Research Progress in Organic Optoelectronic Devices Based on Large π Conjugated Molecules Tetraphenyldibenzoperiflanthene and Diindenoperylene
YU Junle1,2, ZHENG Yanqiong2, TANG Jie1,2, YANG Fang1,2, WANG Chao1,2, WEI Bin2, LI Xifeng2,3, SHI Jifeng2,3
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Advanced Display and System Applications of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China; 3 Shanghai Advanced Display Design, Manufacturing, and System Integration Professional Technical Service Platform, Shanghai 200072, China
Abstract: In recent years, the application of organic semiconductors has promoted the rapid development of organic optoelectronics. Compared with polymer semiconductor devices, small-molecule semiconductor devices have better reproducibility and controllability, more diversified fabrication processes, simpler interface regulation and clearer mechanism. However, small-molecule semiconductors have higher requirement in equipment and process, especially the process parameters exert a significant influence on the molecular aggregation state and orientation in the film. Currently the disadvantages of small-molecule semiconductor materials are as follows: (1) it is difficult to obtain thin films with highly ordered molecular arrangement via conventional fabrication process; (2) small-molecule semiconductors which can be fabricated by evaporation and solution- processing are relatively lack; (3) the optical absorption range is relatively narrow and the exciton diffusion length is shorter. Small molecules of tetraphenyldibenzoperiflanthene (DBP) reported firstly in 2009 and its derivative diindenoperylene (DIP) show excellent photoelectronic properties. DBP demonstrates strong visible absorption, bipolar transport, high hole-mobility, strong trend of horizontal molecular orientation, high light- and thermal-stability. DIP indicates bipolar transport, perpendicular molecular orientation, and apparent crystallinity. Therefore, DBP and DIP have attracted more and more scientists’ attention. In recent years, researchers have mainly tried to improve the performance of organic optoelectronic devices based on DBP and DIP by equipment modification, fabrication process, device structure, and material matching and so on. DBP and DIP have been efficiently applied in organic solar cells (OSC), organic light emitting diodes (OLED), and organic field effect transistors (OFET). The photocurrent and filling factor of DBP photovoltaic cells were increased by thermal annealing and solvent vapor annealing, and higher open-circuit voltage was obtained by using DBP as acceptor or matching DBP donor with non-fullerene acceptor. For DBP-based OLED and OFET, the correlation between device performance and the transport characteristics of buffer layers, the emitting layer structure, the substrate temperature, and the channel length are mainly studied. With regard to the DIP thin films, in recent years the methods of oblique gra-zing angle deposition, temperature control, annealing process, and molecular template have been introduced into the regulation of molecular orie-ntation in thin films. The OSCs based on DIP donor or DIP receptor were prepared due to the bipolar transport of DIP and achieved high efficiency of 5.8%. In addition, the molecular arrangement of other semiconductors is guided by the crystalline DIP to increase the mobility of the OFETs. This paper systematically reviews the DBP and DIP properties and the important research progress in many kinds of organic optoelectronic devices. Finally, the development tendency in the future of organic optoelectronic devices based on DBP and DIP is prospected, hoping to provide a reference for the molecular design and application of such type of small molecular semiconductors.
余俊乐, 郑燕琼, 唐杰, 杨芳, 王超, 魏斌, 李喜峰, 石继锋. 大π共轭分子四苯基二苯并荧蒽及二茚并苝的有机光电器件研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(5): 5148-5157.
YU Junle, ZHENG Yanqiong, TANG Jie, YANG Fang, WANG Chao, WEI Bin, LI Xifeng, SHI Jifeng. Research Progress in Organic Optoelectronic Devices Based on Large π Conjugated Molecules Tetraphenyldibenzoperiflanthene and Diindenoperylene. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(5): 5148-5157.
1 Burlinggame Q, Zanotti G, Ciammaruchi L, et al. Organic Electronics, 2017, 41,274. 2 Zhuang T, Sano T, Kido J. Organic Electronics, 2015, 26,415. 3 Deng D, Zhang Y, Zhang J, et al. Nature Communications, 2016, 7,13740. 4 Cheacharoen R, Mateker W R, Zhang Q, et al. Solar Energy Materials, 2017, 161,368. 5 Liu Z. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2018, 34 (11),1191(in Chinese). 刘忠范. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34 (11),1191. 6 Li S, Ye L, Zhao W, et al. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28,9423. 7 Cui Y, Li P, Song C, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120,28939. 8 Gupta V, Bagui A, Singh S P. Advanced Functional Materials, 2017, 27(2),1603820. 9 Fujishima D, Kanno H, Kinoshita T, et al. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2009, 93,1029. 10 Zhou Y, Taima T, Shibata Y, et al. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2011, 95,2861. 11 Grob S, Opitz A, Opitz A, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3,15700. 12 Nojiri K, Yamamoto K, Yamamoto K, et al. Organic Electronics, 2016, 38,107. 13 Liu C, Zhang S, Wang L, et al. Chemical Industry & Engineering Progress, 2012, 31(2),310(in Chinese). 刘春波, 张实, 王龙, 等. 化工进展, 2012, 31(2),310. 14 Ameen M Y, Pradhan S, Suresh M R, et al. Optical Materials, 2015, 39,134. 15 Kimoto Y, Akiyama T, Fujita K. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2017, 56,021601. 16 Cattin L, Djobo S O, Sanchez C, et al. Energy Procedia, 2012, 31,89. 17 Zhang J, Yang F, Zheng Y Q, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 357,1281. 18 Xiao X, Zimmerman J D, Lassiter B E, et al. Applied Physics Letters, 2013, 102,073302. 19 Calio L, Patil B R, Benduhn J, et al. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2018, 2(10),2296. 20 Patil B R, Ahmadpour M, Sherafatipour G, et al. Science Reports, 2018, 8,12608. 21 Wang Z, Yokoyama D, Wang X F, et al. Energy Environment Science, 2012, 6,249. 22 Song B, Rolin C, Zimmerman J D, et al. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26,2914. 23 Chen C W, Huang Z Y, Lin Y M, et al. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16,8852. 24 Zheng Y Q, Potscavage W J Jr, Komino T, et al. Applied Physics Letters, 2013, 6,143304. 25 Zheng Y Q, Wang C, Yang F, et al. Journal of Physics D: Applied Phy-sics, 2016, 49,465106. 26 Ding K, Liu X, Forrest S R. Nano Letters, 2018, 18,3180. 27 Lee S H, Lee J Y. Optics Express, 2018, 26(14),A697. 28 Peng Y, Zhang L, Andrew T L. Applied Physics Letters, 2014, 105,083304. 29 Bartynski A N, Mark G, Das S, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137,5397. 30 Zheng Y Q, Potscavage W J Jr, Zhang J, et al. Synthetic Metals, 2015, 205,121. 31 Bartynski A N, Grob S, Linderl T, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120,19027. 32 Zhang Y, Stephen R F. Physical Review Letters, 2012, 108,267404. 33 Liu D, Xiang J, Chen Y, et al. Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2017, 47(2), 027001(in Chinese). 刘冬玉, 向杰, 陈颖冰, 等. 中国科学:物理学 力学 天文学, 2017, 47(2), 027001. 34 Zheng Y Q, Yu J L, Wang C, et al. Journal of Physics D: Applied Phy-sics, 2018, 51,225302. 35 Okumoto K, Kanno H, Hamada Y, et al. Applied Physics Letters, 2006, 89,013502. 36 Kasahara T, Mizuno J, Matsunami S, et al. In:Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII: The International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Barcelona, Spain, 2013,pp.2596. 37 Kasahara T, Matsunami S, Edura T, et al. Sensors & Actuators A: Physical, 2014, 214,225. 38 Kasahara T, Matsunami S, Edura T, et al. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2015, 207,481. 39 Kasahara T, Ishimatsu R, Kuwae H, et al. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2018, 57(12),128001. 40 Boukhili W, Mahdouani M, Bourguiga R, et al. Microelectronic Enginee-ring, 2016, 160,39. 41 Boukhili W, Mahdouani M, Bourguiga R, et al. Microelectronic Enginee-ring, 2016, 150,47. 42 Kurrle D, Pflaum J. Applied Physics Letters, 2008, 92,133306. 43 Ciccullo F, Savu S A, Glaser M, et al. Chemical Physics, 2016, 18,13693. 44 Duva G, Mann A, Pithan L, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2019, 10(5),1031. 45 Duva G, Pithan L, Zeiser C, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(32),18705. 46 Zhang G, Hawks S A, Ngo C, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7,25247. 47 Lorch C, Novák J, Banerjee R, et al. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2017, 146,911. 48 Belova V, Beyer P, Meister E, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017, 139(25),8474. 49 Lorch C, Banerjee R, Dieterle J, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119,23211. 50 Wagner J, Gruber M, Hinderhofer A, et al. Advanced Functional Mate-rials, 2010, 20,4295. 51 Gruber M, Wagner J, Klein K, et al. Advanced Energy Materials, 2012, 2,1100. 52 Grob S, Gruber M, Bartynski A N, et al. Applied Physics Letters, 2014, 104,213304. 53 Wang Z, Miyadera T, Yamanari T, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6,6369. 54 Hormann U, Lorch C, Hinderhofer A, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2014, 118,26462. 55 Zheng Y Q, Wang C, Yu J L, et al. Synthetic Metals, 2017, 233,35. 56 Banerjee R, Hinderhofer A, Weinmann M, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(3),1839. 57 Aghamohammadi M, Fernández A, Schmidt M, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2014, 118,14833. 58 Linderl T, Hormann U, Beratz S, et al. Journal of Optics, 2016, 18,024007. 59 Yu S, Opitz A, Grob S, et al. Organic Electronics, 2014, 15,2210. 60 Lorch C, Frank H, Banerjee R, et al. Applied Physics Letters, 2015, 107,201903. 61 Horlet M, Kraus M, Brütting W, et al. Applied Physics Letters, 2011, 98,105. 62 Gerlach A, Sellner S, Kowarik S, et al. Physica Status Solidi A, 2008, 205,461. 63 Opitz A, Horlet M, Kiwull M, et al. Organic Electronics, 2012, 13,1614. 64 Hansen N H, Wunderlich C, Topczak A K, et al. Physical Review B, 2013, 87,3249. 65 Yang J P, Sun Q J, Yonezawa K, et al. Organic Electronics, 2014, 15,2749.
渝公网安备50019002502923号 版权所有：《材料导报》编辑部
2020, Vol. 34 
