油气工业生物及化学硫化氢清除剂研究进展

doi:10.11896/cldb.20080113

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (2415KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract It is well known that hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) is a highly toxic and corrosive chemical, imposes severe health threat on human beings, and may lead to equipment and pipelines failures. Every effort has been made to completely remove H₂S. The most suitable method is to employ some effective chemical scavengers, which react with H₂S dissolved into an aqueous/oil/gas phase and convert it into a nontoxic and less corrosive compound that can be easily removed. Instead of direct addition of a chemical scavenger, different approaches, including absorption and adsorption, are also adopted to eliminate H₂S from gas streams and during well-drilling processes under the actual reservoir conditions. The most recent research advancements are the applications of nano-active sulfide scavengers (NASS) and bio-enzyme scavengers (BES) for H₂S removal. NASS is a non-toxic, non-hazardous, non-dangerous chemical that is manufactured by using advanced chemical nanotechnology processes. It has unique molecular properties to enhance chemical reactivity and selectivity and can absorb a wide range of harmful chemicals. Due to its enhanced chemical reactivity and selectivity as well as exceptionally high porosity, NASS improves scavenger efficacy by 4—6 times. On the other hand, BES is generated by cloning the cDNA sequence from a thermophilic organism and an encoded protein in a suitable vector. Its efficacy is evaluated in the reservoir brine, crude oil and mixed reservoir fluids from laboratory-scale tests to pilot-scale tests with the reduction of H₂S concentration in the range of 72%—90%.
This review presents the most recent research progresses and technical evaluations of a variety of chemical and biological H₂S scavengers that are currently used in the oil and gas industry. It also reveals some technical challenges and offers potential technical solutions. Future studies are required to design and formulate high-capacity sorbents with 100% re-generability. In addition, advanced studies are also required to research and develop environment-friendly and highly effective hydrogen sulfide scavengers through bio-nanotechnology.

Key words： biological and chemical hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) scavengers nano-active sulfide scavengers (NASS) chemical reactivity and selectivity bio-enzyme scavengers (BES) thermophilic organisms

Published: 26 September 2021

CLC number:

Q939.97

Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China(51634008,51574038), National Science and Technology Major Project(2017ZX05009-004).

About author:: Shi Zhang, is a senior engineer with bachelor degree. His main research directions including water plugging and oil increasing technology in oil well, scale prevention and removal technology in oil field.
Yuehui She, is a professor with doctor degree. His main research directions including application of biolo-gical nanotechnology in oil and gas industry, oilfield biological corrosion and prevention, indigenous micro-bial oil recovery, bioremediation of oil pollution.

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Shi
	LI Fei
	HU Linqi
	ZHENG Anying
	SHE Yuehui
	ZHANG Wenda

Cite this article:

ZHANG Shi,LI Fei,HU Linqi, et al. Recent Research Progresses of Biological and Chemical H₂S Scavengers in the Oil and Gas Industry[J]. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(17): 17185-17189.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.20080113 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2021/V35/I17/17185

1 Orr W L. Advances in organic geochemistry, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1978.
2 Postgate J.The sulphate-reducing bacteria(2nd ed), Cambridge University Press, UK, 1984.
3 Dai J.Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1985,3,109.
4 Wang Q.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35, 349.
5 Kapadia P R, Wang J, Gates I D, et al. In: SPE Heavy Oil Conference. Canada, 2013, pp.226.
6 Marriott R A, Pirzadeh P, Marrugo-Hernandez J J, et al. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 2016, 94, 406.
7 Dawson J, John G, Oliver K. In: Shreir’s Corrosion, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2010.
8 Rebak R B. Corrosion Reviews, 2011, 29, 123.
9 Viswanathan S S. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 2021, 37, 663.
10 Perez T E. JOM, 2013, 65, 1033.
11 Kappes M, Iannuzzi M, Rebak R B, et al.Corrosion Reviews, 2014, 32, 101.
12 Yang Y, Sun H, Luo T, et al.Asian Journal of Chemistry, 2014, 26, 3301.
13 Agbroko O W, Piler K, Benson T J. ChemBioEng Reviews, 2017, 4, 339.
14 Groysman A. Corrosion problems and solutions in oil refining and petrochemical industry(1st ed), Springer, Switzerland, 2017.
15 Iannuzzi M, Barnoush A, Johnsen R. Npj Materials Degradation, 2017, 1, 2.
16 Saji V S. Corrosion inhibitors in the oil and gas industries, Wiley, New Jersey, 2019.
17 Valdez B , Schorr M , Bastidas J M.Corrosion Reviews, 2015, 33, 175.
18 Iliuta M C, Larachi F.Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2007, 52, 2.
19 Reiffenstein R J, Hulbert W C, Roth S H. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1992, 32, 109.
20 Jiang J, Chan A, Ali S, et al. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6, 20831.
21 Al-Humaidan A Y, Nasr-El-Din H A. In:SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry. Houston, 1999, pp.603.
22 Amosa M K, Mohammed I A, Yaro S A. Nafta,2010, 61, 85.
23 Kenreck G.Hydrocarbon Process, 2014, 93, 73.
24 Jones I M, Sorrells J L, Stark J L. U.S. patent, US 20170066976A1, 2017.
25 Subramaniam R, Yasa S, Bertrand T, et al.Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2018,49, 417.
26 Park N K , Lee Y J , Han G B , et al.Solid State Phenomena, 2007, 124-126,1003.
27 Taylor G N. U.S. patent, US8734637B2, 2014.
28 Ahmadun F R, Pendashteh A, Abdullah L C, et al. Journal of Hazar-dous Materials, 2009,170, 530.
29 Igunnu E T, Chen G Z. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 2014, 9, 157.
30 Ahmad W, Sethupathi S, Kanadasan G, et al. Reviews In Chemical Engineering, 2019,37(3),407.
31 Saji V S. Innovations in Corrosion & Materials Science, 2011, 1, 63.
32 Goodwin N, Walsh J M, Wright R, et al. In: SPE International Sympo-sium on Oilfield Chemistry, 2011.
33 Keenan S R, Collins J, Ramachandran S, et al. U.S. patent, US 20130090271A1, 2013.
34 Portela N A, Silva S, Jesus L, et al. Fuel, 2018, 216, 681.
35 El-Gendy N S, Speight J G. Handbook of refinery desulfurization, CRC Press, 2015.
36 Burns T W, Quigley P F, Zhao C T. International patent, WO 2016174415A1, 2016.
37 Gupta D V S, Shen D. U.S. patent, US20160009980 A1, 2016.
38 Shah M S, Tsapatsis M, Siepmann J I. Chemical Reviews, 2017,117, 9755.
39 Maryam K, Mansoor A. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 2019, 58, 49,22133.
40 Antonio P, Nicola G, Paolo A.Separation & Purification Reviews, 2019, 48, 78.
41 Sarno P. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2018, 68, 481.
42 Ali G, Arezoo K. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 184,106684.
43 Galstyan V, Poli N, Comini E. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9, 1167.
44 Whittaker S L. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2018.
45 Armstrong C D, Debenedictis F H. International patent, WO2018/006033A1, 2018.
46 Armstrong C D, Debenedictis F H. U.S. patent, US10556815, 2020.
47 Wakai S, Kikumoto M, Kanao T, et al. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 2004, 68, 2519.
48 Prasad D K, Dhulipala J J, et al. In:SPE International Oilfield Corrosion Conference and Exhibition. Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, 2018.
49 Dhulipala P, Jani J, Wyatt M, et al. In:SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Manama, Bahrain, 2019.