Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (8): 25030033-7    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25030033
  金属与金属基复合材料 |
弛豫参数对镁合金层错能计算的影响研究
田莲娟1, 胡静1, 何亮1, 汤爱涛1,2,*, 佘加1,2,*
1 重庆大学材料科学与工程学院,重庆 400045
2 重庆大学国家镁合金材料工程技术研究中心,重庆 400044
Computational Analysis of Relaxation Parameter Impacts on Stacking Fault Energy in Magnesium Alloys
TIAN Lianjuan1, HU Jing1, HE Liang1, TANG Aitao1,2,*, SHE Jia1,2,*
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
2 National Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 10096KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 层错能的计算精度直接影响材料变形机制、力学性能和相稳定性等关键性能的预测准确性。然而,弛豫参数的选择是影响层错能计算精度的关键因素,目前尚缺乏系统的理论依据来指导其合理选取。为此,本工作基于密度泛函理论的第一性原理计算,以密排六方(HCP)结构的纯镁为研究对象,系统探究了九种不同弛豫参数(3-f、3-z、3-yz、3-67、3-5678、2-z、2-yz、2-67、2-5678)对广义层错能(GSFE)计算的影响,进一步将GSFE与Peierls-Nabarro(P-N)模型结合计算出临界分切应力,并与实验结果进行了对比验证。研究表明,原子y方向弛豫对精确计算基面和锥面滑移系层错能至关重要:(0001)〈1120〉和(1122)〈1123〉滑移系GSFE曲线由单γusf变为双γusf和单γisf,(1011)〈1120〉滑移系层错能降低,而(1010)〈1120〉滑移系不受影响。同时,晶格是否弛豫对层错能计算的影响呈现差异:中间原子弛豫(67/5678)能准确定位各滑移系的γisfusf位置,且γusf值随弛豫自由度的增加而减小;(1122)〈1123〉滑移系的γisf(位置和数值)基本保持不变;原子沿z方向或yz方向的弛豫对层错能的影响均可忽略。在多种弛豫方式中,固定晶格,弛豫第6层和第7层原子(2-67)计算的临界分切应力(CRSS)与实验数据吻合最佳。本研究不仅为材料模拟中的参数选择提供了理论支持和实践指导,还为进一步明晰位错行为及塑性变形机制奠定了基础。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
田莲娟
胡静
何亮
汤爱涛
佘加
关键词:  第一性原理  弛豫参数  广义层错能(GSFE)  临界分切应力(CRSS)    
Abstract: The accuracy of stacking fault energy (SFE) calculations d plays a pivotal role in reliably predicting key material properties, including deformation mechanisms, mechanical performance, and phase stability. However, the precision of SFE calculations is significantly influenced by the selection of relaxation parameters, for which systematic theoretical guidance remains lacking. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a comprehensive first-principles study based on density functional theory (DFT) to systematically evaluate the effects of nine distinct relaxation schemes (3-f, 3-z, 3-yz, 3-67, 3-5678, 2-z, 2-yz, 2-67, 2-5678) on the generalized stacking fault energy (GSFE) of hexagonal close-packed (HCP) magnesium. Furthermore, the calculated GSFE values were incorporated into the Peierls-Nabarro (P-N) model to determine the critical resolved shear stress (CRSS), with the results being rigorously validated against experimental data. Our findings reveal several key insights. The relaxation of atoms in the y-direction is crucial for accurately calculating the generalized stacking fault energy (GSFE) of basal and pyramidal slip systems: The GSFE curves for the (0001) 〈1120〉 and (1122) 〈1123〉 slip systems change from a single γusf to double γusf and single γisf, while the stacking fault energy of the (1011) 〈1120〉 slip system decreases, and the (1010) 〈1120〉 slip system remains unaffected. Moreover, whether the lattice is relaxed or not shows differences in the impact on stacking fault energy calculations. Intermediate atomic relaxation (67/5678) can accurately determine the γisfusf positions for each slip system, and the γusf value decreases as the degrees of freedom for relaxation increase. The γisf(position and value) of the (1122) 〈1123〉 slip system remains essentially unchanged. The influence of atomic relaxation along the z-direction or yz-direction on stacking fault energy is negligible. Among various relaxation methods, fixing the lattice and relaxing 67 layers of atoms (2-67) yields critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) calculations that best match experimental data. This study provides theoretical support and practical guidance for parameter selection in materials simulations, and also lays the foundation for further clarifying dislocation behavior and plastic deformation mechanisms.
Key words:  first-principles    relaxation parameter    generalized stacking fault energy (GSFE)    critical resolved shear stress (CRSS)
出版日期:  2026-04-25      发布日期:  2026-05-06
ZTFLH:  TB31  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(U2167213)
通讯作者:  * 汤爱涛,重庆大学材料科学与工程学院教授、博士研究生导师。目前主要研究轻合金组织与性能、基于数据驱动技术的材料设计、金属基复合材料和辐照损伤的计算模拟等。tat@cqu.edu.cn
佘加,重庆大学材料科学与工程学院副教授、博士研究生导师。主要研究生物镁合金材料、高性能变形镁合金材料设计与先进加工技术。jiashe@foxmail.com   
作者简介:  田莲娟,重庆大学材料科学与工程学院博士研究生,在汤爱涛教授和佘加副教授的指导下研究镁合金的第一性原理计算模拟。
引用本文:    
田莲娟, 胡静, 何亮, 汤爱涛, 佘加. 弛豫参数对镁合金层错能计算的影响研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25030033-7.
TIAN Lianjuan, HU Jing, HE Liang, TANG Aitao, SHE Jia. Computational Analysis of Relaxation Parameter Impacts on Stacking Fault Energy in Magnesium Alloys. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(8): 25030033-7.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25030033  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I8/25030033
1 Vitek V. Philosophical Magazine, 1968, 18(154), 773.
2 Yoo M H. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1981, 12, 409.
3 Verma R, Hector L G, Krajewski P E, et al. JOM, 2009, 61, 29.
4 Muzyk M, Pakiela Z, Kurzydlowski K J, et al. Scripta Materialia, 2012, 66(5), 219.
5 Dou Y C, Zhang J. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 98, 405.
6 Ding Z, Liu W, Sun H, et al. Acta Materialia, 2017, 146, 265.
7 Dou Y C. Fundamental research on strengthening and toughening of Mg alloys based on first-principles and molecular dynamics. Ph. D. Thesis, Chongqing University, China, 2015 (in Chinese).
豆雨辰. 基于第一性原理和分子动力学的镁合金强韧化基础研究. 博士学位论文, 重庆大学, 2015.
8 Zhang J, Dou Y C, Dong H B. Scripta Materialia, 2014, 89, 13.
9 Wang C, Zhang H Y, Wang H Y, et al. Scripta Materialia, 2013, 69(6), 445.
10 Muzyk M, Pakiela Z, Kurzydlowski K J, et al. Scripta Materialia, 2012, 66(5), 219.
11 Yin B, Wu Z, Curtin W, et al. Acta Materialia, 2017, 123, 223.
12 Wang C. Influence and mechanism of alloying elements on stacking fault energy and twin segregation energy in Mg. Master's Thesis, Jilin University, China, 2015 (in Chinese).
王珵. 合金元素对镁层错能和孪晶偏析能的影响规律及作用机制. 硕士学位论文, 吉林大学, 2015.
13 Li J, Huang Y, Wang F, et al. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2020, 773, 138877.
14 Sivashanmugam N, Harikrishna K L. Materials Science Forum, 2020, 979, 162.
15 Zhang J, Dou Y C, Liu G B, et al. Computational Materials Science, 2013, 79, 564.
16 Kumar A, Morrow B M, McCabe R J, et al. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2017, 695, 270.
17 Kresse G, Hafner J. Physical Review B, 1993, 48(17), 13115.
18 Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Physical Review B, 1996, 54, 11169.
19 Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M, et al. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 77(18), 3865.
20 Ashcroft N W, Mermin N D, Rodriguez S, et al. American Journal of Physics, 1978, 46(1), 116.
21 Chou M Y. Physical Review B, 1985, 32(12), 7979.
22 Wang C, Wang H Y, Zhang H Y, et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2013, 575, 423.
23 Yasi J A, Nogaret T, Trinkle D R, et al. Modelling & Simulation in Materials Science & Engineering, 2009, 17(5), 055012.
24 Datta A, Waghmare U V, Ramamurty U, et al. Acta Materialia, 2008, 56(11), 2531.
25 Agnew S R, Horton J A, Yoo M H, et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2002, 33(3), 851.
26 Bacon D J, Liang M H. Philosophical Magazine A, 1986, 53(2), 163.
27 Minonishi Y, Ishioka S, Koiwa M, et al. Philosophical Magazine A, 1982, 45(5), 835.
28 Pei Z, Zhu L F, Friák M, et al. New Journal of Physics, 2013, 15(4), 043020.
29 Ak A, Bmm B, Mc B, et al. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2017, 695, 270.
30 Peierls R, et al. Proceedings of the Physical Society, 1940, 52(1), 34.
31 Carrez P, Cordier P, et al. European Journal of Mineralogy, 2006, 18(2), 149.
32 Garg P, Bhatia M A, Solanki K N, et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2019, 788, 413.
33 Tonda H, Ando S. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2002, 33(3), 831.
34 Akhtar A, Teghtsoonian E. Acta Metallurgica, 1969, 17(11), 1339.
35 Reed-Hill R E, Robertson W D. Acta Metallurgica, 1957, 5(12), 717.
36 Liu T T, Pan F S. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2019, 29(9), 14 (in Chinese).
刘婷婷, 潘复生. 中国有色金属学报, 2019, 29(9), 14.
37 Feng Z X, Zhao S, Shi Q N, et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2022, 51(1), 134 (in Chinese).
冯中学, 赵珊, 史庆南, 等. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2022, 51(1), 134.
38 Zeng Y. Study on the effect of alloying elements on critical resolved shear stress and mechanical behavior of Mg alloys. Ph. D. Thesis, Chongqing University, China, 2015 (in Chinese).
曾迎. 合金元素对镁合金临界剪切应力与力学行为影响的研究. 博士学位论文, 重庆大学, 2015.
39 Yasi J A, Nogaret T, Trinkle D R, et al. Modelling & Simulation in Materials Science & Engineering, 2009, 17(5), 055012.
[1] 李耑, 刘远超, 刘新昊, 李梓硕, 常乐涛, 李博涵. 单层硅烯和锗烯的热电输运特性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25030197-7.
[2] 李杰, 王海燕, 邢磊, 于洋, 高雪云. 氢在CoNiV中熵合金中溶解和扩散的第一性原理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 24120202-5.
[3] 马金宁, 李小波, 欧明玉, 徐文俊. 合金中化学短程有序的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 25010164-9.
[4] 刘宇, 张健, 庞小通, 周小杰, 卢先正, 陈小敏, 李佳豪, 彭平. 镧镍系合金对氢化镁组织结构与储氢性能的影响及机理[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(8): 24040039-6.
[5] 陈阿青, 梁轻. Nb掺杂二氧化钛纳米管电子结构第一性原理计算[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(4): 23100185-6.
[6] 张凯铭, 李春雨, 孙洪茹, 韩梓健, 张旭, 魏爽, 路旭格, 董伟, 沈丁, 杨绍斌. 硼掺杂石墨烯作为锂离子电池负极材料的第一性原理计算研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(24): 24120040-9.
[7] 莫秋燕, 吴家隐, 荆涛. 铂和钯修饰硫化锡吸附甲醛的电子及气敏特性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(22): 24100250-7.
[8] 吴慧淋, 张宇飞, 董权, 张静. 基于第一性原理的间隙原子掺杂MgAlLiSbAg轻质高熵合金的结构和
性能研究
[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(22): 24090168-7.
[9] 闫肃, 豆艳坤, 曹金利, 贺新福. 高熵合金结构及性能的第一性原理模拟预测[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(15): 24080206-10.
[10] 陈怀昊, 刘海博, 邓林红. Ti-25%Nb合金β、α″和ω相的力学性能和键合特征的第一性原理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(15): 23100055-8.
[11] 蒋旭浩, 刘远超, 李耑, 徐一帆, 刘新昊, 李梓硕. 层状堆叠对α-石墨炔热电输运特性的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(12): 24070118-6.
[12] 申笠蒙, 李玺, 张博. 点缺陷对二维锡烯材料结构、电学和磁学性质影响的第一性原理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(12): 24050023-6.
[13] 白雪, 文杜林, 王云杰, 苟杰, 苏欣. 三元混晶AlP1-xAsx(x=0,0.125,0.25,0.375,0.5,0.625,0.75,0.875,1)的电子结构和力学性质的第一性原理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(12): 23080043-5.
[14] 蒋旭浩, 刘远超, 李耑, 徐一帆, 李梓硕, 刘新昊. B、N掺杂对α-石墨炔热电输运特性的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(10): 24050034-7.
[15] 吴迪, 林方敏, 张洪龙, 宋孟, 杨永, 殷兆良, 章小峰. 合金元素对bcc-Cu/NiAl共析出影响的第一性原理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(9): 22070183-6.
[1] Wei ZHOU, Xixi WANG, Yinlong ZHU, Jie DAI, Yanping ZHU, Zongping SHAO. A Complete Review of Cobalt-based Electrocatalysts Applying to Metal-Air Batteries and Intermediate-Low Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 337 -356 .
[2] Dongyong SI, Guangxu HUANG, Chuanxiang ZHANG, Baolin XING, Zehua CHEN, Liwei CHEN, Haoran ZHANG. Preparation and Electrochemical Performance of Humic Acid-based Graphitized Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 368 -372 .
[3] Yunzi LIU,Wei ZHANG,Zhanyong SONG. Technological Advances in Preparation and Posterior Treatment of Metal Nanoparticles-based Conductive Inks[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 391 -397 .
[4] Bingwei LUO,Dabo LIU,Fei LUO,Ye TIAN,Dongsheng CHEN,Haitao ZHOU. Research on the Two Typical Infrared Detection Materials Serving at Low Temperatures: a Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 398 -404 .
[5] Yingke WU,Jianzhong MA,Yan BAO. Advances in Interfacial Interaction Within Polymer Matrix Nanocomposites[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 434 -442 .
[6] Zhengrong FU,Xiuchang WANG,Qinglin JIN,Jun TAN. A Review of the Preparation Techniques for Porous Amorphous Alloys and Their Composites[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 473 -482 .
[7] Fangyuan DONG,Shansuo ZHENG,Mingchen SONG,Yixin ZHANG,Jie ZHENG,Qing QIN. Research Progress of High Performance ConcreteⅡ: Durability and Life Prediction Model[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 496 -502 .
[8] Lixiong GAO,Ruqian DING,Yan YAO,Hui RONG,Hailiang WANG,Lei ZHANG. Microbial-induced Corrosion of Concrete: Mechanism, Influencing Factors,Evaluation Indices, and Proventive Techniques[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 503 -509 .
[9] Ningning HE,Chenxi HOU,Xiaoyan SHU,Dengsheng MA,Xirui LU. Application of SHS Technique for the High-level Radioactive Waste Disposal[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 510 -514 .
[10] Haoran CHEN, Yingdong XIA, Yonghua CHEN, Wei HUANG. Low-dimensional Perovskites: a Novel Candidate Light-harvesting Material for Solar Cells that Combines High Efficiency and Stability[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 1 -11 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed