Three-dimensional Reconstruction to Images of Different Types of Coarse Aggregates and Comparative Analysis of Their Morphology Characteristic Parameters
WU Junqing1, LUO Zhu1, WU Zijie1,*, FU Zhijun1, WU Qinghua2, ZHOU Guoliang2, LU Weiwei2, YANG Jialin3
1 Guangdong Provincial Academy of Building Research Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510500, China 2 Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou 510500, China 3 School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
Abstract: Coarse aggregate is the main component of concrete, and its morphology characteristics are highly correlated with the properties of concrete. In order to quantify the morphology of coarse aggregates more accurately and analyze the differences in morphology characteristics of diffe-rent types of coarse aggregates, this work combined three-dimensional laser scanning technology and digital image processing technology to rea-lize the three-dimensional reconstruction to the images of crushed coarse aggregates, pebble coarse aggregates and coal gangue coarse aggregates. The differences of their morphology characteristic parameters at macro, meso and micro scales were compared, and the Pearson correlation analysis method was used to measure the linear relationship between these parameters. The results show that among the three types of coarse aggregates, the overall shape of pebble coarse aggregate is the closest to the sphere, the crushed coarse aggregate shows the most significant multi-angular characteristics, and the surface of coal gangue coarse aggregate is the roughest. The sphericity of the three types of coarse aggregate is concentrated between 0.6 and 0.8. The angularity index of crushed coarse aggregate and coal gangue coarse aggregate is above 250, while pebble coarse aggregate’s is mostly below 250, and the maximum roughness index of pebble coarse aggregate is smaller than the minimum roughness index of coal gangue coarse aggregate. The sphericity, angularity index and roughness index are not correlated with each other, which can be used as quantitative indicators for the overall shape, angularity and surface roughness of coarse aggregate, respectively.
吴俊清, 罗柱, 吴子洁, 付志君, 吴清华, 周国梁, 卢伟伟, 杨嘉霖. 不同类型粗骨料的图像三维重构及其形貌特征参数对比分析[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(21): 24090072-7.
WU Junqing, LUO Zhu, WU Zijie, FU Zhijun, WU Qinghua, ZHOU Guoliang, LU Weiwei, YANG Jialin. Three-dimensional Reconstruction to Images of Different Types of Coarse Aggregates and Comparative Analysis of Their Morphology Characteristic Parameters. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(21): 24090072-7.
1 Li C Z, Zhou X B, Wei S G, et al. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(17), 23030064(in Chinese). 李长志, 周新斌, 魏世恭, 等. 材料导报, 2024, 38(17), 23030064. 2 Li L, Long G C, Xie Y J, et al. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022(3), 19(in Chinese). 李良, 龙广成, 谢友均, 等. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022(3), 19. 3 Zhang X Q, Ma K L, Long G C, et al. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(2), 114(in Chinese). 张雪芹, 马昆林, 龙广成, 等. 材料导报, 2024, 38(2), 114. 4 Xiao B L, Yang Z Q, Chen D X, et al. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2019, 52(5), 545(in Chinese). 肖柏林, 杨志强, 陈得信, 等. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版 ), 2019, 52(5), 545. 5 Zhao Y, Duan Y H, Zhu L L, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 286, 122940. 6 Deng P, Xu K, Guo S C. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 63, 105408. 7 Jiang W Q, Liu Q F. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2020, 48(2), 258(in Chinese). 姜文镪, 刘清风. 硅酸盐学报, 2020, 48(2), 258. 8 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Pebble and crushed stone for construction: GB/T 14685-2022. Standards Press of China, China, 2022 (in Chinese) 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 建设用卵石、碎石: GB/T 14685-2022. 中国标准出版社, 2022. 9 Ding Z, Li P L, Wu X, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 247, 118608. 10 Ma K L, Huang X Y, Shen J T, et al. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 44, 103292. 11 Zhao L H, Zhang S H, Huang D L, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 262, 119986. 12 Li J M, Huang Y L, Pu H, et al. Powder Technology, 2021, 384, 112. 13 Guo M H. Shape Characteristics analysis of coarse aggregate based on image processing technology and its application. Master’s Thesis, Yantai University, China, 2024(in Chinese). 郭美虹. 基于图像处理技术的粗骨料形状特性分析及其应用. 硕士学位论文, 烟台大学, 2024. 14 Liu Y, Gong F Y, You Z P, et al. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2018, 30(1), 04017248. 15 Song J B, Zhou X L, Jiang R Q. Buildings, 2023, 13(4), 1029. 16 Jiang W, Xie Y J, Ma K L, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 403, 133132. 17 Li W X, Wang D Y, Chen B, et al. Buildings, 2022, 12(3), 293. 18 Bai G L, Liu H Q, Wang J W, et al. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2023, 56(11), 27(in Chinese). 白国良, 刘瀚卿, 王建文, 等. 土木工程学报, 2023, 56(11), 27. 19 Liu H Q, Bai G L, Zhu K F, et al. Journal of Building Materials, 2023, 26(4), 346(in Chinese). 刘瀚卿, 白国良, 朱可凡, 等. 建筑材料学报, 2023, 26(4), 346. 20 Liu H Q, Bai G L, Wang J W, et al. Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44(7), 236(in Chinese). 刘瀚卿, 白国良, 王建文, 等. 建筑结构学报, 2023, 44(7), 236. 21 Ge J Y, Zhu H G, Li Z H, et al. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(S2), 218(in Chinese). 葛洁雅, 朱红光, 李宗徽, 等. 材料导报, 2021, 35(S2), 218. 22 Wang Q H, Li Z, Zhou M, et al. Journal of Building Structures, 2020, 41(12), 64(in Chinese). 王庆贺, 李喆, 周梅, 等. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(12), 64. 23 Zhang T, Wen Q, Gao S, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 400, 132646. 24 Lin F, Zou L, Zhang C. Computer Simulation, 2023, 40(9), 454(in Chinese). 林菲, 邹玲, 张聪. 计算机仿真, 2023, 40(9), 454. 25 Greenacre M, Groenen P J F, Hastie T, et al. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2022, 2(1), 100. 26 Fang K, Zhang J F, Tang H M, et al. Engineering Geology, 2023, 322, 107170. 27 Bhattacharya S, Subedi S, Lee S J, et al. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 23, 100344. 28 Pouranian M R, Shishehbor M, Haddock J E. Powder Technology, 2020, 363, 369. 29 Rao C, Tutumluer E, Kim I T. Transportation Research Record, 2002, 1787(1), 117. 30 Yu H N, Zhang C, Qian G P, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 388, 131299. 31 Gong F Y, Liu Y, You Z P, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 273, 121989. 32 Roy N, Kuna K K. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2023, 24(2), 2099854. 33 Latham J P, Munjiza A, Garcia X, et al. Minerals Engineering, 2008, 21(11), 797. 34 Zhou M, Dou Y W, Zhang Y Z, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 220, 386. 35 Yu L L. Study on mechanical properties and durability of FRP-confined coal gangue concrete in goaf. Ph. D. Thesis, China University of Mining and Technology, China, 2023(in Chinese). 郁林利. 采空区FRP约束煤矸石混凝土力学性能与耐久性研究. 博士学位论文, 中国矿业大学, 2023. 36 Liu H X. Recognition and application of concrete coarse aggregate shape based on image processing technolog. Master’s Thesis, Chongqing University, China, 2021(in Chinese). 刘和鑫. 基于图像处理技术的混凝土粗骨料形貌识别与应用. 硕士学位论文, 重庆大学, 2021. 37 Wu S Y, Wu Q L, Shan J S, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 367, 130219. 38 Bai G L, Liu H Q, Liu H, et al. Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44(10), 243(in Chinese). 白国良, 刘瀚卿, 刘辉, 等. 建筑结构学报, 2023, 44(10), 243. 39 Barrett P J. Sedimentology, 1980, 27(3), 291.
渝公网安备50019002502923号 版权所有：《材料导报》编辑部
2025, Vol. 39 
