UHPC加固石拱桥试验与极限承载力计算

doi:10.11896/cldb.24080230

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (27182KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract To clarify the effect of UHPC on enhancing the bearing capacity of masonry arch bridges, a full process failure test and ultimate bearing capacity calculation analysis were conducted on stone arch bridges strengthened with UHPC. Four sets of stone arches with different types of UHPC materials, interface treatment methods and reinforcement layer thickness were designed and prepared. The structural failure mode, section strain development, crack propagation, and ultimate bearing capacity under concentrated load at the L/4 location were analyzed. The experimental results show that the unreinforced masonry arch exhibits a four-hinge failure mode, while the reinforced masonry arch exhibits two failure modes, one is a four-hinge failure and the other is a composite failure mode of four-hinge failure and interface debonding. The UHPC layer can effectively improve the ultimate bearing capacity and crack resistance of stone arches. The ultimate bearing capacity of unreinforced stone arches is only 0.46 kN, after reinforced with a 3 cm UHPC layer at the intrados, the ultimate bearing capacity of the specimens reaches more than 15 kN. While the tensile strength of UHPC increases from 6.21 MPa to 8.01 MPa, the average peak load of the reinforced stone arc increases from 14.13 kN to 22.27 kN. The calculation formula for the ultimate bearing capacity based on limit analysis method has a calculation error within 25%, which can predict the bearing capacity of reinforced stone masonry arches well. Parameter analysis shows that the ultimate bearing capacity of reinforced arch structures increases linearly with the increase of UHPC reinforcement layer thickness. However, due to the constraint of masonry compressive strength, to increase UHPC tensile strength does not significantly improve the ultimate bearing capacity, the material type of UHPC should be scientifically selected based on the compressive strength of masonry.

Key words： bridge engineering stone bridges UHPC reinforcement ultimate bearing capacity model test

Published: Online: 2025-08-28

CLC number:

U444

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Zongshan
	YANG Jun
	ZHOU Jianting
	ZHANG Hong

Cite this article:

WANG Zongshan,YANG Jun,ZHOU Jianting, et al. Test and Ultimate Bearing Capacity Calculation of Stone Arch Bridges Strengthened with UHPC[J]. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(17): 24080230-7.

URL:

https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.24080230 OR https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2025/V39/I17/24080230

1 Xu Y. World Bridges, 2013, 41(3), 85 (in Chinese).
徐勇. 世界桥梁, 2013, 41(3), 85.
2 Zhang M, Qian R J, Zhang F, et al. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(1), 210 (in Chinese).
张淼, 钱永久, 张方, 等. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1), 210.
3 San C L, Ma X J. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2019, 39(5), 156 (in Chinese).
单成林, 马兴键. 中外公路, 2019, 39(5), 156.
4 Qiao W J, Sun K D, Song Y F, et al. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016(1), 89 (in Chinese).
乔文靖, 孙克东, 宋一凡, 等. 中国公路学报, 2016(1), 89.
5 George J, Menon A. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26(6), 6021005.
6 Angiolilli M, Gregori A, Pathirage M, et al. Engineering Structures, 2020, 224, 111102.
7 Baraccani S, Zauli L, Theodossopoulos D, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 265, 120305.
8 Simoncello N, Zampieri P, Gonzalez-libreros J, et al. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2019, 177, 107386.
9 Cao J, Shao X, Zhan J, et al. Engineering Structures, 2023, 289, 116122.
10 Zhang X, Li X, Liu R, et al. Engineering Structures, 2020, 213, 110569.
11 Liu C, Ma R J, Wang J Y, et al. Bridge Construction, 2017, 47(5), 112(in Chinese).
刘超, 马汝杰, 王俊颜, 等. 桥梁建设, 2017, 47(5) 112.
12 Tazarv M, Bohn L, Wehbe N. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2019, 24(6), 4019044.
13 Gao X, Shen S, Chen G, et al. Engineering Structures, 2023, 278, 115315.
14 San B, Liu Z, Xiao Y, et al. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 2017, 44(3), 88 (in Chinese).
单波, 刘志, 肖岩, 等. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 44(3), 88.
15 Cui D Y, Liu F Z, Han Y, et al. Construction Technology, 2018, 47(21), 140 (in Chinese).
崔登云, 刘福忠, 韩瑜, 等. 施工技术, 2018, 47(21), 140.
16 Wang Z S, Zhou J T, Yang J, et al. World Bridges, 2022, 50(2), 105 (in Chinese).
王宗山, 周建庭, 杨俊, 等. 世界桥梁, 2022, 50(2), 105.
17 Sun C, Liu M, Chen B C, et al. Journal of Fuzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 40(3), 376 (in Chinese).
孙潮, 刘明, 陈宝春, 等. 福州大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(3), 376.
18 Yang J, Zhou J T, Cheng J, et al. Bridge Construction, 2018, 48(4), 74 (in Chinese).
杨俊, 周建庭, 程俊, 等. 桥梁建设, 2018, 48(4), 74.
19 Yang J, Chen R, Zhang Z, et al. Engineering Structures, 2023, 279, 115611.
20 Wang Z, Yang J, Zhou J, et al. Structures, 2022, 43, 805.