金属有机骨架材料作为荧光探针的研究进展

doi:10.11896/cldb.19060114

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (4667KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Metal-organic framework materials (MOFs) are porous materials with a crystal structure formed by self-assembly of secondary or structural units of metal ions or metal ions, and organic ligands containing nitrogen and carboxylic acid functional groups, and metal organic framework materials. They have a very high specific surface area and a very high porosity, and their pore structure is adjustable compared to conventional porous materials. The luminescence mechanism of metal-organic framework materials includes: based on central metal ion luminescence, based on organic ligand luminescence, ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) or metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) luminescence, based on package which has guest molecule with excellent luminescence performance emits light. The detection of the analyte by changing the fluorescence spectrum of the metal organic framework material by the analyte, the metal organic framework material fluorescent probe has been widely used in many fields.
Fluorescent probes for metal-organic framework materials mainly include fluorescent probes of classical metal-organic framework materials, fluo-rescent probes of metal-organic framework materials modified by post-synthesis modification, and fluorescent probes of composite metal-organic framework materials modified by encapsulation of guest. In the past, researchers have been mainly concentrated on the preparation of fluorescent probes for classical metal-organic framework materials. Recently, in order to enrich the types of detectable targets, they have begun to study the advantages of adjusting the pore structure of classical metal-organic framework fluorescent probes and superior fluorescence performance. The guest materials are combined to develop a composite metal organic framework material fluorescent probe or a classical metal organic framework material fluorescent probe for post-synthesis modification, thereby enhancing the fluorescence performance and specific sensing performance of the classical metal organic framework material fluorescent probe.
In this paper, the application of fluorescent probes of metal-organic framework materials in the detection and identification of explosives, anions and cations, bio-small molecules, temperature, pH and water waiting for analytes in recent years is introduced. The design concept of fluorescent probes for metal organic framework materials is summarized, which provides a new idea for the design and development of fluorescent probes for metal organic framework materials.

Key words： metal-organic framework material composite metal-organic framework material fluorescent probe fluorescence sensing

Published: 24 June 2020

CLC number:

O657

Fund:Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, China (B2015017), the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Heilongjiang Province, China (135109201)

About author:: Hongtao Chu, male, doctor of engineering, master’s tutor, associate professor of Qiqihar University. He graduated from Qiqihar University in July 2002 and March 2005 with bachelor’s and master’s degrees respectively. In November 2014, he obtained a doctorate degree in chemical engineering and technology from Harbin Institute of Technology. His main research direction is the design and application of new fluorescent probes. In recent years, he has published more than 20 academic papers.

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHU Hongtao
	YAO Dong
	CHEN Jiaqi
	YU Miao

Cite this article:

CHU Hongtao,YAO Dong,CHEN Jiaqi, et al. Research Progress of Metal-Organic Framework Materials as Fluorescent Probes[J]. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(13): 13114-13120.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.19060114 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2020/V34/I13/13114

1 White K A, Chengelis D A, Gogick K A, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, 131(50), 18069.
2 Mendiratta S, Lee C H, Usman M, et al. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2015, 16(5), 054204.
3 Sun C Y, Qin C, Wang X L, et al. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 2012, 10(1), 89.
4 Wang H S. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2017, 349, 139.
5 Tang B, Xing Y, Li P, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007, 129(38), 11666.
6 Keenan L. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 38(5),1315.
7 Akhgari F, Fattahi H, Oskoei Y M. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2015, 221, 867.
8 Wan Y, Cui Y, Yang Y, et al. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2018, 268, 202.
9 Hao J, Liu F, Liu N, et al. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2017, 245, 641.
10 Banerjee D, Hu Zhichao, Li Jing. Dalton Transactions, 2014, 43(28), 10668.
11 Hu Z, Deibert B J, Li J. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(16), 5815.
12 Wang X S, Li L, Yuan D Q. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 344, 283.
13 Nagarkar S S, Desai A V, Ghosh S K. Chemical Communications, 2014, 50(64), 8915.
14 Pramanik S, Zheng C, Zhang X, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133(12), 4153.
15 Ma Y J, Xu G, Wei F, et al. New Journal of Chemistry, 2018, 42(7), 5162.
16 Wu W, Wu P, Yang F, et al. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 630, 53.
17 Wang Y, Wang X, Zhang K, et al. Dalton Transactions, 2019,48, 2569.
18 Lin X, Gao G, Zheng L, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 86(2), 1223.
19 Ma Y J, Xu G H, Wei F D, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2017, 5(33), 8566.
20 Yan B, Xu X Y. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2016, 4(7), 1543.
21 Singh G, Kumari B, Sinam G, et al. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 239, 95.
22 Barbier O, Arreola-Mendoza L, Luz María Del Razo. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 2010, 188(2), 319.
23 Ebrahim F M, Nguyen T N, Shyshkanov S, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019,141(7), 3052.
24 Cheng G, Fan J, Sun W, et al. Chemical Communications, 2013, 50(8), 1018.
25 Ma Y J, Xu G H, Wei F D, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018,10(24), 20801.
26 Warwick C, Guerreiro A, Soares A. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2013, 41, 1.
27 Abdulazeez T, Adeloju S B. Talanta, 2013, 114, 191.
28 Zhao D, Wan X, Song H, et al. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2014, 197, 50.
29 Guo X Y, Zhao F, Liu J J, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 5(37), 20035.
30 Tong W Q, Liu W N, Cheng J G, et al. Dalton Transactions, 2018, 47(28), 9466.
31 Yang W, Xia J, Zhou G, et al. RSC Advances, 2018, 8(32), 17854.
32 Du Y, Li X, Lv X, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(36), 30925.
33 Xu Yan. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1998, 280(8), 719.
34 Zhang S Y, Shi W, Cheng P, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137(38), 12203.
35 Boscari C N, Mazzuia G R, Wisniewski Célio, et al. Electrophoresis, 2017, 38(7), 1083.
36 Du Y, Li X, Zheng H, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2018, 1001, 134.
37 Tongo I, Ezemonye L, Akpeh K. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 2017, 189(6), 247.
38 He R, Wang Y L, Ma H F, et al. Dyes and Pigments, 2018, 151, 342.
39 Fernández-Ramos A A, Marchetti-Laurent C, Poindessous V, et al. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(26), 43048.
40 Jin M, Mou Z L, Zhang R L, et al. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2017, 91, 162.
41 Ajayakumar M R, Mukhopadhyay P. Chemical Communications, 2009, 25, 3702.
42 Mostakim S K, Biswas S. Crystengcomm, 2016, 18(17), 3104.
43 Martinez J L. Environmental Pollution, 2009, 157(11), 2893.
44 Zhu X D, Zhang K, Wang Y, et al. Inorganic Chemistry, 2018, 57(3), 1060.
45 Jiang H L, Feng D, Wang K, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135(37), 13934.
46 Rao X, Song T, Gao J, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135(41), 15559.
47 Lee W E, Jin Y J, Park L S, et al. Advanced Materials, 2012, 24(41), 5604.
48 Ooyama Y, Uenaka K, Matsugasako A, et al. RSC Advances, 2013, 3(45), 23255.
49 Kreno L E, Leong K, Farha O K, et al. Chemical Reviews, 2012, 112(2), 1105.
50 Douvali A, Tsipis A C, Eliseeva S V, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54(5), 1651.