硫酸酸浸改性修饰花生壳基硬碳负极材料的制备和储钠性能的研究

doi:10.11896/cldb.25030015

材料导报

2026, Vol. 40

Issue (7): 25030015-8 https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25030015

无机非金属及其复合材料

硫酸酸浸改性修饰花生壳基硬碳负极材料的制备和储钠性能的研究

彭思源¹, 漆小鹏^2,*

1 江西理工大学材料科学与工程学院,江西赣州 341000
2 江西理工大学稀土学院,江西赣州 341000

Synthesis and Sodium Storage Performance of Sulfuric Acid Immersion Modified Peanut Shell-derived Hard Carbon Anode Material

PENG Siyuan¹, QI Xiaopeng^2,*

1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China
2 School of Rare Earths, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China

摘要
参考文献
相关文章
推荐阅读
Metrics

下载:

全文 ( PDF ) ( 21497KB )
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要生物质硬碳材料具有廉价易得、可再生和天然多孔结构等优势,逐渐成为钠离子电池负极材料研究的热点。但普通的生物基硬碳负极材料因存在表面结构复杂、官能团副反应多等缺点,电化学性能受到了严重限制,其初始库仑效率偏低、循环稳定性较差。采用硫酸酸浸修饰改性花生壳基前驱体并结合简单的炭化工艺合成了S-HC-1000硬碳材料。结果表明,S-HC-1000的初始库仑效率得到了显著提升(从51.1%提升至82.3%),循环稳定性也得到了改善(在500次循环中,容量保留率达到94.4%),这归功于硫酸修饰对材料层间距的优化和对表面含氧官能团的影响,使所得的生物质基硬碳具有稳定的结构和良好的电化学性能。本工作的硫酸酸浸修饰改性方法为钠离子电池负极材料性能改善的研究提供了一种有效的思路。

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	彭思源
	漆小鹏

关键词: 钠离子电池生物质硬碳硫酸酸浸改性

Abstract: Biomass-based hard carbon materials have lots of advantages, such as low cost, renewability, and natural porous structures. They have gradually become a hotspot in research of anode materials of sodium-ion batteries. However, the electrochemical performance of ordinary biomass-based hard carbon anode materials is severely limited due to their complex surface structures and numerous side reactions of functional groups. They exhibit low initial coulombic efficiency (ICE) and poor cycling stability. In this work, the S-HC-1000 hard carbon material was synthesized by modifying the peanut shell-based precursor through sulfuric acid immersion and then combining it with a simple carbonization process. The results demonstrate that the S-HC-1000 exhibits a notable enhancement in ICE (increasing from 51.1% to 82.3%) and improved cycling stability (exhibiting a high capacity retention rate of 94.4% after 500 cycles). This can be attributed to the sulfuric acid modification, which optimizes the interlayer spacings of the material and modulates surface oxygen-containing functional groups, thereby endowing the resultant biomass-derived hard carbon with a stable structure and enhanced electrochemical performance. The sulfuric acid leaching modification method proposed in this study provides an effective strategy for advancing research on the performance enhancement of sodium-ion battery anode materials.

Key words: sodium ion battery biomass hard carbon sulfuric acid immersion modification

发布日期: 2026-04-16

ZTFLH:	TM912
	TQ127.11

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(22065015)

通讯作者: *漆小鹏,博士,江西理工大学稀土学院副教授、硕士研究生导师。目前主要从事能源与催化材料方面的研究。qxpai@163.com

作者简介: 彭思源,江西理工大学材料科学与工程学院硕士研究生,在漆小鹏教授的指导下研究功能材料。

引用本文:

彭思源, 漆小鹏. 硫酸酸浸改性修饰花生壳基硬碳负极材料的制备和储钠性能的研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(7): 25030015-8.
PENG Siyuan, QI Xiaopeng. Synthesis and Sodium Storage Performance of Sulfuric Acid Immersion Modified Peanut Shell-derived Hard Carbon Anode Material. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(7): 25030015-8.

链接本文:

https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25030015 或 https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I7/25030015

1 Vaalma C, Buchholz D, Weil M, et al. Nature Reviews Materials, 2018, 3(4), 18013.
2 Nayak P K, Yang L T, Brehm W, et al. Angewandte Chemie, 2018, 57(1), 102.
3 Chen M G, Han X Y, Zheng X M, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2024, 478, 143867.
4 Kuang Y, Wu Y, Zhang H, et al. Molecule, 2024, 29(24), 5988.
5 Jian Z L, Clement B, Luo L L, et al. Chemistry of Materials, 2017, 29(5), 2314.
6 James M, Tina S, Ramaraja P R. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2019, 49, 529.
7 Dou X W, Ivana H, Damien S, et al. Materials Today, 2019, 23, 87.
8 Xiao B W, Teófilo R, Li X L. ChemSusChem, 2019, 12(1), 133.
9 Li X D, Tan X J, Liu Y C, et al. Modern Chemical Industry, 2024, 44(z1), 118 (in Chinese).
李旭东, 谭晓杰, 刘亚超, 等. 现代化工, 2024, 44(z1), 118.
10 Damien S, Brahim O, Xiao B W, et al. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(17), 1703268.
11 Gao Z, Zhang Y Y, Song N N, et al. Materials Research Letters, 2017, 5(2), 69.
12 Yu K, Wang X, Yang H, et al. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2021, 55, 499.
13 Li Y, Hu Y S, Titirici M M, et al. Advanced Energy Materials, 2016, 6(18), 1600659.
14 Naik P B, Reddy N S, Nataraj S K, et al. ChemSusChem, 2024, 18(2), e202400970.
15 Hu H Y, Xiao Y, Ling W, et al. Energy Technology, 2021, 9(1), 2000730.
16 Zheng A C, Qi Y B, Xu Z P, et al. Development and Application of Materials, 2020, 35(6), 88 (in Chinese).
郑安川, 齐翊博, 许志鹏, 等. 材料开发与应用, 2020, 35(6), 88.
17 Dou X W, Ivana H, Damien S, et al. ChemSusChem, 2018, 11(18), 3276.
18 Jin Y C, Wu S T, Wang Y Y, et al. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 100, 113682.
19 Ren X, Xu S D, Liu S, et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2019, 841, 63.
20 Luo W, Schardt J, Bommier C, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2013, 1(36), 10662.
21 Chen X Y, Liu C Y, Fang Y J, et al. Carbon Energy, 2022, 4(6), 1133.
22 Zhou S, Tang Z, Jin G, et al. Small, 2024, 20(51), 2407341.
23 Wang Y, Yi Z, Xie L, et al. Advanced Materials, 2024, 36(26), 2401249.
24 Liu Y, Dai H, Wu L, et al. Advanced Energy Materials, 2019, 9(34), 1901379.
25 Wu X S, Dong X L, Wang B Y, et al. Renewable Energy, 2022, 189, 630.
26 Jung K W, Lee S Y, Choi J W, et al. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 369, 529.
27 Wang Z Y, Liu G C, Zheng H, et al. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 177, 308.
28 Åkerholm M, Salmén L. Holzforschung, 2003, 57(5), 459.
29 Ma W Y, Pei P G, Gao G, et al. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(7), 3682 (in Chinese).
马文艳, 裴鹏刚, 高歌, 等. 环境科学, 2022, 43(7), 3682.
30 Tsai P C, Chung S C, Lin H K, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3, 9763.
31 Zeng Y J, Yang J, Yang H Y, et al. ACS Energy Letters, 2024, 9(3), 1184.
32 Chen C, Huang Y, Zhu Y D, et al. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8(3), 1497.
33 Bo Z, Huang Y Z, Zheng Z W, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2023, 461, 142641.
34 Zheng T, Zhang R, Wang H Y, et al. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1), 6024.
35 Duan Z H, Ye X J, Chen J X, et al. Journal of Energy Storage, 2025, 114, 115674.
36 Wang T S, Hu P, Zhang C J, et al. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2016, 8, 7811.
37 Liu J H, Xu Z Q, Wu M Q, et al. Frontiers in chemistry, 2019, 7, 640.
38 Li F, Wang C, Zhao X S. Energy Material Advances, DOI:10.34133/2022/9876319.

[1]	徐群娜, 赵源, 徐小雨, 路佳琪, 邓燕婷, 蒲瑶. 生物质基导电油墨研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(7): 25030213-8.
[2]	王旭, 何心, 解志鹏, 张达, 侯圣平, 吴越, 东鹏, 陈嘉乐, 梁风. 低温等离子体在钠离子电池负极材料制备与改性中的应用[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25040155-11.
[3]	席歆玥, 张延生, 杨云波, 李焱, 徐宏殷, 王娟, 郑元勋. 绿筑智建:农业生物质纤维强化再生水泥3D打印绿色建材研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 24080146-7.
[4]	毕浩, 韩清清, 吴平, 陈思源, 虞育杰, 黄睿. 微藻水热碳化技术的机理、调控与应用:面向“双碳”目标的生物质基功能材料的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(4): 25030017-11.
[5]	黑亚双, 王亚晖, 邢翠娟, 李伟涛, 郭焕焕, 赵治巨, 刘永正. 基于桂圆壳衍生的碳材料构筑电化学传感器用于尿酸检测[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 24120112-7.
[6]	王妍, 唐文建, 顾爱群, 谢美菊, 余自力. 磷酸铁基聚阴离子型钠离子电池正极材料改性策略[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 24120135-11.
[7]	张文浩, 韩文佳, 陈安祥, 周世晋, 王晓龙, 陈仪玮, 李霞. 生物质基硬碳钠离子电池负极材料预处理研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(9): 24030195-12.
[8]	蒋悦, 肖明军. 高熵氧化物在钠离子电池电极材料中的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(24): 25010122-9.
[9]	王蕾, 刘少冕, 范凤兰, 韩伟. 大幅提高速生木基钠离子电池负极首次库伦效率方法的研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(23): 24110189-6.
[10]	惠功领, 张晋豪, 解炜, 辛智, 毛昳萱, 陈成猛. 预氧化在高性能钠离子电池用硬炭制备改性中发挥的作用[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(20): 24090241-13.
[11]	武志红, 许怡凡, 李鹏, 齐珺, 常吉进, 牛丹, 任安文. 生物质衍生多孔碳基吸波材料的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(20): 24090134-8.
[12]	丁一丁, 陈洋羊, 卿彦. 木竹衍生硬碳材料在钠离子电池中的应用[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(20): 24090167-10.
[13]	刘冬旭, 宋皓炜, 刘鹏, 姚青荣, 王仲民, 邓健秋. 天然生物聚合物衍生硬炭材料的微观结构与储钠性能[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(16): 24070125-6.
[14]	王汇杰, 胡江涛, 盖晓倩, 刘馨蔓, 李仁爱, 肖惠宁, 刘超. 纳米纤维素在相变储能领域的应用研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(16): 24080046-12.
[15]	张婉靖, 卢燕, 商赛男, 彭锋, 边静. 木质生物质细胞壁半纤维素-纤维素相互作用研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(13): 24050153-7.

[1]	Yanzhen WANG, Mingming CHEN, Chengyang WANG. Preparation and Electrochemical Properties Characterization of High-rate SiO₂/C Composite Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 357 -361 .
[2]	Yimeng XIA, Shuai WU, Feng TAN, Wei LI, Qingmao WEI, Chungang MIN, Xikun YANG. Effect of Anionic Groups of Cobalt Salt on the Electrocatalytic Activity of Co-N-C Catalysts[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 362 -367 .
[3]	Zhiqiang QIAN,Zhijian WU,Shidong WANG,Huifang ZHANG,Haining LIU,Xiushen YE,Quan LI. Research Progress in Preparation of Superhydrophobic Coatings on Magnesium Alloys and Its Application[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 102 -109 .
[4]	CHENG Xiaole, YIN Jun, QU Yinhu, FU Hanguang, ZHAO Bing. A Review of the State-of-Art Preparation Techniques and Interface Characteristics of Continuous-silicon-fiber-reinforced Titanium Matrix(SiC_f/Ti) Composites[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(5): 796 -807 .
[5]	ZHANG Tingting, DONG Jiahao, WANG Meng,WEI Liangqiang, QIN Shuhao. Dispersed Phase Content of Ethylene-vinyl Acetate Copolymer/Polypropylene (EVA/PP) In-situ Microfibrillar Composites (MFCs): Influences to Microfiber Morphology, Crystallization Behavior, Rheological and Mechanical Properties[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(12): 2032 -2037 .
[6]	YANG Haiou, WANG Jian, ZHOU Yinghui, WANG Chong, LIN Xin. Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing Technology and Its Application in TC4 Titanium Alloy: a Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(11): 1884 -1890 .
[7]	LI Yan’an, YANG Rulu, ZHANG Hua, SUN Haibin, SI Weimeng, LI Jiao. Effect of Calcining Temperature on Morphology and Properties of BiFeO₃ Fibers[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(14): 2340 -2344 .
[8]	CHENG Xiaohong, QU Shaohua, ZHONG Zhicheng. A Novel Fluorescent Chemosensor for α-Amino Acids and Its Application for the Detection of Protease[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(14): 2486 -2490 .
[9]	HU Yaoqiang, CHEN Fajin, LIU Haining, ZHANG Huifang, WU Zhijian, YE Xiushen. Preparation of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Hydrogel and Its Thermally Induced Aggregation Behavior[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(14): 2491 -2496 .
[10]	CHEN Jian, MIU Weifeng, WANG Jilin, ZHENG Guoyuan, LONG Fei. A Brief Survey on the Stability Study of Organometal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(13): 2151 -2160 .

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed