Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2021, Vol. 35 Issue (Z1): 421-424    
  金属与金属基复合材料 |
保温时间对2024包铝薄板元素扩展及力学性能的影响
黄同瑊1, 晁代义1,2,3, 于芳1, 张芮源1, 周艳艳1, 赵晓红1,3, 徐志远1
1 山东南山铝业股份有限公司,国家铝合金压力加工工程技术研究中心,龙口 265713
2 山东南山科学技术研究院有限公司,龙口 265713
3 烟台南山学院工学院,龙口 265713
Effect of Holding Time on the Elements Expansion and Mechanical Properties of 2024 Alclad Sheet
HUANG Tongjian1, CHAO Daiyi1,2,3, YU Fang1, ZHANG Ruiyuan1, ZHOU Yanyan1, ZHAO Xiaohong1,3, XU Zhiyuan1
1 National Engineering Research Center for Plastic Working of Aluminum Alloys, Shandong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd., Longkou 265713, China
2 Shandong Nanshan Science and Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Longkou 265713,China
3 College of Engineering, Yantai Nanshan University, Longkou 265713,China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 3780KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为了研究大飞机蒙皮用2024包铝薄板元素扩散及性能之间的关系,采用OM、SEM、拉伸试验等分析手段,研究了保温时间对2024包铝薄板过渡层元素扩散及其力学性能的影响。结果表明,随着保温时间的延长,过渡层主合金元素开始逐渐向包铝层扩展。当保温时间为10 min时,主合金元素Mg、Cu元素的扩散增长较为明显,当保温时间达到40 min时,主合金元素扩散到整个包覆层。合金的力学性能随着保温时间的延长先快速增加,然后趋于平缓。保温处理2 min时合金屈服强度为137 MPa,10 min 后达到272 MPa。随着保温时间的继续延长,合金的屈服强度增加较为缓慢,15 min后保持在280 MPa左右。因此,采用连退线对大尺寸2024包铝薄板进行固溶处理时,合适的保温时间为10 min。在这样的固溶处理工艺下,合金元素扩散距离较小,同时合金的屈服强度也达到要求。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
黄同瑊
晁代义
于芳
张芮源
周艳艳
赵晓红
徐志远
关键词:  保温时间  2024包铝薄板  元素扩散  屈服强度    
Abstract: In order to investigate the relationship between element diffusion and performance of 2024 alclad sheet for the large aircraft skin. In this work, OM, SEM, and tensile tests are used to study the effects of solution time on the transition layer element diffusion and the mechanical properties of 2024 alu minum alloy clad sheet. The results show that the main alloy elements of the transition layer begin to gradually expand to the alu minum clad layer with the solution time increasing. When the solution time is 10 min, the diffusion of the main alloy elements Mg and Cu is very obvious. When the solution time reaches to 40 min, the main alloy elements almost diffused to the entire coating layer. The mechanical properties first increase rapidly with the solid solution time increasing, then tends to increase slower. The yield strength of the sample after solution treatment was 137 MPa for 2 min, and reached 272 MPa after 10 min. With the increase of solution time, the yield strength increased slowly, and basically remained at 280 MPa after 15 min. Therefore, when the continuous annealing line is used to solution treatment of large-size 2024 alclad sheet, the appropriate solution time is 10 min. The diffusion distance of alloy elements is small, and the yield strength of the alloy also meets the requirements after this solution treatment process.
Key words:  holding time    2024 alclad sheet    element diffusion    yield strength
                    发布日期:  2021-07-16
ZTFLH:  TG142.71  
通讯作者:  cdy19861226@163.com   
作者简介:  黄同瑊, 2005年毕业于兰州理工大学金属材料专业,获得学士学位,工程师。主要从事航空铝合金的轧制变形工艺研发。晁代义,2013年6月毕业于烟台大学,获得工学硕士学位。2013年9月到2017年3月于哈尔滨工业大学材料学院攻读博士学位。目前就职于山东南山科学技术研究院,担任铝业研究院院长助理;南山学院副教授,共计发表学术论文20余篇。主要从事高强铝合金热处理及变形工艺研究以及金属材料失效分析。目前担任中国机械工程协会失效分析分会失效分析专家。
引用本文:    
黄同瑊, 晁代义, 于芳, 张芮源, 周艳艳, 赵晓红, 徐志远. 保温时间对2024包铝薄板元素扩展及力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(Z1): 421-424.
HUANG Tongjian, CHAO Daiyi, YU Fang, ZHANG Ruiyuan, ZHOU Yanyan, ZHAO Xiaohong, XU Zhiyuan. Effect of Holding Time on the Elements Expansion and Mechanical Properties of 2024 Alclad Sheet. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(Z1): 421-424.
链接本文:  
http://www.mater-rep.com/CN/  或          http://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2021/V35/IZ1/421
1 张航, 何克准, 张江斌, 等.金属热处理, 2019, 44(6), 169.
2 张彦民. 热加工工艺, 2020, 49(24), 1001.
3 宁爱林, 刘志义, 等. 金属热处理, 2006, 31(9), 22.
4 王能均. 铝加工, 2015(6), 16.
5 郑欣. 金属热处理, 2012, 37(11), 99.
[1] 韩志勇, 卢博文, 王仕成. Ni-Al-Pt粘结层的制备及微观组织演变分析[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(4): 4144-4149.
[2] 刘成红, 王均安, 熊邦汇, 张植权, 陈纪昌, 贺英. 立方织构Ni-Cr-Mo-W合金薄带及其性能*[J]. 《材料导报》期刊社, 2017, 31(20): 53-57.
[3] 邓磊波, 张雪峰, 张明星, 欧阳顺利, 殷哲一. 熔制保温时间对CAMS系矿渣微晶玻璃结构与性能的影响*[J]. 《材料导报》期刊社, 2017, 31(18): 125-130.
[4] 敖晓辉,邢书明,于佰水,张佳虹,郭强,王如芬. 铸造铝硅合金熔炼过程中Ca含量的变化规律*[J]. 材料导报编辑部, 2017, 31(10): 92-95.
[1] Huimin PAN,Jun FU,Qingxin ZHAO. Sulfate Attack Resistance of Concrete Subjected to Disturbance in Hardening Stage[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 282 -287 .
[2] Xu LI,Ziru WANG,Li YANG,Zhendong ZHANG,Youting ZHANG,Yifan DU. Synthesis and Performance of Magnetic Oil Absorption Material with Rice Chaff Support[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 219 -222 .
[3] WANG Tong, BAO Yan. Advances on Functional Polyacrylate/Inorganic Nanocomposite Latex for Leather Finishing[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(1): 64 -71 .
[4] HUANG Dajian, MA Zonghong, MA Chenyang, WANG Xinwei. Preparation and Properties of Gelatin/Chitosan Composite Films Enhanced by Chitin Nanofiber[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(8): 21 -24 .
[5] ZHANG Le, ZHOU Tianyuan, CHEN Hao, YANG Hao, ZHANG Qitu, SONG Bo, WONG Chingping. Advances in Transparent Nd∶YAG Laser Ceramics[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(13): 41 -50 .
[6] CHEN Bida, GAN Guisheng, WU Yiping, OU Yanjie. Advances in Persistence Phosphors Activated by Blue-light[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(21): 37 -45 .
[7] ZHANG Yong, WANG Xiongyu, YU Jing, CAO Weicheng,FENG Pengfa, JIAO Shengjie. Advances in Surface Modification of Molybdenum and Molybdenum Alloys at Elevated Temperature[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(7): 83 -87 .
[8] JIN Chenxin, XU Guojun, LIU Liekai, YUE Zhihao, LI Xiaomin,TANG Hao, ZHOU Lang. Effects of Bulk Electrical Resistivity and Doping Type of Silicon on the Electrochemical Performance of Lithium-ion Batteries with Silicon/Graphite Anodes[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(22): 10 -14 .
[9] FANG Sheng, HUANG Xuefeng, ZHANG Pengcheng, ZHOU Junpeng, GUO Nan. A Mechanism Study of Loess Reinforcing by Electricity-modified Sodium Silicate[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(22): 135 -141 .
[10] ZHOU Dianwu, HE Rong, LIU Jinshui, PENG Ping. Effects of Ge, Si Addition on Energy and Electronic Structure of ZrO2 and Zr(Fe,Cr)2[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(22): 146 -152 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed