Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (5): 25040239-7    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25040239
  生物质助力建筑材料可持续发展 |
糯米浆-脲酶诱导碳酸钙联合加固砂土强度研究
王剑烨, 李肖, 张进, 鲁爽, 彭丽云*, 王冬勇
北京建筑大学土木与交通工程学院,北京 100044
Study on the Strength Behavior of Sandy Soil Reinforced by Glutinous Rice Slurry Combined with Enzyme-induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation
WANG Jianye, LI Xiao, ZHANG Jin, LU Shuang, PENG Liyun*, WANG Dongyong
School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 19677KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀(EICP)技术在加固粗颗粒土时存在效率较低的问题。为提升其加固效果,本研究引入绿色有机材料糯米浆,协同EICP技术联合加固砂土。针对糯米浆与EICP联合(G-EICP)加固砂土开展无侧限抗压强度试验,结合扫描电子显微术(SEM)、X射线衍射(XRD)、傅里叶红外光谱(FTIR)和显微断层扫描(Micro-CT)等微观分析,系统探究了糯米浆浓度、体积占比及土体相对密实度对加固效果的影响,并阐明了其加固机理。结果表明:G-EICP加固土强度在糯米浆浓度为12%时最大,且随糯米浆体积占比增加先增大后减小,并在体积比15%时达到峰值。糯米浆虽然不改变碳酸钙的晶型及产量,但是其支链淀粉中的羟基可提供成核位点,从而提高加固土效率。孔隙分析显示,土体总体孔隙率随糯米浆体积占比的增加而降低,但占比超过15%时,孔隙均匀性和分形维数均下降,易形成薄弱面导致强度降低。G-EICP技术加固砂土的机理可以总结为多相复合胶结、分级优化桥接和表面改性包覆三种作用模式。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王剑烨
李肖
张进
鲁爽
彭丽云
王冬勇
关键词:  糯米浆  EICP  砂土加固  微观机理分析  CT扫描  分形维数    
Abstract: Reinforcing coarse-grained soils using the enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) technique has a relatively low efficiency. To enhance its effectiveness, a green organic material—glutinous rice slurry—was introduced in this study to reinforce sand in combination with EICP. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests were conducted on sand reinforced using the combined glutinous rice slurry and EICP me-thod (G-EICP). Combined with microstructural analyses (SEM, XRD, FTIR, and Micro-CT), the effects of glutinous rice slurry concentration, volumetric ratio, and soil relative density on the reinforcement efficacy were systematically investigated, and the reinforcement mechanism was elucidated. The results demonstrate that the strength of the G-EICP reinforced soil is maximized at a glutinous rice slurry concentration of 12%. The strength initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing volumetric ratio of glutinous rice slurry, peaking at a volumetric ratio of 15%. Although glutinous rice slurry did not alter the crystalline form or quantity of calcium carbonate produced, the hydroxyl groups in its amy-lopectin component provided nucleation sites, thereby improving the reinforcement efficiency. Pore structure analysis revealed that the overall soil porosity decreased with increasing glutinous rice slurry volumetric ratio. The formation of weak planes and a reduction in strength occurred when the ratio exceeded 15%, resulting in pore uniformity and fractal dimension declining. The reinforcement mechanism of the G-EICP technique can be summarized into three synergistic modes, multiphase composite cementation, hierarchical optimized bridging, and surface modification coa-ting.
Key words:  glutinous rice slurry    EICP    sand stabilization    microscopic mechanism analysis    CT scanning    fractal dimension
出版日期:  2026-03-10      发布日期:  2026-03-10
ZTFLH:  TU411  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(42202309;42172299;42372312)
通讯作者:  *彭丽云,博士,北京建筑大学教授,主要从事土体加固、特殊土工程、城市轨道交通运输工程等方面的研究。pengliyun@bucea.edu.cn   
作者简介:  王剑烨,博士,北京建筑大学讲师,主要从事微生物加固土和土体本构模型等方面的研究。
引用本文:    
王剑烨, 李肖, 张进, 鲁爽, 彭丽云, 王冬勇. 糯米浆-脲酶诱导碳酸钙联合加固砂土强度研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25040239-7.
WANG Jianye, LI Xiao, ZHANG Jin, LU Shuang, PENG Liyun, WANG Dongyong. Study on the Strength Behavior of Sandy Soil Reinforced by Glutinous Rice Slurry Combined with Enzyme-induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(5): 25040239-7.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25040239  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I5/25040239
1 Shi L, Fang J M, Zhang J W, et al. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(23), 55(in Chinese).
石磊, 房佳明, 张建伟, 等. 材料导报, 2024, 38(23), 55.
2 Harkes, Marien P, van Paassen L A, et al. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(2), 112.
3 Bian H L, Ji P R, Wang J L, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(10), 2779(in Chinese).
边汉亮, 吉培瑞, 王俊岭, 等. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10), 2779.
4 Minto J M, Maclachlan E, Mountassir G, et al. Water Resources Research, 2016, 52(11), 8827.
5 Wu M, Gao Y F, He J, et al. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(10), 1914(in Chinese).
吴敏, 高玉峰, 何稼, 等. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(10), 1914.
6 Yasuhara H, Neupane D, Hayashi K, et al. Soils and Foundations, 2012, 52(3), 539.
7 Cui M J, Zheng J J, Lai H J. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(S2), 397(in Chinese).
崔明娟, 郑俊杰, 赖汉江. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(S2), 397.
8 Du Y Q, Sui X Z, Shi H, et al. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2023, 47(6), 147(in Chinese).
杜衍庆, 隋昕展, 师海, 等. 北京交通大学学报, 2023, 47(6), 147.
9 Shi S, Gao L, Cai X, et al. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 124, 103574.
10 Xiao Y, Tong L, Che H, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 344, 128242.
11 Xu J, Guo K Y, Chen Q, et al. Journal of Building Materials, 2024, 27(11), 1011(in Chinese).
徐晶, 郭坤宇, 陈庆, 等. 建筑材料学报, 2024, 27 (11), 1011.
12 An R, Deng C, Zhang X W, et al. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2024, 56(3), 134(in Chinese).
安然, 邓成, 张先伟, 等. 工程科学与技术, 2024, 56(3), 134.
13 Zhu J H. Application of chitosan-modified EICP in repairing leakage of mountain tunnel lining. Master's Thesis, Henan University, China, 2022(in Chinese).
朱佳华. 壳聚糖改良EICP在山岭隧道衬砌渗漏修复中的应用研究. 硕士学位论文, 河南大学, 2022.
14 Yang F W, Zhang B J, Pan C C, et al. Chinese Science: Technology Sciences, 2009(1), 1(in Chinese).
杨富巍, 张秉坚, 潘昌初, 等. 中国科学:技术科学, 2009(1), 1.
15 Ji X J, Song M Q, Pang M. Building Technology, 2013, 44(6), 540(in Chinese).
纪晓佳, 宋茂强, 庞苗. 建筑技术, 2013, 44(6), 540.
16 Yue J W, Xing X X, Kong Q M, et al. Journal of Henan University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 51(4), 455(in Chinese).
岳建伟, 邢旋旋, 孔庆梅, 等. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 51(4), 455.
17 Cui M, Fu X, Zheng J J, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(11), 3027(in Chinese).
崔猛, 符晓, 郑俊杰, 等. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11), 3027.
18 Wang J Y, Li X, Peng L Y, et al. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(11), 105(in Chinese).
王剑烨, 李肖, 彭丽云, 等. 材料导报, 2025, 39(11), 105.
19 De Silva P, Bucea L, Moorehead D R, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2006, 28(7), 613.
20 Ashraf W, Olek J. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2018, 93, 85.
21 Xu S H, Xia M, Materials Reports, 2020, 34(16), 16140(in Chinese).
徐善华, 夏敏. 材料导报, 2020, 34(16), 16140.
22 Wang S, Jiang H, Wang W, et al. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2024, 83(11), 472.
23 Zhao L N, Zhao X, Ren S X, et al. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2009(1), 47(in Chinese).
赵丽娜, 赵旭, 任素霞, 等. 物理化学学报, 2009(1), 47.
24 Yuan H, Sun F, Li J, et al. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2025, 42(5), 2753(in Chinese).
原华, 孙放, 李瑾, 等. 复合材料学报, 2025, 42(5), 2753.
[1] 薛翠真, 李肖克, 苏丽, 冯琼, 乔宏霞. 基于核磁共振技术的生物炭水泥砂浆强度及孔结构性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25060140-8.
[2] 肖海, 朱建康, 张伦, 董欣慧, 丁瑜, 夏振尧. 聚丙烯酰胺-剑麻纤维强化EICP对黏性紫色土体抗剪性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25040055-7.
[3] 刘尧, 邓红卫, 蒋震, 王鹏, 虞松涛. 人工砂骨料砂浆孔隙结构及力学特征研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(4): 25020126-7.
[4] 杨军兆, 张戎令, 薛彦瑾, 王小平, 窦晓峥, 宋毅. 基于分形维数的硫酸盐环境下混凝土抗蚀系数及微观机理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(7): 24020033-7.
[5] 吴剑锋, 黄雨悦, 李赫赫, 马德源, 王彩华. 混凝土单轴压缩表面裂纹分布的一致分形特征[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(4): 23030047-7.
[6] 宋毅, 张戎令, 史银亮, 杨一帆, 刘益麟. 基于核磁共振的碱激发材料硫酸盐环境下孔隙结构特征演变分析[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(20): 24090004-7.
[7] 程立年, 刘娟红, 周大卫, 郭凌志, 陈德平. 混凝土孔隙结构特征对超低温力学性能影响研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(13): 24060113-7.
[8] 王剑烨, 李肖, 彭丽云, 王冬勇. EICP加固砂土的强度及应力-应变关系研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(11): 24070113-9.
[9] 田威, 云伟, 党可欣, 李腾. 不同钙源EICP溶液改良路基黄土动力特性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(9): 22110275-9.
[10] 都思哲, 张淼, 张玉, Selyutina Nina, Smirnov Ivan, 马树娟, 董晓强, 刘元珍. 基于CT图像三维重建的高温下再生混凝土孔隙特征研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(5): 22060128-11.
[11] 石磊, 房佳明, 张建伟, 张欢, 边汉亮, 徐向春. 考虑干密度影响的EICP矿化粉砂土渗透特性试验研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(23): 23090044-7.
[12] 王习, 张云升, 张宇, 乔宏霞, 路承功, Hakuzweyezu Theogene, 刘志超, 李忠慧. CTF增效剂提升混凝土抗冻性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(19): 23030006-7.
[13] 韩照, 张云升, 乔宏霞, 冯琼, 薛翠真, 尚明刚. 基于CT扫描及图像处理技术的机制砂形貌研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(19): 22060032-6.
[14] 姜春萌, 宫经伟, 蒋林华, 陈成, 唐新军. 冲磨作用下低热水泥混凝土时变行为及其影响因素研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(16): 21110020-6.
[15] 林长宇, 王启睿, 杨立云, 吴云霄, 李芹涛, 谢焕真, 汪自扬, 张飞. 玄武岩纤维活性粉末混凝土在冲击载荷下的力学行为及本构关系[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(19): 21050237-7.
[1] WANG Wenjin, WANG Keqiang, YE Shenjie, MIAO Weijun, CHEN Zhongren. Effect of Asymmetric Block Copolymer of PI-b-PB on Phase Morphology and Properties of IR/BR Blends[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(2): 96 -100 .
[2] CHEN Peng, MA Guohong, PING Qiwen. Improved Microstructure and Promoted Mechanical Properties of DE-GMAW Weld Seam of AZ31B Magnesium Alloy by Pre-coating SiC[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(20): 82 -86 .
[3] YANG Junbao, GUO Qiuping, ZHAO Boyuan, JIN Hao, GUO Ce’an, ZHANG Jian. Friction and Wear Performance of W-Ni-Fe-Co Coating Electrospark Deposited on CrNi3MoVA Steel[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(12): 35 -38 .
[4] LIU Ping, ZENG Baoqing, WANG Yaxiong, WANG Jianghao. Transparent Conductive Nanowires Thin Films: Preparation Methods and Applications in Optoelectronic Devices[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(7): 6 -18 .
[5] WU Yihua, HUANG Jing, WU Di, CHEN Zhongzhen, LI Dan,ZHU Zhigang, SHI Weiheng,. Effect of Reaction Time on Morphology and Fluorescence Performance of CH3NH3PbBr3 Perovskite Crystals[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(22): 1 -4 .
[6] WANG Yanjing, LIU Yu, CUI Suping, WANG Zhihong. Research on Carbon Emission and Reduction Potential of Building Ceramics in China[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(22): 3967 -3972 .
[7] ZHANG Mo, WANG Shiyu. Experimental Investigation and Microstructural Analysis of Ambient Temperature Cured Red Mud-Class F Fly Ash Based Geopolymer[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(6): 980 -985 .
[8] JIANG Debin, YUAN Yunsong, WU Junshu, DU Yucheng, WANG Jinshu, ZHANG Yuxin. Advances in Application of Diatomite-based Composites in the Field of Energy and Environment[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(9): 1483 -1489 .
[9] AN Wen, MA Jianzhong, XU Qunna. Research Progress on Functional Casein-based Composites[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(15): 2602 -2609 .
[10] REN Xiuxiu, ZHU Yiju, ZHAO Shengxiang, HAN Zhongxi, YAO Lina. The Relationship Between Micromechanical Property and Friction Property of Four Kinds of Energetic Crystals[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(z1): 448 -452 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed