电催化尿素氧化的镍基催化剂表界面调控

doi:10.11896/cldb.20080297

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (7133KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Electrochemically splitting water into hydrogen by renewable energy production is considered as one of the most promising candidates for building “hydrogen cycle”, alleviating energy crisis and sloving environmental problems. However, it is greatly restrained the overall efficiency of hydrogen production by the high overpotential of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and slow reaction kinetics in the traditional water electrolysis. In comparison with OER, urea oxidation reaction (UOR) is an easy process which not only consumes much less energy from hydrogen production, but also degrades urea-rich wastewater. Thus, it is an environmentally friendly technology for hydrogen production from urea electrolysis, which has attracted much attention in recent years. Significant efforts have been made to explore high-effective catalysts due to the UOR with complex process and slow 6e^- transfer rate.
To improve the UOR performance of Ni-based electrocatalysts, some researchers have devoted to increasing the active sites for electrocatalytic oxidation of urea by controlling the size and morphology of Ni-based catalysts. The surface electron structure can also be changed by incorporation of defect vacancy and unsaturated active site, which is beneficial for UOR. In addition, doping heteroatom is conducive to regulate the electron structure of the catalyst, which can not only change its electrical conductivity, but also induce the conversion of crystal phase or crystal face to improve the intrinsic activity of the catalyst. In recent years, some studies have been dedicated to developing composite catalysts with heterogeneous junction, forming synergistic effect of heterogeneous interface and active phase, which can change the adsorption/desorption of the reactants and promote the electron transfer and electrical conductivity, resulting in enhancing the electrocatalytic UOR performance of Ni-based catalysts.
Herein, the design concept and research status of nickel-based UOR catalysts were summarized in recent years, especially in the mechanism of promoting UOR on the Ni-based catalysts through regulating morphology and microstructure, defect engineering, doping modification, and heterojunction. The influence on the electrochemical properties and reaction mechanism of UOR and the synthesis method and structure of Ni-based catalysts were also reviewed. Furthermore, in view of the lack of understanding of the relationships of defect-structure-performance, the research direction of rational design of defective nickel-based catalysts was proposed to shed light on further development of urea electrolysis.

Key words： Ni-based catalyst electrocatalysis urea oxidation defect engineering doping heterojunction

Published: Online: 2022-05-24

CLC number:	TB331
	O646

Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China (22078032), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0345), Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (KJZD-M202100802), Innovative Group of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (CXQT21023) and Postgraduate Supervisor Group of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (yds183007).

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	XIANG Yang
	XIONG Kun
	ZHANG Haidong
	CHEN Jia
	YU Linjian

Cite this article:

XIANG Yang,XIONG Kun,ZHANG Haidong, et al. Surface Interface Regulation of Nickel-based Catalysts for Electrocatalytic Urea Oxidation[J]. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(10): 20080297-8.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.20080297 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2022/V36/I10/20080297

1 Baraat N A M, Amwn M T, Al-mubaddel F S, et al. Journal of Advanced Research, 2019, 16, 43.
2 Kakati N, Maiti J, Lee K S, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2017, 240, 175.
3 Yan W, Wang D, Botte G G. Electrochimica Acta, 2012, 61, 25.
4 Sun X, Ding R. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2020, 10, 1567.
5 Urbańczyk E, Sowa M, Simka W. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2016, 46(10), 1011.
6 Bian L L, Du Q Y, Tian X L, et al. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(3), 926 (in Chinese).
边路路, 杜庆阳, 田晓录, 等. 化工进展, 2017, 36(3), 926.
7 Yousef A, El-newehy M H, Al-deyab S S, et al. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2017, 10(6), 811.
8 Liang Y, Liu Q, Asiri A M, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2015, 153, 456.
9 Yan W, Wang D, Botte G G. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2012, 127, 221.
10 Li F, Chen J, Zhang D, et al. Chemical Communications, 2018, 54(41), 5181.
11 King R L, Botte G G. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(22), 9579.
12 Chen Q, Nie Y, Ming M, et al. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 41(12), 1791.
13 Cooper M, Botte G. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2006, 153(10), A1894.
14 Sayed E T, Eise T, Mohamed H O, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 417, 159.
15 Zhu B, Liang Z, Zou R. Small, 2020, 16(7), 1906133.
16 Sha L, Ye K, Wang G, et al. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 359, 1652.
17 Vedharathinam V, Botte G G. Electrochimica Acta, 2012, 81, 292.
18 Yang D, Gu Y, Yu X, et al. ChemElectroChem, 2018, 5(4), 659.
19 Yu Z, Zhu W, Li Y, et al. Inorganic Chemistry, 2018, 57(8), 4693.
20 Xiao C, Li S, Zhang X, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(17), 7825.
21 Ding Y, Li Y, Xue Y, et al. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(3), 1058.
22 Jiao S, Fu X, Zhang L, et al. Nano Today, 2020, 31, 100833.
23 Wang Q, Lei Y, Wang Y, et al. Energy & Environmental Science, 2020, 13(6), 1593.
24 Li B, Song C, Rong J, et al. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2020, 50, 195.
25 Ye K, Wang G, Cao D, et al. Topics in Current Chemistry, 2018, 376, 42.
26 Liu M, Jiao Y, Zhan S, et al. Catalysis Today, 2020, 355, 596.
27 Zhan S, Zhou Z, Liu M, et al. Catalysis Today, 2019, 327, 398.
28 Yang W, Yang X, Hou C, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 259, 118020.
29 Bian L, Du T, Du Q, et al. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2017, 47, 905.
30 Xiong P, Ao X, Chen J, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2019, 297, 833.
31 Hosseini H, Shahrokhian S. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 375, 122090.
32 Xiong K, Gao Y, Chen J, et al. Chemical Communications, 2020, 56(4), 611.
33 Gajaria T K, Roondhe B, Dabhi S D, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(44), 23928.
34 Zhang D, Zhang J, Wang H, et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2019, 806, 1419.
35 Zhou X, Gao H, Wang Y, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(30), 14939.
36 Pei J, Gai X, Yang J, et al. Nature Communications, 2016, 7, 10450.
37 Wang H, Yong D, Chen S, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(5), 1760.
38 Xiao Z, Xie C, Wang Y, et al. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2020, 53, 208.
39 Liu Y, Liu P, Qin W, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2019, 297, 623.
40 Zhang L, Wang L, Lin H, et al.Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(47), 16820.
41 He Q, Wan Y, Jiang H, et al. ACS Energy Letters, 2018, 3(6), 1373.
42 Tong Y, Chen P, Zhang M, et al. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 8(1), 1.
43 Liu Z, Teng F, Yuan C, et al. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2020, 602, 117670.
44 Yan X, Zhang W D, Hu Q T, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(51), 27664.
45 Zeng M, Wu J, Li Z, et al. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(5), 4777.
46 Senthilkumar N, Gnana K G, Manthiram A. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(6), 1.
47 Guo F, Ye K, Cheng K, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 278, 562.
48 You X C.Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Nature Science), 2020, 34(6), 123 (in Chinese).
游晓畅. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 34(6), 123.
49 Guo Y J, Li F, Guo D, et al. Material Reports B: Review Papers, 2020, 34(8), 16011 (in Chinese).
郭亚杰, 李帆, 郭栋, 等.材料导报:研究篇, 2020, 34(8), 16011.
50 Xiong K, Yu L J, Xiang Y, et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2022, 912, 165234.
51 Wang Z, Liu W, Hu Y, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 272, 118959.
52 Wang G Q, Liu J Q, Dong W N, et al. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(23), 276 (in Chinese).
王桂强, 刘洁琼, 董伟楠, 等. 物理学报, 2018, 67(23), 276.
53 Muthuchamy N, Jang S, Park J C, et al. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(18), 15526.
54 Qian S, Rao Z, Liu Y, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2020, 330, 135211.
55 Xu Y, Chai X, Ren T, et al. Chemical Communications, 2020, 56(14), 2151.
56 Vilana J, Góémez E, Vallés E. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 360, 816.
57 Shi W, Ding R, Li X, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2017, 242, 247.
58 Sun C B, Guo M W, Siwal S S, et al. Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 381, 454.
59 Song X, Gao L, Li Y, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2017, 251, 284.
60 Wang L, Ren L, Wang X, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(5), 4750.
61 Zhu X, Dou X, Dai J, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55, 12465.
62 Barakat N A M, Yassin M A, Yasin A S, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(34), 21741.
63 Wu N, Guo R, Zhang X, et al. Journal of alloys and Compouns, 2019, 806, 1419.
64 Liu D, Li W, Li L, et al. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 2018, 529, 337.
65 Liu H, Liu Z, Feng L. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(34), 16017.
66 Li C, Liu Y, Zhuo Z, et al. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(27), 1.
67 Shi J P, Zhou X B, Zhang Z P, et al. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2017, 62(20), 2180 (in Chinese).
史建平, 周协波, 张哲朋, 等. 科学通报, 2017, 62(20), 2180.
68 Khalafallah D, Ouyang C, Zhi M, et al. ChemElectroChem, 2019, 6(20), 5191.
69 Sha L, Liu T, Zhu K, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2020, 8(35), 18055.
70 Ma G, Xue Q, Zhu J, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 265, 118567.