Performance Analysis of UO2 Fuel Based on MOOSE Platform
WANG Zhao1, ZHANG Xinhu2, WANG Zhaohao1, WANG Guan3,4, XI Yongbo2, ZHENG Wei5, DING Yang6, ZHU Libing6, DENG Yongjun5, FU Xiangang5, YUN Di1,7, LIU Wenbo1
1 School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China 2 Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu 610213, China 3 Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China 4 School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 5 China Nuclear Power Technology Research Institute Co.,Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, China 6 Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute, Shanghai 200233, China 7 State Key Laboratory of Multi-phase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
Abstract: In order to better simulate the physical processes of nuclear fuel radiation swelling, radiation creep, thermal creep, fission gas release, pellet cladding mechanical interaction (PCMI) and other physical processes, as well as the coupling between radiation-heat-force and other physical fields, a performance analysis program for PWR UO2 fuel has been developed based on the multiphysics object-oriented simulation environment (MOOSE) platform. The experimental data of Halden reactor IFA-432r1 and IFA-513r6 rods were used to verify the steady-state and tran-sient performance, and preliminary analysis of fuel performance under the conditions was conducted. The results show that the program deve-loped in this paper can fairly accurately simulate the radiation-thermo-mechanical behavior of fuel rods during reactor operation. Under steady-state operating conditions, periodic stress peaks will appear in the axial direction indicated by the axial cladding strain profile; at the transient, the sudden change in power will cause significant changes in the centerline temperature of the fuel pellet and the contact pressure between pellet and cladding, which can considerably affect the safety of the fuel rod.
1 Yang Z, Su G H, Tian W X, et al. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2012, 46(5), 590(in Chinese). 杨震,苏光辉,田文喜,等. 原子能科学技术,2012, 46(5), 590. 2 Tang C B, Jiao Y J, Chen P, et al. In: The Chinese Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Shanghai, 2015,pp.169(in Chinese). 唐昌兵,焦拥军,丁淑蓉. 中国理论力学和应用力学代表大会.上海,2015,pp.169. 3 Berna G A, Bohn M P, Rausch W N, et al. FRAPCON-2: A computer code for the calculation of steady state thermal-mechanical behavior of oxide fuel rods, United States, 1981. 4 Qiu B, Wang J. Nuclear power plant design and analysis codes, Woodhead Publishing, UK, 2021,pp.141. 5 Notley M J F. Nuclear Technology, Canada,1979, 44(3), 445. 6 Lassmann K. Journal of Nuclear Materials,1992,188, 295 7 Williamson R L, Hales J D, Novascone S R, et al.Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2012, 423(1-3), 149. 8 Liu R, Prudil R, Zhou W, et al.Progress in Nuclear Energy,2016,91,38. 9 Williamson R L.Optics Communications, 2011, 415(1), 74. 10 Gaston D, Newman C, Hansen G, et al.Nuclear Engineering & Design, 2009, 239(10), 1768. 11 Fink J K, Chasanov M G, Leibowitz L.Journal of Nuclear Materials, 1981, 279(1-2), 1. 12 Lucata P G, Hastings I J, Matzke H.Journal of Nuclear Materials, 1996, 232(2-3), 166. 13 Fink J K.Journal of Nuclear Materials, 1981, 279(1-2), 1. 14 Hagrman D L, Reymann G A. MATPRO-version 11: a handbook of materials properties for use in the analysis of light water reactor fuel rod beha-vior, United States, 1976. 15 Rashid Y. Fuel analysis and licensing code: FALCON MOD01, EPRI Report, 2004. 16 Hayes T A, Kassner M E.Metallurgical & Materials Transactions A, 2006, 37(8), 2389. 17 Hoppe N E. In: International Topical Meeting on LWR Fuel Perfor-mance. Avignon (France), US, 1991. 18 Ross A M, Stoute R L. In: Heat transfer coefficient between UO2 and zircaloy-2. Canada, 1962. 19 Olander D R.International Metals Reviews, DOI: 10.1179/imtr.1977.22.1.258 20 Liu R, Zhou W, Zhou W.Metallurgical and Materials Transactions E, 2016, 18, 27 21 Bradley E R, Cunningham M E, Lanning D D, et al. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, DOI: 10.2172/6401826. 22 Bradley E R, Cunningham M E, Lanning D D, et al.Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, DOI: 10.2172/1080052. 23 Geelhood K J, Luscher W G, Beyer C E. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, DOI: 10.2172/576025.