Principles and Research Progress of Metal Fluid Velocimetry Techniques
WANG Chang1, LI Anmin1,2,3,*, WANG Xiaodong4,*
1 School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China 2 Guangxi Key Laboratory of Processing for Non-ferrous Metals and Featured Materials, Nanning 530004 China 3 Center of Ecological Collaborative Innovation for Aluminum Industry in Guangxi, Nanning 530004, China 4 College of Materials Science and Opto-Electronic Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract: Flow is a very common phenomenon in nature and engineering fields, and measurement and control of flow have always been essential goals. Liquid metal flow is indispensable in the metallurgical industry, and its flow behavior and transport process involve multiple processing links, including use of blast furnaces, ladles and molds, all of which significantly impact both production efficiency and product quality. In material processes such as continuous casting, continuous hot galvanisation, and secondary aluminium production, the speed,direction and changing law of molten metal flow is of great important for adjusting process parameters and controlling product quality. However, in the face of opaqueness, high temperature, and chemically aggressive molten metal fluids, accurately measuring the flow velocity yield poses a challenge for researchers and engineers. In the past 20 years, with the advancement of electromagnetic technology, great progress has been achieved in velocity measurement techniques for molten metal, and real-time online noncontact measurement of multiphase three-dimensional turbulence has gradually been realised. The application of velocity measurement technology has gradually been extended to fields such as crystal growth, electrochemistry, the nuclear industry and medicine. There are the wide variety of molten metal velocity measurement methods, and each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, we introduce the principles, application scenarios and research progress of several molten metal velocity measurement methods commonly used in industry, analyse the differences among different methods and their respective advantages and disadvantages, and discuss prospects for their future development.
通讯作者:
* 李安敏,广西大学资源环境与材料学院副教授、硕士研究生导师。1995年7月本科毕业于武汉科技大学材料系,2010年6月在广西大学结构工程专业取得博士学位。主要从事高熵合金、铝合金的强韧化、复合材料的研究工作。近年来,在高熵合金、铝合金、复合材料等领域发表论文30余篇,包括Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance、Acta Metallurgica Sinica、Journal of Electronic Materials等。lianmin@gxu.edu.cn 王晓东,2002年博士毕业于大连理工大学,同年,进入德国伊尔梅瑙科技大学(Ilmenau)从事博士后研究,从事纳米磁性材料的研究工作;2003—2008年在法国国家科研中心(CNRS)材料的电磁过程研究所(EPM/SIMAP)从事材料的电磁过程的研究工作;2008—2010年在加拿大麦吉尔大学(McGill)从事电磁检测方面的工作;2010—2011年在德国伊尔梅瑙科技大学(Ilmenau)从事磁流体力学方向的研究工作,现为中国科学院大学材料科学与光电技术学院教授,博士研究生导师、中国科学院“百人计划”入选者。发表论文70余篇,发表著作两部,从事与电磁场相关的材料科学研究工作。xiaodong.wang@ucas.ac.cn
王畅, 李安敏, 王晓东. 金属液测速技术的原理及研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(4): 21020076-7.
WANG Chang, LI Anmin, WANG Xiaodong. Principles and Research Progress of Metal Fluid Velocimetry Techniques. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(4): 21020076-7.
1 Jin G, Jiao J J, Wu X. Mining & Processing Equipment, 2015, 43(12), 10 (in Chinese). 金光, 焦晶晶, 吴晅. 矿山机械, 2015, 43(12), 10. 2 Rutkevich I M. Fluid Dynamics, 1981, 16(3), 414. 3 Iguchi M, Takeuchi M, Kawabata H, et al. Materials Transactions, JIM, 1994, 35(10), 716. 4 Mikrovas A C, Argyropoulos S A. Metallurgical & Materials Transactions B, 1993, 24(6), 1009. 5 Lee H C, Evans J W, Vives C. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 1984, 15(4), 734. 6 Iguchi M, Kawabata H, Morita Z. High Temperature Materials & Processes, 2000, 19(3-4), 187. 7 Iguchi M, Kosaka H, Hayashi A, et al. Metallurgical & Materials Tran-sactions B, 1999, 30(1), 53. 8 Iguchi M, Terauchi Y. ISIJ International, 2002, 42(9), 939. 9 Iguchi M, Kawabata H, Ogura T, et al. ISIJ International, 1996, 36(1), 190. 10 Mizukami H, Hanao M, Hiraki S, et al. Tetsu-to-Hagane, 2000, 86(4), 265. 11 Poornapushpakala S, Gomathy C, Sylvia J I, et al. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2014, 38, 98. 12 Sureshkumar S, Sabih M, Narmadha S, et al. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2013, 265, 1223. 13 Kumar M, Tordjeman P, Bergez W, et al. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2015, 86(10), 106104. 14 Guichou R, Ayroles H, Zamansky R, et al. Journal of Applied Physics, 2019, 125(9), 94504. 15 Kumar M, Tordjeman P, Bergez W, et al. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2016, 1, 1. 16 Krauter N, Galindo V, Wondrak T, et al. Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science, 2021. 86(10), 106104. 17 Forbriger J, Stefani F. Measurement Science & Technology, 2015, 26(10), 105303. 18 Looney R, Priede J. Flow Meas Urement Instrum, 2017, 1705, 02939. 19 Krauter N, Stefani F. Measurement Science & Technology, 2017, 28(10), 105301. 20 Krauter N, Stefani F. Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 424(1), 12004. 21 Eckert S, Gerbeth G. Experiments in Fluids, 2002, 32(5), 542. 22 Jaafar W, Fischer S, Bekkour K. Measurement, 2009, 42(2), 175. 23 Eckert S, Gerbeth G, Melnikov V I. Experiments in Fluids, 2003, 35(5), 381. 24 Cramer A, Zhang C, Eckert S. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2004, 15(3), 145. 25 Eckert S, Gerbeth G, Melnikov V I. Experiments in Fluids, 2003, 35(5), 381. 26 Eckert S, Buchenau D, Gerbeth G, et al. Journal of Nuclear Science & Technology, 2011, 48(4), 490. 27 Perez A, Kelley D H. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2015, 102, 52622. 28 Gates P E, Gurung A, Mazzaro L, et al. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2018, 44(7), 1392. 29 Ratajczak M, Gundrum T, Stefani F, et al. Journal of Sensors, 2014, 2014, 1. 30 Stefani F, Gundrum T, Gerbeth G. Physical Review E, 2004, 70, 56306. 31 Ratajczak M, Wondrak T, Timmel K, et al. Journal for Manufacturing Science and Production, 2015, 15(1), 41. 32 Wondrak T, Galindo V, Gerbeth G, et al. Measurement Science & Technology, 2010, 21(4), 45402. 33 Wondrak T, Eckert S, Gerbeth G, et al. Steel Research International, 2014, 85(8), 1266. 34 Wondrak T, Pal J, Stefani F, et al. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2017, 62, 269. 35 Wondrak T, Stefani F, Galindo V, et al. Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 424(1), 12007. 36 Wondrak T, Galindo V, Stefani F, et al. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 2019, 59(4), 1291. 37 Ratajczak M, Wondrak T, Stefani F. Philosophical Transactions A , 2016, 374, 2070. 38 Davidson P A. An introduction to magnetohydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, UK, 2001. 39 Thess A, Votyakov E V, Kolesnikov Y. Physical Review Letters, 2006, 96(16), 164501. 40 Halbedel B, Resagk C, Thess A, et al. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2014, 92(1), 361. 41 Werner M, Halbedel B. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2012, 48(11), 2925. 42 Vasilyan S, Ebert R, Weidner M, et al. Measurement Science & Technology, 2015, 26(11), 115302. 43 Vakaliuk O V, Ainslie M D, Halbedel B. Superconductor Science & Technology, 2018, 31(8), 84003. 44 Viré A, Knaepen B, Thess A. Physics of Fluids (1994), 2010, 22(12), 125101. 45 Jian D, Karcher C. Measurement Science & Technology, 2012, 23(7), 894. 46 Kolesnikov Y, Karcher C, Thess A. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2011, 42(3), 441. 47 Zheng J C, Liu R C, Wang X D. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2020, 56(7), 3 (in Chinese). 郑锦灿, 刘润聪, 王晓东. 金属学报, 2020, 56(7), 3. 48 Wang X D, Thess A, Moreau R, et al. Journal of Applied Physics, 2016, 120(1), 188. 49 Wang B, Wang X D. Measurement Science & Technology, 2018, 29(12), 125601. 50 Tan Y Q, Liu R C, Dai S J, et al. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2018, 29(6), 80. 51 Kolesnikov Y, Karcher C, Thess A. Metallurgical and materials transactions B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2011, 42(3), 441. 52 Carmen Stelian. Flow Measurement & Instrumentation, 2013, 33, 36. 53 Wang X D, Kolesnikov Y, Thess A. Measurement Science and Technology, 2012, 23(4), 45005.
渝公网安备50019002502923号 版权所有：《材料导报》编辑部
2023, Vol. 37 
