Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (6): 25030235-5    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25030235
  高分子与聚合物基复合材料 |
热风加热自动铺丝成型CF/PEEK的工艺参数优化研究
靳子昂1,2,*, 杨杰1, 孙科1, 孙守政2, 韩振宇2
1 中国船舶集团有限公司系统工程研究院,北京 100094;
2 哈尔滨工业大学机电工程学院,哈尔滨 150001
Optimization of Process Parameters for Hot Air Heating Automated Fiber Placement Forming CF/PEEK
JIN Zi'ang1,2,*, YANG Jie1, SUN Ke1, SUN Shouzheng2, HAN Zhenyu2
1 CSSC Systems Engineering Research Institute, Beijing 100094, China;
2 School of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 27849KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 热风加热自动铺丝成型连续碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮(Carbon fiber reinforced polyether ether ketone,CF/PEEK)高性能热塑性复合材料被广泛应用于航空航天等领域。但是,CF/PEEK由于具有较高的熔点和黏性,对自动铺丝成型工艺具有较大的挑战。本工作采用自研的机器人自动铺丝机,研究了铺丝压力、铺丝速度和模具温度对CF/PEEK层合板的孔隙率、结晶度和弯曲强度的影响规律,并通过响应面法进行了自动铺丝工艺参数优化。结果表明,铺丝压力对孔隙率的影响较大,铺丝速度对结晶度和弯曲强度的影响较大,而模具温度对孔隙率、结晶度和弯曲强度的影响均较小,且优化得到最佳的工艺参数为铺丝压力800 N、模具温度150 ℃、铺丝速度8 mm/s,这为热风加热自动铺丝成型CF/PEEK热塑性复合材料的工程应用提供理论指导。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
靳子昂
杨杰
孙科
孙守政
韩振宇
关键词:  自动铺丝  CF/PEEK  工艺优化  力学性能    
Abstract: A high-performance carbon fiber reinforced polyether ether ketone(CF/PEEK) thermoplastic composite manufactured through hot-air-heated automated fiber placement has been used extensively in aerospace. However, the elevated melting temperature and high melt viscosity of CF/PEEK present considerable processing challenges when utilizing automated fiber placement manufacturing techniques. This study fabricates CF/PEEK laminates using automated fiber placement. The influence of laying pressure, laying speed, and mold temperature on processing-structure-property relationships is systematically examined, focusing on porosity, crystallinity, and flexural strength. Process parameter optimization of the automated fiber placement process uses response surface methodology. The results show that the laying pressure has a greater effect on porosity. The laying speed has a greater impact on crystallinity and flexural strength. While the mold temperature has less effect on porosity, crystallinity, and flexural strength. The optimal processing parameters combine 800 N laying pressure, 150 ℃ mold temperature, and 8 mm/s laying speed, which provides theoretical guidance for the engineering application of CF/PEEK thermoplastic composites formed by hot-air-heated automated fiber placement.
Key words:  automated fiber placement    CF/PEEK    process optimization    mechanical performance
出版日期:  2026-03-25      发布日期:  2026-04-03
ZTFLH:  TB33  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(52205460)
通讯作者:  *靳子昂,博士,中国船舶集团有限公司系统工程研究院工程师。目前主要从事热塑性复合材料工程应用的研究。jinziang24@163.com   
引用本文:    
靳子昂, 杨杰, 孙科, 孙守政, 韩振宇. 热风加热自动铺丝成型CF/PEEK的工艺参数优化研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25030235-5.
JIN Zi'ang, YANG Jie, SUN Ke, SUN Shouzheng, HAN Zhenyu. Optimization of Process Parameters for Hot Air Heating Automated Fiber Placement Forming CF/PEEK. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(6): 25030235-5.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25030235  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I6/25030235
1 Chen J P, Fu K K, Li Y. Composites Part A-Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2021, 140, 106160.
2 Bandaru A K, Clancy G, Peeters D, et al. Composites Structures, 2019, 214, 123.
3 Yassin K, Hojjati M. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 2018, 31(12), 1676.
4 Chen J P, Li Y, Liu W P, et al. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2019, 36(4), 784(in Chinese).
陈吉平, 李岩, 刘卫平, 等. 复合材料学报, 2019, 36(4), 784.
5 Cheng Y, Huan D J, Li Y, et al. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(22), 22190(in Chinese).
成烨, 还大军, 李勇, 等. 材料导报, 2020, 34(22), 22190.
6 Lau K T, Chipara M, Composites Part B-Engineering, 2004, 35(2), 95.
7 Centea T, Grunenfelder L K, Nutt S R. Composites Part A-Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2015, 70, 132.
8 Saenz-Castillo D, Martin M I, Garcia-Martinez V, et al. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2020, 39(19-20), 703.
9 Comer A J, Ray D, Obande W O, et al. Composites Part A-Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2015, 69, 10.
10 Tafreshi O A, Van Hoa S, Shadmehri F, et al. Advanced Manufacturing-Polymer & Composites Science, 2020, 6(2), 86.
11 Wang X F, Zhang Y Y, Zhao C, et al. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 61(14), 83(in Chinese).
王显峰, 张育耀, 赵聪, 等. 航空制造技术, 2018, 61(14), 83.
12 Cao Z L, Guo D K, Lin G J, et al. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(21), 21185(in Chinese).
曹忠亮, 郭登科, 林国军, 等. 材料导报, 2021, 35(21), 21185.
13 Nanami N, Sato T, Ikeda T, et al. In:20th International Conference on Composite Materials(ICCM). Denmark, 2015.
14 Sun H, Godin D, Dong A, et al. In:17th European Conference on Composite Materials. Germany, 2016, pp. 1.
15 Schledjewski R, Latrille M. Composites Science and Technology, 2003, 63(14), 2111.
16 Qureshi Z, Swait T, Scaife R, et al. Composites Part B-Engineering, 2014, 66, 255.
17 Jin Z A, Sun S Z, Joshi S C, et al. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(6), 392.
[1] 高晨宇, 王艳, 张少辉, 李奥阳, 吴杰, 霍钰仁, 卢冠楠. 解胶剂改性废弃碳纤维预浸料及其对混凝土力学及导电性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25050007-11.
[2] 乔木, 赵志伟, 穆柄运, 张涵. MWCNTs对放电等离子烧结制备Ti(C,N)微观结构和综合性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25010106-7.
[3] 胡一雄, 邓方, 张柯康, 孟锦晖, 赵枫, 刘洋. 激光增材制造异构钛合金的力学性能及其变形机理[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25020116-7.
[4] 曹江海, 房卫萍, 罗兵兵, 曾扬铭, 张宇鹏, 王刚. 热等静压加热温度对增材制造Ti6Al4V钛合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25020112-6.
[5] 席歆玥, 张延生, 杨云波, 李焱, 徐宏殷, 王娟, 郑元勋. 绿筑智建:农业生物质纤维强化再生水泥3D打印绿色建材研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 24080146-7.
[6] 高颖, 康亚腾, 景茂武, 王长龙, 吕小博. 基于声发射的聚合物增强水泥稳定碎石损伤特性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25020025-7.
[7] 黄瑞, 王明亮, 赵佳萱, 卢一平. 非金属Si元素对AlNbTiMoHfSi难熔高熵合金组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25040014-6.
[8] 林婕, 张海瑞, 丁昊昊, 姚鑫宇, 姚重阳, 王尧. 飞行器运输振动下GH4169/WC激光熔覆复合涂层摩擦磨损性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(4): 25020059-10.
[9] 施其锋, 杨涛, 齐亮, 郝静妍, 吴惠舒, 李润霞. 利用微量稀土元素提高选区激光熔融成型Al-Si合金的力学性能[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(4): 24120189-6.
[10] 李田, 严佑锐凌, 牛晶晶, 牛赢, 郭强, 周惦武, 张明军. 直线摆动对钢/铝激光搭接焊接头组织性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 24120236-7.
[11] 毕晓勤, 杨开放, 郑泽远, 崔熙雅, 付莹, 徐琴. T6热处理对Al-Mg-Zn-xSc系铝合金组织演变和力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 25010051-6.
[12] 张中平, 董秀萍, 黄明吉. 金属橡胶研究进展与展望[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 25030115-12.
[13] 李凌锋, 司瑶晨, 王瑞达, 刘广华, 赵世贤, 李红霞, 李虹屿. 掺CeO2稀土钽酸盐陶瓷材料的性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(2): 24110106-5.
[14] 张丽娇, 祝弘滨, 曲华, 王振民. 电弧增材制造技术研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(2): 24120065-10.
[15] 孟嘉乐, 卢春成, 王恩会, 张雪良, 石英男, 贾建, 侯新梅. 陶瓷颗粒增强镍基粉末高温合金的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(2): 25020153-8.
[1] Yanzhen WANG, Mingming CHEN, Chengyang WANG. Preparation and Electrochemical Properties Characterization of High-rate SiO2/C Composite Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 357 -361 .
[2] Yimeng XIA, Shuai WU, Feng TAN, Wei LI, Qingmao WEI, Chungang MIN, Xikun YANG. Effect of Anionic Groups of Cobalt Salt on the Electrocatalytic Activity of Co-N-C Catalysts[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 362 -367 .
[3] Qingshun GUAN,Jian LI,Ruyuan SONG,Zhaoyang XU,Weibing WU,Yi JING,Hongqi DAI,Guigan FANG. A Survey on Preparation and Application of Aerogels Based on Nanomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 384 -390 .
[4] Wen XI,Zheng CHEN,Shi HU. Research Progress of Deformation Induced Localized Solid-state Amorphization in Nanocrystalline Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 116 -121 .
[5] Laima LUO, Mengyao XU, Xiang ZAN, Xiaoyong ZHU, Ping LI, Jigui CHENG, Yucheng WU. Progress in Irradiation Damage of Tungsten and Tungsten AlloysUnder Different Irradiation Particles[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 41 -46 .
[6] Fengsen MA,Yan YU,Jie ZHANG,Haibo CHEN. A State-of-the-art Review of Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Biomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 76 -85 .
[7] Huimin PAN,Jun FU,Qingxin ZHAO. Sulfate Attack Resistance of Concrete Subjected to Disturbance in Hardening Stage[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 282 -287 .
[8] Acidifier at High Temperature SiO2Bearing, , , , . Research on Stabilization of Free CaO in Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag with[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 301 -306 .
[9] Ziming LIU,Huaxin CHEN,Rui XIONG,Yongdan WANG,Xiaowen WANG. Experimental Investigation on Properties of Steel Wool Fiber/Brucite Fiber Reinforced Asphalt Mortar[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 295 -300 .
[10] ZHANG Hehe, LI Fangfang, WANG Haiyan, PENG Zhiguang, TANG Yougen. Iron Electrode Derived from Fe/Co-MOF and Its Electrochemical Performance for Nickel-Iron Batteries[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(5): 719 -724 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed