| REVIEW PAPER |
|
|
|
|
|
| A Comprehensive Method of Parameter Identification and Validation for Bammann-Chiesa-Johnson Viscoplasticity Constitutive Model |
| ZHOU Tingting1,2, WANG Gang2, YANG Yang1,2, LI Yao1, SHUAI Maobing1
|
1 Science and Technology on Surface Physic and Chemistry Laboratory, Jiangyou 621908;
2 Beijing Key Lab of Precision/Ultra-precision Manufacturing Equipments and Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084; |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The Bammann-Chiesa-Johnson (BCJ) viscoplasticity constitutive model is advanced to predict mechanical behavior of metals. And the capability of prediction relies on the determination of the model parameters. Normally, the parameters would be identified by using the back-analysis method. However, the method is very complicated because there are quite a number of parameters in the BCJ model and it is not easy to obtain the optimal values. These parameters are involved to describe the coupling effects of strain, strain rate, temperature, as well as the load path and temperature history. This paper proposed a method to identify the 18 papameters, in which comprehensive experiments, based on the physics of the parameters, had been conducted, including quasi-static tests, creep tests and the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests, furthermore parameters decoupling and the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm had been applied. The dynamic mechanical response of Al 1060 was taken to validate the method and the prediction on flow stressesis in good agreement with the test data. The quantitative error analysis showed that the method was effective for a large range of strain rate and temperature variation with high accuracy.
|
|
Published: 02 May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
1 Johnson G C, Bammann D J. Discussion of stress rates in finite deformation problems[J]. Int J Solids Struct,1984,20(8):725.
2 Bammann D J. An internal variable model of viscoplasticity[J]. Int J Eng Sci,1984,22(8-10):1041.
3 Horstemeyer M F, Lathrop J, Gokhale A M, et al. Modeling stress state dependent damage evolution in a cast Al-Si-Mg aluminum alloy[J]. Theor Appl Fract Mech,2000,33(1):31.
4 Tanner A B, Mcginty R D, Mcdowell D L. Modeling temperature and strain rate history effects in OFHC Cu[J]. Int J Plast,1999,15(6):575.
5 Ahad F R, Enakoutsa K, Solanki K N, et al. Nonlocal modeling in high-velocity impact failure of 6061-T6 aluminum[J]. Int J Plast,2013,55(4):108.
6 Guo Y B, Wen Q, Horstemeyer M F. An internal state variable plasticity-based approach to determine dynamic loading history effects on material property in manufacturing processes[J]. Int J Mech Sci,2005,47(9):1423.
7 Guo Y B, Wen Q, Woodbury K A. Dynamic material behavior mo-deling using internal state variable plasticity and its application in hard machining simulations[J]. J Manuf Sci Eng,2006,128(3):749.
8 Harley E J, Miller M P, Bammann D J. Experimental study of internal variable evolution in SS304L, at multiple rates and temperatures[J]. J Eng Mater Technol,1999,121(2):162.
9 Sherburn J A, Horstemeyer M F, Bammann D J, et al. Application of the Bammann inelasticity internal state variable constitutive model to geological materials[J]. Geophys J Int,2011,184(3):1023.
10 Enakoutsa K, Ahad F R, Solanki K N, et al. Localization effects in bammann-chiesa-johnson metals with damage delocalization[C]// ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition,2011:505.
11 Mei Q C, Bammann D J, Horstemeyer M F. A continuum model for hydrogen-assisted void nucleation in ductile materials[J]. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng,2013,21(5):1097.
12 Wang Guosheng. High-speed cutting numerical simulation based on BCJ constitutive model [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2011(in Chinese).
王国胜.基于BCJ本构模型的高速切削过程数值模拟研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2011.
13 Salehghaffari S, Rais-Rohani M, Marin E B, et al. A new approach for determination of material constants of internal state variable based plasticity models and their uncertainty quantification[J]. Comput Mater Sci,2012,55:237.
14 Chuzhoy L, Devor R E, Kapoor S G, et al. Machining simulation of ductile iron and its constituents, Part 1: Estimation of material mo-del parameters and their validation[J]. J Manuf Sci Eng,2003,125(2):181.
15 Miller M P, Harley E J, Bammann D J. Reverse yield experiments and internal variable evolution in polycrystalline metals[J]. Int J Plast,1999,15(15):93.
16 Chuzhoy L, Devor R E, Kapoor S G. Machining simulation of ductile iron and its constituents, Part 2: Numerical simulation and experimental validation of machining[J]. J Manuf Sci Eng,2003,125(2):192.
17 Nie Z G, Wang G, Yu J C, et al. Phase-based constitutive modeling and experimental study for dynamic mechanical behavior of martensitic stainless steel under high strain rate in a thermal cycle[J]. Mech Mater,2016,101:160.
18 Peng Y B, Wang G, Zhu T, et al. Dynamic mechanical behaviors of 6082-T6 aluminum alloy[J]. Adv Mechan Eng,2013,5(12):878016.
19 Salehghaffari S, Raisrohani M, Marin E, et al. An evidence-dased framework for determination of material constants in advanced plasticity models[C]// AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference,2011.
20 Tan Yang, Chi Yilin, Huang Yayu, et al. An approach for identification of material parameters in Bammann-Chiesa-Johnson viscoplastic constitutive model[J]. Chin J Comput Mech,2015(4):490(in Chinese).
谭阳,迟毅林,黄亚宇,等.Bammann-Chiesa-Johnson粘塑性本构模型材料参数的一种识别方法[J]. 计算力学学报,2015(4):490.
21 Bammann D J. Modeling temperature and strain rate dependent large deformations of metals[J]. Appl Mech Rev,1990,43(5S):S312.
22 Davies E D H, Hunter S C. The dynamic compression testing of so-lids by the method of the split Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. J Mech Phys Solids,1963,11(3):155. |
|
|
|
渝公网安备50019002502923号 © Editorial Office of Materials Reports.
2017, Vol. 31 
