INORGANIC MATERIALS AND CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
Preparation of Superhydrophilic Anodized Aluminum Oxide Membrane and Superhydrophobic Anodized Aluminum Oxide Membrane with Different Adhesion |
SHANG Fuqiang1,2, HUANG Liqing1, LI Gang1, ZHANG Yu1, CAI Yakun1, WANG Huimin1, DONG Weili1, ZHANG Lei1, LIU You1
|
1 Non-equilibrium Condensed Matter and Quantum Engineering Laboratory, the Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China 2 Unit 63658 of PLA, Urumqi 841700, China |
|
|
Abstract Both superhydrophilic and superhydrophobic surfaces have great application value in many fields. In this article, anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) membranes prepared by two-step high-field anodizing were subjected to wet chemical etching and high-temperature annealing. The change of surface wettability characteristics with post-treatment conditions was studied. The results showed that, with the increase of etching duration, the water contact angle (WCA) of AAO membranes increased first and then decreased to a minimum fixed value. As the etching duration was more than 90 min, the etched AAO membranes showed superhydrophilic characteristic (WCA<10°). The WCA of AAO membranes etched at different time with high temperature annealing was larger than that without high temperature annealing, and the WCA increased with the increase of etching time. Especially when the etching time was 120—180 min, the AAO membranes were superhydrophobic and highly viscous. while the AAO membranes with etching time of 200 min showed extremely low superhydrophobic characteristic (WCA>150°) and ultralow viscosity, and the average contact duration between the AAO membranes surface and droplet was only 4.6 ms. The as-prepared superhydrophobic AAO membranes were of good time stability. Also the mechanism of the wettability of AAO membrane changing with post-treatment conditions was analyzed. The results obtained in this article provide a new idea for design functional solid surfaces with different wettability and have good practical application value.
|
Published: 26 April 2020
|
|
Fund:This work was financially supported by Major Programs of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61890961);the Industry Key Technologies R&D Project in Shaanxi Province of China (2020GY-274);General Programs of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11774279) |
Corresponding Authors:
Liqing Huang, professor and Ph.D. supervisor at School of Science in Xi'an Jiaotong University. Her research interests include optical functional materials, preparation and application of nano-porous membranes, and optical properties of nano-metal materials and their assembly systems.
|
About author:: Fuqiang Shang, master of science in Xi'an Jiaotong University,mainly engaged in research on micro-nano structure wetting characteristics based on anodic oxidation technology and preparation of superhydrophobic materials |
|
|
1 Xia F, Jiang L. Advanced Materials, 2008, 20(15), 2842. 2 Yan Y Y, Gao N, Barthlott W. Advances in Colloid and Interface Scie-nce, 2011, 169(2), 80. 3 Webb H K, Crawford R J, Ivanova E P. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2014, 210, 58. 4 Gao X F, Jiang L. Nature, 2004, 432(7013), 36. 5 Sun T, Feng L, Gao X, et al. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2005, 38(8), 644. 6 Wen L, Tian Y, Jiang L. Angewandte Chemie. International Ed. in English, 2015, 54(11), 3387. 7 Jin J, Zhao X, Du Y H, et al. iScience, 2018, 6, 289. 8 Xiang C, Sun L, Wang Y, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(28), 15448. 9 Xiang C, Sun L. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(51), 29210. 10 Xiang C, Zhao X, Tan L, et al. Nano Energy, 2019, 55, 269. 11 Losic D, Santos A. Nanoporous alumina: fabrication, structure, properties and applications, Springer, 2015. 12 Tsai K T, Liu C Y, Wang H H, et al. Nanotechnology,2014, 25(33), 335301. 13 Woo L, Sang-Joon P. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(15), 7487. 14 Zhang W, Huang L, Zi C, et al. Journal of Porous Materials, 2018, 25(6), 1707. 15 Ran C, Ding G, Liu W, et al. Langmuir, 2008, 24(18), 9952. 16 Kim S, Polycarpou A A, Liang H. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 351, 460. 17 Buijnsters J G, Zhong R, Tsyntsaru N, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5(8), 3224. 18 Yao L, Zheng M, Ma L, et al. Materials Research Bulletin, 2011, 46(9), 1403. 19 Peng S, Tian D, Miao X, et al. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2013, 409, 18. 20 Baxte A B D C. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1944, 40, 546. 21 Wenzel R N. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1936, 28(8), 988. 22 Le Coz F, Arurault L, Fontorbes S, et al. Surface and Interface Analysis, 2010, 42(4), 227. 23 Atkinson R. Atmospheric Environment, 2000, 34(12-14), 2063. 24 Atkinson R, Arey J. Chemical Reviews, 2003, 103(12), 4605. 25 Deng X, Mammen L, Butt H J, et al. Science, 2012, 335(6064), 67. 26 Ma M, Hill R M. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2006, 11(4), 193. 27 Perevalov T V, Tereshenko O E, Gritsenko V A, et al. Journal of Applied Physics, 2010, 108(1), 13501. 28 Das S N, Choi J H, Kar J P, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2009, 255(16), 7319. 29 Sun R, Nakajima A, Fujishima A, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2001, 105(10), 1984. 30 Yu X, Ma J, Ji F, et al. Thin Solid Films, 2005, 483(1-2), 296. 31 Yarin A L. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 38(1), 159. 32 Graeber G, Martin Kieliger O B, Schutzius T M, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(49), 43275. 33 Liu Y, Moevius L, Xu X, et al. Nature Physics, 2014, 10(7), 515. 34 Lai Y, Gao X, Zhuang H, et al. Advanced Materials, 2009, 21(37), 3799. |
|
|
|