Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (8): 25030227-7    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25030227
  无机非金属及其复合材料 |
机制砂自密实轻骨料混凝土单轴受压破坏机理的3D数值模拟研究
张淑云1,*, 张倩倩1, 郑素琴2, 代慧娟1
1 西安科技大学建筑与土木工程学院,西安 710054
2 西安基准方中建筑设计有限公司,西安 710061
3D Numerical Simulation-based Study on Uniaxial Compressive Failure Mechanism of Manufactured Sand Self-compacting Lightweight Aggregate Concrete
ZHANG Shuyun1,*, ZHANG Qianqian1, ZHENG Suqin2, DAI Huijuan1
1 School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China
2 Xi'an JZFZ Architectural Design Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710061, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 33037KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 采用细观数值模拟方法,将机制砂自密实轻骨料混凝土(Manufactured sand self-compacting lightweight aggregate concrete,MS-SCLC)视为由轻骨料、砂浆及界面过渡区(Interfacial transition zone,ITZ)组成的三相复合材料;采用塑性损伤本构,建立对应的三维随机骨料模型,对其在单轴受压破坏时的损伤分布和力学性能进行数值分析,研究MS-SCLC单轴受压损伤分布及宏观应力-应变曲线关系。结果表明:对MS-SCLC的三维立方体模型进行单轴受压数值模拟,MS-SCLC40立方体抗压强度模拟结果值与试验值相差1.14%,且整体呈现的破坏形式相似,说明三维模型建立合理;对MS-SCLC的三维棱柱体进行单轴受压数值模拟,两者应力-应变曲线近似重合,其峰值应力模拟值与试验值相差2.15%,弹性模量模拟值与试验值相差2.49%,再次验证了所建立细观模型的有效性;MS-SCLC破坏损伤始于中部轻骨料,扩展至边缘,80%峰值应力时砂浆基体出现45°裂纹,界面破坏后骨料斜向贯穿,最终形成斜向宏观裂纹,揭示了MS-SCLC的受压破坏机理。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张淑云
张倩倩
郑素琴
代慧娟
关键词:  机制砂  自密实轻骨料混凝土  细观模拟  单轴受压  破坏机理    
Abstract: This study investigates the structural degradation mechanisms of manufactured sand self-compacting lightweight aggregate concrete (MS-SCLC) through meso-scale numericalsimulations. The composite system was conceptualized as a three-phase structure consisting of lightweight aggregates, mortar matrix, and interfacial transition zone (ITZ). A three-dimensional random aggregate model was developed using a plastic damage constitutive relationship, enabling systematic investigation of damage propagation patterns and mechanical behavior under uniaxial compression. Numerical simulations were performed to quantify both spatial damage distribution characteristics and macroscopic stress-strain responses during compressive loading. The results show that the difference between the simulated value and the experimental value of the compressive strength of the MS-SCLC40 cube is 1.14%, and the overall failure model is similar, indicating that the three-dimensional model is reaso-nable. Uniaxial compression simulations were performed on three-dimensional prismatic specimens of MS-SCLC, revealing near-overlapping stress-strain curves between numerical and experimental results. The simulated peak stress exhibited a marginal deviation of 2.15%, while the elastic modulus demonstrated a 2.49% discrepancy compared to experimental measurements, thereby further validating the efficacy of the proposed meso-scale modeling framework. The failure of MS-SCLC starts from the middle lightweight aggregate and extends to the edge. When the peak stress is 80%, the mortar matrix has a 45° crack. After the interface failure, the aggregate penetrates obliquely and finally forms an oblique macroscopic crack. The pressurized damage mechanism of MS-SCLC was revealed.
Key words:  manufactured sand    self-compacting lightweight aggregate concrete    meso-scale model    uniaxial compression    failure mechanism
出版日期:  2026-04-25      发布日期:  2026-05-06
ZTFLH:  TU528  
基金资助: 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2025JC-YBMS-570)
通讯作者:  * 张淑云,博士,西安科技大学建筑与土木工程学院教授、硕士研究生导师,主要从事混凝土结构理论及应用方面的研究。zhshy@xust.edu.cn   
引用本文:    
张淑云, 张倩倩, 郑素琴, 代慧娟. 机制砂自密实轻骨料混凝土单轴受压破坏机理的3D数值模拟研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25030227-7.
ZHANG Shuyun, ZHANG Qianqian, ZHENG Suqin, DAI Huijuan. 3D Numerical Simulation-based Study on Uniaxial Compressive Failure Mechanism of Manufactured Sand Self-compacting Lightweight Aggregate Concrete. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(8): 25030227-7.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25030227  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I8/25030227
1 Chen Y L, Z L, J Y P, et al. Acta Material Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(10), 4801 (in Chinese).
陈宇良, 朱玲, 吉云鹏, 等. 复合材料学报, 2022, 39(10), 4801.
2 Vigneshkumar D, Vasudevan M, Soundara B. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 400, 132747.
3 Chintada C, Ransinchung G R. Composites Communications, 2023, 41, 101657.
4 Lin G H, Zhang L F, Cheng P Y, et al. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 62, 105380.
5 Yao Z Q, Gao M, Wang H L. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2025(5), 1 (in Chinese).
姚占全, 高猛, 王海龙. 北京工业大学学报, 2025(5), 1.
6 Li S M, Zeng Z, Liu J, et al. Railway building, 2020, 60(11), 148 (in Chinese).
李书明, 曾志, 刘竞, 等. 铁道建筑, 2020, 60(11), 148.
7 Wang L C, Song Y P. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2005(7), 27 (in Chinese).
王立成, 宋玉普. 土木工程学报, 2005(7), 27.
8 Yang J H, Zhang P, Wang T, et al. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(10), 89 (in Chinese).
杨健辉, 张鹏, 王涛, 等. 工程力学, 2015, 32(10), 89.
9 Chen Y L, Zhu L, Zhang S S, et al. Journal of Silicate, 2022, 50(8), 2196 (in Chinese).
陈宇良, 朱玲, 张绍松, 等. 硅酸盐学报, 2022, 50(8), 2196.
10 Bažant Z P, Tabbara M R, Kazemi M T, et al. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1990, 116(8), 1686.
11 Mohamed A R, Hansen W. ACI Materials Journal, 1999, 96(2), 196.
12 Mohamed A R, Hansen W. ACI Materials Journal, 1999, 96(3), 354.
13 Mohamed A R, Hansen W. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1999, 21(5-6), 349.
14 Zhang C H, Liu P, Li K, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2020, 114, 103714.
15 Liang Y X, Dang N F. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012, 226-228, 1780.
16 Jin L, Yang W X, Yu W X, et al. Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 37(3), 56 (in Chinese).
金浏, 杨旺贤, 余文轩, 等. 工程力学, 2020, 37(3), 56.
17 Jin L, Li J, Yu W X, et al. Journal of Mechanics, 2022, 54(3), 800(in Chinese).
金浏, 李健, 余文轩, 等. 力学学报, 2022, 54(3), 800.
18 Wang G Z, Xu B, W J, et al. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2023, 40(4), 909(in Chinese).
王公志, 许斌, 王江等. 应用力学学报, 2023, 40(4), 909.
19 Wang G Z, W J, X B. Mechanics Quarterly, 2023, 44(2), 456(in Chinese).
王公志, 王江, 许斌. 力学季刊, 2023, 44(2), 456.
20 Zhang S Y, Yang X L, Zhou J, et al. Concrete, 2022(2), 140(in Chinese).
张淑云, 杨旭龙, 周杰, 等. 混凝土, 2022(2), 140.
21 Guo Z H, Zhang X Q, Zhang D C, et al. Journal of Building Structures, 1982, 1982(1), 1(in Chinese).
过镇海, 张秀琴, 张达成, 等. 建筑结构学报, 1982, (1), 1.
22 Grassl P, Grégoire D, Solano L R, et al. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2012, 49(13), 1818.
23 Fuller W B, Thompson S E. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1907, 59(2), 67.
24 Liu W, Xu M, Chen Z F. Industrial Building, 2014, 44(S1), 167 (in Chinese).
刘巍, 徐明, 陈忠范. 工业建筑, 2014, 44(S1), 167.
25 Chen H B, Xu B, Wang J, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 246, 118375.
26 Sun Y Z, Fang C Z, Fan D, et al. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018(1), 3489082.
27 Tian M Y, Zhang E, Cao R D, et al. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2020, 37(3), 975(in Chinese).
田梦云, 张恩, 曹瑞东, 等. 应用力学学报, 2020, 37(3), 975.
28 Huang Y, Yang Z, Chen X, et al. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 97, 102.
29 Ke Y, Ortola S, Beaucour A L, et al. Mechanics of Materials, 2014, 68, 176.
30 Niu J G, Yang X Y, Xu Z H. Building Science, 2019, 35(3), 95 (in Chinese).
牛建刚, 杨溪原, 徐泽华. 建筑科学, 2019, 35(3), 95.
31 Huang Y, Yang Z, Ren W, et al. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2015, 67, 340.
32 Kim S M, Al-Rub R K A. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(3), 339.
33 Song Z, Lu Y. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 46, 41.
34 Jin L, Yu W, Du X, et al. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 230, 106979.
35 Xu F, Tian B, Xu G. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2021(1), 6643956.
[1] 元强, 胡艺瀚, 李苏宁, 刘正湘, 田义. 铜矿废石机制砂吸附行为及与聚羧酸减水剂作用效率研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(1): 25030086-6.
[2] 夏益健, 张宇, 张云升, 朱微微, 朱文轩. 磨细凝灰岩制备机制砂混凝土力学性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(9): 24030199-7.
[3] 纪泳丞, 王大洋, 贾艳敏. PVA纤维增强砖骨料再生混凝土数值模拟及尺寸效应研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(3): 23100214-11.
[4] 贡力, 赵学昊, 许天乐, 卜延忠, 杨腾腾, 秦军, 党丹丹. 硫酸盐环境下沙漠砂混凝土抗冻耐久性及界面微观结构研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(22): 24100076-10.
[5] 贾松, 何成龙, 霍子怡, 黄治镡, 蒲彦蓉. 陶瓷层结构对复合防弹板抗子弹多次侵彻性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(13): 25010118-7.
[6] 肖民, 吴娟, 奚健杨, 李方贤, 祝雯, 韦江雄. 基于Mazars损伤模型评价不同粗糙度机制砂砂浆的抗裂性能[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(21): 23060117-6.
[7] 董昊良, 李化建, 杨志强, 温家馨, 黄法礼, 王振, 易忠来. 混凝土冻融破坏机理及寿命预测方法[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(2): 22070123-11.
[8] 许应杰, 陈红鸟. 长龄期机制砂再生骨料混凝土的断裂参数和断裂过程区[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(19): 23040205-10.
[9] 边晨, 郭君渊, 肖建庄, 赵长军. 纳米偏高岭土及细骨料对UHPC力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(23): 22070261-5.
[10] 韩照, 张云升, 乔宏霞, 冯琼, 薛翠真, 尚明刚. 基于CT扫描及图像处理技术的机制砂形貌研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(19): 22060032-6.
[11] 宋卫民, 吴昊. 基于断裂力学的沥青混凝土抗裂性能与研究方法进展[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(16): 22050119-11.
[12] 刘超, 王有强, 刘化威, 张荣飞. 基于打印参数影响的3D打印混凝土力学性能试验研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(1): 21110276-7.
[13] 王俊辉, 黄悦, 杨国涛, 魏琦安, 刘文卓. 再生混凝土抗压性能研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(Z1): 21100033-9.
[14] 胡时, 蔡海兵, 马祖桥, 袁助, 丁祖德. 不同加载速率下饱水高延性喷射混凝土的单轴压缩试验[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(8): 21090227-10.
[15] 张广田, 刘娟红, 孔丽娟, 吴瑞东. 石英岩型铁尾矿机制砂中石粉的吸附特性及机理[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(6): 6071-6077.
[1] Lanyan LIU,Jun SONG,Bowen CHENG,Wenchi XUE,Yunbo ZHENG. Research Progress in Preparation of Lignin-based Carbon Fiber[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 405 -411 .
[2] Haoqi HU,Cheng XU,Lijing YANG,Henghua ZHANG,Zhenlun SONG. Recent Advances in the Research of High-strength and High-conductivity CuCrZr Alloy[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 453 -460 .
[3] Yanchun ZHAO,Congyu XU,Xiaopeng YUAN,Jing HE,Shengzhong KOU,Chunyan LI,Zizhou YUAN. Research Status of Plasticity and Toughness of Bulk Metallic Glass[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 467 -472 .
[4] Xinxing ZHOU,Shaopeng WU,Xiao ZHANG,Quantao LIU,Song XU,Shuai WANG. Molecular-scale Design of Asphalt Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 483 -495 .
[5] Yongtao TAN, Lingbin KONG, Long KANG, Fen RAN. Construction of Nano-Au@PANI Yolk-shell Hollow Structure Electrode Material and Its Electrochemical Performance[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 47 -50 .
[6] Ping ZHU,Guanghui DENG,Xudong SHAO. Review on Dispersion Methods of Carbon Nanotubes in Cement-based Composites[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 149 -158 .
[7] Fangyuan DONG,Shansuo ZHENG,Mingchen SONG,Yixin ZHANG,Jie ZHENG,Qing QIN. Research Progress of High Performance ConcreteⅠ:Raw Materials and Mix Proportion Design Method[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 159 -166 .
[8] Guiqin HOU,Yunkai LI,Xiaoyan WANG. Research Progress of Zinc Ferrite as Photocatalyst[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 51 -57 .
[9] Jianxiang DING,Zhengming SUN,Peigen ZHANG,Wubian TIAN,Yamei ZHANG. Current Research Status and Outlook of Ag-based Contact Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 58 -66 .
[10] Jing WANG,Hongke LIU,Pingsheng LIU,Li LI. Advances in Hydrogel Nanocomposites with High Mechanical Strength[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 67 -75 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed