Optimization of Process Parameters for Hot Air Heating Automated Fiber Placement Forming CF/PEEK
JIN Zi'ang1,2,*, YANG Jie1, SUN Ke1, SUN Shouzheng2, HAN Zhenyu2
1 CSSC Systems Engineering Research Institute, Beijing 100094, China; 2 School of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Abstract: A high-performance carbon fiber reinforced polyether ether ketone(CF/PEEK) thermoplastic composite manufactured through hot-air-heated automated fiber placement has been used extensively in aerospace. However, the elevated melting temperature and high melt viscosity of CF/PEEK present considerable processing challenges when utilizing automated fiber placement manufacturing techniques. This study fabricates CF/PEEK laminates using automated fiber placement. The influence of laying pressure, laying speed, and mold temperature on processing-structure-property relationships is systematically examined, focusing on porosity, crystallinity, and flexural strength. Process parameter optimization of the automated fiber placement process uses response surface methodology. The results show that the laying pressure has a greater effect on porosity. The laying speed has a greater impact on crystallinity and flexural strength. While the mold temperature has less effect on porosity, crystallinity, and flexural strength. The optimal processing parameters combine 800 N laying pressure, 150 ℃ mold temperature, and 8 mm/s laying speed, which provides theoretical guidance for the engineering application of CF/PEEK thermoplastic composites formed by hot-air-heated automated fiber placement.
靳子昂, 杨杰, 孙科, 孙守政, 韩振宇. 热风加热自动铺丝成型CF/PEEK的工艺参数优化研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25030235-5.
JIN Zi'ang, YANG Jie, SUN Ke, SUN Shouzheng, HAN Zhenyu. Optimization of Process Parameters for Hot Air Heating Automated Fiber Placement Forming CF/PEEK. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(6): 25030235-5.
1 Chen J P, Fu K K, Li Y. Composites Part A-Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2021, 140, 106160. 2 Bandaru A K, Clancy G, Peeters D, et al. Composites Structures, 2019, 214, 123. 3 Yassin K, Hojjati M. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 2018, 31(12), 1676. 4 Chen J P, Li Y, Liu W P, et al. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2019, 36(4), 784(in Chinese). 陈吉平, 李岩, 刘卫平, 等. 复合材料学报, 2019, 36(4), 784. 5 Cheng Y, Huan D J, Li Y, et al. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(22), 22190(in Chinese). 成烨, 还大军, 李勇, 等. 材料导报, 2020, 34(22), 22190. 6 Lau K T, Chipara M, Composites Part B-Engineering, 2004, 35(2), 95. 7 Centea T, Grunenfelder L K, Nutt S R. Composites Part A-Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2015, 70, 132. 8 Saenz-Castillo D, Martin M I, Garcia-Martinez V, et al. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2020, 39(19-20), 703. 9 Comer A J, Ray D, Obande W O, et al. Composites Part A-Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2015, 69, 10. 10 Tafreshi O A, Van Hoa S, Shadmehri F, et al. Advanced Manufacturing-Polymer & Composites Science, 2020, 6(2), 86. 11 Wang X F, Zhang Y Y, Zhao C, et al. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 61(14), 83(in Chinese). 王显峰, 张育耀, 赵聪, 等. 航空制造技术, 2018, 61(14), 83. 12 Cao Z L, Guo D K, Lin G J, et al. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(21), 21185(in Chinese). 曹忠亮, 郭登科, 林国军, 等. 材料导报, 2021, 35(21), 21185. 13 Nanami N, Sato T, Ikeda T, et al. In:20th International Conference on Composite Materials(ICCM). Denmark, 2015. 14 Sun H, Godin D, Dong A, et al. In:17th European Conference on Composite Materials. Germany, 2016, pp. 1. 15 Schledjewski R, Latrille M. Composites Science and Technology, 2003, 63(14), 2111. 16 Qureshi Z, Swait T, Scaife R, et al. Composites Part B-Engineering, 2014, 66, 255. 17 Jin Z A, Sun S Z, Joshi S C, et al. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(6), 392.