镍铁双氢氧化物的响应曲面法优化生长和电催化析氧性能研究

doi:10.11896/cldb.23040152

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (11923KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The layered nickel-iron dihydroxide electrocatalysts were prepared by corrosion engineering. The physicochemical properties of the samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, high resolution transmission electron microscopy and photoelectron spectroscopy. Linear voltammetry characteristic curve, Tafel curve, electrochemical impedance spectrum, cyclic voltammetry cha-racteristic and constant-current potential-time curve were used to analyze the electrocatalytic oxygen evolution characteristics of samples in detail. On the basis of single factor experiment, with 50 mA·cm^-2 corresponding to the oxygen evolution potential for response factor, by using the response surface method on the main factors affecting the catalyst performance is optimized, established the oxygen evolution after the foam nickel iron corrosion potential of the polynomial model. And the corrosion temperature of 80 ℃, time of 9 h, NiSO₄ concentration of 9 mmol·L^-1 are the optimization of the preparation conditions. The sample prepared under this condition has an overpotential of 200 mV at 10 mA·cm^-2 and a Tafel slope of 52.5 mV·dec^-1. After 48 h continuous testing at 50 mA·cm^-2 current density, the OER catalytic activity remaines at 95%, showing better electrocatalytic activity than the commercial RuO₂ electrode.

Key words： nickel-iron dihydroxide corrosion engineering response surface method electrocatalysis oxygen evolution reaction

Published: 25 August 2024 Online: 2024-09-10

CLC number:

TB321

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Xiangyang
	WANG Yi
	XIA Shuang
	LIU Zhongqing

Cite this article:

LIU Xiangyang,WANG Yi,XIA Shuang, et al. Optimization of Growth and Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution of Nickel-Iron Dihydroxide by Response Surface Method[J]. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(16): 23040152-5.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.23040152 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2024/V38/I16/23040152

1 Song J, Wei C, Huang Z-F, et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2020, 49(7), 2196.
2 Gao S, Wang B, Liu X, et al. Nanoscale, 2018, 10(21), 10288.
3 Fan Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y, et al. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 604, 508.
4 Wu Z, Lu X F, Zang S, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2020, 30(15), 1910274.
5 Du F, Liu S, Gu J J, et al. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2021(5), 37 (in Chinese).
杜芳, 刘帅, 古京九, 等. 无机化学学报, 2021(5), 37.
6 Zhang T R, Wang S Y. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2021, 37(7), 3 (in Chinese).
张铁锐, 王双印. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7), 3.
7 Liao C, Yang B, Zhang N, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019, 29(40), 1904020.
8 Li C, Chen J, Wu Y, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(5), 2656.
9 Duan Y, Sun S, Sun Y, et al. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31(12), 1807898.
10 Wang Y, Chen G, Xie J, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(92), 39108.
11 Wang Y, Wang B, Liu X, et al. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2022, 5(7), 8686.
12 Acharya P, Manso R H, Hoffman A S, et al. ACS Catalysis, 2022, 12(3), 1992.
13 Wu X, Li M, Li Q, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(10), 6691.
14 Zhang H, Pan Q, Sun Z, et al. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(24), 11505.
15 Wang R, Yang Y, Sun Z, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(5), 2958.
16 Lan W, Li D, Wang W, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(1), 412.
17 Xu X, Wang R, Chen S, et al. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 2022, 9(21), 5507.
18 Wang R, Yang Y, Xu X, et al. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 2023, 10(4), 1348.
19 Xie J, Qu H, Lei F, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(33), 16121.
20 Yu L, Zhou H, Sun J, et al. Energy & Environmental Science, 2017, 10(8), 1820.
21 Niu S, Jiang W J, Tang T, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019, 29(36), 1902180.
22 Liu X, Gong M, Deng S, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(11), 2009032.
23 Hao S, Chen L, Yu C, et al. ACS Energy Letters, 2019, 4(4), 952.
24 Hao S, Zheng G, Gao S, et al. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(17), 14361.
25 Zhu W X, Zhang T S, Zhang Y, et al. Applied Catalysis B, Environmental, 2019, 244, 844.
26 Liu X, Gong M, Xiao D, et al. Small, 2020, 16(24), 2000663.
27 Zhao W, Xu H, Luan H, et al. Advanced Energy Materials, 2022, 12(2), 2102372.
28 Liu Y, Liang X, Gu L, et al. Nature Communication, 2018, 9(1), 2609.
29 Wang J, Ji L, Zuo S, et al. Advanced Energy Materials, 2017, 7(14), 1700107.
30 Yamashita T, Hayes P. Applied surface science, 2008, 254(8), 2441.
31 Biesinger M C, Payne B P, Grosvenor A P, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257(7), 2717.
32 Wang Y, Xie C, Zhang Z, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2018, 28(4), 1703363.
33 Cui C, Liu Y, Mehdi S, et al. Applied Catalysis B, Environmental, 2020, 265, 118612.
34 Huang J, Han J, Wang R, et al. ACS Energy Letters, 2018, 3(7), 1698.
35 Shinagawa T, Garcia-Esparza A T, Takanabe K. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5(1), 13801.
36 Gao Y, Li H, Yang G. Crystal Growth & Design, 2015, 15(9), 4475.