of Gelatin/Chitosan Composite Films Enhanced by Chitin Nanofiber[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(8): 21 -24 .
[6] YUAN Xinjian, LI Ci, WANG Haodong, LIANG Xuebo, ZENG Dingding, XIE Chaojie. Effects of Micro-alloying of Chromium and Vanadium on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of High Carbon Steel[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(8): 76 -81 .
[7] ZHANG Le, ZHOU Tianyuan, CHEN Hao, YANG Hao, ZHANG Qitu, SONG Bo, WONG Chingping. Advances in Transparent Nd∶YAG Laser Ceramics[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(13): 41 -50 .
[8] YAN Zhilong, LI Yongsheng, HU Kai, ZHOU Xiaorong. Progress of Study on Phase Decomposition of Duplex Stainless Steel[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(15): 75 -80 .
[9] SHI Yu, ZHOU Xianglong, ZHU Ming, GU Yufen, FAN Ding. Effect of Filler Wires on Brazing Interface Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al/Cu Dissimilar Metals Welding-Brazing Joint[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(10): 61 .
[10] DONG Fei,YI Youping,HUANG Shiquan,ZHANG Yuxun,. TTT Curves and Quench Sensitivity of 2A14 Aluminum Alloy[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(10): 77 -81 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed