Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (9): 25040161-10    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25040161
  无机非金属及其复合材料 |
稳态和动态条件下流态固化土相变及流变特性研究
雷宝锋1,2, 孙居聪1,2, 鞠鹏1,2, 樊恒辉1,2,*, 任冠洲1,2, 谢非含1,2
1 西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院,陕西 杨凌 712100
2 西北农林科技大学岩土工程研究所/特殊岩土博物馆,陕西 杨凌 712100
Phase Transition and Rheological Behavior of Fluidized Stabilized Soil UnderSteady-state and Dynamic Conditions
LEI Baofeng1,2, SUN Jucong1,2, JU Peng1,2, FAN Henghui1,2,*, REN Guanzhou1,2, XIE Feihan1,2
1 College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
2 Institute of Geotechnical Engineering/Museum of Problematic Rock and Soil, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 40387KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 流态固化土是一种高含水的固液混合材料,其在搅拌、运输及泵送等环节均存在不同形式、不同程度的流变行为。为探究其相变特征及流变性能变化规律,采用MCR 92流变仪对不同含水率及固化剂掺量下的流态固化土新拌浆体开展稳态剪切和振幅扫描试验,并结合扫描电镜测试、超景深显微观察和Zeta电位仪探索其作用机理。结果表明:(1)试样随剪切速率增大历经固态-液态的相变过程。表观黏度在低剪切速率(0~15 s-1)下急剧减小,呈现剪切稀化行为;高剪切速率(15~40 s-1)下试样具有Bingham流体特性。(2)随剪切应变增大,试样动剪应力呈先增后减再增大的趋势,储能模量和损耗模量均减小;低剪切应变(0.001%~1%)下损耗因子基本不变,高剪切应变(10%~100%)下损耗因子急剧上升,试样黏性行为增强。(3)随含水率降低和固化剂掺量增多,试样的稳态参数(屈服应力、塑性黏度)和动态参数(最大动剪应力、储能模量、损耗模量及流动点剪应力)总体增大,结构稳定性增强;含水率较高时,固化剂掺量对流变参数的影响减弱。通过粒际作用和双电层理论,能较好解释流态固化土浆料的流变特征及变化机理。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
雷宝锋
孙居聪
鞠鹏
樊恒辉
任冠洲
谢非含
关键词:  流态固化土  流变性能  相态转变  稳态剪切  振幅扫描    
Abstract: Fluidized stabilized soil, a solid-liquid composite material with high water content, exhibits diverse rheological behaviors during mixing, transportation, and pumping processes. To investigate its phase transition characteristics and rheological evolution, steady-state shear and amplitude sweep tests were conducted on fresh fluidized stabilized soil paste with varying water contents and stabilizer dosages using an MCR 92 rheometer. The mechanisms were further elucidated through scanning electron microscopy, super-depth microscopy, and Zeta potential analysis. Key findings include: (1) The paste undergoes a solid-to-liquid phase transition with increasing shear rate. Apparent viscosity decreases sharply at low shear rates (0—15 s-1), demonstrating shear-thinning behavior, while Bingham fluid characteristics dominate at higher shear rates (15—40 s-1). (2) Dynamic shear stress initially increases, then decreases, and subsequently rises with increasing shear strain. Both storage and loss moduli decrease, while the loss factor remains stable at low shear strains (0.001%—1%) but surges at high strains (10%—100%), indicating enhanced viscous behavior. (3) Reduced water content and increased stabilizer dosage amplify steady-state parameters (yield stress, plastic viscosity) and dynamic parameters (maximum dynamic shear stress, storage/loss moduli, flow point stress), thereby improving structural stability. The influence of stabilizer dosage diminishes at higher water contents. Interparticle interactions and electric double-layer theory effectively explain the rheological mechanisms.
Key words:  fluidized stabilized soil    rheological property    phase transition    steady-state shear    amplitude sweep
收稿日期:  2026-05-10      出版日期:  2026-05-10      发布日期:  2026-05-18
ZTFLH:  TU502+.4  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(52079116)
通讯作者:  *樊恒辉,博士,西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院教授、博士研究生导师。目前主要从事特殊土的工程性质及其机理、土壤固化改良技术等方面的研究。yt07@nwsuaf.edu.cn   
作者简介:  雷宝锋,西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院硕士研究生,在樊恒辉研究员的指导下进行研究。目前主要研究领域为土壤固化改良技术。
引用本文:    
雷宝锋, 孙居聪, 鞠鹏, 樊恒辉, 任冠洲, 谢非含. 稳态和动态条件下流态固化土相变及流变特性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(9): 25040161-10.
LEI Baofeng, SUN Jucong, JU Peng, FAN Henghui, REN Guanzhou, XIE Feihan. Phase Transition and Rheological Behavior of Fluidized Stabilized Soil UnderSteady-state and Dynamic Conditions. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(9): 25040161-10.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25040161  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I9/25040161
1 Zhou Y X, Huo M H, Hou L, et al.Materials Reports, 2024, 38(15), 130(in Chinese).
周永祥, 霍孟浩, 侯莉, 等.材料导报, 2024, 38(15), 130.
2 Su Y, Yan N, Bai X Y, et al.Materials Reports, 2024, 38(9), 66 (in Chinese).
苏悦, 闫楠, 白晓宇, 等.材料导报, 2024, 38(9), 66.
3 Cao M L, Xu L, Zhang C.Journal of Chinese Ceramic Society, 2016, 44(2), 246(in Chinese).
曹明莉, 许玲, 张聪.硅酸盐学报, 2016, 44(2), 246.
4 Liang Z C, Zhang A J, Ren W Y, et al.Transations of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(5), 90 (in Chinese).
梁志超, 张爱军, 任文渊, 等.农业工程学报, 2023, 39(5), 90.
5 Markgraf W, Horn R.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2007, 71(3), 851.
6 Khitrov N B, Khaydapova D D.Eurasian Soil Science, 2019, 52, 808.
7 Zhang Y N, Zhou L, Xu C Y, et al.Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 44(4), 143(in Chinese).
张亚楠, 周琳, 许晨阳, 等.水土保持通报, 2024, 44(4), 143.
8 Wang J X, Hu F N, Xu C Y, et al.Transations of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(19), 147(in Chinese).
王金晓, 胡斐南, 许晨阳, 等.农业工程学报, 2021, 37(19), 147.
9 Guo X S, Nian T K, Fan N, et al.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(1), 161(in Chinese).
郭兴森, 年廷凯, 范宁, 等.岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(1), 161.
10 Holthusen D, Peth S, Horn R.Soil and Tillage Research, 2010, 111(1), 75.
11 Pértile P, Holthusen D, Gubiani P I, et al.Scientia Agricola, 2018, 75, 154.
12 Xiao J, Xiang J J, Liu Z H, et al.China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2025, 38(3), 250(in Chinese).
肖杰, 向家骏, 刘朝晖, 等.中国公路学报, 2025, 38(3), 250.
13 Wang D X, Xu W Y.Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(12), 3659 (in Chinese).
王东星, 徐卫亚.岩土力学, 2012, 33(12), 3659.
14 Li Y X, Wang Q, Zhang Q C, et al.Materials Reports, 2023, 37(S1), 156 (in Chinese).
李雅曦, 王琴, 张秋臣, 等.材料导报, 2023, 37(S1), 156.
15 Zhou Y X, Liu Q, Wang Z Q, et al.Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(10), 3548(in Chinese).
周永祥, 刘倩, 王祖琦, 等.硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(10), 3548.
16 Ghezzehei T A, Or D.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2001, 65(3), 624.
17 Yan R F, Yin S H, Liu J M, et al.Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2022, 53(4), 1450(in Chinese).
严荣富, 尹升华, 刘家明, 等.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(4), 1450.
18 Xiao J, Zhou S H, Wang D F, et al.Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2018, 35(8), 2185.
肖佳, 周书会, 王大富, 等.复合材料学报, 2018, 35(8), 2185.
19 Roussel N, Ovarlez G, Garrault S, et al.Cement and Concrete Research, 2012, 42(1), 148.
20 Jeong S W, Urgeles R, Bahk J J, et al.Marine Geophysical Research, 2022, 43(2), 16.
21 Li Y F, Luo H J, Zhang B, et al.Journal of Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, 2023, 41(4), 76.
李允峰, 罗宏杰, 张彪, 等.陕西科技大学学报, 2023, 41(4), 76.
22 Zhang Y J.Effect and mechanism of polymer thickener on properties of fresh cement paste.Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, China, 2022 (in Chinese).
张艺劼.高分子增稠剂对新拌水泥浆体性能的影响及机理研究.硕士学位论文, 北京建筑大学, 2022.
23 Hou Y Y, Zeng X H, Long G C, et al.Materials Reports, 2022, 36(19), 97(in Chinese).
侯悦悦, 曾晓辉, 龙广成, 等.材料导报, 2022, 36(19), 97.
24 Kaya A, Fang H Y.Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1997, 123(2), 169.
25 Liu J S, Zhu K X, Zuo J P, et al.Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2024, 83(8), 335.
26 Fan H H, Zhang L, Yang X J, et al.Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2019, 17(3), 10 (in Chinese).
樊恒辉, 张路, 杨秀娟, 等.水利与建筑工程学报, 2019, 17(3), 10.
[1] 朱萧霄, 郝智利, 竺寅威, 葛苗苗, 孙奥博, 葛春雨. 水泥基纤维流态固化土强度及耐久性试验研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(9): 25020057-10.
[2] 姬语洋, 任冠洲, 鞠鹏, 樊恒辉. 酶促活性氧化镁碳化流态固化土[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25020050-8.
[3] 栗东平, 角远烁, 张凯帆, 翟玉新, 钱增志, 王长龙, 黄天勇, 郑永超, 白云翼, 付兴帅, 田京雷, 孙宇佳. 煤气化渣基流态固化土的制备、性能及水化机理[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 25020118-7.
[4] 周祥胥, 段锋, 朱博. 基于机器学习的SHAP和PDP分析对UHPC流变性能的研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(2): 24100237-8.
[5] 席晗, 孔令云. 紫外老化沥青分子构成变化及其与流变性能和化学组成的构效关系[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(6): 23120008-9.
[6] 张万国, 万贵稳, 乔元辉, 张吉哲, 熊远顺. 生物油基再生剂对老化沥青流变性能恢复规律研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(22): 24110036-8.
[7] 鞠鹏, 雷宝锋, 姬语洋, 樊恒辉. 聚丙烯纤维对流态固化土流变及力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(20): 24080171-8.
[8] 杨正辉, 朱涛, 张东生, 杨秋宁, 毛明杰. 纳米Al2O3和钢纤维复合增强煤矸石-矿渣基地聚合物灌浆材料的性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(15): 24050076-11.
[9] 苏悦, 闫楠, 白晓宇, 付林, 张启军, 梁斌, 王保栋, 王立彬, 张英杰, 张安琪. 预拌流态固化土的工程特性研究进展及应用[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(9): 23070212-7.
[10] 元强, 钟福文, 姚灏, 左胜浩, 谢宗霖, 姜孟杰. 搅拌工艺对高掺量丁苯乳液改性硫铝酸盐水泥性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(9): 22110286-7.
[11] 何印章, 熊坤, 张久鹏, 李哲, 李岩. 基于SARA组分调和沥青流变性能、粘附性自愈合性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(22): 24050184-8.
[12] 刘亚敏, 韩旭晖, 高晨光, 钟国亮. 全程老化沥青中温抗疲劳性能及预测模型研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(21): 23070147-6.
[13] 仲小凡, 王爱国, 于乐乐, 刘开伟, 张祖华, 徐志杰, 孙道胜. 缓凝剂对碱激发胶凝材料凝结时间及流变性能影响的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(19): 23070036-9.
[14] 张吉哲, 郭晨晨, 胡学亮, 何亮, 吕鑫, 樊超, 姚占勇. 富油沥青砂浆再生设计与性能恢复规律研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(24): 22100098-7.
[15] 黄帅, 张文芹, 刘志超, 王发洲. 基于CO2驱动固结的镁渣基3D打印材料的制备与性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(19): 22050050-7.
[1] Huanchun WU, Fei XUE, Chengtao LI, Kewei FANG, Bin YANG, Xiping SONG. Fatigue Crack Initiation Behaviors of Nuclear Power Plant Main Pipe Stainless Steel in Water with High Temperature and High Pressure[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 373 -377 .
[2] Miaomiao ZHANG,Xuyan LIU,Wei QIAN. Research Development of Polypyrrole Electrode Materials in Supercapacitors[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 378 -383 .
[3] Congshuo ZHAO,Zhiguo XING,Haidou WANG,Guolu LI,Zhe LIU. Advances in Laser Cladding on the Surface of Iron Carbon Alloy Matrix[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 418 -426 .
[4] Huaibin DONG,Changqing LI,Xiahui ZOU. Research Progress of Orientation and Alignment of Carbon Nanotubes in Polymer Implemented by Applying Electric Field[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 427 -433 .
[5] Xiaoyu ZHANG,Min XU,Shengzhu CAO. Research Progress on Interfacial Modification of Diamond/Copper Composites with High Thermal Conductivity[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 443 -452 .
[6] Anmin LI,Junzuo SHI,Mingkuan XIE. Research Progress on Mechanical Properties of High Entropy Alloys[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 461 -466 .
[7] Qingqing DING,Qian YU,Jixue LI,Ze ZHANG. Research Progresses of Rhenium Effect in Nickel Based Superalloys[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 110 -115 .
[8] Yaxiong GUO,Qibin LIU,Xiaojuan SHANG,Peng XU,Fang ZHOU. Structure and Phase Transition in CoCrFeNi-M High-entropy Alloys Systems[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 122 -127 .
[9] Changsai LIU,Yujiang WANG,Zhongqi SHENG,Shicheng WEI,Yi LIANG,Yuebin LI,Bo WANG. State-of-arts and Perspectives of Crankshaft Repair and Remanufacture[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 141 -148 .
[10] Xia WANG,Liping AN,Xiaotao ZHANG,Ximing WANG. Progress in Application of Porous Materials in VOCs Adsorption During Wood Drying[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 93 -101 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed