| INORGANIC MATERIALS AND CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
| Study on Thermoelectric Transport Properties of Monolayer Silicene and Monolayer Germanene |
| LI Duan, LIU Yuanchao*, LIU Xinhao, LI Zishuo, CHANG Letao, LI Bohan
|
| School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102617, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract A systematic investigation on thermoelectric properties of monolayer silicene and germanene was conducted through integrated density functional theory calculations and phonon Boltzmann transport analysis. Distinct thermal and electronic transport behaviors were revealed in these two-dimensional group-IV materials. Near-isotropic thermal transport characteristics were demonstrated in both systems, with lattice thermal conductivities along the X-direction calculated as 9.8 W/(m·K) for silicene and 2.1 W/(m·K) for germanene. In contrast, significant anisotropy was observed in electrical transport properties, with both systems identified as direct bandgap semiconductors exhibiting exceptionally narrow electronic bandgaps of 0.019 eV and 0.002 eV, respectively, accompanied by characteristic Dirac cone features. Maximum ZT values at room temperature were determined to be 0.58 (X-direction) and 0.67 (Y-direction) for silicene, while values of 0.41 (X-direction) and 0.67 (Y-direction) were obtained for germanene. The obtained results establish theoretical foundations and provide valuable references for thermoelectric device design utilizing silicene and germanene, while demonstrating the feasibility of further performance modulation through strain engineering approaches.
|
|
Published: 25 April 2026
Online: 2026-05-06
|
|
|
|
|
1 Elsheikh M H, Shnawah D A, Sabri M F M, et al. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 30, 337. 2 Shi X L, Zou J, Chen Z G. Chemical Reviews, 2020, 120(15), 7399. 3 Han H, Zhao L, Wu X, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2024, 12(36), 24041. 4 Liu K, Wu J. Journal of Materials Research, 2016, 31(7), 832. 5 Jiang H, Zheng L, Liu Z, et al. InfoMat, 2020, 2(6), 1077. 6 Xu M, Liang T, Shi M, et al. Chemical Reviews, 2013, 113(5), 3766. 7 Butler S Z, Hollen S M, Cao L, et al. ACS Nano, 2013, 7(4), 2898. 8 Xie Z, Zhang B, Ge Y, et al. Chemical Reviews, 2021, 122(1), 1127. 9 Ghosal S, Bandyopadhyay A, Jana D. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2020, 22(35), 19957. 10 Roome N J, Carey J D. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(10), 7743. 11 Dien V K, Li W B, Lin K I, et al. RSC Advances, 2022, 12(54), 34851. 12 Cinquanta E, Scalise E, Chiappe D, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(32), 16719. 13 Wei H, Xiao X, Jin X, et al. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2024, 8(1), 244. 14 Wang Z, Feng T, Ruan X. Journal of Applied Physics, 2015, 117(8), 1. 15 Zaveh S J, Roknabadi M R, Morshedloo T, et al. Superlattices and Microstructures, 2016, 91, 383. 16 Kuang Y D, Lindsay L, Shi S Q, et al. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(6), 3760. 17 John R, Merlin B. Crystal Structure Theory and Applications, 2016, 5(3), 43. 18 Dimoulas A. Microelectronic Engineering, 2015, 131, 68. 19 Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Physical Review B, 1996, 54(16), 11169. 20 Grimme S. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2006, 27(15), 1787. 21 Li W, Carrete J, Katcho N A, et al. Computer Physics Communications, 2014, 185(6), 1747. 22 Xie H, Hu M, Bao H. Applied Physics Letters, 2014, 104(13), 1. 23 Wang J, Deng S, Liu Z, et al. National Science Review, 2015, 2(1), 22. 24 Chang, Hyunju, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2005, 109(1), 30. 25 Hong M, Lyu W, Wang Y, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2020, 142(5), 2672. 26 Snyder G J, Toberer E S. Nature Materials, 2008, 7(2), 105. |
|
|
|