基于MSCR试验的温拌阻燃沥青高温性能评价与分级

doi:10.11896/cldb.21060064

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (3794KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to study the high temperature performance of warm-mixed flame retardant asphalt, the warm agents (Sasobit), aluminum hydroxide (ATH) and organic montmorillonite (OMMT) were added respectively into 70^#petroleum asphalt and SBS modified asphalt to prepare warm-mixed flame retardant asphalt with three kinds of different use levels (by mass). The high temperature performance of warm-mixed flame retar-dant asphalt was evaluated by multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test at 60 ℃. Then, strain variation percent recovery (R), non-recoverable creep compliance (J_nr) and their stress sensitivity index (R_diff,J_nrdiff) derived from this test were analyzed. According to AASHTO M 332-20 specification, traffic grading was conducted on modified asphalt with different use levels of flame retardant. The results show that for the two types of asphalt, with the increase of use level of flame retardant, the strain decreases, the non-recoverable creep compliance shows downward trend and percent recovery shows upward trend, especially for flame retardant at lower content, which indicates that the increasing use level of flame retardant is more prominent for the improvement of high temperature performance of asphalt at lower flame retardant content. The J_nr3.2 value of warm mix flame retardant bitumen (road petroleum bitumen) does not meet the requirement of ‘≤ 4.5' in the AASHTO standard. The J_nrdiff values of warm mix flame retardant asphalt can meet the requirement of ‘≤75%' in the AASHTO standard. Warm-mixed flame retardant asphalt (road petroleum asphalt) does not meet the requirements of standard traffic and thus can not be graded, warm-mixed flame retardant asphalt (SBS modified asphalt) reaches the standard of Very Heavy Traffic ‘V' Grade at 4% flame retardant content, and Extremely Heavy Traffic ‘E' Grade at 8% and 12% content, so warm mixed flame retardant asphalt (SBS modified asphalt) has better high temperature performance.Through comprehensive evaluation of various creep mechanical properties indicators, high temperature performance grade and traffic classification and economy, the optimal dosage of compound flame retardant is recommended to be 8%.

Key words： warm mix agent flame retardant SBS modified asphalt multiple stress creep recovery(MSCR) test performance grade

Published: 10 May 2023 Online: 2023-05-04

CLC number:

U414

Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China (51908194), the Key Research and Development Program of Guangxi(AB20297033, AB17292032), the Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi (20192BBG70080), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project (2019M650101), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B200202071).

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Shengjie
	LIN Yu
	LI Mengran
	ZHOU Shengbo

Cite this article:

LIU Shengjie,LIN Yu,LI Mengran, et al. High Temperature Performance Evaluation and Grading of Warm-mixed Flame Retardant Asphalt Based on MSCR Test[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(9): 21060064-6.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.21060064 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2023/V37/I9/21060064

1 Ren F, Zhang X J, Sun H B, et al. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 32(6), 1 (in Chinese).
任梵, 张晓娇, 孙海斌, 等. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 32(6), 1.
2 Wang D W, He L Q, Shen P. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(5), 59 (in Chinese).
王大伟, 赫利强, 沈鹏. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(5), 59.
3 Xiao F P, Guo R, Wang J G. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 212, 841.
4 Fu Q L, Wei J G, Peng W J, et al. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(2), 44 (in Chinese).
付其林, 魏建国, 彭文举, 等. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(2), 44.
5 Sun Y N, Li L H. Journal of Building Materials, 2019, 22(5), 750 (in Chinese).
孙艳娜, 李立寒. 建筑材料学报, 2019, 22(5), 750.
6 Liu H Q, Zeiada W, Al-Khateeb G G, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 269, 121320. 1.
7 Rodrigo Delgadillo, Kitae Nam, Hussain Bahia. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2006, 7(1), 7.
8 Ali Behnood, Jan Olek. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 157, 635.
9 Lei Yong, Wang Hainian, Fini E H, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 191, 692.
10 Guo Y M, Xu L, Wu L, et al. Journal of Building Materials, 2018, 21(1), 154 (in Chinese).
郭咏梅, 许丽, 吴亮, 等. 建筑材料学报, 2018, 21(1), 154.
11 Lei J A, Zheng N X, Xu X Q, et al. Journal of Jiangsu University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 41(4), 459 (in Chinese).
雷俊安, 郑南翔, 许新权, 等. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 41(4), 459.
12 Yu P H, Nie Y H, Sun S H, et al. Hlighway Engineering, 2022, 47(1), 47 (in Chinese).
余沛涵, 聂忆华, 孙世恒, 等. 公路工程, 2022, 47(1), 47.
13 Hassanpour-Kasanagh S, Ahmedzade P, Fainleib A M, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 230, 117047.
14 Seyed Alireza Ghanoon, Javad Tanzadeh, Mehrnaz Mirsepahi. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 238, 117183.
15 Alireza Azarhoosh, Mehdi Koohmishi. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 255, 119363.
16 Wei J G, Xie C, Fu Q L, et al. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2013, 26(6), 30 (in Chinese).
魏建国, 谢成, 付其林. 中国公路学报, 2013, 26(6), 30.
17 Guo M. Study on mechanism and multiscale evaluation method of interfacial interaction between asphalt binder and mineral aggregate. Ph. D. Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, China, 2015 (in Chinese).
郭猛. 沥青与矿料界面作用机理及多尺度评价方法研究. 博士学位论文, 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015.
18 AASHTO M 332-20, Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, 2020.
19 Wu C Y, Lyu Z L. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2017, 37(3), 244 (in Chinese).
吴春颖, 吕正龙. 中外公路, 2017, 37(3), 244.
20 Zhu X Z, Sun Y R, Du C, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 240, 117860.