Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (10): 25030157-9    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25030157
  金属与金属基复合材料 |
聚脲/金属复合结构的抗侵彻性能试验与数值仿真
何成龙1,2,†,*, 蒲彦蓉1,†, 黄治镡1, 霍子怡1, 杨可谞1, 毛翔1, 贾松1
1 中北大学机电工程学院,太原 030051
2 中北大学高端装备可靠性技术山西重点实验室,太原 030051
Penetration Resistance Performance Test and Numerical Simulation of Polyurea/Metal Composite Structures
HE Chenglong1,2,†, *, PU Yanrong1,†, HUANG Zhixin1, HUO Ziyi1, YANG Kexu1, MAO Xiang1, JIA Song1
1 College of Mechatronic Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China
2 Shanxi Key Laboratory of High-end Equipment Reliability Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 44666KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对现代军事装备对轻量化复合装甲抗多场景侵彻威胁的迫切需求,对铝/聚脲复合板进行了滑膛枪弹道侵彻试验,利用数字图像相关方法(Digital image correlation method,DIC)和X射线断层扫描(Computed tomography,CT)观测了复合板的失效模式,分析了聚脲涂层对铝板抗破片侵彻性能的影响。在此基础上,利用有限元软件ABAQUS/Explicit建立了铝/聚脲抗侵彻数值模型,进一步研究了聚脲涂层在不同涂覆方式下的吸能效应和复合板受弹体斜侵彻的失效模式,并且分析了入射角度对跳弹现象和复合板破坏形态的影响规律。结果表明,聚脲层通过弹性变形和压剪破坏有效缓冲冲击载荷并降低破片剩余速度;当迎弹面涂覆聚脲层时,复合板防护性能的提升效果更为显著;低速侵彻下聚脲涂层的最佳厚度为2~5 mm,600、800、1 000m/s侵彻下10 mm铝板所需要的极限抗侵彻前聚脲层厚度分别为3、30、50 mm;入射角对聚脲层的抗冲击性能有显著影响,入射角为30°时复合板吸能效率最高,而入射角为60°时易引发跳弹导致吸能效率下降;增加前聚脲层厚度可以提升复合板的抗冲击性能,但会减小单位面密度吸收的冲击动能,从而降低复合板的吸能效率。本工作从不同角度揭示了聚脲涂层的防护特性,为复合防护结构设计提供了优化思路。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
何成龙
蒲彦蓉
黄治镡
霍子怡
杨可谞
毛翔
贾松
关键词:  聚脲  铝复合板  抗钨球冲击模拟  斜侵彻  抗侵彻行为    
Abstract: This paper investigates the enhancement effect of polyurea coating on the impact resistance of 2024 aluminium sheet against fragmentation, and analyses the effect of the thickness and relative position of the sprayed polyurea on the impact resistance of the composite sheet by loa-ding spherical fragments into different polyurea-coated composite structures through ballistic tests. A numerical model of aluminium/polyurea anti-invasion and penetration was established by using finite element software ABAQUS/Explicit to further investigate the influence law of the incident angle on the ricochet phenomenon and the damage morphology of the composite plate. The results show that the protective performance of the composite plate is more significantly improved when the surface is coated with a polyurea layer;the optimal thickness of the polyurea coating is 2—5 mm and the protective performance is better under low velocity penetration. The angle of incidence has a significant effect on the impact resis-tance of the polyurea layer, 30° when the composite plate has the highest energy-absorbing efficiency, while 60° is prone to cause ricochet resulting in a decrease in energy-absorbing efficiency. Increasing the thickness of the former polyurea increases the impact resistance of the composite panel, but reduces the kinetic energy of impact absorbed per unit of surface density, thus reducing the energy absorption efficiency of the composite panel.
Key words:  polyurea    aluminum composite panel    tungsten ball impact simulation    oblique penetration    bullet penetration resistance
发布日期:  2026-06-03
ZTFLH:  TB333  
基金资助: 博士后科学基金(2021M702981);山西省基础研究计划(20210302124197);中北大学第二十届研究生科研项目(20242003)
通讯作者:  *何成龙,博士,中北大学机电工程学院副教授,主要研究脆性材料冲击动力学、复合材料抗侵彻、武器结构动力学、断裂与损伤力学机理等。hechenglong@nuc.edu.cn   
作者简介:  †共同第一作者。蒲彦蓉,中北大学机电与工程学院硕士研究生,在何成龙副教授的指导下研究冲击动力学。
引用本文:    
何成龙, 蒲彦蓉, 黄治镡, 霍子怡, 杨可谞, 毛翔, 贾松. 聚脲/金属复合结构的抗侵彻性能试验与数值仿真[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(10): 25030157-9.
HE Chenglong, PU Yanrong, HUANG Zhixin, HUO Ziyi, YANG Kexu, MAO Xiang, JIA Song. Penetration Resistance Performance Test and Numerical Simulation of Polyurea/Metal Composite Structures. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(10): 25030157-9.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25030157  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I10/25030157
1 Dai Y S, Wu J H, Gong H D, et al. Hans Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 5(4), 131 (in Chinese).
戴银所, 邬建华, 龚华栋, 等. 土木工程, 2016, 5(4), 131.
2 Gong CC, Chen Y, Dai L H. Chinese Joumal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2023, 55(1), 1 (in Chinese).
龚臣成, 陈艳, 戴兰宏. 力学学报, 2023, 55(1), 1.
3 Cai L G, Al-Ostaz A, Li X B, et al. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 75, 1.
4 Zhang P, Zhao P D, Wang Z J, et al. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(1), 101 (in Chinese).
张鹏, 赵鹏铎, 王志军, 等. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(1), 101.
5 Xu Z W, Wang W, Li Y S, et al. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2025, 45(3), 66 (in Chinese).
徐赵威, 汪维, 李奕硕, 等. 爆炸与冲击, 2025, 45(3), 66.
6 Mao L W, Wan C Z, Chen C H, et al. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2022, 42(10), 1017 (in Chinese).
毛柳伟, 万昌召, 陈长海, 等. 北京理工大学学报, 2022, 42(10), 1017.
7 Xiao Y J, Shi S Q, Liu Y F, et al. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(23), 216 (in Chinese).
肖颍杰, 石少卿, 刘盈丰, 等. 材料导报, 2022, 36(23), 216.
8 Jin H F, Lyu P, Huang W B, et al. Low Temperature Architecture Technology, 2021, 43(1), 58 (in Chinese).
金浩法, 吕平, 黄微波, 等. 低温建筑技术, 2021, 43(1), 58.
9 Goldsmith W. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1999, 22(2/3), 95.
10 Wei H Y, Zhang X F, Liu C, et al. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2021, 148, 103745.
11 Ji H B, Wang X, Zhao Z Y, et al. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2023, 43(6), 063302 (in Chinese).
季海波, 王昕, 赵振宇, 等. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(6), 063302.
12 Meyer C S, Catugas I G, Gillespie J W J R, et al. Defence Technology, 2022, 18(11), 1960.
13 Zhu Y H, Zhang X Y, Xue B Y, et al. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(4), 1505.
14 Carrasco-Baltasar D, Garcia-Castillo S, Ivanez I, et al. Composite Structures, 2023, 303, 116344.
15 Zhang B Y, Jiang Y X, Zhai D B, Wang W. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2024, 56(6), 44 (in Chinese).
张博一, 蒋月新, 翟德保, 等. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2024, 56(6), 44.
16 Zhou Y, Zheng B Q, et al. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2024, 44(11), 1138 (in Chinese).
周熠, 郑冰倩, 王昕, 等. 北京理工大学学报, 2024, 44(11), 1138.
17 Hazell P J, Kister G, Stennett C, et al. Composites Part A:Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2008, 39(5), 866.
18 Phillip R. Experimental Techniques, 2015, 38(6), 1.
19 Phillip R. Experimental Techniques, 2014, 38(5), 1.
20 Demir T, Uebeyli M, Yildirim R O. Materials & Design, 2008, 29(10), 2009.
21 Deng Y, Zhang W, Cao Z. Materials & Design, 2012, 41, 266.
22 Sun G Y, Chen DD, Wang H X, et al. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 122, 119.
23 Han Q G, Li H M, Chen X H, et al. Composite Structures, 2022, 291, 115551.
24 Zhang S Y, Zong Q, Lyu N. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2021, 17(1), 162 (in Chinese).
张守旸, 宗琦, 吕闹. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2021, 17(1), 162.
25 Zhao X X, Xu Y X, Tian F, et al. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(S2), 309 (in Chinese).
赵晓旭, 徐豫新, 田非, 等. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(S2), 309.
[1] 丁来龙, 马明亮, 冯超, 黄微波, 王一凡, 林佳宇, 吴超. 聚脲材料的优化及抗爆抗侵彻性能研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(4): 24010082-9.
[2] 闫帅, 吕平, 黄微波, 张锐, 王旭, 王文斌, 鞠家辉. 喷涂聚脲及其纤维复合材料的抗侵彻性及防护机理研究新进展[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(19): 23040240-6.
[3] 郭辉, 冯晶晶, 陈玉, 孙亚斌, 邱爽. 聚脲涂覆泡沫铝压缩力学性能及吸能特性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(23): 22120195-7.
[4] 肖颍杰, 石少卿, 刘盈丰, 陈首, 廖瑜. 聚脲钢板复合层抗枪弹侵彻性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(23): 22010187-7.
[5] 张月, 孙鹏飞, 吕平, 黄微波, 车凯圆, 王荣珍. 自然曝晒条件下聚脲涂层的耐老化性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(2): 21010092-8.
[6] 孙鹏飞, 吕平, 黄微波, 张锐, 方志强, 桑英杰. 喷涂抗爆型聚脲钢筋混凝土板抗爆性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(z2): 642-648.
[7] 郑成燕, 张典堂, 梁燕民, 钱坤. 织物/聚脲柔性复合材料抗爆性能研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(23): 23205-23211.
[8] 孙鹏飞, 黄舰, 吕平, 张锐, 方志强. 聚脲涂覆建筑结构抗爆性能研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(Z2): 623-630.
[9] 锅渺, 李莎, 赵利平, 韩建超, 王涛. 波纹辊轧制温度对镁/铝复合板界面组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(22): 22087-22092.
[10] 李少杰, 闫军, 杜仕国, 鲁彦玲, 蔡军锋. 聚脲弹性体微相分离研究及主要进展[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(21): 21205-21210.
[11] 张忠厚, 张光辉, 陈荣源, 韩琳, 谭延方, 闫春绵. 聚天冬氨酸酯型聚脲增韧结构型环氧树脂及其机理[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(6): 1061-1064.
[12] 杨世杰, 李元东, 曹驰, 董澎源, 李嘉铭, 李明. A356覆层温度对AZ31/A356轧制复合板界面组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(14): 2397-2402.
[13] 谢敬佩, 刘哲, 王爱琴, 吕世敬, 毛志平, 刘帅洋, 田捍卫. 铸轧铜铝复合板界面演变规律研究[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(10): 1702-1705.
[14] 田捍卫, 王爱琴, 谢敬佩, 苌清华, 刘帅洋. 铜铝复合板铸轧工艺优化及实验分析[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(10): 1706-1711.
[15] 罗学禹, 刘立柱. 防水用聚脲绝缘涂料的制备及性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2018, 32(16): 2723-2727.
[1] Lanyan LIU,Jun SONG,Bowen CHENG,Wenchi XUE,Yunbo ZHENG. Research Progress in Preparation of Lignin-based Carbon Fiber[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 405 -411 .
[2] Haoqi HU,Cheng XU,Lijing YANG,Henghua ZHANG,Zhenlun SONG. Recent Advances in the Research of High-strength and High-conductivity CuCrZr Alloy[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 453 -460 .
[3] Xinxing ZHOU,Shaopeng WU,Xiao ZHANG,Quantao LIU,Song XU,Shuai WANG. Molecular-scale Design of Asphalt Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 483 -495 .
[4] Ping ZHU,Guanghui DENG,Xudong SHAO. Review on Dispersion Methods of Carbon Nanotubes in Cement-based Composites[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 149 -158 .
[5] Fangyuan DONG,Shansuo ZHENG,Mingchen SONG,Yixin ZHANG,Jie ZHENG,Qing QIN. Research Progress of High Performance ConcreteⅠ:Raw Materials and Mix Proportion Design Method[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 159 -166 .
[6] Guiqin HOU,Yunkai LI,Xiaoyan WANG. Research Progress of Zinc Ferrite as Photocatalyst[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 51 -57 .
[7] Yan MA,Zhi LI,Ruilong RAN,Kang LI. Research on Application of Silk in Biomaterial Field[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 86 -92 .
[8] Kui ZHENG,Changlai YUAN,Xingxing ZHOU,Weiqing WANG,Jiwen XU,Changrong ZHOU. Microstructures and Energy-storage Properties of Ba0.04Bi0.48Na0.48TiO3-SrTiO3 Ceramics[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 171 -175 .
[9] Shilie DENG,Huimin XIAN,Xi CHEN,Lingyun TANG,Jiang ZHANG,Zhongquan MAO. Enhanced Magnetic Properties of Bismuth Ferrite by La and Nb Co-doping[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 176 -179 .
[10] Wei LIU,Houhe CHEN. 1D Energetic Metal-organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Properties[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(2): 223 -227 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed