Advances in Interfacial Interaction Within Polymer Matrix Nanocomposites
Yingke WU1,Jianzhong MA2,Yan BAO2
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021; 2 Key Laboratory of Leather Cleaner Production, China National Light Industry, College of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021;
Polymer matrix nanocomposites with excellent properties which are prepared from polymer and nanoparticles is a hot research topic during the past two decades, and the interfacial interaction between polymer and nanoparticles is of key importance for the properties of the composites. Based on a rich amount of literatures, the progress of interfacial interaction about polymer based nanocomposites is reviewed from the perspectives interface structure, mechanical properties, thermal properties, and computer simulation in this paper, and meanwhile, the research prospect of this field is discussed.
Reflecting chemical reaction among interfaces through band strength changes and number of contact points (anchor number)
Studying interface from a chemical point of view
The interface can not be observed intuitively
NMR[40]
Reflecting chemical reaction among interfaces through nanoparticle’s surface grafting or adsorption on polymer chains
Raman
Reflecting chemical reaction among interfaces through surface adsorption molecules arranging orientation and structure
XPS[43]
Reflecting interface combination and achieving the qualitative analysis of surface elements (including the price) through binding energy of electrons
Studying interface from the photoelectron energy
The interface can not be observed intuitively
SEM
TEM
Reflecting interface through roughness of cross-section and compatibility Reflecting interface action via microstructure of nanoparticles and latex particles
Observing the interface directly
The interface can not be quantitatively studied from a chemical point of view
AFM
SANS
XRD
Thickness of crosslinked interface layer can be estimated by surface roughness Interfacial action can be studied by particle dispersibility and interfacial phase Interfacial action can be studied by the width and position of peaks
The thickness of the interface layer can be calculated
The interface can not be observed intuitively and quantitatively studied from a chemical point of view
表1 聚合物基纳米复合材料各种表征方法的比较
图5 PLA及其复合材料的动态力学分析
Method
Features
Advantages
Disadvantages
Rheology
Interface can be analyzed via viscosity, stress, storage modulus, loss modulus and yield value
Researching interface through rheological parameters
The interface can not be observed intuitively
DMA
Researching interface through analysis of tanδ, storage modulus, Tg ,etc.
Researching interface through dynamic mechanical parameters
Static mechanics analysis
Researching interface through tensile modulus,etc.
Interfacial forces can be compared
表2 聚合物基纳米复合材料各种力学性能研究方法的比较
图6 PPS/SiO2纳米复合材料的DSC曲线
Method
Advantages
Disadvantages
DSC
Studying strength of the interface action through Tg
TGA
Thickness of polymer adsorbed on nanoparticles’ surface can be known
Ma J, Liu J, Bao Y , et al. Synjournal of large-scale uniform mulberry-like ZnO particles with microwave hydrothermal method and its antibacterial property[J]. Ceramics International, 2013,39(3):2803.
2
Zhang W, Ma J, Gao D , et al. Preparation of amino-functionalized graphene oxide by Hoffman rearrangement and its performances on polyacrylate coating latex[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2016,94:9.
3
Merkel T C, Freeman B D, Spontak R J , et al. Sorption, transport, and structural evidence for enhanced free volume in poly(4-methyl-2-pentyne)/fumed silica nanocomposite membranes[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2016,15(1):109.
4
Shaohui L, Jiwei Z, Jinwen W , et al. Enhanced energy storage density in poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanocomposites by a small loading of suface-hydroxylated Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3 nanofibers[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016,6(3):1533.
5
Bodakhe S, Verma S, Garkhal K , et al. Injectable photocrosslin-kable nanocomposite based on poly(glycerol sebacate) fumarate and hydroxyapatite: Development, biocompatibility and bone regeneration in a rat calvarial bone defect model[J]. Nanomedicine, 2017,8(11):1777.
6
Subramani N K, Nagaraj S K, Shivanna S , et al. Highly flexible and visibly transparent poly(vinyl alcohol)/calcium zincate nanocompo-site films for UVA shielding applications as assessed by novel ultraviolet photon induced fluorescence quenching[J]. Macromolecules, 2016,49(7):2791.
7
Jeon H, Park S, Nam S , et al. Spin self-assembled clay nanocomposite passivation layers made from a photocrosslinkable poly(vinyl alcohol) and Na +-montmorillonite enhance the environmental stabi-lity of organic thin-film transistors [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemistry, 2016,34(11):1103.
8
Imran S M, Shao G N, Haider M S , et al. Carbon nanotube-based thermoplastic polyurethane-poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocompo-sites for pressure sensing applications[J]. Polymer Engineering & Science, 2016,56(9):1031.
9
Lizundia E, Ruiz Rubio L, Vilas J L , et al. Poly(l-lactide)/ZnO nanocomposites as efficient UV-shielding coatings for packaging applications[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2016,133(2):42426.
10
Lei J, Tao Y, Yan L , et al. Preparation of Au-polydopamine functionalized carbon encapsulated Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposites and their application for ultrasensitive detection of carcino-embryonic antigen[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016,6:21017.
11
Liu C, Yan H, Lv Q , et al. Enhanced tribological properties of aligned reduced graphene oxide-Fe3O4 @polyphosphazene/bismalei-mides composites[J]. Carbon, 2016,102:145.
12
Bao Y, Shi C, Ma J , et al. Double in-situ synjournal of polyacrylate/nano-TiO2 composite latex[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2015,85:101.
13
Ma J, Xu Q, Zhou J , et al. Nano-scale core-shell structural casein based coating latex: Synjournal, characterization and its biodegra-dability[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2013,76(10):1346.
14
Bao Y, Ma J, Li N . Synjournal and swelling behaviors of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose-g-poly(AA-co-AM-co-AMPS)/MMT superabsorbent hydrogel[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2011,84(1):76.
15
Xue C H, Ma J Z . Long-lived superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2013,1(13):4146.
16
Xu Q, Fan Q, Ma J , et al. Facile synjournal of casein-based TiO2 nanocomposite for self-cleaning and high covering coatings: Insights from TiO2 dosage[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2016,99:223.
17
Petrella A, Tamborra M, Curri M L , et al. Colloidal TiO2 nanocrystals/MEH-PPV nanocomposites: Photo(electro)chemical study[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2005,109(4):1554.
18
Zhang J, Wang B J, Ju X , et al. New observations on the optical properties of PPV/TiO2 nanocomposites[J]. Polymer, 2001,42(8):3697.
19
Savenije T J, Warman J M, Goossens A . Visible light sensitisation of titanium dioxide using a phenylene vinylene polymer[J]. Chemical Physics Letters, 1998,287(1):148.
20
Salafsky J S . Exciton dissociation, charge transport, and recombination in ultrathin, conjugated polymer-TiO2 nanocrystal intermixed composites[J]. Physical Review B, 1999,59(16):293.
21
Chamis C C . Computerized multilevel analysis for multilayered fiber composites[J]. Computers & Structures, 1973,3(3):467.
22
Adams D F, Walrath D E. Iosipescu shear properties of SMC composite materials [C]∥Composite Materials: Testing and Design (6th Conference). ASTM International, 1982: 19.
23
Gent A N, Wang C . Fracture mechanics and cavitation in rubber-like solids[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1991,26(12):3392.
24
Zhou L M, Mai Y W, Ye L . Analyses of fibre push-out test based on the fracture mechanics approach[J]. Composites Engineering, 1995,5(10-11):1199.
25
Scheutjens J M H M, Fleer G J . Statistical theory of the adsorption of interacting chain molecules. 2. Train, loop, and tail size distribution[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1980,84(2):178.
26
Gennes P G D . Polymers at an interface: A simple view[J]. Advances in Colloid & Interface Science, 1987,27(3-4):189.
27
Guiselin O . First measurement of the discontinuity jump in a reflectivity curve near total reflection edge[J]. Europhysics Letters, 1992,17:57.
28
Semenov A N, Bonet-Avalas J, Johner A , et al. Adsorption of polymer solutions onto a flat surface[J]. Macromolecules, 1996,29(6):2179.
29
Theodorou D N . Lattice models for bulk polymers at interfaces[J]. Macromolecules, 1988,21(5):1391.
30
Tannenbaum R, Zubris M, David K , et al. FTIR characterization of the reactive interface of cobalt oxide nanoparticles embedded in polymeric matrices[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006,110(5):2227.
31
Lou Yuanhua, Liu Meihong, Wang Xinping . Study on the interfacial structure of inorganic particles polymer nanocomposites[J].Polymer Bulletin,2009(4):38(in Chinese).
Doganay D, Coskun S, Kaynak C , et al. Electrical, mechanical and thermal properties of aligned silver nanowire/polylactide nanocomposite films[J]. Composites Part B Engineering, 2016,99:288.
33
Goumri M, Venturini J W, Bakour A , et al. Tuning the luminescence and optical properties of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide functionnalized with PVA[J]. Applied Physics A, 2016,122(3):212.
34
She X, He C, Peng Z , et al. Molecular-level dispersion of graphene into epoxidized natural rubber: Morphology, interfacial interaction and mechanical reinforcement[J]. Polymer, 2014,55(26):6803.
35
Shao L, Li J, Yu G , et al. PVA/polyethyleneimine-functionalized graphene composites with optimized properties[J]. Materials & Design, 2016,99:235.
36
Li Y, Yang T, Yu T , et al. Synergistic effect of hybrid carbon nanotube-graphene oxide as a nanofiller in enhancing the mechanical pro-perties of PVA composites[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2011,21(29):10844.
37
Hwang S H, Kang D, Ruoff R S , et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol) reinforced and toughened with poly(dopamine)-treated graphene oxide, and its use for humidity sensing[J]. ACS Nano, 2014,8(7):6739.
38
Lin Y, Liu L, Xu G , et al. Interfacial interactions and segmental dynamics of poly(vinyl acetate)/silica nanocomposites[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015,119(23):12956.
39
Zaman I, Phan T T, Kuan H C , et al. Epoxy/graphene platelets nanocomposites with two levels of interface strength[J]. Polymer, 2011,52(7):1603.
40
Cheng Guojun, Song Ruijuan, Miao Jibin , et al. Characterization of interfacial structure of polymer nanocomposites[J]. Materials Review A:Review Papers, 2012,26(6):130(in Chinese).
Hoshino J, Limpanart S, Khunthon S , et al. Adsorption of single-strand alkylammonium salts on bentonite, surface properties of the modified clay and polymer nanocomposites formation by a two-roll mill[J]. Materials Chemistry & Physics, 2010,123(2-3):706.
42
Wilson K S , Washburn A N R. Interphase effects in dental nanocomposites investigated by small-angle neutron scattering[J]. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2007,81(1):113.
43
Zhang Li, Shen Shijie . The research of fiber reinforced polymer interface[J]. Fiber Composites, 2011,28(4):30(in Chinese).
Hong S, Leroueil P R, Janus E K , et al. Interaction of polycationic polymers with supported lipid bilayers and cells: Nanoscale hole formation and enhanced membrane permeability[J]. Bioconjugate Che-mistry, 2006,17(3):728.
45
Leroueil P R, Berry S A, Duthie K , et al. Wide varieties of cationic nanoparticles induce defects in supported lipid bilayers[J]. Nano Letters, 2008,8(2):420.
46
Peetla C, Labhasetwar V . Effect of molecular structure of cationic surfactants on biophysical interactions of surfactant-modified nano-particles with a model membrane and cellular uptake[J]. Langmuir, 2009,25(4):2369.
47
Jing B, Hutin M, Connor E , et al. Polyoxometalate macroion induced phase and morphology instability of lipid membrane[J]. Che-mical Science, 2013,4(10):3818.
48
van Lehn R C, Ricci M, Silva P H , et al. Lipid tail protrusions media-te the insertion of nanoparticles into model cell membranes[J]. Nature Communications, 2014,5:4482.
49
Roiter Y, Ornatska M, Rammohan A R , et al. Interaction of nano-particles with lipid membrane[J]. Nano Letters, 2008,8(3):941.
50
Xiao X, Monta?o G A, Edwards T L , et al. Surface charge depen-dent nanoparticle disruption and deposition of lipid bilayer assemblies[J]. Langmuir, 2012,28(50):17396.
51
Dong H, Ye P, Zhong M , et al. Superhydrophilic surfaces via polymer-SiO2 nanocomposites[J]. Langmuir the ACS Journal of Surfaces & Colloids, 2010,26(19):15567.
52
Wu L, Jiang X . Recent developments in methodology employed to study the interactions between nanomaterials and model lipid membranes[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2016,408(11):1.
53
Zhang L, Luo M, Sun S , et al. Effect of surface structure of nano-CaCO3 particles on mechanical and rheological properties of PVC composites[J]. Journal of Macromolecular Science Part B, 2010,49(5):970.
54
Ashida M, Noguchi T, Mashimo S . Dynamic moduli for short fiber-CR composites[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1984,29(2):661.
55
Richard A, Vaia A, Giannelis E P . Polymer melt intercalation in organically-modified layered silicates: Model predictions and experiment[J]. Macromolecules, 1997,30(25):8000.
56
Pukánszky B, Fekete E . Adhesion and surface modification[J]. 1999,139:109.
57
Diao H, Si Y, Zhu A , et al. Surface modified nano-hydroxyapatite/poly(lactide acid) composite and its osteocyte compatibility[J]. Materials Science & Engineering C, 2012,32(7):1796.
58
Jiang C, He H, Jiang H , et al. Nano-lignin filled natural rubber composites: Preparation and characterization[J]. Express Polymer Letters, 2013,7(5):480.
59
Zhang S, Guo M, Chen Z , et al. Grafting photosensitive polyurethane onto colloidal silica for use in UV-curing polyurethane nanocomposites[J]. Colloids & Surfaces A Physicochemical & Enginee-ring Aspects, 2014,443(4):525.
60
Hosseini S M, Torbati-Fard N, Kiyani H , et al. Comparative role of interface in reinforcing mechanisms of nano silica modified by silanes and liquid rubber in SBR composites[J]. Journal of Polymer Research, 2016,23(9):203.
61
Zhan Y, Fan Y, Pan Y , et al. Construction of advanced poly(arylene ether nitrile)/multi-walled carbon nanotubes nanocompo-sites by controlling the precise interface[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2016,51(4):2090.
62
Yang J, Xu T, Lu A , et al. Preparation and properties of poly (p-phenylene sulfide)/multiwall carbon nanotube composites obtained by melt compounding[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2009,69(2):147.
63
Wrobel D, Ionov M, Gardikis K , et al. Interactions of phosphorus-containing dendrimers with liposomes[J]. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta, 2011,1811(3):221.
64
Gardikis K, Hatziantoniou S, Viras K , et al. A DSC and raman spectroscopy study on the effect of PAMAM dendrimer on DPPC model lipid membranes[J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2006,318(1-2):118.
65
Yang Y, Yu W, Duan H , et al. Realization of reinforcing and toug-hening poly (phenylene sulfide) with rigid silica nanoparticles[J]. Journal of Polymer Research, 2016,23(9):188.
66
García-Chávez K I, Hernández-Escobar C A, Flores-Gallardo S G , et al. Morphology and thermal properties of clay/PMMA nanocomposites obtained by miniemulsion polymerization[J]. Micron, 2013,49(6):21.
67
Kim D, Lee Y, Seo J , et al. Preparation and properties of poly(urethane acrylate) (PUA) and tetrapod ZnO whisker (TZnO-W) composite films[J]. Polymer International, 2013,62(2):257.
68
Ciprari D, Karl Jacob A, Rina Tannenbaum . Characterization of polymer nanocomposite interphase and its impact on mechanical properties[J]. Macromolecules, 2006,39(19):6565.
69
Huang H, Chen L, Varshney V , et al. Investigation of phonon transport and thermal boundary conductance at the interface of functionalized SWCNT and poly (ether-ketone)[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2016,120(9):95102.
70
Ansari R, Rouhi S, Ajori S . On the interfacial properties of polymers/functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes[J]. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2016,46(3):361.
71
Rouhi S . Molecular dynamics simulation of the adsorption of polymer chains on CNTs, BNNTs and GaNNTs[J]. Fibers and Polymers, 2016,17(3):333.
72
Asadinezhad A, Kelich P . Effects of carbon nanofiller characteristics on PTT chain conformation and dynamics: A computational study[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2017,392:981.
渝公网安备50019002502923号 版权所有：《材料导报》编辑部
2018, Vol. 32 
