Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (8): 25040220-6    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25040220
  无机非金属及其复合材料 |
退火工艺下氧化铟锡薄膜光电性能退化规律研究
刘振华1,2, 王一心2, 梅云俭2, 单恒升3,*
1 浙江大学常州工业技术研究院,江苏 常州 213002
2 陕西科技大学材料科学与工程学院,西安 710021
3 陕西科技大学物理与信息科学学院,西安 710021
Study on Photoelectric Degradation of ITO Film Under Annealing
LIU Zhenhua1,2, WANG Yixin2, MEI Yunjian2, SHAN Hengsheng3,*
1 Zhejiang University Changzhou Industrial Technology Research Institute, Changzhou 213002, Jiangsu,China
2 School of Materials Science & Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710021, China
3 School of Physics & Information Science, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710021, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 12262KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 氧化铟锡(ITO)薄膜作为透明电极在光电领域有着极其重要的作用。本工作从实验角度研究了ITO薄膜光电性能的退化行为,着重从元素状态和表面形貌的角度分析了退火温度对ITO薄膜光电性能的影响。利用直流磁控溅射技术在普通透明玻璃上制备了ITO薄膜样品,并采用高分辨X射线衍射(HRXRD),紫外-可见光谱,四探针测试,X射线光电子能谱(XPS)、扫描电子显微术(SEM)对其退化性能进行测试表征。研究表明,在低温段(50、100、200、250 ℃),250 ℃退火样品618 nm处的透射率相比未退火样品降低了4.83%,电学性能基本不变;在高温段(300、500、700、800 ℃),700、800 ℃退火样品618 nm处的透射率相比未退火样品分别下降13.29%、50.28%,电学性能在退火温度高于500 ℃后有明显退化,700 ℃退火样品表面电阻相比未退火样品增加533.21%。随退火温度升高氧空位的数量的变化趋势和透射率降低的变化趋势具有一致性;同时,ITO薄膜表面形貌的退化和电学性能的退化也具有一致性。因此,ITO薄膜中氧空位的增加和表面形貌的恶化导致了其光电性能的退化。本工作的研究有助于揭示退火工艺对ITO薄膜光电性能的影响规律,进而为高质量ITO薄膜电极的制备提供了实验依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘振华
王一心
梅云俭
单恒升
关键词:  ITO薄膜  退火  光电性能  氧空位    
Abstract: Indium tin oxide (ITO) films play an extremely important role as transparent electrodes in the field of optoelectronics. This paper investigates the degradation behavior of the photoelectric properties of ITO thin films under annealing is investigated from an experimental point of view, with a focus on analyzing the internal mechanism of annealing temperature on the degradation of ITO thin film optoelectronic properties from the perspectives of element state and surface morphology. In this study, ITO films were prepared by DC magnetron sputtering on ordinary transparent glass and characterized by means of high-resolution X-ray diffractometry (HRXRD), UV-visible spectroscopy, four-probe test, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed that compared to unannealed samples, the transmittance at 618 nm decreased by 4.83% at 250 ℃ in the low-temperature range (50, 100, 200, 250 ℃), with electrical properties remaining largely unchanged. At high temperatures (300, 500, 700, 800 ℃), the transmittance at 618 nm decreased by 13.29% at 700 ℃ and 50.28% at 800 ℃ compared to the unannealed state. Electrical properties exhibited significant degradation beyond 500 ℃, with surface resistance increasing by 533.21% at 700 ℃ compared to the unannealed state. It was found that increase in the number of oxygen vacancies induced by decreasing transmittance was consistent with the increase of annealing temperature. At the same time, the degradation of surface morphology and electrical pro-perties of ITO thin films were consistent. Therefore, the increase of oxygen vacancies and the deterioration of surface morphology in ITO thin films degraded their optoelectronic properties. This study helps to reveal the laws affecting the optoelectronic properties of ITO thin films under the annealing process, and provides an experimental basis for the preparation of high-quality ITO thin film electrodes.
Key words:  ITO film    annealing    photoelectric property    oxygen vacancy
出版日期:  2026-04-25      发布日期:  2026-05-06
ZTFLH:  O484  
基金资助: 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(202012141)
通讯作者:  * 单恒升,博士,陕西科技大学物理信息与科学学院讲师、硕士研究生导师。主要从事GaN基光电材料与器件、材料与器件可靠性等研究。hsshan@sust.edu.cn   
作者简介:  刘振华,硕士,浙江大学常州工业技术研究院研发部长。主要从事Si基光电材料与器件研究。
引用本文:    
刘振华, 王一心, 梅云俭, 单恒升. 退火工艺下氧化铟锡薄膜光电性能退化规律研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25040220-6.
LIU Zhenhua, WANG Yixin, MEI Yunjian, SHAN Hengsheng. Study on Photoelectric Degradation of ITO Film Under Annealing. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(8): 25040220-6.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25040220  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I8/25040220
1 Wang S H, Hsiao Y J, Fang T H, et al. Microsystem Technologies, 2014, 20, 1181.
2 Ollotu E R, Nyarige J S, Mlyuka N R, et al. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics, 2020, 31(19), 16406.
3 Cai X Y, Wang X W, Zhang Y P, et al. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(18), 180201(in Chinese).
蔡昕旸, 王新伟, 张玉苹, 等. 物理学报, 2018, 67(18), 180201.
4 Yang S, Sun B, Liu Y, et al. Ceramics International, 2020, 46(5), 6342.
5 Zhang J, Jia X, Lian D, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2021, 542, 148555.
6 Djeffal F, Ferhati H, Benhaya A, et al. Superlattices and Microstructures, 2019, 128, 382.
7 Dang M T, Lefebvre J, Wuest J D. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2015, 3(12), 3373.
8 Wang T, Lu K, Xu Z, et al. Crystals, 2021, 11(5), 511.
9 Park J H, Seok H J, Jung S H, et al. Ceramics International, 2021, 47(3), 3149.
10 Liu Y J, Huang C C, Chen T Y, et al. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 2011, 23(15), 1037.
11 Lin C W, Chen H I, Chen T Y, et al. IEEE Transactions on Electronic Devices, 2011, 58(12), 4407.
12 de Cesare G, Caputo D, Tucci M. IEEE Electronic Device Letters, 2012, 33(3), 327.
13 Cheng C W, Lin C Y. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 314, 215.
14 Janarthanan B, Thirunavukkarasu C, Maruthamuthu S, et al. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2021, 1241, 130606.
15 Stranak V, Bogdanowicz R, Sezemsky P, et al. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2018, 335, 126.
16 Ali A H, Hassan Z, Shuhaimi A. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 443, 544.
17 Kim J, Shrestha S, Souri M, et al. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1), 12486.
18 Watson J, Castro G. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics, 2015, 26, 9226.
19 Kato K, Omoto H, Tomioka T, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257(21), 9207.
20 Song S, Yang T, Liu J, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257(16), 7061.
21 Chen Y, Jiang H, Jiang S, et al. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2014, 27, 368.
22 Physica E, Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 2007, 39(1), 69.
23 Hong S J, Kim J W, Han J I. Current Applied Physics, 2011, 11(1), S202.
24 Jiang H, Zhou Y R, Liu F Z, et al. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(9), 097801. (in Chinese)
蒋行, 周玉荣, 刘丰珍, 等. 物理学报, 2016, 65(9), 097801.
25 Ghosh S, Dev B N. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 439, 891.
26 Barraud L, Holman Z C, Badel N, et al. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2013, 115, 151.
27 Kim H, Horwitz J S. Journal of Applied Physics, 2000, 88(10), 6021.
[1] 朱亮, 葛声宏, 沈琪峰, 吴恒, 陶海军. QBe2弹簧管表面黄斑成因分析及调控可行性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(4): 25020087-6.
[2] 陈黎松, 刘金学, 解海涛, 刘志鹏, 宋新宇, 肖阳, 关绍康, 何季麟. 退火工艺对Mg-8Li-3Al-2Zn合金挤压板材显微组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(7): 24020152-5.
[3] 龙海洋, 王涛, 曹俊, 李艳辉, 马汝成, 李晓硕, 王博超, 刘志存, 方姣. LiSbO3掺杂对KNN基无铅压电陶瓷结构及压电性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(23): 24110207-9.
[4] 赵启忠, 李承波, 王春霞, 徐夕, 杨鸿驰, 卢贤业, 闫焱, 孙宜琳, 阮晋德. 特种装备用高强度5A06铝合金板材退火工艺研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(19): 24090208-5.
[5] 岳庆, 李文全, 盛鸿伟, 兰伟. 高温退火增强碳纳米管的生物电化学性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(18): 24080109-5.
[6] 张明虎, 朱文杰, 陆继长, 刘江平, 罗永明. 铜铈催化剂在催化氧化中的研究进展:作用机制及结构性能调控[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(17): 24100145-10.
[7] 邝亚飞, 李永斌, 张艳, 陈峰华, 孙志刚, 胡季帆. SPS烧结Ni-Mn-In合金的马氏体相变和力学性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(9): 23110107-6.
[8] 吴长军, 朱付成, 王权, 彭浩平, 刘亚, 苏旭平. 600~1 000 ℃退火处理对FCC型CoxFeMnNi3-x合金组织演变及耐蚀性的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(18): 23080153-7.
[9] 马云路, 杨劼人, 刘泽栋, 陈瑞润. TiAl金属间化合物定向技术研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(15): 23100177-12.
[10] 贾建, 罗俊鹏, 张浩鹏, 闫婷, 侯琼, 张义文. W元素在新型镍基粉末高温合金中的强化作用[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(15): 23110103-6.
[11] 余志强, 徐佳敏, 韩旭, 陈诚, 曲信儒, 唐锦, 孙子君, 徐智谋. 金红石TiO2纳米线忆阻器的制备及阻变存储机制[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(13): 23020160-7.
[12] 何承绪, 高洁, 毛航银, 马光, 陈新, 祝志祥, 张一航, 胡卓超. 退火温度对耐热型取向硅钢组织与磁性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(8): 21090231-5.
[13] 杜金亮, 杨丽娜, 冯运莉, 李杰, 刘国龙, 吝冉. 温轧40CrMo中厚钢板在退火过程中铁素体与碳化物的协同演变规律[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(8): 21070164-3.
[14] 徐艳茹, 汪燕青, 陈焕明, 马骏, 侯毅. 高温快速退火制备AgNPs/SiO2中保温时间对粒径和形貌的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(7): 21060278-5.
[15] 张冠星, 董宏伟, 钟素娟, 薛行雁, 刘晓芳, 常云峰. BAg30CuZnSn退火过程中组织性能演变[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(6): 21070103-4.
[1] Yanzhen WANG, Mingming CHEN, Chengyang WANG. Preparation and Electrochemical Properties Characterization of High-rate SiO2/C Composite Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 357 -361 .
[2] Yimeng XIA, Shuai WU, Feng TAN, Wei LI, Qingmao WEI, Chungang MIN, Xikun YANG. Effect of Anionic Groups of Cobalt Salt on the Electrocatalytic Activity of Co-N-C Catalysts[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 362 -367 .
[3] Qingshun GUAN,Jian LI,Ruyuan SONG,Zhaoyang XU,Weibing WU,Yi JING,Hongqi DAI,Guigan FANG. A Survey on Preparation and Application of Aerogels Based on Nanomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 384 -390 .
[4] Lijing YANG,Zhengxian LI,Chunliang HUANG,Pei WANG,Jianhua YAO. Producing Hard Material Coatings by Laser-assisted Cold Spray:a Technological Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 412 -417 .
[5] Zhiqiang QIAN,Zhijian WU,Shidong WANG,Huifang ZHANG,Haining LIU,Xiushen YE,Quan LI. Research Progress in Preparation of Superhydrophobic Coatings on Magnesium Alloys and Its Application[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 102 -109 .
[6] Wen XI,Zheng CHEN,Shi HU. Research Progress of Deformation Induced Localized Solid-state Amorphization in Nanocrystalline Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 116 -121 .
[7] Xing LIANG, Guohua GAO, Guangming WU. Research Development of Vanadium Oxide Serving as Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 12 -33 .
[8] Hao ZHANG,Yongde HUANG,Yue GUO,Qingsong LU. Technological and Process Advances in Robotic Friction Stir Welding[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 128 -134 .
[9] Laima LUO, Mengyao XU, Xiang ZAN, Xiaoyong ZHU, Ping LI, Jigui CHENG, Yucheng WU. Progress in Irradiation Damage of Tungsten and Tungsten AlloysUnder Different Irradiation Particles[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 41 -46 .
[10] Fengsen MA,Yan YU,Jie ZHANG,Haibo CHEN. A State-of-the-art Review of Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Biomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 76 -85 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed