Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (9): 25040084-7    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25040084
  无机非金属及其复合材料 |
基于道路服役年限下多循环再生混凝土力学强度损伤演变及机理探究
索智*, 宫臣, 野堯, 赵子豪, 丁习周, 李加禾, 徐士杰
北京建筑大学土木与交通工程学院,北京 102600
Investigation on the Damage Evolution of Mechanical Strength and Mechanisms in Multi-cycle Recycled Concrete Under Road Service Duration
SUO Zhi*, GONG Chen, YE Yao, ZHAO Zihao, DING Xizhou, LI Jiahe, XU Shijie
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102600, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 18909KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为分析水泥混凝土循环再生过程中骨料性能衰减机理及其对再生混凝土性能的影响规律,采用加速碳化、持续荷载及冻融循环的耦合作用方式,模拟北京地区道面混凝土在服役年限内的既有损伤,并回收制备成多次循环再生骨料混凝土(RAC)试件;通过抗压性能、劈裂抗拉强度及抗压弹性模量测试不同配合比下一次循环再生混凝土(RAC1)、二次循环再生混凝土(RAC2)和三次循环再生混凝土(RAC3)的力学性能;分析再生混凝土骨料的成分组成和微观形貌,探究再生骨料微观特征与力学性能间的关联性。结果表明:随着再生次数的增加,再生骨料表面附着的砂浆层含量逐渐增加,骨料孔隙率显著增大(RAC3较原生粗骨料(RAC0)增大一倍),原始骨料特征被覆盖;同时,Si、Al元素在骨料表面浓度提升(三次循环分别增加24.6%、5.51%),但未检测到新物相生成,表明性能衰减主要源于物理性结构劣化而非化学变化。力学性能测试显示,再生次数与抗压强度(RAC3较原生下降21.6%)、劈裂抗拉强度(下降17.8%)及弹性模量(下降26.4%)呈线性梯度下降趋势,50%替代率工况下三次循环仍满足C40强度要求,且性能损失率最低。研究揭示骨料-旧砂浆界面过渡区(ITZ)增厚导致的应力集中效应是力学性能劣化的主导机制,建议再生过程中骨料替代率控制在50%以内且循环次数不超过三次,以满足水泥混凝土道路对骨料性能的要求。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
索智
宫臣
野堯
赵子豪
丁习周
李加禾
徐士杰
关键词:  再生混凝土  再生粗骨料  多次循环再生  力学性能  微观分析    
Abstract: This work investigated the performance degradation mechanisms of recycled aggregates in cement concrete through multi-cycle regeneration processes and their impacts on the mechanical behavior of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). A synergistic aging protocol combining accelerated carbonation, sustained loading, and freeze-thaw cycles was employed simulate the cumulative damage in pavement concrete under Beijing’s operational conditions. Specimens with 1—3 regeneration cycles (RAC1—RAC3) were systematically evaluated through compressive strength tests, splitting tensile strength measurements, and elastic modulus determinations. Quantitative microstructural characterization via XRF and SEM-EDS revealed progressive accumulation of mortar layers on aggregate surfaces. Porosity doubled in RAC3 compared to virgin aggregates (RAC0), while elemental mapping showed 24.6% and 5.51% enrichment of Si and Al respectively, though XRD analysis confirmed that no new chemical phases were formed. Mechanical degradation exhibits linear correlations with regeneration cycles: 21.6% reduction in compressive strength, 17.8% in tensile strength, and 26.4% in elastic modulus for RAC3. Critical thresholds were identified through parametric analysis: specimens with 50% replacement ratio maintained C40 compliance even after three cycles, demonstrating minimized performance loss. The fundamental mechanism was attributed to stress concentration effects from the thickened interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between aggregates and adhered mortar. These findings propose an optimized regeneration protocol limiting replacement ratios to 50% and regeneration cycles to three, balancing resource efficiency with structural requirements for pavement applications.
Key words:  recycled concrete    recycled coarse aggregate    multiple-cycle recycling    mechanical property    microstructural analysis
收稿日期:  2026-05-10      出版日期:  2026-05-10      发布日期:  2026-05-18
ZTFLH:  U414  
基金资助: 国家重点研发计划(2022YFC3803405)
通讯作者:  *索智,北京建筑大学教授、博士研究生导师。长期从事绿色道路新材料开发及低碳建养技术方面的科研、教学与实践。suozhi@bucea.edu.cn   
引用本文:    
索智, 宫臣, 野堯, 赵子豪, 丁习周, 李加禾, 徐士杰. 基于道路服役年限下多循环再生混凝土力学强度损伤演变及机理探究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(9): 25040084-7.
SUO Zhi, GONG Chen, YE Yao, ZHAO Zihao, DING Xizhou, LI Jiahe, XU Shijie. Investigation on the Damage Evolution of Mechanical Strength and Mechanisms in Multi-cycle Recycled Concrete Under Road Service Duration. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(9): 25040084-7.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25040084  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I9/25040084
1 Ding Y, Zhao J, Liu J W, et al.Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 293, 126144.
2 Cai L, Zhang P.Energy Conservation & Environmental, 2024(7), 59 (in Chinese).
蔡立奇, 张鹏.节能与环保, 2024(7), 59.
3 An L, Chen W, Zhao T.Materials Reports, 2024, 38(S2), 257 (in Chinese).
安亮, 谌文武, 赵天宇, 等.材料导报, 2024, 38(S2), 257.
4 Marie I, Quiasrawi H.Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 37, 243.
5 Thomas C, De Brito J, Cimentada A, et al.Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 245, 118843.
6 Salesa Á, Pérez-Benedicto J A, Colorado-Aranguren D, et al.Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 141, 248.
7 Salesa Á, Esteban L M, Lopez-Julian P L, et al.Materials, 2022, 15(16), 5714.
8 Salesa Á, Pérez-Benedicto J Á, Esteban L M, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 153, 364.
9 Zhu P, Hao Y, Liu H, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 210, 442.
10 Zhu P, Liu W.Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater, 2018, 33(5), 1113 (in Chinese).
朱平华, 刘文英.武汉理工大学学报(材料学版), 2018, 33(5), 1113
11 Zhu P, Zhang X, Wu J, et al.Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater, 2016, 31(5), 989 (in Chinese).
朱平华, Zhang X, 伍君勇, 等.武汉理工大学学报(材料学版), 2016, 31(5), 989.
12 Belabbas O, Bouziadi F, Boulekbache B, et al.Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 89, 109333.
13 Faury J, Caquot A.Le béton, third ed, Dunod, Paris, France, 1958.
14 Fei D, Yan Y, Liangcai C, et al.Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, 2017(1), 2050285.
15 Abreu V, Evangelista L, De Brito J.Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 188, 480.
16 Sun B, Mao S, Wang J, et al.Building Structure, 2019, 49(9), 111 (in Chinese).
孙彬, 毛诗洋, 王景贤, 等.建筑结构, 2019, 49(9), 111.
17 Li X, Fu Z, Wang H.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(2), 169 (in Chinese).
李雪峰, 付智, 王华牢.农业工程学报, 2018, 34(2), 169.
18 Sultana A, Roknuzzaman M, Civil Engineering Beyond Limits, 2021, 1, 12.
19 Casuccio M, Torrijos M C, Giaccio G, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2008, 22(7), 1500.
20 Pedro D, De Brito J, Evangelista L.Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 154, 294.
21 Zhu X, Zhang Y, Chen L, et al.Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 139, 105004.
22 Gao S, Guo J, Zhu Y, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 408, 133592.
23 Wang Y, Zhang W, Wang J, et al.Cement and Concrete Composites, 2024, 154, 105777.
24 Thomas C, De Brito J, Gil V, et al.Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 166, 171.
25 Mandolia R, Kalla P, Nagar R, et al.Materials Letters, 2025, 381, 137779.
[1] 杨至高, 谢小林, 江洪流, 叶亮亮, 许旺达. 碳纤维化学接枝MXene:碳纤维/环氧树脂复合材料的界面强化与力学性能提升[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(9): 25040063-7.
[2] 欧阳景豪, 吴婷婷, 李瑶, 杨凤, 李东翰. 油胺对天然橡胶/白炭黑复合材料结构与性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(9): 25030241-7.
[3] 王思莹, 刘文欢, 郝毅, 常宁, 焦小玉, 李辉. 热活化赤泥多固废基胶凝材料的性能优化及水化特性[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25030240-11.
[4] 刘向, 朱海峰, 张东生, 毛明杰, 杨秋宁. 3D打印参数对地聚物混凝土力学性能的影响及深度学习预测模型[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25030205-9.
[5] 戴耀南, 潘凌峰, 徐逸恒, 丁珮珊, 郑小涛. 核级316型不锈钢高温液钠腐蚀效应的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25040054-11.
[6] 张家傅, 单雪影, 黄其鑫, 刁玉璇, 李锦春. 含磷低分子量聚苯醚的制备及在环氧树脂阻燃中的应用[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25040078-7.
[7] 张思凡, 罗威, 方媛, 刘毅, 朱建锋. 固溶型MAX相材料的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(7): 25030103-13.
[8] 高晨宇, 王艳, 张少辉, 李奥阳, 吴杰, 霍钰仁, 卢冠楠. 解胶剂改性废弃碳纤维预浸料及其对混凝土力学及导电性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25050007-11.
[9] 孙畅, 罗奕敬, 王宗昊, 赵海烨, 刘琼, 潘峰. 再生混凝土-超高性能混凝土不同粗糙程度后浇节点试件剪力传递机理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 24110017-9.
[10] 乔木, 赵志伟, 穆柄运, 张涵. MWCNTs对放电等离子烧结制备Ti(C,N)微观结构和综合性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25010106-7.
[11] 胡一雄, 邓方, 张柯康, 孟锦晖, 赵枫, 刘洋. 激光增材制造异构钛合金的力学性能及其变形机理[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25020116-7.
[12] 曹江海, 房卫萍, 罗兵兵, 曾扬铭, 张宇鹏, 王刚. 热等静压加热温度对增材制造Ti6Al4V钛合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25020112-6.
[13] 靳子昂, 杨杰, 孙科, 孙守政, 韩振宇. 热风加热自动铺丝成型CF/PEEK的工艺参数优化研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25030235-5.
[14] 席歆玥, 张延生, 杨云波, 李焱, 徐宏殷, 王娟, 郑元勋. 绿筑智建:农业生物质纤维强化再生水泥3D打印绿色建材研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 24080146-7.
[15] 高颖, 康亚腾, 景茂武, 王长龙, 吕小博. 基于声发射的聚合物增强水泥稳定碎石损伤特性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25020025-7.
[1] Yanzhen WANG, Mingming CHEN, Chengyang WANG. Preparation and Electrochemical Properties Characterization of High-rate SiO2/C Composite Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 357 -361 .
[2] Yimeng XIA, Shuai WU, Feng TAN, Wei LI, Qingmao WEI, Chungang MIN, Xikun YANG. Effect of Anionic Groups of Cobalt Salt on the Electrocatalytic Activity of Co-N-C Catalysts[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 362 -367 .
[3] Qingshun GUAN,Jian LI,Ruyuan SONG,Zhaoyang XU,Weibing WU,Yi JING,Hongqi DAI,Guigan FANG. A Survey on Preparation and Application of Aerogels Based on Nanomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 384 -390 .
[4] Lijing YANG,Zhengxian LI,Chunliang HUANG,Pei WANG,Jianhua YAO. Producing Hard Material Coatings by Laser-assisted Cold Spray:a Technological Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 412 -417 .
[5] Zhiqiang QIAN,Zhijian WU,Shidong WANG,Huifang ZHANG,Haining LIU,Xiushen YE,Quan LI. Research Progress in Preparation of Superhydrophobic Coatings on Magnesium Alloys and Its Application[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 102 -109 .
[6] Wen XI,Zheng CHEN,Shi HU. Research Progress of Deformation Induced Localized Solid-state Amorphization in Nanocrystalline Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 116 -121 .
[7] Xing LIANG, Guohua GAO, Guangming WU. Research Development of Vanadium Oxide Serving as Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 12 -33 .
[8] Hao ZHANG,Yongde HUANG,Yue GUO,Qingsong LU. Technological and Process Advances in Robotic Friction Stir Welding[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 128 -134 .
[9] Laima LUO, Mengyao XU, Xiang ZAN, Xiaoyong ZHU, Ping LI, Jigui CHENG, Yucheng WU. Progress in Irradiation Damage of Tungsten and Tungsten AlloysUnder Different Irradiation Particles[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 41 -46 .
[10] Fengsen MA,Yan YU,Jie ZHANG,Haibo CHEN. A State-of-the-art Review of Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Biomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 76 -85 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed