Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (8): 25040054-11    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25040054
  金属与金属基复合材料 |
核级316型不锈钢高温液钠腐蚀效应的研究进展
戴耀南, 潘凌峰, 徐逸恒, 丁珮珊, 郑小涛*
武汉工程大学机电工程学院,磷矿及其共伴生资源绿色高效开发利用全国重点实验室,武汉 430205
Research Progress on Corrosion of Nuclear-grade 316 Stainless Steel in High-temperature Liquid Sodium
DAI Yaonan, PAN Lingfeng, XU Yiheng, DING Peishan, ZHENG Xiaotao*
State Key Laboratory of Green and Efficient Development of Phosphorus Resources, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 31892KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 液态钠冷快堆(SFR)作为第四代快中子堆的首选技术,其堆芯关键构件主要采用核级316型不锈钢材料。为实现SFR超过60年的超长设计寿命目标,深入研究核级316型不锈钢在高温液钠环境下的腐蚀机理具有重要工程意义。本文系统梳理了核级316型不锈钢在高温液态钠环境中的腐蚀动力学机制,揭示了材料表面钝化膜演化规律与元素偏析特征对腐蚀进程的影响机理。在此基础上,定量表征了材料在长期服役条件下的力学性能退化规律,重点总结了高温液态钠环境诱发材料蠕变-疲劳交互损伤的微观作用机制及基于多因素耦合的腐蚀速率预测模型。针对现有实验方法的局限性,建议构建钠腐蚀等效加速实验体系的技术方案,通过温度-时间-应力多参数协同调控实现加速劣化过程的等效模拟,研究成果可为建立适用于SFR堆芯构件的钠腐蚀评价标准体系提供数据与理论支撑。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
戴耀南
潘凌峰
徐逸恒
丁珮珊
郑小涛
关键词:  SFR  核级316型不锈钢  腐蚀动力学机制  力学性能  蠕变-疲劳交互损伤    
Abstract: As a preferred technology for Generation IV fast neutron reactors, the sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) primarily utilizes nuclear-grade 316 stainless steel for its core critical components. To achieve the ultra-long design life target of over 60 years for SFRs, in-depth investigations into the corrosion behavior mechanisms of nuclear-grade 316 stainless steel in high-temperature liquid sodium environments hold significant engineering importance. This summary systematically reviews the corrosion kinetic mechanisms of nuclear-grade 316 stainless steel in high-temperature liquid sodium, elucidating the influences of evolutionary behavior of the passive film and elemental segregation characteristics on the corrosion progression. Based on these findings, it quantitatively characterizes the degradation laws of mechanical properties under long-term service conditions, with a particular focus on summarizing the microscopic mechanisms of creep-fatigue interaction damage induced by high-temperature liquid sodium environments in the material, as well as developing a multi-factor coupled corrosion rate prediction model. In response to the limitations of existing experimental methods, this paper proposes a technical scheme for constructing an equivalent accelerated sodium corrosion experimental system. By coordinating the regulation of multi-parameters (temperature, time, stress), this system aims to achieve equivalent simulation of the accelerated degradation process. The research outcomes are expected to provide theoretical and data-driven foundations for establishing a so-dium corrosion evaluation standard system tailored to SFR core components.
Key words:  SFR    nuclear-grade 316 stainless steel    corrosion kinetic mechanism    mechanical property    creep-fatigue interaction damage
出版日期:  2026-04-25      发布日期:  2026-05-06
ZTFLH:  TL34  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(52275159);湖北省自然科学基金创新研究团队项目(JCZRQT202600096);湖北省教育厅优秀中青年科技创新团队项目(T2024008);湖北省教育厅科学研究计划青年人才项目(Q20241513);化工装备强化与本质安全湖北省重点实验室开放课题(2025KA06)
通讯作者:  * 郑小涛,博士,博士研究生导师。主要从事高温化工装备、高温核电装备、高效化工装备、高压/超高压承压设备等方面的研究。xiaotaozheng@163.com   
作者简介:  戴耀南,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师。主要从事高温结构完整性、深度学习等方面的研究。
引用本文:    
戴耀南, 潘凌峰, 徐逸恒, 丁珮珊, 郑小涛. 核级316型不锈钢高温液钠腐蚀效应的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25040054-11.
DAI Yaonan, PAN Lingfeng, XU Yiheng, DING Peishan, ZHENG Xiaotao. Research Progress on Corrosion of Nuclear-grade 316 Stainless Steel in High-temperature Liquid Sodium. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(8): 25040054-11.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25040054  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I8/25040054
1 Aodi Sun, Muping Li, Shuhan Yang, et al. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2024, 172, 105214.
2 Sofu T. Nuclear Engineering & Technology, 2015, 47(3), 227.
3 Sipeng Du, Qingmin Zhang, Yaodong Sang, et al. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2025, 215, 111252.
4 Hideki Kamide, Tai Asayama, Takashi Wakai, et al. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2024, 421, 113062.
5 Abram T, Ion S. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(12), 4323.
6 Yang H Y, Zhou P D, Wang M Z, et al. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2025, 59(S1), 1(in Chinese).
杨红义, 周培德, 王明政, 等. 原子能科学技术, 2025, 59(S1), 1.
7 Katarzyna Kiegiel, Dagmara Chmielewska-Ś mietanko, Irena Herdzik-Koniecko, et al. Energies, 2025, 18(3), 622.
8 Qin B, Lu S H, Liu S H, et al. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(4), 139(in Chinese).
秦博, 鲁盛会, 刘思涵, 等. 材料导报, 2025, 39(4), 139.
9 Shohanul Islam. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2025, 215, 111241.
10 Fan Mingjing, Wang Haoze, Zhang Yu, et al. Fuel, 2024, 371, 132189.
11 Wang Q, Liu C, Li D, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(33), 14777.
12 Allibert M, Delpech S, Gerardin D, et al. Homogeneous molten salt reactors (MSRs): The molten salt fast reactor (MSFR) concept, Woodhead Publishing, 2023, pp. 231.
13 Duo Dong, Jingyu Guan, Ziqi Wang, et al. Energy, 2025, 314, 134253.
14 Takashi Onizawa, Ryuta Hashidate. Mechanical Engineering Journal, 2019, 6(1), 18.
15 Vaibhav Sinha, Mertcan Atikler, Matthew Mileski. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2024, 422, 113124.
16 Amruta P, Balaguru S. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 137, 106161.
17 Barkia B, Courouau J L, Perrin E, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2018, 507, 15.
18 Ravi S, Laha K, Mathew M D, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2012, 427(1-3), 174.
19 Chun E, Saida K. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2018, 505, 212.
20 Zhang H L, Zhu M D, Sun X Y, et al. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2021, 42(4), 270 (in Chinese).
张宏亮, 朱明冬, 孙晓阳, 等. 核动力工程, 2021, 42(4), 270.
21 Tian H, Fan L, Li Y, et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2021, 894, 115368.
22 Pandey G K, Ramdasu D, Padmakumar G, et al. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2013, 262, 63.
23 Choe J, Batra C, Kriventsev V, et al. The European Physical Journal Conferences, 2021, 247(12), 10008.
24 Kaneko S. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015, 138(3), 1775.
25 Gudikandula, Sravanthi, Kumar, et al. Sadhana-Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences, 2025, 50(1), 32.
26 Le Zhao, Jiawei Du, Jingyao Wang, et al. Journal of Energy Storage, 2025, 117, 116161.
27 Raiman S S, Kurley J M, Sulejmanovic D, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2022, 561, 153551.
28 Gnanasekaran T, Dayal R K, Raj B. Nuclear Corrosion Science and Engineering, DOI:10.1533/9780857095343.3.301.
29 Qian K, Chen B, Zhao P, et al. ISIJ International, 2019, 59(12), 2220.
30 Hoejun H, Yoon-Cheol P, Chung-Yun K, et al. Corrosion science, 2018, 144(9), 35.
31 Rivollier M, Courouau J L, Tabarant M, et al. Corrosion Science, 2020, 165, 108399.
32 Sivai B N, Thyagarajan K, Shaikh H, et al. Metallurgical & Materials Transactions A, 2012, 43(2), 561.
33 Nikhil V, Sateesh N, Venkatesh P, et al. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023, 2754(1), 1.
34 Ji-Hyun Yoon, Young-Chun Kim, Seokmin Hong, et al. Korean Journal of Metals and Materials, 2015, 53(10), 681.
35 Takashi Onizawa, Ryuta Hashidate. Mechanical Engineering Journal, 2019, 1(6), 1.
36 Brissonneau L. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2012, 423(1-3), 67.
37 Feria F, Herranz L E. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2017, 97, 90.
38 Zhang D H, Wang S P, Dai Z W. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2024, 44(5), 980 (in Chinese).
张东辉, 王松平, 代智文. 核科学与工程, 2024, 44(5), 980.
39 Audora R D, Kamonsuangkasem K, Ahmadi H, et al. In:Engineering Physics International Conference 2021-EPIC 2021. Yogyakarta, 2023, pp. 1.
40 Bharasi N S, Pujar M G, Das C R, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2019, 516, 84.
41 Sivai B N, Pujar M G, Thyagarajan K, et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2015, 46, 6065.
42 Sivai Bharasi N, Krishna N G, Shankar A R, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2022, 567, 153830.
43 Shin S H, Lee J, Kim J H, et al. Corrosion Science, 2016, 112, 611.
44 Pillai S R, Barasi N S, Khatak H S, et al. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2000, 9, 98.
45 Yu C Y, Park J S, Jung H G, et al. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015, 8(7), 2019.
46 Schmucker E, Petitjean C, Martinelli L, et al. Corrosion Science, 2016, 111, 467.
47 Liu Q, Sun H, Yin H, et al. Corrosion Science, 2019, 160, 108174.
48 Schindelholz E J, Cong H, Jove-Colon C F, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 276, 194.
49 Hong X, Chen J, Gu J, et al. Packaging Technology and Science, 2022, 35(4), 327.
50 Liu T, Xia S, Du D, et al. Materials Letters, 2019, 234, 201.
51 Ohtsuka S, Tanno T, Oka H, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2018, 505, 44.
52 Chen T X, Liao J J, Qiu S Y. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(15), 24050203(in Chinese).
陈天旭, 廖京京, 邱绍宇. 材料导报, 2025, 39(15), 24050203.
53 Brittan A M, Mahaffey J T, Colgan N E, et al. Corrosion Science, 2020, 169, 108639.
54 Zhang Q, Yu M, Zhang B, et al. Materials Today Communications, 2022, 33, 104647.
55 Pillai S R, Khatak H S, Gnanamoorthy J B. Materials Transactions, 1998, 39(3), 370.
56 Bharasi N S, Thyagarajan K, Shaikh H, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2008, 377(2), 378.
57 Bhatt N P, Borgstedt H U. Materials and Corrosion, 1988, 39(3), 115.
58 Asayama T, Nagae Y, Wakai T, et al. In: ASME 2014 Symposium on Elevated Temperature Application of Materials for Fossil, Nuclear, and Petrochemical Industrie Seattle. Washington, 2014, pp. 296.
59 Romedenne M, Rouillard F, Hamon D, et al. Corrosion Science, 2019, 159, 108147.
60 Severo F S, Scheuer C J, Cardoso R P, et al. Wear, 2019, 428, 162.
61 Kim E J, Kumar P R, Gossage Z T, et al. Chemical Science, 2022, 13(21), 6121.
62 Guo X, Nan N, Liu B, et al. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2022, 198, 104649.
63 Garcia J E M, Petesch C, Lebarbé T, et al. Mechanical Engineering Journal, 2020, 7(4), 20-00052.
64 Mathew M D. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2010, 63(2-3), 151.
65 Yin Y, Rumman R, Sarvghad M, et al. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2023, 251, 112170.
66 Poonguzhali A, Anita T, Sivaibharasi N, et al. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2014, 67, 177.
67 Miranda G, Faria S, Bartolomeu F, et al. Materials Science and Engineering, A, 2016, 657, 43.
68 Desu R K, Krishnamurthy H N, Balu A, et al. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2016, 5(1), 13.
69 Skelton R P, Horton C A P. Materials at High Temperatures, 1999, 16(2), 87.
70 Nakada N, Ito H, Matsuoka Y, et al. Acta Materialia, 2010, 58(3), 895.
71 Eaton-Mckay J, Yan K, Callaghan M D, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2022, 558, 153329.
72 Yang Li, Zeng Xiangguo, Kou Huaqin, et al. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2024, 208, 105127.
73 Zhiyuan Ma, Zhuojia Fu, Haofeng Chen, et al. Engineering Structures, 2024, 308, 118005.
74 Sambuu O, Hoang V K, Nishiyama J, et al. Nuclear Science & Engineering, 2022, 196(3), 322.
75 Pan Lingfeng, Gong Cheng, Xu Feng, et al. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2024, 424, 113288.
76 Ukai S, Mizuta S, Kaito T, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2000, 278(2-3), 320.
77 Hajra R N, Rai A K, Tripathy H P, et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, 689, 829.
78 Song Y, Pan Z, Li Y, et al. Materials Characterization, 2022, 186, 111806.
79 Ravi S, Laha K, Mathew M D, et al. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 55, 823.
80 Ravi S, Laha K, Sakthy S, et al. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2014, 267, 1.
81 Date S, Ishikawa H, Otani T, et al. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2008, 238(2), 353.
82 Natesan K, Li M, Chopra O K, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2009, 392(2), 243.
83 Vela Murali, Mathew M D, Bhanu S R K. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2010, 63(2), 635.
84 Houssin D, Dujardin T, Cameron R, et al. Technology road-map nuclear energy,Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2015.
85 Akashi Onizawa, Yuji Nagae, Shigeru Takaya, et al. In:ASME 2013 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Paris, 2013.
86 Tadashi Suzuki, Isao Mutoh. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 1988, 152(2-3), 343.
87 Maruyama A, Nomura S, Kawai M,et al. Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan/Atomic Energy Society of Japan, 1984, 26(4), 327.
88 The State Committee of the USSR for Use of Atomic Power. Rules and regulations for atomic power engineering,Energoatomizdat Publishing House, Moscow, 1989.
89 Vaidehi Ganesan, Vedaraman Ganesan. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 1998, 256(1), 69.
90 Sudha C, Bharasi N S, Anand R, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2010, 402(2-3), 186.
91 Dai Y, Zheng X, Ding P. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2021, 53(11), 3474.
[1] 王思莹, 刘文欢, 郝毅, 常宁, 焦小玉, 李辉. 热活化赤泥多固废基胶凝材料的性能优化及水化特性[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25030240-11.
[2] 刘向, 朱海峰, 张东生, 毛明杰, 杨秋宁. 3D打印参数对地聚物混凝土力学性能的影响及深度学习预测模型[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25030205-9.
[3] 张家傅, 单雪影, 黄其鑫, 刁玉璇, 李锦春. 含磷低分子量聚苯醚的制备及在环氧树脂阻燃中的应用[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25040078-7.
[4] 张思凡, 罗威, 方媛, 刘毅, 朱建锋. 固溶型MAX相材料的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(7): 25030103-13.
[5] 高晨宇, 王艳, 张少辉, 李奥阳, 吴杰, 霍钰仁, 卢冠楠. 解胶剂改性废弃碳纤维预浸料及其对混凝土力学及导电性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25050007-11.
[6] 乔木, 赵志伟, 穆柄运, 张涵. MWCNTs对放电等离子烧结制备Ti(C,N)微观结构和综合性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25010106-7.
[7] 胡一雄, 邓方, 张柯康, 孟锦晖, 赵枫, 刘洋. 激光增材制造异构钛合金的力学性能及其变形机理[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25020116-7.
[8] 曹江海, 房卫萍, 罗兵兵, 曾扬铭, 张宇鹏, 王刚. 热等静压加热温度对增材制造Ti6Al4V钛合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25020112-6.
[9] 靳子昂, 杨杰, 孙科, 孙守政, 韩振宇. 热风加热自动铺丝成型CF/PEEK的工艺参数优化研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25030235-5.
[10] 席歆玥, 张延生, 杨云波, 李焱, 徐宏殷, 王娟, 郑元勋. 绿筑智建:农业生物质纤维强化再生水泥3D打印绿色建材研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 24080146-7.
[11] 高颖, 康亚腾, 景茂武, 王长龙, 吕小博. 基于声发射的聚合物增强水泥稳定碎石损伤特性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25020025-7.
[12] 黄瑞, 王明亮, 赵佳萱, 卢一平. 非金属Si元素对AlNbTiMoHfSi难熔高熵合金组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25040014-6.
[13] 施其锋, 杨涛, 齐亮, 郝静妍, 吴惠舒, 李润霞. 利用微量稀土元素提高选区激光熔融成型Al-Si合金的力学性能[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(4): 24120189-6.
[14] 李田, 严佑锐凌, 牛晶晶, 牛赢, 郭强, 周惦武, 张明军. 直线摆动对钢/铝激光搭接焊接头组织性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 24120236-7.
[15] 毕晓勤, 杨开放, 郑泽远, 崔熙雅, 付莹, 徐琴. T6热处理对Al-Mg-Zn-xSc系铝合金组织演变和力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 25010051-6.
[1] Lanyan LIU,Jun SONG,Bowen CHENG,Wenchi XUE,Yunbo ZHENG. Research Progress in Preparation of Lignin-based Carbon Fiber[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 405 -411 .
[2] Haoqi HU,Cheng XU,Lijing YANG,Henghua ZHANG,Zhenlun SONG. Recent Advances in the Research of High-strength and High-conductivity CuCrZr Alloy[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 453 -460 .
[3] Yanchun ZHAO,Congyu XU,Xiaopeng YUAN,Jing HE,Shengzhong KOU,Chunyan LI,Zizhou YUAN. Research Status of Plasticity and Toughness of Bulk Metallic Glass[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 467 -472 .
[4] Xinxing ZHOU,Shaopeng WU,Xiao ZHANG,Quantao LIU,Song XU,Shuai WANG. Molecular-scale Design of Asphalt Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 483 -495 .
[5] Yongtao TAN, Lingbin KONG, Long KANG, Fen RAN. Construction of Nano-Au@PANI Yolk-shell Hollow Structure Electrode Material and Its Electrochemical Performance[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 47 -50 .
[6] Ping ZHU,Guanghui DENG,Xudong SHAO. Review on Dispersion Methods of Carbon Nanotubes in Cement-based Composites[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 149 -158 .
[7] Fangyuan DONG,Shansuo ZHENG,Mingchen SONG,Yixin ZHANG,Jie ZHENG,Qing QIN. Research Progress of High Performance ConcreteⅠ:Raw Materials and Mix Proportion Design Method[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 159 -166 .
[8] Guiqin HOU,Yunkai LI,Xiaoyan WANG. Research Progress of Zinc Ferrite as Photocatalyst[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 51 -57 .
[9] Jianxiang DING,Zhengming SUN,Peigen ZHANG,Wubian TIAN,Yamei ZHANG. Current Research Status and Outlook of Ag-based Contact Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 58 -66 .
[10] Jing WANG,Hongke LIU,Pingsheng LIU,Li LI. Advances in Hydrogel Nanocomposites with High Mechanical Strength[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 67 -75 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed