ENVIRONMENTAL CATALYTIC MATERIALS |
|
|
|
|
|
Research Progress of Gaseous Ozone Decomposition Catalysts |
ZHANG Ruiyang1,2, WANG Shuyan2, LI Bangxin2, ZHANG Aili2, ZHANG Qian2, ZHOU Ying1,2
|
1 State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China 2 School of New Energy and Materials, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China |
|
|
Abstract Advanced oxidation technology involving strong oxidizing ozone has been applied in the fields of water treatment, air purification and sterilization. But the excessive discharge of ozone causes substantial air pollution and represents a major hazard to human health. Compared to typical ozone treatment procedures, such as adsorption, thermal decomposition, absorption and so on, catalytic ozone decomposition has garnered a lot of attention since it is very efficient, safe and environmentally benign. Up to now, great progress has been made on catalysts for ozone decomposition. The types of catalysts have become more abundant, including activated carbon, noble metals, transition metal oxides, metal-organic framework materials, etc., and their application forms have evolved from powder-based materials to monolithic materials. Nevertheless, two major difficulties severely limit the practical application of catalysts: on the one hand, catalyst deactivation is unavoidable due to the accumulation of intermediate oxygen species at surface active sites, which is the rate-limiting phase of the reaction. On the other hand, due to the intense competing adsorption between water molecules and ozone at active sites, catalysts are rapidly poisoned in moist conditions. As a result, catalysts with high catalytic activity and water resistance are highly desirable. To enhance the catalytic property, some effective strategies, including enlarging the surface area, fabricating oxygen vacancy, regulating lattice plane, doping and surface modification, are used to increase the concentration of active sites and accelerate the electron transfer. While hydrophobic treatment is a common approach to improve water resistance. Furthermore, researchers have shown in recent years that water can ope-rate as a promoter at some specific active sites, which not only boosts catalytic activity but also prevents unstable performance caused by water adsorption competition. This overview covers the research progress of catalytic ozone decomposition materials, as well as the gas ozone decomposition reaction process and mechanism. Especially, the advantages and challenges of various catalysts are summarized and the strategies for improving the activity and stability are highlighted. This review serves as a good reference for the preparation of stable and efficient catalytic ozone decomposition materials and the large-scale application of ozone oxidation technology in the chemical industry.
|
Published: 30 November 2021
|
|
Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1862111) and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2020ZDZX0008). |
About author:: Ruiyang Zhang received his B.C from Henan Polytechnic University in 2012 and his Ph.D. at Southwest Petroleum University in 2020. Currently he is a lecturer at Southwest Petroleum University. His main research interest is the development and application of environmental functional materials. Ying Zhou received his B.C and MSc from Central South University and Chinese Academy of Sciences, respectively. In 2010, he received his Ph.D. at the University of Zurich (UZH) under the supervision of Prof. Greta R. Patzke. He then continued his work with a postdoctoral Forschungskredit grant from UZH. He was also awarded a fellowship by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology with Prof. Jan-Dierk Grunwaldt and was a visiting professor at Kyoto University. He currently holds a professorship at Southwest Petroleum University. His research interest is in the clean utilization of oil and gas and environmental remediation materials as well as the related in situ characterization techniques. |
|
|
1 Brunekreef B, Holgate S T. Lancet, 2002, 360 (9341), 1233. 2 Akimoto H. Science, 2003, 302 (5651), 1716. 3 Schwarzenbach R P, Egli T, Hofstetter T B, et al. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2010, 35, 109. 4 Geng F, Tie X, Xu J, et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42 (29), 6873. 5 Sillman S. Atmospheric Environment, 1999, 33 (12), 1821. 6 Oyama S T. Catalysis Reviews, 2000, 42 (3), 279. 7 Snyder S A, Wert E C, Rexing D J, et al. Ozone: Science & Enginee-ring, 2006, 28 (6), 445. 8 Van Geluwe S, Braeken L, Van der Bruggen B. Water Research, 2011, 45 (12), 3551. 9 Destaillats H, Chen W, Apte M G, et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45 (21), 3561. 10 Wang T, Xue L, Brimblecombe P, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 575, 1582. 11 Takeuchi Y, Itoh T. Separations Technology, 1993, 3(3), 168. 12 Jones W M, Davidson N. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1962, 84 (15), 2868. 13 Harteck P, Dondes S, Thompson B. Science, 1965, 147 (3656), 393. 14 Liu Y, Yang W, Zhang P, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 442, 640. 15 Gong S, Xie Z, Li W, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 241, 578. 16 Ohtani B, Zhang S W, Nishimoto S, et al. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, 1992, 88 (7), 1049. 17 Cho K C, Hwang K C, Sano T, et al. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 2004, 161(2-3), 155. 18 Jia J, Zhang P, Chen L. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 189, 210. 19 Dhandapani B, Oyama S T. Applied Catalysis A: General, 1997, 11 (2), 129. 20 Beltrán F J, Rivas J, Álvarez P, et al. Ozone: Science & Engineering, 2002, 24 (4), 227. 21 Zhu G, Zhu W, Lou Y, et al. Nature Communications, 2021, 12, 4152. 22 Lin J, Kawai A, Nakajima T. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2002, 39 (2), 157. 23 Wang H, Rassu P, Wang X, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57 (50), 16416. 24 Jia J, Zhang P. Ozone: Science & Engineering, 2018, 40 (1), 21. 25 Sullivan R, Thornberry T, Abbatt J. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2004, 4 (5), 1301. 26 Batakliev T, Georgiev V, Anachkov M, et al. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 2014, 7 (2), 47. 27 Tomiyasu H, Fukutomi H, Gordon G. Inorganic Chemistry, 1985, 24 (19), 2962. 28 Alder M G, Hill G R. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1950, 72 (5), 1884. 29 Bulanin K, Lavalley J, Tsyganenko A. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1995, 99 (25), 10294. 30 Bulanin K, Alexeev A, Bystrov D, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1994, 98 (19), 5100. 31 Li W, Gibbs G, Oyama S T. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1998, 120 (35), 9041. 32 Li W, Oyama S T. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1998, 120 (35), 9047. 33 Radhakrishnan R, Oyama S T. Journal of Catalysis, 2001, 199 (2), 282. 34 Shafeeyan M S, Daud W M A W, Houshmand A, et al. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2010, 89 (2), 143. 35 Dαbrowski A, Podkościelny P, Hubicki Z, et al. Chemosphere, 2005, 58 (8), 1049. 36 Subrahmanyam C, Bulushev D A, Kiwi-Minsker L. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2005, 61(1-2), 98. 37 Jüntgen H. Fuel, 1986, 65(10), 1436. 38 Yang Y, Chiang K, Burke N. Catalysis Today, 2011, 178 (1), 197. 39 Yu Y, Ji J, Li K, et al. Catalysis Today, 2020, 355 (15), 573. 40 Gélin P, Primet M. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2002, 39 (1), 1. 41 Pakhare D, Spivey J. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43 (22), 7813. 42 Manchot W, Kampschulte W. Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft, 1907, 40 (4), 4984. 43 Chang C L, Lin T S. Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters, 2005, 86 (1), 91. 44 Nikolov P, Genov K, Konova P, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 184 (1-3), 16. 45 Hao Z, Cheng D, Guo Y, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2001, 33 (3), 217. 46 Kameya T, Urano K. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2002, 128 (3), 286. 47 Shao X, Li X, Ma J, et al. ACS Omega, 2021, 6 (16), 10715. 48 Yang L, Ma J, Li X, et al. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2020, 10 (22), 7671. 49 Li B X, Zhang Q, Xiao J, et al. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2021, DOI: 10.15541/jim20210127 (in Chinese). 黎邦鑫,张骞,肖杰,等. 无机材料学报,2021,DOI: 10.15541/jim20210127. 50 Schwab G, Hartman C. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1964, 6, 72. 51 Cao R, Zhang P, Liu Y, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 495, 143607. 52 Gopi T, Swetha G, Shekar S C, et al. Catalysis Communications, 2017, 92, 51. 53 Chen X, Zhao Z, Liu S, et al. Journal of Rare Earths, 2020, 38 (2), 175. 54 Tanaka H, Misono M. Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science, 2001, 5 (5), 381. 55 Polo-Garzon F, Wu Z. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6 (7), 2877. 56 Khan N A, Hasan Z, Jhung S H. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 244, 444. 57 Rangnekar N, Mittal N, Elyassi B, et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44 (20), 7128. 58 Liu Y C, Zhu M, Chen M Y, et al. Materials Reports, 2020,34(7), 7003 (in Chinese). 刘宇程, 祝梦, 陈明燕, 等. 材料导报, 2020, 34 (7), 7003. 59 Sun Z B, Si Y N, Zhao S N, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2021, 143 (13), 5150. 60 Wang Q, O'Hare D. Chemical Reviews, 2012, 112 (7), 4124. 61 Hu L, Zeng X, Wei X, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 273, 119014. 62 Wang Z, Liu W, Hu Y, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 272, 118959. 63 Wang S, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, et al. Nanoscale, 2020, 12 (24), 12817. 64 Ma J, Chen Y, He G, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 285, 119806. 65 Zhang R Y, Li C J, Zhang A L, et al. Materials Reports, 2020, 34 (3), 3001 (in Chinese). 张瑞阳,李成金,张艾丽,等. 材料导报, 2020, 34 (3), 3001. 66 Zhang R, Ma M, Zhang Q, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 235, 17. 67 Lejeune A, Cabrol A, Lebullenger R, et al. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8 (7), 2854. 68 Gong S, Wang A, Wang Y, et al. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2020, 3 (1), 597. 69 Rahimi M G, Wang A, Ma G, et al. RSC Advances, 2020, 10 (67), 40916. 70 Cao R, Li L, Zhang P. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 407, 124793. 71 Wang C, Ma J, Liu F, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119 (40), 23119. 72 Wang M X, Zhang P Y, Li J G, et al. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2014, 35 (3), 335 (in Chinese). 王鸣晓, 张彭义, 李金格, 等.催化学报, 2014, 35 (3), 335. 73 Oyama S, Zhang W, Heisig C. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 1997, 14 (1), 117. 74 Azhariyah A, Pradyasti A, Dianty A, et al. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Banda Aceh, Indonesia,2018, pp. 012075 . 75 Imamura S, Ikebata M, Ito T, et al. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1991, 30 (1), 217. 76 Yu Q, Pan H, Zhao M, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 172 (2-3), 631. 77 Li X, Ma J, Zhang C, et al. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 80, 159. 78 Yang Y, Zhang P, Jia J. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 484, 45. 79 Ma J, Wang C, He H. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 201, 503. 80 Yang Y, Jia J, Liu Y, et al. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2018, 562, 132. 81 Jia J, Yang W, Zhang P, et al. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2017, 546, 79. 82 Gong S, Li W, Xie Z, et al. New Journal of Chemistry, 2017, 41 (12), 4828. 83 Gong S, Wu X, Zhang J, et al. CrystEngComm, 2018, 20 (22), 3096. 84 Zhu G, Zhu J, Li W, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52 (15), 8684. 85 Gong S, Chen J, Wu X, et al. Catalysis Communications, 2018, 106, 25. 86 Rao Y, Zeng D, Cao X, et al. Ceramics International, 2019, 45 (6), 6966. 87 Liu Y, Zhang P. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2017, 530, 102. 88 Liu Y, Zhang P. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121 (42), 23488. 89 Lian Z, Ma J, He H. Catalysis Communications, 2015, 59, 156. 90 Sun S, Li H, Xu Z J. Joule, 2018, 2 (6), 1024. 91 Leofanti G, Padovan M, Tozzola G, et al. Catalysis Today, 1998, 41 (1-3), 207. 92 Liu S, Ji J, Yu Y, et al. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2018, 8 (16), 4264. 93 Ding Z, Kloprogge J T, Frost R L, et al. Journal of Porous Materials, 2001, 8 (4), 273. 94 Noack M, Kölsch P, Schäfer R, et al. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2002, 25 (3), 221. 95 Yang L, Ma J, Li X, et al. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 59 (1), 118. 96 Brodu N, Manero M H, Andriantsiferana C, et al. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 96 (9), 1911. 97 Jia J, Zhang P, Chen L. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2016, 6 (15), 5841. 98 Pan X, Yang M Q, Fu X, et al. Nanoscale, 2013, 5 (9), 3601. 99 Zhu G, Zhu J, Jiang W, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 209, 729. 100 Ding Y, Zhang X, Chen L, et al. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2017, 250, 121. 101 Li X, Ma J, Yang L, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52 (21), 12685. 102 Zhang L, Wang S, Ni C, et al. Chemical Engineering Science, 2021, 229, 116011. 103 Zhang L, Wang S, Lv L, et al. Langmuir, 2021, 37 (4), 1410. 104 Wang A, Zhang L, Rahimi M G, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 277, 119223. 105 Liu X, Liu J, Chang Z, et al. Catalysis Communications, 2011, 12 (6), 530. 106 Wang N, Qian W, Chu W, et al. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2016, 6 (10), 3594. 107 Chen Y, Qu W, Li C, et al. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57 (37), 12590. 108 Shi M, Li G, Li J, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59 (16), 6590. 109 Li X, Luo L, Bi Y, et al. Nanoscale Research Letters, 2019, 14 (1), 374. 110 Brodu N, Manero M H, Andriantsiferana C, et al. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 231, 281. 111 Ji J, Fang Y, He L, et al. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2019, 9 (15), 4036. 112 Naydenov A, Konova P, Nikolov P, et al. Catalysis Today, 2008, 137 (2-4), 471. 113 Fang C, Li D, Wang X, et al. New Journal of Chemistry, 2021, 45, 10402. 114 Li X, Ma J, Zhang C, et al. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 91, 43. 115 Li X, Ma J, He H. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54 (18), 11566. 116 Cao R, Li L, Zhang P, et al. Environmental Science: Nano, 2021, 8 (6), 1628. 117 Fang C, Hu C, Li D, et al. New Journal of Chemistry, 2020, 44 (41), 17993. 118 Li D, Cen B, Fang C, et al. New Journal of Chemistry, 2021, 45 (2), 561. |
|
|
|