Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (10): 25050005-9    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25050005
  无机非金属及其复合材料 |
碱激发矿渣-粉状炉渣水泥基本拉伸徐变机理研究
许诺诚, 丁方硕, 林旭健, 梁咏宁, 季韬*
福州大学土木工程学院,福州 350108
Study for the Basic Tensile Creep Mechanism of Alkali-Activated Blast Furnace Slag-Powdered Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Slag Cement
XU Nuocheng, DING Fangshuo, LIN Xujian, LIANG Yongning, JI Tao*
College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 31919KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为了缓解碱矿渣水泥收缩较大和抗裂性能较差的问题,以矿渣及粉状炉渣为前驱体,采用碳酸钾及硅酸钠为复合激发剂,研究不同碳酸钾掺量(0%~2%)对碱激发矿渣-粉状炉渣水泥砂浆(ASPm)自收缩及基本拉伸徐变的影响,并通过XRD、TG/DTG、SEM-EDS、MIP(压汞)及NMR揭示其机理。结果表明:随着碳酸钾掺量提高,水化程度降低,化学收缩减小,毛细孔压力降低,C-A-S-H凝胶生成量减少,碳酸钙晶体生成量增加,名义晶胶比增大,n(Al)/n(Si)下降,C-A-S-H凝胶的堆叠明显,重组重排受限,ASPm自收缩减小。当碳酸钾掺量从0%增加至1.5%时,自收缩减小,n(K)/n(Na)提高,C-A-S-H凝胶生成量下降,此时开裂时间延长和C-A-S-H凝胶层间摩擦降低起主导作用,ASPm开裂时的基本拉伸徐变增大。当碳酸钾掺量从1.5%增加至2%时,n(K)/n(Na)提高,开裂时间不变,此时自收缩减小起主导作用,ASPm开裂时的基本拉伸徐变减小。碳酸钾掺量为1.5%时,ASPm具有较好的力学性能、较小的自收缩、最好的抗裂性能和最大的基本拉伸徐变。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
许诺诚
丁方硕
林旭健
梁咏宁
季韬
关键词:  碱矿渣-粉状炉渣水泥  碳酸钾掺量  名义晶胶比  自收缩  基本拉伸徐变    
Abstract: In order to relieve the significant shrinkage and poor crack resistance of alkali-activated slag cement, with the blast furnace slag and powdered municipal solid waste incineration slag as precursors and the potassium carbonate and sodium silicate as composite activators, alkali-activated blast furnace slag-powdered municipal solid waste incineration slag mortar (ASPm) was prepared, and the effect of potassium carbo-nate content (from 0% to 2%) on the autogenous shrinkage and basic tensile creep of ASPm was studied, and its mechanism was revealed by TG/DTG, SEM-EDS, MIP, and NMR. The results show that, with the increase of potassium carbonate content, the hydration degree decreases, the chemical shrinkage decreases, the capillary pressure decreases, the amount of C-A-S-H gel decreases, the amount of calcium carbo-nate crystal increases, the nominal crystal-gel ratio increases, the n(Al)/n(Si) decreases, the stacking of C-A-S-H gel is obvious, the recombination and rearrangement are restricted, and the autogenous shrinkage of ASPm decreases. When the content of potassium carbonate increases from 0% to 1.5%, the autogenous shrinkage decreases, the n(K)/n(Na) ratio increases, the amount of C-A-S-H gel declines. At this stage, the prolonged cracking time and the decreased interlayer friction of C-A-S-H gel play a leading role, and the basic tensile creep at the cracking time of ASPm increases. When the content of potassium carbonate increases from 1.5% to 2%, the n(K)/n(Na) ratio increases, and the crac-king time remains unchanged. At this stage, the reduction of autogenous shrinkage plays a dominant role, and the basic tensile creep at the cracking time of ASPm decreases. When the potassium carbonate content is 1.5%, ASPm has better mechanical properties, smaller autogenous shrinkage, the best crack resistance, and maximum basic tensile creep.
Key words:  alkali-activated blast furnace slag-powdered municipal solid waste incineration slag cement    potassium carbonate content    nominal crystal-gel ratio    autogenous shrinkage    basic tensile creep
发布日期:  2026-06-03
ZTFLH:  TU225  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(52278248;52279126)
通讯作者:  *季韬,浙江大学工学博士,福州大学二级教授、博士研究生导师,长期从事固废利用、环保水泥基材料及其工程应用研究。jt72@163.com   
作者简介:  许诺诚,福州大学土木工程学院硕士研究生,在季韬教授的指导下研究环保水泥基材料。
引用本文:    
许诺诚, 丁方硕, 林旭健, 梁咏宁, 季韬. 碱激发矿渣-粉状炉渣水泥基本拉伸徐变机理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(10): 25050005-9.
XU Nuocheng, DING Fangshuo, LIN Xujian, LIANG Yongning, JI Tao. Study for the Basic Tensile Creep Mechanism of Alkali-Activated Blast Furnace Slag-Powdered Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Slag Cement. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(10): 25050005-9.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25050005  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I10/25050005
1 Chu H, Wang Q, Zhang W. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 426, 136152.
2 Bawab J, Khatib J, Kenai S, et al. Buildings, 2021, 11(5), 179.
3 Chen B, Perumal P, Illikainen M, et al. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 71, 106386.
4 Chen B, Perumal P, Aghabeyk F, et al. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2024, 204, 107516.
5 Chen Z, Liu Y, Zhu W, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 112, 1025.
6 Zhu W, Chen X, Zhao A, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 212, 261.
7 Maldonado-Alameda À, Giro-Paloma J, Alfocea-Roig A, et al. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(12), 4129.
8 Li Y, Yan X, Wan M, et al. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 22, e04423.
9 Dai X, Ren Q, Aydin S, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 141, 105118.
10 Zhao X W, Zhang J M, Chen X D, et al. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(16), 187 (in Chinese).
赵晓雯, 张检梅, 陈徐东, 等. 材料导报, 2022, 36(16), 187.
11 Komljenović M, Baščarević Z, Marjanović N, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 49, 31.
12 Li Z, Chen Y, Provis J L, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2023, 172, 107244.
13 Neto A A M, Cincotto M A, Repette W. Cement and Concrete Research, 2008, 38(4), 565.
14 Yang C, Liu J, Liu L, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 446, 138018.
15 Gu Y M, Fang Y H. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2012, 40(1), 76 (in Chinese).
顾亚敏, 方永浩. 硅酸盐学报, 2012, 40(1), 76.
16 Ma Y, Zhang B, Lin Y, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 351, 128778.
17 Gaisinskaya-Kipnis A, Ma L, Kampf N, et al. Langmuir, 2016, 32(19), 4755.
18 Jin F, Al-Tabbaa A. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 81, 58.
19 Li G, Tan H, Zhang J, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 291, 123378.
20 Wang S D, Scrivener K L. Cement and Concrete Research, 1995, 25(3), 561.
21 Frías M, Martínez-Ramírez S, Villa R, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2022, 152, 106657.
22 Wang J, Lyu X J, Wang L, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 171, 622.
23 Chen L J, Dou L Y. New Building Materials, 2013, 40(10), 22 (in Chinese).
陈立军, 窦立岩. 新型建筑材料, 2013, 40(10), 22.
24 Yao X, Zhang Z, Zhu H, et al. Thermochimica Acta, 2009, 493(1-2), 49.
25 Yang J H, Lin T Q, Zhang J M, et al. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2024, 56(2), 86 (in Chinese).
杨锦湖, 林添琦, 张检梅, 等. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2024, 56(2), 86.
26 Zhang Z, Zhang J, Yang X, et al. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 68, 105903.
27 Yang J, Zheng X, Ma Y, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 140, 105110.
28 Neto A, Cincotto M A, Repette W. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2010, 32(4), 312.
29 Yuan B, Yu Q L, Dainese E, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 153, 459.
30 Tan H, Deng X, He X, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 97, 387.
31 Myers R J, Bernal S A, Gehman J D, et al. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2015, 98(3), 996.
32 Fang G. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 135(1), 106141.
33 Lura P, Jensen O M, Breugel K V. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(2), 223.
34 Ma Y, Ye G. Cement and Concrete Research, 2015, 68, 75.
35 Ye H, Radlińska A. Cement and Concrete Research, 2016, 88, 126.
[1] 刘剑辉, 杨五卫, 苏炜炜, 汤中亿, 陈正, 史才军. 钙镁膨胀剂与SAP复掺对UHPC收缩特性的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(19): 24080191-10.
[2] 马梦阳, 贺行洋, 熊光, 李欣懋, 龙勇, 王福龙. 二水磷石膏-电石渣-镍铁渣三元胶凝体系的性能与微观结构[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(13): 22080048-5.
[3] 杨医博, 岳晓东, 姚丁语, 张迪, 郭文瑛, 王恒昌. 碱渣内养护剂对高强高性能混凝土自收缩及早期抗裂性能的影响及机理分析[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(12): 20020019-6.
[4] 郑伟豪, 何娟, 伍勇华, 宋学锋, 桑国臣. 活性MgO对碱矿渣水泥收缩性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(10): 21040175-8.
[5] 龚建清, 罗鸿魁, 张阳, 龚啸, 谢泽酃, 吴五星, 戴远帆. 减缩剂和HCSA膨胀剂对UHPC力学性能和收缩性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(8): 8042-8048.
[6] 徐彬彬, 欧忠文, 罗伟, 刘娜, 袁旺, 付来平. 饱水轻骨料和减缩剂对UHPC水化过程和自收缩的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(22): 22065-22069.
[7] 李霖皓, 龙广成, 刘芳萍, 石晔, 马聪, 谢友均. 混凝土在蒸养过程中的变形性能[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(8): 1322-1327.
[1] TAN Haijun, HE Jingwen, PEI Hairui, LI Heping, ZHANG Shufen, ZHANG Shuhua. Phenothiazine and Phenoxazine Sensitizer Donor Units: a Comparative Analysis with an Application to Dye-sensitized Solar Cells[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(15): 2538 -2541 .
[2] DU Juan, LIU Qingmao, WANG Fusheng, SONG Xiaoxiao, HU Xuelan. Corrosion Inhibiting Behaviors and Mechanism of Ti-6Al-4V in Hydrofluoric-Nitric Pickling Solutions[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(6): 1000 -1005 .
[3] SUN Ya, WU Changjun, LIU Ya, PENG Haoping, SU Xuping. Impact of Alloying Elements on the Phase Composition and mechanical Properties of the CoCrFeNi-based High Entropy Alloys: a Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(7): 1169 -1173 .
[4] FAN Kai, LU Xuefeng, LYU Kaiming, QIAN Kun. Advances in Research on Pore Structure of C/C Composites[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(13): 2184 -2190 .
[5] HU Yanyan, YANG Chunlin , QIAO Huina , OU Meigui. Research Progress in the Preparation and Application of Gadolinium-based Nanoparticles[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(13): 2243 -2251 .
[6] ZHANG Biao, CHEN Xin, PAN Kaixuan, ZHAO Kangming, YU Guishen. Failure Prediction of Friction Stir Spot Welded Joints Under Multi-axis Loads: an Empirical Failure Model[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(18): 3096 -3100 .
[7] WAN Jian, WANG Hong, LIU Tongxin, CHEN Peng. Effects of the Methacrylic Copolymer on the Developing Properties of Photosensitive Conductive Silver Paste[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(Z2): 512 -515 .
[8] PU Wenjing, LU Wei, XIE Kai, ZHENG Chunman. Progress on the Carbonate-based Electrolyte Designed for Lithium-ion Batteries with Wide Operating Temperature Range[J]. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(7): 7036 -7044 .
[9] RE Yan, QIU Keqiang, LI Donghe, DING Ren, WANG Mei, XU Hui, XU Ying. Investigation on Creep Behavior of Mg-5Al-2Sn-5Ca Magnesium Alloy with High Hardness in As-cast and After Heat-treatment[J]. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(12): 12076 -12082 .
[10] LIANG Guang, ZHU Sheng, WANG Wenyu, WANG Xiaoming, HAN Guofeng, REN Zhiqiang. Research Status and Development Trend of Aluminum Alloy Anticorrosion Technology[J]. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(Z2): 429 -436 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed