3D打印连续苎麻纤维增强聚乳酸复合材料的准静态侵彻性能

doi:10.11896/cldb.22010088

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (15415KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The synthetic fiber reinforced composite materials manufactured by conventional manufacturing processes are gradually unable to meet the requirements of low-cost, rapid manufacturing and environmental friendliness. Therefore, continuous ramie fiber-reinforced polylactic acid (PLA)-based biomass composites with different layups were manufactured by in-situ impregnated 3D printing process. The quasi-static penetration test was conducted to evaluate the effects of layup configuration, support span to indenter diameter ratios (SIRs) and fiber reinforcement on the penetration property of the composites. The damage evolution behavior of the composites during the penetration process was captured in real time by the backlight method. The results show that the addition of continuous ramie fiber increased the penetration strength of the composites by 51.5% (unidirectional) and 52.9% (orthogonal). Compared with the unidirectional layup, the composite with orthogonal layup had an increase of 24.9% and 13.1% in the absorbed energy and maximum penetration force, respectively. The penetration property of the printed sample increased significantly with the decrease of the SIR. The orthogonal layup composite had an increase of 202.4% in strength when the SIR was 10 compared to when the SIR was 5. Finally, the relationship between the layup structure and penetration property of 3D printed composites was revealed through the multiscale analysis of failure features and penetration damage mechanisms.

Key words： continuous ramie fiber bio-composite 3D printing quasi static penetration

Published: 10 January 2023 Online: 2023-01-31

CLC number:	TH16
	TB33

Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China (51905555)and Huxiang Talent Projects (2018RS3002,2020RC3009).

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHENG Ping
	PENG Yong
	WANG Kui
	YAO Song
	LIU Zhixiang

Cite this article:

CHENG Ping,PENG Yong,WANG Kui, et al. Quasi Static Penetration Property of 3D Printed Continuous Ramie-fiber Reinforced Polylactic Acid Composites[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(1): 22010088-6.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.22010088 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2023/V37/I1/22010088

1 Peng Y, Wu Y, Li S, et al. Composites Science Technology, 2020, 199, 108337.
2 Yang K, Zhang G M, Li X Q, et al. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(23), 193(in Chinese).
杨昆, 张广明, 李晓强, 等. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(23), 193.
3 Yang Z Z, Kong Z W, Wu G M, et al. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(13), 13177(in Chinese).
杨兆哲, 孔振武, 吴国民, 等. 材料导报, 2021, 35(13), 13177.
4 Yan R, Li H, Li J C, et al. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46(3), 138(in Chinese).
鄢然, 李浩, 李军超, 等. 中国激光, 2019, 46(3), 138.
5 Dudek P. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 2013, 58(4), 1415.
6 Kabir S, Mathur K, Seyam A. Composite Structures, 2020, 232, 111476.
7 Botelho E C, Figiel L, Rezende M C, et al. Composites Science and Technology, 2003, 63(13), 1843.
8 Blok L G, Longana M L, Yu H, et al. Additive Manufacturing, 2018, 22, 176.
9 Liu T F, Tian X Y, Zhu W J, et al. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(7), 128(in Chinese).
刘腾飞, 田小永, 朱伟军, 等. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(7), 128.
10 Tian X, Liu T, Yang C, et al. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2016, 88, 198.
11 Wang F, Zhang Z, Ning F, et al. Additive Manufacturing, 2020, 32, 101102.
12 Pertuz A D, Díaz-Cardona S, González-Estrada O A. International Journal of Fatigue, 2020, 130, 105275.
13 Dickson A N, Barry J N, Mcdonnell K A, et al. Additive Manufacturing, 2017, 16, 146.
14 Karoyo A H, Dehabadi L, Alabi W. ACS Omega, 2020, 5, 6113.
15 Wang K, Addiego F, Laachachi A, et al. Composite Structures, 2014, 113, 74.
16 Cheng P, Wang K, Chen X, et al. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021, 170, 113760.
17 Matsuzaki R, Ueda M, Namiki M, et al. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6, 23058.
18 Duigon A L, Barbe A, Guillon E, et al. Materials & Design, 2019, 180, 107884.
19 Duigon A L, Chabaud G, Matsuzaki R, et al. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2020, 203, 108474.
20 Zhou N, Yu B, Sun J, et al. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy, 2012, 6(5), 564.
21 Li Q, Li Y, Ma H, et al. Composite Communication, 2020, 20, 100343.
22 Bulut M, Erklig A, Yeter E. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 98, 9.
23 Yudhanto A, Wafai H, Lubineau G, et al. Composite Structures, 2018, 186, 324.
24 Wang K, Li S, Wu Y, et al. Composite Structures, 2021, 267, 113854.
25 Lee S W R, Sun C T. Journal of Composite Materials, 1993, 27(3), 251.
26 Pulungan D, Lubineau G, Yudhanto A, et al. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2017, 117, 177.
27 Erkendirci Ö F, Haque B Z. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2012, 43(8), 3391.
28 Ismail K I, Sultan M T H, Shah A U M, et al. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 163, 455.
29 Fotouhi M, Damghani M, Leong M C, et al. Composite Structures, 2020, 245, 112327.
30 Wagih A, Maimi P, Blanco N, et al. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2016, 82, 180.
31 Taghizadeh S A, Liaghat G, Niknejad A, et al. Journal of Composite Materials, 2019, 53(1), 107.