Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (5): 25040055-7    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25040055
  生物质助力建筑材料可持续发展 |
聚丙烯酰胺-剑麻纤维强化EICP对黏性紫色土体抗剪性能的影响
肖海1,2,3, 朱建康1,2, 张伦1,2,3, 董欣慧1,2, 丁瑜1,2,3, 夏振尧1,2,3,*
1 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;
2 三峡大学土木与建筑学院,湖北 宜昌 443002;
3 三峡库区生态环境教育部工程研究中心,湖北 宜昌 443002
Effect of Polyacrylamide-Sisal Fiber Reinforced EICP on the Shear Strength of Cohesive Purple Soil
XIAO Hai1,2,3, ZHU Jiankang1,2, ZHANG Lun1,2,3, DONG Xinhui1,2, DING Yu1,2,3, XIA Zhenyao1,2,3,*
1 Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, Yichang 443002, Hubei, China;
2 College of Civil Engineering ﹠ Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, Hubei, China;
3 Engineering Research Center of Eco-environment in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, Ministry of Education, Yichang 443002, Hubei, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 20522KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为进一步改善脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀(EICP)技术存在的脆性破坏和纤维分散不均带来的应力集中问题,探究聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)-剑麻纤维强化EICP对黏性紫色土抗剪性能的影响,以三峡库区黏性紫色土为研究对象,设置纤维掺量(0%、0.2%,质量分数)、PAM掺量(0.0 g/L、0.5 g/L、1.0 g/L和1.5 g/L)和胶结液浓度(0.0 mol/L、0.5 mol/L、1.0 mol/L和1.5 mol/L),开展直剪实验,以未加固土试样作为空白对照(CK),分析不同处理下试样应力-应变曲线、黏聚力、内摩擦角和碳酸钙含量变化特征,明确PAM-纤维掺入对EICP加固土体抗剪性能的影响,并从微观结构揭示其加固机理。结果表明:相较CK,经纤维-EICP、PAM-EICP和PAM-纤维-EICP处理的黏性紫色土试样黏聚力与内摩擦角分别提升29.89%~94.19%、35.82%~144.93%和37.89%~149.66%与9.83%~18.99%、5.04%~15.06%和5.49%~17.24%;当PAM、纤维掺量和胶结液浓度分别为1.5 g/L、0.2%和1.5 mol/L时黏聚力最大且为38.22 kPa,当PAM、纤维掺量和胶结液浓度分别为0.0 g/L、0.2%和0.5 mol/L时内摩擦角最大且为21.53°。此外,本研究中试样黏聚力与碳酸钙含量呈显著的指数关系(P<0.05),表明碳酸钙胶结作用是试样黏聚力增加的主要因素。PAM形成的网状结构可包裹土颗粒、碳酸钙和纤维并填充孔隙,不仅提高了试样强度,还进一步改善了脆性破坏。研究结果表明PAM-纤维能强化EICP处理黏性紫色土的抗剪性能,可为三峡库区黏性紫色土加固及生态防护提供理论依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
肖海
朱建康
张伦
董欣慧
丁瑜
夏振尧
关键词:  聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)  剑麻纤维  脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀(EICP)  土体加固  微观特征    
Abstract: To further improve the challenges of brittle failure and stress concentration caused by uneven fiber dispersion existing in enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) technology, the synergistic effects of polyacrylamide (PAM)-sisal fiber reinforced EICP on the shear perfor-mance of cohesive purple soil were investigated. Cohesive purple soil from the Three Gorges Reservoir area (TGRA) was selected as the research subject. Experimental parameters included sisal fiber content (0%, 0.2%, in mass percentage), PAM concentration (0.0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 1.0 g/L, and 1.5 g/L), and cementation solution concentration (0.0 mol/L, 0.5 mol/L, 1.0 mol/L, and 1.5 mol/L), and unreinforced soil samples (CK) were taken as control check. Direct shear tests were conducted; the stress-strain curves, cohesion, internal friction angle, and calcium carbonate content under different treatments were systematically analyzed to evaluate the impact of PAM-fiber integration on the shear performance of EICP-reinforced soil. Microstructural characterization was further performed to elucidate the reinforcement mechanisms. Results demonstrated that, compared to CK, fiber-EICP, PAM-EICP, and PAM-fiber-EICP treatments increased cohesion by 29.89%—94.19%, 35.82%—144.93%, and 37.89%—149.66%, respectively, and improved internal friction angle by 9.83%—18.99%, 5.04%—15.06%, and 5.49%—17.24%, respectively. The maximum cohesion (38.22 kPa) was achieved at 1.5 g/L PAM, 0.2% fiber, and 1.5 mol/L cementation solution, while the highest internal friction angle (21.53°) occurred at 0.0 g/L PAM, 0.2% fiber, and 0.5 mol/L cementation solution. Additio-nally, a statistically significant exponential relationship (P<0.05) was observed between cohesion and calcium carbonate content, indicating that carbonate cementation was the primary contributor to the enhancement of cohesion. Microstructural analysis revealed that PAM formed a cohesive network encapsulating soil particles, carbonate precipitates, and fibers while filling interparticle pores. This dual mechanism not only enhanced soil strength but also mitigated brittle failure by improving ductility. These findings demonstrate that the integration of PAM and sisal fiber effectively optimizes the shear resistance of EICP-treated cohesive purple soil, providing a theoretical foundation for eco-friendly soil stabilization and ecological protection strategies in the TGRA.
Key words:  polyacrylamide (PAM)    sisal fiber    enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP)    soil consolidation    microscopic characteristic
出版日期:  2026-03-10      发布日期:  2026-03-10
ZTFLH:  TU411.7  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(52378351;U2040207);“土木工程防灾减灾湖北省引智创新示范基地”(2021EJD026)
通讯作者:  *夏振尧,博士,三峡大学土木与建筑学院教授、博士研究生导师。目前主要从事边坡生态修复、生物岩土等方面的研究。xzy_yc@126.com   
作者简介:  肖海,博士,三峡大学土木与建筑学院教授、博士研究生导师。目前主要从事生物岩土水土治理的相关研究。
引用本文:    
肖海, 朱建康, 张伦, 董欣慧, 丁瑜, 夏振尧. 聚丙烯酰胺-剑麻纤维强化EICP对黏性紫色土体抗剪性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25040055-7.
XIAO Hai, ZHU Jiankang, ZHANG Lun, DONG Xinhui, DING Yu, XIA Zhenyao. Effect of Polyacrylamide-Sisal Fiber Reinforced EICP on the Shear Strength of Cohesive Purple Soil. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(5): 25040055-7.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25040055  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I5/25040055
1 Chu P H, Liu P K, Pan H. Renewable Energy, 2019, 131, 1168.
2 He X B, Bao Y H, Nan H W, et al. Journal of Mountain Science, 2009, 6, 205.
3 Tang Q, Bao Y H, He X B, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 479, 258.
4 Liu L, Yin K L, Xu Y, et al. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(2), 403 (in Chinese).
刘磊, 殷坤龙, 徐勇, 等. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(2), 403.
5 Zhang L L, Hua S D, Zhu H J, et al. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(9), 9034 (in Chinese).
张立力, 华苏东, 诸华军, 等. 材料导报, 2020, 34(9), 9034.
6 Wu Y P, Wang X S, Jin S H, et al. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2023, 31(2), 409 (in Chinese).
吴越鹏, 王修山, 金胜赫, 等. 工程地质学报, 2023, 31(2), 409.
7 Qian C X, Wang A H, Wang X. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(6), 1537 (in Chinese).
钱春香, 王安辉, 王欣. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(6), 1537.
8 Ahenkorah I, Rahman M, Karim R, et al. Acta Geotechnica, 2024, 19, 5891.
9 Wang Y J, Chen W B, Li P L, et al. Computers and Geotechnics, 2024, 172, 106446.
10 Liu Z Y, Zhang S X, Wu C Z, et al. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 22, e04270.
11 Zhu J, Wei R J, Peng J, et al. Materials, 2024, 17, 5420.
12 Gao Y F, He J, Tang X Y, et al. Soils and Foundations, 2019, 59, 1631.
13 Fan G C, Miao L C, Sun X H, et al. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2022, 42(5), 1019 (in Chinese).
范广才, 缪林昌, 孙潇昊, 等. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2022, 42(5), 1019.
14 Zhang J W, Li X, Han Z G, et al. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2024, 41(1), 426 (in Chinese).
张建伟, 李想, 韩智光, 等. 复合材料学报, 2024, 41(1), 426.
15 Cui M, Xiong H H, Zheng J J, et al. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2024, 24, 04024098
16 Castoldi R S, Souza L M S, Andrade-Silva F. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 211, 617.
17 Castro B D, Fotouhi M, Vieira L M G, et al. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2021, 29, 429.
18 Fu G Y, Xiao Y, Shi J Q, et al. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(11), 2341 (in Chinese).
付贵永, 肖杨, 史金权, 等. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(11), 2341.
19 Zhang J W, Yin Y, Shi L, et al. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 10, 992474.
20 Song Z Z, Liu J, Wang Z, et al. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2024, 32(1), 28 (in Chinese).
宋泽卓, 刘瑾, 王梓, 等. 工程地质学报, 2024, 32(1), 28.
21 Xiao H, Wang G H, Zhang L, et al. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(11), 24040113 (in Chinese).
肖海, 王光辉, 张伦, 等. 材料导报, 2025, 39(11), 24040113.
22 Zhang Q, Ye W M, Liu Z R, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(2), 345 (in Chinese).
张茜, 叶为民, 刘樟荣, 等. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2), 345.
23 Xiao H, Xu M R, Xia Z Y, et al. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2024, 32(5), 1307 (in Chinese).
肖海, 徐萌苒, 夏振尧, 等. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2024, 32(5), 1307.
24 Wu Z P, Xu J, Fan H H, et al. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2025, 84, 1.
25 Li T, Wang R Z, Chen Y, et al. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(2), 69 (in Chinese).
李铁, 王润泽, 谌芸, 等. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2), 69.
26 Zhou T, Chen Y, Wang R Z, et al. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(3), 62 (in Chinese).
周涛, 谌芸, 王润泽, 等. 草业学报, 2019, 28(3), 62.
27 Doi A, Nguyen T A, Nguyen N N, et al. Journal of Environmental Ma-nagement, 2023, 344, 118488.
28 Wu C C, Zheng J J, Lai H J, et al. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2020, 42(1), 31 (in Chinese).
吴超传, 郑俊杰, 赖汉江, 等. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2020, 42(1), 31.
29 Xia Z Y, Dong X H, Hu H, et al. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2024, 46(5), 91 (in Chinese).
夏振尧, 董欣慧, 胡欢, 等. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2024, 46(5), 91.
30 Yuan H, Ren G Z, Liu K, et al. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10, 7678.
31 Shao S G, Li T, Zhu L A, et al. Artificial Intelligence Science and Engineering, 2023, 48(6), 97 (in Chinese).
邵社刚, 李婷, 朱立安, 等. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 48(6), 97.
32 Miao L C, Wu L Y, Sun X L, et al. Land Degradation & Development, 2020, 31, 1317.
33 Zheng W. Study on shear properties of basalt fiber-EICP modified silt. Master's Thesis, Henan University, China, 2022 (in Chinese).
郑伟. 玄武岩纤维-EICP改良粉砂剪切特性研究. 硕士学位论文, 河南大学, 2022.
34 Xie Y H, Tang C S, Yin L Y, et al. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(4), 675 (in Chinese).
谢约翰, 唐朝生, 尹黎阳, 等. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(4), 675.
35 Wang J. Experimental study on sand consolidation and dust suppression combined with polyacrylamide and MICP. Master's Thesis, Nanjing Fo-restry University, China, 2023 (in Chinese).
王杰. 聚丙烯酰胺与MICP联合固沙抑尘试验研究. 硕士学位论文, 南京林业大学, 2023.
36 Sun X H, Miao L C, Chen R F, et al. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 301, 113883.
[1] 谷立楠, 王亚男, 隋高阳, 潘正祺, 冯竟竟. 温度对掺加PAM的新拌水泥基材料黏聚性的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(20): 24060105-6.
[2] 王剑烨, 李肖, 彭丽云, 王冬勇. EICP加固砂土的强度及应力-应变关系研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(11): 24070113-9.
[3] 王志良, 陈玉龙, 申林方, 施辉盟. 偏高岭土基地聚合物对水泥固化红黏土的改善机制[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(8): 22080080-7.
[4] 王家滨, 车志豪, 侯泽宇, 范一杰, 牛荻涛. 部分浸泡再生混凝土复合盐侵蚀微观特征与损伤演化[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(16): 22070227-12.
[5] 曾小川, 李学军, 邓小云, 胡侨丹, 尤磊. SA508 Gr.4N钢的辐照脆化性能研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(Z1): 438-442.
[6] 冯伟丽, 康兴隆, 柳妍, 鲁哲宏, 刘保英, 房晓敏, 丁涛. 层层自组装改性剑麻纤维填充聚丙烯复合材料性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(10): 10211-10215.
[7] 岳承军, 余红发, 麻海燕, 章艳, 梅其泉, 达波. 全珊瑚海水混凝土动态冲击性能试验研究[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(16): 2697-2703.
[1] ZHENG Tao, HUANG Qian, HOU Guofu, DING Yi, ZHANG Xiaodan, ZHAO Ying. Research and Development of Colloidal Quantum Dot Solar Cells Based on Ⅳ-Ⅵ Compounds[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(1): 1 -9 .
[2] GUO Hongjian, JIA Junhong, ZHANG Zhenyu, LIANG Bunu, CHEN Wenyuan, LI Bo, WANG Jianyi. Microstructure and Tribological Properties of VN/Ag Films Fabricated by Pulsed Laser Deposition Technique[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(2): 55 -59 .
[3] . Magnetic Properties and Dysprosium Infiltration of Sintered Nd-Fe-B
Magnets by Magnetron Sputtering
[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(4): 17 -20 .
[4] . Effects of Forging and Heat Treatment Processing on Structure and Mechanical
Properties of Al-7Si-1.6Cu Alloy
[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(4): 70 -74 .
[5] YUAN Xinjian, LI Ci, WANG Haodong, LIANG Xuebo, ZENG Dingding, XIE Chaojie. Effects of Micro-alloying of Chromium and Vanadium on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of High Carbon Steel[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(8): 76 -81 .
[6] LI Shijie, HAN Kuihua, HAN Xudong, LU Chunmei. Preparation and Characterization for High Specific Surface Area
Activated Carbon from Gulfweed
[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(6): 38 -44 .
[7] ZUO Yingfeng, WU Yiqiang, GU Jiyou, SHE Jiarong, GUO Xin, JIANG Ping. Effect of MAH Modifying Method on the Interfacial Compatibility of Starch/Polylactic Acid[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(16): 41 -45 .
[8] GAO Wei, ZHAO Guangjie. Synergetic Oxidation Modification of Wooden Activated Carbon Fiber with Nitric Acid and Ceric Ammonium Nitrate[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(9): 1507 -1512 .
[9] WU Zibin, SONG Sensen, DONG An, YANG Zongwu, LI Xueke, QIN Ke, ZHANG Haitao, BAN Chunyan, LI Baomian, CUI Jianzhong, Hiromi Nagaumi. Research Progress on Anode Materials and Electrolytes of Aluminum-Air Battery[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(1): 135 -142 .
[10] HE Pei, YANG Junliang. Printed Organic Transistors with Ultralow Power Consumption[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(13): 2107 -2108 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed