Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (9): 25010123-8    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25010123
  无机非金属及其复合材料 |
干湿循环条件下疏水改性泡沫混凝土的耐久性研究
田振海1,2, 罗斌1,2, 李明明1,2, 杨龙龙1,2, 苏延俐3, 姜东兵3,*, 赵丕琪3
1 中交第一航务工程局有限公司,天津 300450
2 中交一航局第四工程有限公司,南昌 330000
3 济南大学山东省绿色与智能建筑材料重点实验室(筹),济南 250022
Durability Study of Hydrophobically Modified Foamed Concrete Under Dry-Wet Cycles
TIAN Zhenhai1,2, LUO Bin1,2, LI Mingming1,2, YANG Longlong1,2, SU Yanli3, JIANG Dongbing3,*, ZHAO Piqi3
1 CCCC First Harbor Engineering Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300450, China
2 CCCC First Harbor Engineering Co., Ltd., Branch Fourth, Nanchang 330000, China
3 Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Green and Intelligent Building Materials, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 29773KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为提升泡沫混凝土在干湿循环条件下的服役寿命,本工作利用改性聚二甲基硅氧烷(mPDMS)对泡沫混凝土进行整体疏水处理,探究了不同掺量(质量分数)mPDMS(0.8%、1.6%、2.4%)对泡沫混凝土接触角、吸水率及干湿循环条件下质量、强度和声学参数的影响规律,然后结合扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、毛细管压力及干燥收缩测试揭示了mPDMS抑制泡沫混凝土结构劣化的作用机理。研究结果表明:mPDMS能够赋予泡沫混凝土整体疏水性能,接触角可达106°,最大吸水率降低至39.7%;经45次干湿循环后,掺2.4% mPDMS泡沫混凝土的强度损失率及质量损失率比空白组分别下降71.4%和38.3%,而未经疏水改性的泡沫混凝土发生明显断裂,表明mPDMS的掺入显著增强了泡沫混凝土的耐干湿循环能力,原因在于间隙区域-泡壁毛细孔形成的低表面能疏水层延缓了微裂纹的发展。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
田振海
罗斌
李明明
杨龙龙
苏延俐
姜东兵
赵丕琪
关键词:  干湿循环  泡沫混凝土  疏水改性  耐久性  微结构    
Abstract: To extend the service life of foamed concrete under dry-wet cycle conditions, a bulk hydrophobic modification of foamed concrete was prepared by incorporating modified polydimethylsiloxane (mPDMS). The effects of mPDMS dosages (0.8%, 1.6%, 2.4%) on the contact angle, water absorption rate of foamed concrete, as well as its mass, strength, and acoustic parameters under dry-wet cycles were systematically investigated. Moreover, combined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), capillary pressure, and drying shrinkage tests, the mechanism by which mPDMS inhibits the structural deterioration of foamed concrete was revealed. The experimental results presented that mPDMS conferred bulk hydrophobicity to foamed concrete, raising the contact angle to 106° and lowering the maximum water absorption rate to 39.7%. After 45 dry-wet cycles, the strength loss rate and the mass loss rate of foamed concrete containing 2.4% mPDMS are 71.4% and 38.3% lower than those of the control sample, respectively. In contrast, the foamed concrete without hydrophobic modification exhibits obvious cracking. These findings demonstrate that the incorporation of mPDMS can significantly improve the dry-wet cycle resistance of foamed concrete, owing to the low surface energy hydrophobic layer formed in the capillary pores of interstitial region and foam wall mitigated the development of microcracks.
Key words:  dry-wet cycles    foamed concrete    hydrophobic modification    durability    microstructure
收稿日期:  2026-05-10      出版日期:  2026-05-10      发布日期:  2026-05-18
ZTFLH:  TU526  
基金资助: 山东省优秀青年科学基金(ZR2023YQ041);泰山学者计划(tsqn202306224);国家自然科学基金(52402027);山东省高等学校青创团队计划(2024KJH099);山东省博士后创新项目(SDCX-ZG-202400285)
通讯作者:  *姜东兵,博士,济南大学建筑材料制备与测试技术重点实验室副教授。目前主要从事高性能水泥基材料、碱激发胶凝材料、建筑防水等方面的工作。mse_jiangdb@ujn.edu.cn   
作者简介:  田振海,高级工程师,主要研究领域为道路、钢结构、建筑工程项目管理。
引用本文:    
田振海, 罗斌, 李明明, 杨龙龙, 苏延俐, 姜东兵, 赵丕琪. 干湿循环条件下疏水改性泡沫混凝土的耐久性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(9): 25010123-8.
TIAN Zhenhai, LUO Bin, LI Mingming, YANG Longlong, SU Yanli, JIANG Dongbing, ZHAO Piqi. Durability Study of Hydrophobically Modified Foamed Concrete Under Dry-Wet Cycles. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(9): 25010123-8.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25010123  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I9/25010123
1 Aditya L, Mahlia T, Rismanchi B, et al.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 73, 1352.
2 Gao Z H, Chen B, Chen J L, et al.Journal of Building Materials, 2023, 26(7), 723 (in Chinese).
高志涵, 陈波, 陈家林, 等. 建筑材料学报, 2023, 26(7), 723.
3 Gao J, Geng Y J, Li S C, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 301, 124082.
4 Sun C, Zhu Y, Guo J, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 186, 833.
5 Meng Y F, Zhang W M, Gao L X.Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 331, 127299.
6 Tang R, Wei Q S, Zhang K, et al.Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 57, 104948.
7 Xie H Y, Dai Y W, Ren Y H, et al.China Powder Science and Technology, 2023, 29(5), 125 (in Chinese).
谢洪阳, 戴宜文, 任宇航, 等.中国粉体技术, 2023, 29(5), 125.
8 Yavuz O B, Hasan S, Gokhan K, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 302, 124229.
9 Yang X, Lan X L, Yin G, et al.Low Temperature Architecture Technology, 2023, 45(10), 92 (in Chinese).
杨旭, 兰小磊, 尹刚, 等.低温建筑技术, 2023, 45(10), 92.
10 Wu S T, Zhang W M, Zhang Y B, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 427, 136233.
11 Wang X Q, Jin Y L, Ma Q, et al.Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 21, e03476.
12 Jiang J, Lu Z Y, Niu Y H, et al.Concrete, 2013(8), 47 (in Chinese).
蒋俊, 卢忠远, 牛云辉, 等.混凝土, 2013(8), 47.
13 Wang L, Yang H Q, Zhou S H, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 187, 1073.
14 Zeng Z J, Xu W, Mu S, et al.New Building Materials, 2021, 48(6), 139 (in Chinese).
曾志军, 徐文, 穆松, 等.新型建筑材料, 2021, 48(6), 139.
15 Shi D D, Geng Y J, Li S C, et al.Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022, 16, e00908.
16 Guo L C, Huang S Q, Zhang L, et al.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2018, 146, 136.
17 Li R, Hou P K, Xie N, et al.Cement and Concrete Composites, 2018, 87, 89.
18 Li Z R, Wang Z J, Zhang H B, et al.Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(3), 793 (in Chinese).
李兆睿, 王振军, 张海宝, 等.硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(3), 793.
19 She W, Zheng Z H, Zhang Q C, et al.Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 131, 106029.
20 Guo S H, Yu Z J, Luo M B, et al.Materials Reports, 2012, 26(5), 74 (in Chinese).
郭树虎, 于志家, 罗明宝, 等.材料导报, 2012, 26(5), 74.
21 Li Q, Yang C H, Chen P, et al.Materials Reports, 2021, 35(23), 23241 (in Chinese).
李青, 杨长辉, 陈平, 等.材料导报, 2021, 35(23), 23241.
22 Sun L, Xu Y D, Wang J L, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 365, 130073.
23 Liang C, Zhao P Q, Liu L, et al.Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 63, 105492.
24 Wu J Q, Lv C, Pi R D, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 304, 124674.
25 Li J, Zhang L, Wang H, et al.Materials Reports, 2024, 38(11), 170 (in Chinese).
李静, 张灵, 王昊, 等.材料导报, 2024, 38(11), 170.
26 Ye K Z.Experimental study on ultrasonic testing of foam concrete strength.Master’s Thesis, Hebei University of Technology, China, 2019 (in Chinese).
叶科志.超声波检测泡沫混凝土强度试验研究.硕士学位论文, 河北工业大学, 2019.
27 Pang Y, Wang H, Tang Q, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 441, 137556.
28 Rahoui H, Maruyama I, Vandamme M, et al.Cement and Concrete Research, 2021, 143, 106227.
[1] 朱萧霄, 郝智利, 竺寅威, 葛苗苗, 孙奥博, 葛春雨. 水泥基纤维流态固化土强度及耐久性试验研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(9): 25020057-10.
[2] 黄晋, 方德明, 殷成龙, 付传清. 混凝土-钢筋界面锈蚀层分布模型及混凝土锈胀开裂时间研究综述[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(9): 25070009-13.
[3] 白天文, 魏卓, 胡翔, 蒋震, 刘铁军, 史才军. 高原服役环境混凝土耐久性研究与性能提升综述[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25050028-13.
[4] 马瑞, 邱晶晶, 王尔恒, 胡慧瑛, 胡勋, 丁益, 程杰, 王爱国, 孙道胜. 聚甲醛纤维对高性能混凝土性能提升的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(10): 25040165-13.
[5] 孙化强, 卓康鸿, 田伊笛, 钱觉时, 季韬. 超硫酸盐水泥混凝土耐久性研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(10): 25040228-12.
[6] 孙纬宇, 张世珂, 梁庆国, 贾乐琪, 方登甲, 李佳, 张威, 严松宏. 干湿循环下木质素改良黄土力学特性及应力-应变归一化分析[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(10): 24110089-10.
[7] 张大川, 易忠来, 李化建, 杨志强. 高速铁路服役混凝土耐久性检测指标与现场检测方法研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(1): 24120026-14.
[8] 徐超亮, 全琪炜, 武焕春, 李远飞, 贾文清, 尹建, 李时磊, 宋淼, 张乐福, 刘向兵, 郭相龙. 轻水反应堆环境对不锈钢辐照促进应力腐蚀开裂的影响综述[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(1): 25010139-11.
[9] 钱如胜, 叶志波, 张云升, 赵儒泽, 孔德玉, 杨杨, 聂海波. 固碳强化再生粗骨料对其混凝土力学强度及体积稳定性的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(9): 24020155-6.
[10] 陈洋, 李增祎, 吴智, 邓承继, 娄晓明, 李勇庆, 谭嘉琳, 丁军, 余超. 催化剂添加量和温度对催化氮化制备低碳MgO-C耐火材料显微结构演变的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(8): 24030031-5.
[11] 潘杜, 牛荻涛, 罗大明. 海水海砂混凝土中低合金钢筋钝化膜结构及厚度预测模型[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(6): 23120173-8.
[12] 杜宗泽, 王刚, 朱轲, 夏钰东, 谢峰, 欧凯, 倪宇翔. 仿生微结构调控风阻研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(4): 23090080-8.
[13] 周志刚, 何斯华, 黎凯, 黄红明, 章泽鹏. 酸雨-干湿循环-荷载综合作用下水泥稳定碎石强度特性分析[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(3): 23070146-9.
[14] 张国林, 刘建忠, 夏薇薇, 尹锐, 申健, 韩方玉, 吉旭平. 固体颜料对装饰超高性能混凝土基本性能和着色效果的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(22): 24110187-7.
[15] 贡力, 赵学昊, 许天乐, 卜延忠, 杨腾腾, 秦军, 党丹丹. 硫酸盐环境下沙漠砂混凝土抗冻耐久性及界面微观结构研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(22): 24100076-10.
[1] Yanzhen WANG, Mingming CHEN, Chengyang WANG. Preparation and Electrochemical Properties Characterization of High-rate SiO2/C Composite Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 357 -361 .
[2] Yimeng XIA, Shuai WU, Feng TAN, Wei LI, Qingmao WEI, Chungang MIN, Xikun YANG. Effect of Anionic Groups of Cobalt Salt on the Electrocatalytic Activity of Co-N-C Catalysts[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 362 -367 .
[3] Qingshun GUAN,Jian LI,Ruyuan SONG,Zhaoyang XU,Weibing WU,Yi JING,Hongqi DAI,Guigan FANG. A Survey on Preparation and Application of Aerogels Based on Nanomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 384 -390 .
[4] Lijing YANG,Zhengxian LI,Chunliang HUANG,Pei WANG,Jianhua YAO. Producing Hard Material Coatings by Laser-assisted Cold Spray:a Technological Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 412 -417 .
[5] Zhiqiang QIAN,Zhijian WU,Shidong WANG,Huifang ZHANG,Haining LIU,Xiushen YE,Quan LI. Research Progress in Preparation of Superhydrophobic Coatings on Magnesium Alloys and Its Application[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 102 -109 .
[6] Wen XI,Zheng CHEN,Shi HU. Research Progress of Deformation Induced Localized Solid-state Amorphization in Nanocrystalline Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 116 -121 .
[7] Xing LIANG, Guohua GAO, Guangming WU. Research Development of Vanadium Oxide Serving as Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 12 -33 .
[8] Hao ZHANG,Yongde HUANG,Yue GUO,Qingsong LU. Technological and Process Advances in Robotic Friction Stir Welding[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 128 -134 .
[9] Laima LUO, Mengyao XU, Xiang ZAN, Xiaoyong ZHU, Ping LI, Jigui CHENG, Yucheng WU. Progress in Irradiation Damage of Tungsten and Tungsten AlloysUnder Different Irradiation Particles[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 41 -46 .
[10] Fengsen MA,Yan YU,Jie ZHANG,Haibo CHEN. A State-of-the-art Review of Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Biomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 76 -85 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed