Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (5): 25060109-8    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25060109
  生物质助力建筑材料可持续发展 |
生物炭分层添加对黄河底泥基植生基材入渗特征和养分固持的影响
赵冰琴1,2, 朱俊豪1,2, 高儒章1,2, 胡鑫凯1,2, 吴欣1,2, 夏栋2, 赵自超3,4, 许文年1,2,*
1 三峡大学三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;
2 三峡大学水泥基生态修复技术湖北省工程研究中心,湖北 宜昌 443002;
3 山东省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所,济南 250100;
4 山东省农业科学院黄河三角洲现代农业研究所,济南 250100
Effects of Layered Biochar Application on the Infiltration Characteristics and Nutrient Retention of Planting Substrate Derived from Yellow River Sediment
ZHAO Bingqin1,2, ZHU Junhao1,2, GAO Ruzhang1,2, HU Xinkai1,2, WU Xin1,2, XIA Dong2, ZHAO Zichao3,4, XU Wennian1,2,*
1 MOE Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, Hubei, China;
2 Hubei Provincial Engineering Research Center of Cement-based Ecological Restoration Technology, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, Hubei, China;
3 Institute of Agricultural Resource and Environment, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China;
4 Institute of Modern Agriculture on Yellow River Delta, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 20514KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对黄河流域面临的泥沙淤积和矿区边坡生态修复缺土少水的双重难题,本工作通过室内土柱定水头入渗试验,系统解析生物炭分层添加(2 cm面层、8 cm基层、10 cm全土层)对黄河底泥基植生基材入渗特性及养分固持的调控效应。结果表明:①在入渗特征方面,只在2 cm面层(U1-D0、U2-D0)添加生物炭会导致基材在龄期初期入渗速率及饱和导水率的提高,不利于水分的保持。在8 cm基层(U0-D1、U1-D2)与10 cm全土层(U2-D1、U1-D1、U2-D2、U1-D2)添加均可降低土壤饱和导水率,其中生物炭在2 cm面层添加1%(质量分数)和8 cm基层添加2%(U1-D2)时效果最明显,相比对照组(U0-D0)可降低土壤饱和导水率45%以上。②在养分固持方面,在2 cm面层添加生物炭对养分固持的效果不稳定,而在8 cm基层和10 cm全土层添加不同比例生物炭均能有效减小土壤铵态氮、速效磷、速效钾的流失量,其中U1-D2效果最明显,三者的流失量相比不添加生物炭时的降幅分别达到69.17%、79.46%、68.77%。③面层适量掺杂+基层较多掺杂的分层添加策略,既能增加水分在土壤中的留存时长,又能在土样基层形成相对稳定的吸附层,有效吸附和固定面层迁移的养分。本工作的结果可为黄河底泥在矿山生态修复中的高效资源化利用及优化生物炭分层添加策略提供理论依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵冰琴
朱俊豪
高儒章
胡鑫凯
吴欣
夏栋
赵自超
许文年
关键词:  生物炭  黄河底泥  入渗特征  养分固持  分层添加    
Abstract: To address the dual challenges of sediment deposition in the Yellow River basin and the scarcity of soil and water in the ecological restoration of mining area slopes, this study systematically analyzed the regulatory effects of layered biochar application (2-cm surface layer, 8-cm base layer, and 10-cm full soil layer) on the infiltration characteristics and nutrient retention of the Yellow River sediment substrate through an indoor soil column constant water head infiltration test. The results indicated that: (ⅰ) In terms of infiltration characteristics, the application of biochar exclusively to the 2-cm surface layer (U1-D0, U2-D0) resulted in an elevated infiltration rate and saturated hydraulic conductivity of the substrate at the early age, which was detrimental to water retention. In contrast, the application of biochar at the 8-cm base layer (U0-D1, U0-D2) and the 10-cm full soil layer (U2-D1, U1-D1, U2-D2, U1-D2) resulted in a reduction in the soil's saturated hydraulic conductivity. The most significant effect, which can reduce the soil's saturated hydraulic conductivity by more than 45% compared with the control group (U0-D0), was observed when 1% is added at the 2-cm surface layer and 2% is added at the 8-cm base layer (U1-D2). (ⅱ) In terms of nutrient retention, the effect of adding biochar to the 2-cm surface layer on nutrient fixation exhibited instability, while the addition of varying proportions of biochar to the 8-cm base layer and the 10-cm full soil layer effectively reduced the loss of soil ammonium nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium. Among these treatments, U1-D2 showed the most significant impact, achieving reductions of 69.17%, 79.46%, and 68.77%, respectively. (ⅲ) The layered application strategy, which involves the application of an appropriate amount of biochar to the surface layer and a higher dosage to the base layer, simultaneously enhanced the water retention time in the soil, and established a relatively stable adsorption layer in the base layer of the soil sample. This process effectively adsorbs and retains the nutrients that migrate from the surface layer. The output of this study can provide a theoretical basis for the utilization of the Yellow River substrate in the ecological restoration of mines.
Key words:  biochar    Yellow River sediment    infiltration characteristic    nutrient retention    layered application
出版日期:  2026-03-10      发布日期:  2026-03-10
ZTFLH:  X70  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(52200230);内蒙古自治区科技重大专项(2021ZD0007-03)
通讯作者:  *许文年,博士,三峡大学土木与建筑学院教授、博士研究生导师。目前主要研究领域为工程扰动区生态防护与修复理论及应用。xwn@ctgu.edu.cn   
作者简介:  赵冰琴,博士,三峡大学土木与建筑学院副教授、博士研究生导师。目前主要研究方向为工程扰动区边坡防护与生态修复等。
引用本文:    
赵冰琴, 朱俊豪, 高儒章, 胡鑫凯, 吴欣, 夏栋, 赵自超, 许文年. 生物炭分层添加对黄河底泥基植生基材入渗特征和养分固持的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25060109-8.
ZHAO Bingqin, ZHU Junhao, GAO Ruzhang, HU Xinkai, WU Xin, XIA Dong, ZHAO Zichao, XU Wennian. Effects of Layered Biochar Application on the Infiltration Characteristics and Nutrient Retention of Planting Substrate Derived from Yellow River Sediment. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(5): 25060109-8.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25060109  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I5/25060109
1 Teng Y L, Xie M M, Wang H H, et al. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(19), 7941 (in Chinese).
滕雅丽, 谢苗苗, 王回茴, 等. 生态学报, 2022, 42(19), 7941.
2 Peng S P, Bi Y L. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(4), 1211 (in Chinese).
彭苏萍, 毕银丽. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(4), 1211.
3 Shen Y J, Yang B H, Wang S M, et al. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2022, 50(6), 104 (in Chinese).
申艳军, 杨博涵, 王双明, 等. 煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(6), 104.
4 Song L, Zhao B Q, Xia D, et al. Coal Science and Technology, 2025, 53(4), 401 (in Chinese).
宋亮, 赵冰琴, 夏栋, 等. 煤炭科学技术, 2025, 53(4), 401.
5 Hu Z Q, Wang P J, Shao F. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(3), 288 (in Chinese).
胡振琪, 王培俊, 邵芳. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(3), 288.
6 Ma W C, Han R, Zhang W, et al. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 352, 120058.
7 Baveye P. Geoderma, 2006, 134, 231.
8 Ndoung O C N, Figueiredo C C D, Ramos M L G. Heliyon, 2021, 7(12), e08473.
9 Bao W B, Bai Y R, Zhao Y P, et al. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2018, 49(6), 1326 (in Chinese).
包维斌, 白一茹, 赵云鹏, 等. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(6), 1326 (in Chinese).
10 Yang C D, Liu J J, Lu S G. Geoderma, 2021, 397, 115097.
11 Wei C, Lyu H H, Wang Y Y, et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(4), 595 (in Chinese).
魏存, 吕豪豪, 汪玉瑛, 等. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(4), 595.
12 Song D L, Xi X Y, Huang S M, et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2017, 23(2), 369 (in Chinese).
宋大利, 习向银, 黄绍敏, 等. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2), 369.
13 Nie R N, Wang W M, Cao L J. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(22), 242 (in Chinese).
聂若楠, 王旺民, 曹丽娟, 等. 材料导报, 2023, 37(22), 242.
14 Cao R X, Liu J, Deng K K, et al. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(12), 5330 (in Chinese).
曹瑞霞, 刘京, 邓开开, 等. 环境科学, 2019, 40(12), 5330.
15 Shi G Y, Wu B B, Hu J Y, et al. Environmental Chemistry, 2025, 44(1), 149 (in Chinese).
史广宇, 吴贝贝, 胡嘉源, 等. 环境化学, 2025, 44(1), 149.
16 Chen X X, He X S, Geng Z C, et al. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(20), 6534 (in Chinese).
陈心想, 何绪生, 耿增超, 等. 生态学报, 2013, 33(20), 6534.
17 Yuan S, Zhao L X, Meng H B, et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(5), 1402 (in Chinese).
袁帅, 赵立欣, 孟海波, 等. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5), 1402.
18 Shiv B, Shailja S, Santanu M, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 914, 169585.
19 Wang N, Xia D, Duan X, et al. Coal Science and Technology, 2025, 53(6), 522 (in Chinese).
王宁, 夏栋, 段晓明, 等. 煤炭科学技术, 2025, 53(6), 522.
20 Xu W N, Xia Z Y, Zhou Y H, et al. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2007(4), 30 (in Chinese).
许文年, 夏振尧, 周宜红, 等. 中国水土保持, 2007(4), 30.
21 Liu D X, Gao X, Wu Y K, et al. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2021, 29(1), 1 (in Chinese).
刘大翔, 高贤, 许亚坤, 等. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2021, 29(1), 1.
22 Yang Y S, Chen J S, Zhou T L, et al. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 345, 12023.
23 Xu W N, Zhou M T, Xia Z Y. Technical code for eco-restoration of vegetation concrete on steep slope of hydropower projects:NB/T 35082-2016, China Electric Power Press, China, 2016 (in Chinese).
许文年, 周明涛, 夏振尧. 水电工程陡边坡植被混凝土生态修复技术规范: NB/T 35082-2016, 中国电力出版社, 2016.
24 Lin H, Shi H B, Zhou C B, et al. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(23), 96 (in Chinese).
林海, 时花豹, 周创兵, 等. 材料导报, 2024, 38(23), 96.
25 Mohd Azmi N Z, Buthiyappan A, Abdul Raman A, et al. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2022, 116, 1.
26 Yazdanpanah H, Mahmoodabadi M, Cerdà A. Geoderma, 2016, 266, 58.
27 Li S L, Wang X, Wang S, et al. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32 (14), 135 (in Chinese).
李帅霖, 王霞, 王朔, 等. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32 (14), 135.
28 Liu Z Y, Huang T T, Cao Y Q, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45 (10), 2929 (in Chinese).
刘忠玉, 黄通通, 曹永青, 等. 岩土力学, 2024, 45 (10), 2929.
29 Edeh I G, Mašek O, Buss W. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 714, 136857.
30 Garg A, Zhu H, Sarmah A K, et al. Biochar, 2023, 5, 34.
31 Yan S H, Zhang S L, Yan P K, et al. Biochar, 2022, 4, 56.
32 Zou Y P, Zhang S Y, Shi Z R, et al. Arid Land, 2022, 14, 374.
33 Wang H, Yao L, Zhang Q, et al. Environmental Science, 2023, 44(2), 868 (in Chinese).
王宏, 姚莉, 张奇, 等. 环境科学, 2023, 44(2), 868.
34 Gai X, Wang H, Liu J, et al. Plos One, 2014, 9(12), e113888.
35 Hailegnaw N S, Mercl F, Pracke K, et al. Geoderma, 2019, 338, 48.
36 Jiang Z X, Cui S, Zhang X, et al. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(10), 4658 (in Chinese).
姜志翔, 崔爽, 张鑫, 等. 环境科学, 2022, 43(10), 4658.
37 Dady Y, Ismail R, Jol H, et al. Soil and Its Sustainability, 2021, 13(19), 10851.
38 Chu Y L, Zhao Z, Su S W, et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2024, 30(2), 385 (in Chinese).
褚玉麟, 赵哲, 苏少伟, 等. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30(2), 385.
39 Kuo Y, Lee C, Jien S. Water, 2020, 12(7), 2012.
40 Zhao Y F, Lu Y P, Zhuang H F, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 904, 166292.
41 Sun N T, Wang X Y, Zhou H, et al. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59(3), 723 (in Chinese).
孙宁婷, 王小燕, 周豪, 等. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(3), 723.
42 Jidapa P, Kishor A, Wojciech M, et al. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 26, 115684.
[1] 胡慧, 陈宇, 张亚梅. 生物炭在多功能涂层改性中的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25090003-15.
[2] 寇长江, 许舒翔, 花倩, 吴正光, 康爱红. 面向路面径流重金属的生物炭复合滤料制备与净化机理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25070056-12.
[3] 薛翠真, 李肖克, 苏丽, 冯琼, 乔宏霞. 基于核磁共振技术的生物炭水泥砂浆强度及孔结构性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25060140-8.
[4] 何俊, 左子威, 孙思琴, 康多运, 杨心语, 胡晓慧. 生物炭辅助固化土强度性质的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25040059-8.
[5] 敬凌琨, 王洪博, 曹振玺, 张磊, 梁亚康, 王兴鹏. 鼠李糖脂改性对棉花秸秆生物炭结构特性及盐胁迫下植物生长的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(4): 24110033-7.
[6] 鲍志超, 周雪松. 高铁酸钾改性酒糟生物炭对诺氟沙星的吸附性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(4): 24010137-8.
[7] 张云松, 庞赟佶, 许嘉, 陈义胜, 王丽, 屈忠义. 微波热解技术在制备生物炭中的应用及研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(11): 24040164-7.
[8] 鲁丽佳, 计丕霞, 陈全, 易鹏, 吴敏. 生物炭提升土壤中解磷菌定殖及其解磷能力[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(21): 23050070-9.
[9] 桂超, 宋晨浩, 钱文敏, 刘泽, 张伟, 文瀚, 陈玉保. 基于废弃茄科植物的纳米铁/生物炭制备及其对含铬(Ⅵ)废水的吸附净化研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(18): 23070104-9.
[10] 黄雪刚, 刘洋, 李博文, 谭聪, 谭春玲, 宋兰, 仇浩. 三种热点工程颗粒材料的性质与环境行为和细胞毒性的关系[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(6): 21050141-8.
[11] 聂若楠, 王旺民, 曹丽娟, 徐慧敏, 储刚, 秦文秀, 王振, 司友斌. 关于生物炭的四重功能化改性及其吸附环境污染物机制的综述[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(22): 22050019-9.
[12] 赵悦, 李德念, 阳济章, 熊传溪, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 中药渣生物炭活化制备碳基电催化剂及其氧还原反应催化性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(2): 21070205-7.
[13] 阳济章, 李德念, 谈强, 廖达秀, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 市政污泥生物炭负载氧化钙催化剂的制备及催化酯交换反应性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(10): 21110211-6.
[14] 李博文, 刘洋, 李宗霖, 齐佳敏, 谭聪, 何莹, 仇浩. 生物炭对土壤酶活性影响的机理研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(7): 20060202-6.
[15] 张军, 王薇, 储刚, 周丹丹, 赵婧, 王琳, 李芳芳. 生物炭中溶解性有机质与Cu(Ⅱ)的络合机制研究[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(22): 22160-22165.
[1] ZHENG Tao, HUANG Qian, HOU Guofu, DING Yi, ZHANG Xiaodan, ZHAO Ying. Research and Development of Colloidal Quantum Dot Solar Cells Based on Ⅳ-Ⅵ Compounds[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(1): 1 -9 .
[2] GUO Hongjian, JIA Junhong, ZHANG Zhenyu, LIANG Bunu, CHEN Wenyuan, LI Bo, WANG Jianyi. Microstructure and Tribological Properties of VN/Ag Films Fabricated by Pulsed Laser Deposition Technique[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(2): 55 -59 .
[3] . Magnetic Properties and Dysprosium Infiltration of Sintered Nd-Fe-B
Magnets by Magnetron Sputtering
[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(4): 17 -20 .
[4] . Effects of Forging and Heat Treatment Processing on Structure and Mechanical
Properties of Al-7Si-1.6Cu Alloy
[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(4): 70 -74 .
[5] YUAN Xinjian, LI Ci, WANG Haodong, LIANG Xuebo, ZENG Dingding, XIE Chaojie. Effects of Micro-alloying of Chromium and Vanadium on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of High Carbon Steel[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(8): 76 -81 .
[6] LI Shijie, HAN Kuihua, HAN Xudong, LU Chunmei. Preparation and Characterization for High Specific Surface Area
Activated Carbon from Gulfweed
[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(6): 38 -44 .
[7] ZUO Yingfeng, WU Yiqiang, GU Jiyou, SHE Jiarong, GUO Xin, JIANG Ping. Effect of MAH Modifying Method on the Interfacial Compatibility of Starch/Polylactic Acid[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(16): 41 -45 .
[8] GAO Wei, ZHAO Guangjie. Synergetic Oxidation Modification of Wooden Activated Carbon Fiber with Nitric Acid and Ceric Ammonium Nitrate[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(9): 1507 -1512 .
[9] WU Zibin, SONG Sensen, DONG An, YANG Zongwu, LI Xueke, QIN Ke, ZHANG Haitao, BAN Chunyan, LI Baomian, CUI Jianzhong, Hiromi Nagaumi. Research Progress on Anode Materials and Electrolytes of Aluminum-Air Battery[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(1): 135 -142 .
[10] HE Pei, YANG Junliang. Printed Organic Transistors with Ultralow Power Consumption[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(13): 2107 -2108 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed