Experimental Investigation of Moisture-salt Erosion and Multiple Factors Influence on Asphalt Mortar-Aggregate Interface
ZHU Yanli1, MA Chuanyi2, ZHANG Jizhe1,*, FAN Xiuze1, HE Liang3,*, YAO Zhanyong1
1 School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China 2 Shandong Hi-Speed Co., Ltd., Jinan 250098, China 3 School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
Abstract: Long-term erosion by soluble salts result in a decrease in terms of the asphalt mortar-aggregate interface adhesion, and it is an important factor to the service life of asphalt pavement in coastal areas. In order to reveal the essential principles of the soluble salt erosion, this work focused on the adhesive behavior of asphalt mortar-aggregate interface under different conditions. A type of dynamic moisture pressure simulation test device was developed to study the strength attenuation behavior of asphalt mortar-aggregate interface under different erosion conditions. In addition, the influence of physical and chemical properties of mineral powders and aggregates on the interface strength was revealed by using grey correlation analysis, andthe key factors which dominate the moisture and salt erosion damage of asphalt mortar-aggregate interface were explored. The results indicated that the strength of asphalt mortar-aggregate interface decreases gradually under the water immersion, and the soluble salt promotes the attenuation rate of interface strength. Under dynamic moisture pressure erosion, the interface, subjected to repeated extrusion and pumping action, leads to a significant decrease of adhesive strength. At the same time, the dry-wet and freeze-thaw conditions improved the internal stress of the mortar-aggregate interface which accelerated the interfacial failure. The correlation between interface strength and diffe-rent factors are ranked as follows:void content > apparent density > specific surface area > average particle size > SiO2 content of mineral powder > SiO2 content of aggregate, the pore volume, apparent density and specific surface area are the key factors which affect the interfacial strength.
1 Ma T, Luan Y C, He L, et al. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(2), 1 (in Chinese). 马涛, 栾英成, 何亮, 等. 交通运输工程学报, 2023, 23(2), 1. 2 Zhang Q P, Gu X Y, Ding J T, et al. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(5), 104 (in Chinese). 张启鹏, 顾兴宇, 丁济同, 等. 交通运输工程学报, 2021, 21(5), 104. 3 Zhou Z G, Li H J, Liu X, et al. Journal of Building Materials, 2020, 23(6), 1430 (in Chinese). 周志刚, 李浩嘉, 刘鑫, 等. 建筑材料学报, 2020, 23(6), 1430. 4 Zhang Q L, Wu D L, Zhang X J, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 284, 122649. 5 Long Z W, You L Y, Guo N J, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 367, 130213. 6 Pan P, Wu S P, Xiao Y, et al. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 48, 624. 7 Xiong R, Chu C, Qiao N, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 201, 121. 8 Chen X, Ren D Y, Tian G S, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 366, 130177. 9 Cheng Y C, Tao J L, Jiao Y B, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 118, 268. 10 Lin M, Li P, Nian T F, et al. Journal of Functional Materials, 2020, 51(6), 6150(in Chinese). 林梅, 李萍, 念腾飞, 等. 功能材料, 2020, 51(6), 6150. 11 Lv D, Zheng C F, Qin Y. Construction and Building Materials. 2014, 65, 330. 12 Wu J T. Studies on interaction capability of asphalt and aggregate based on rheological characteristics. Master's Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, China, 2009 (in Chinese). 吴建涛. 基于流变特性的沥青与集料交互作用能力的研究. 硕士学位论文, 哈尔滨工业大学, 2009. 13 Xu W Y, Qiu X, Xiao S L, et al. Materials (Basel), 2020, 13(12), 2744. 14 Cala A, Caro S, Lleras M, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 216, 661. 15 Zhou L, Huang W D, Lyu Q. Journal of Building Materials, 2021, 24(1), 137 (in Chinese). 周璐, 黄卫东, 吕泉. 建筑材料学报, 2021, 24(1), 137. 16 Yin Y P, Chen H X, Kuang D L, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 146, 231. 17 Xu Y Z, Zheng C F, Feng Y P, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 183, 95. 18 Han S, Dong S H, Liu M M, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 227, 116794. 19 Xu G J, Wang H. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 112(10), 161. 20 Wang D Y, Guo X L, Tang C. Journal of Building Materials, 2021, 24(3), 624 (in Chinese). 王端宜, 郭秀林, 唐成. 建筑材料学报, 2021, 24(3), 624. 21 Guo Q L, Li G Y, Gao Y, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 206, 590. 22 Xiao Q Y, Hu H X, Wang L J, et al. Journal of Hebei University of Technology, 2012, 41(4), 64 (in Chinese). 肖庆一, 胡海学, 王丽娟, 等. 河北工业大学学报, 2012, 41(4), 64. 23 Xiao Q Y, Wang Y B, Hu H X, et al. Journal of Wuhan University (Engineering Edition), 2015, 48(2), 187 (in Chinese). 肖庆一, 王玉宝, 胡海学, 等. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2015, 48(2), 187. 24 Chu C, Liu K P, Li K H, et al. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2018, 37(12), 3906 (in Chinese). 褚辞, 刘开平, 李科宏, 等. 硅酸盐通报, 2018, 37(12), 3906. 25 Huang X Y, Sha A M, Jiang W, et al. Journal of Chang'An University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 37(3), 33 (in Chinese). 黄新颜, 沙爱民, 蒋玮, 等. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 37(3), 33. 26 Zhang J Z, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(16), 22040097 (in Chinese). 张吉哲, 王静, 李岩, 等. 材料导报, 2022, 36(16), 22040097. 27 Apeagyei A K, Grenfell J R A, Airey G D. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2014, 26(8), 04014045. 28 Gao J, Yao Y Q, Wang D, et al. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(2), 126 (in Chinese). 高杰, 姚玉权, 王迪, 等. 交通运输工程学报, 2023, 23(2), 126.