INORGANIC MATERIALS AND CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
Prediction Model of Effective Strength of Sulfate-eroded Tunnel Lining Based on Micro-element-Layering Method |
LIU Xinrong1,2,3,*, ZHUANG Yang1, ZHOU Xiaohan1,2,3, LIANG Ninghui1,2,3, CHEN Hai1
|
1 School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China 2 State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China 3 National Joint Engineering Research Center for Prevention and Control of Environmental Geological Hazards in the TGR Area, Chongqing 400045, China |
|
|
Abstract The effective strength of tunnel lining after sulfate erosion is an important basis for evaluating the safety of service tunnels. However, existing sulfate erosion tests, by increasing the concentration of sulfate solution to shorten the test period, make it impossible to predict the effective strength of tunnel lining under sulfate erosion during actual service period. In view of the characteristics of single-side corrosion of tunnel lining, this work put forward the micro-element-layering method. Based on this method, established the effective strength prediction model of tunnel lining considering the time effect. A sulfate-eroded tunnel in Chongqing was selected as the engineering case for analysis. Through 420 days of indoor corrosion test and numerical simulation, the key parameters of the model were solved. Compared with the test results, the change law of the effective lining strength of the tunnel under the condition of overall corrosion and localized arch foot corrosion was further studied. The results show that the effective strength prediction model proposed can obtain the effective strength of corroded lining unimpeded by the size effect, and the calculated results were in good agreement with the experimental results. In the tunnel lining effective strength loss stage, the loss rate was slow first and then fast. Under the same condition, the effective strength loss of the tunnel lining under localized arch foot corrosion was less than that under overall corrosion.
|
Published: 10 July 2025
Online: 2025-07-21
|
|
|
|
1 Zhang Z Y, Zou Y, Yang J, et al. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2022, 125, 104299. 2 Liu X R, Zhuang Y, Zhou X H, et al. Underground Space, 2023, 9, 200. 3 Zhang X P, Zhang R L, Yang B, et al. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(5), 209 (in Chinese). 张学鹏, 张戎令, 杨斌, 等. 材料导报, 2024, 38(5), 209. 4 Lu F, Wang H Y, Wang L C, et al. Materials, 2022, 15(13), 4435. 5 Fan J Y, Li M S, Duan P, et al. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(13), 241 (in Chinese). 樊晋源, 李茂森, 段平, 等. 材料导报, 2023, 37(13), 241. 6 Yao W J, Bai M Y, Pang J Y, et al. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(39), 59173. 7 Zhang Z Y, Zhou J T, Zou Y, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 235, 117463. 8 Liang N H, Mao J W, Yan R, et al. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022, 16, e01065. 9 Sotiradis K, Nikolopoulou E, Tsivilis S. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(8), 903. 10 Zhang Z Y, Zhou J T, Yang J, et al. Materials and Structures, 2020, 53(4), 104. 11 Zhang Z Y. Mesoscopic erosion mechanism and shear properties of shotcrete materials under sulfate-containing environments. Ph. D. Thesis, Chongqing University, China, 2019 (in Chinese). 张中亚. 硫酸盐环境喷射混凝土细观侵蚀机理及剪切特性研究. 博士学位论文, 重庆大学, 2019. 12 Liu X R, Zhuang Y, Zhou X H, et al. Frontiers in Materials, 2024, 10, 1323274. 13 Luo W. Study on characteristics of shotcrete under sulfate attack and its influence on tunnel stability. Ph. D. Thesis, Chongqing University, China, 2019 (in Chinese). 罗维. 硫酸盐环境隧道喷射混凝土力学特性及稳定性研究. 博士学位论文, 重庆大学, 2019. 14 Tian H. Study on sulfate transmission-degradation mechanism of concrete under long-term soaking. Master’s Thesis, Shenzhen University, China, 2015 (in Chinese). 田浩. 长期浸泡下混凝土硫酸盐传输—劣化机理研究. 硕士学位论文, 深圳大学, 2015. 15 Yang D Q, Yan C W, Liu S G, et al. Materials, 2022, 15(13), 4663. 16 Cheng H B. Study on the deterioration law and uniaxial compressive constitutive relationship of concrete under sulfate attack. Master’s Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, China, 2019 (in Chinese). 程汉斌. 硫酸盐侵蚀混凝土劣化规律与单轴受压本构关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019. 17 Li J P, Xie F, Zhao G W, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 249, 118789. 18 Min H G, Sui L L, Xing F, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 216, 365. 19 Chen Z, Yi C F, Bindihanavife V. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 187, 791. 20 Zhuang Y, Liu X R, Zhou X H, et al. Structural Concrete, 2022, 23(6), 3786. 21 Liu X R, Chen H, Zhuang Y, et al. Industrial Construction, 2024, 54(9), 177 (in Chinese). 刘新荣, 陈海, 庄炀, 等. 工业建筑, 2024, 54(9), 177. 22 Jiang L. Study on deterioration of concrete under sulfate attack. Ph. D. Thesis, Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, China, 2014 (in Chinese). 姜磊. 硫酸盐侵蚀环境下混凝土劣化规律研究. 博士学位论文, 西安建筑科技大学, 2014. 23 Gao R D. Micro-macro degradation regularity of sulfate attack on concrete under complex environments. Ph. D. Thesis, Tsinghua University, China, 2010 (in Chinese). 高润东. 复杂环境下混凝土硫酸盐侵蚀微—宏观劣化规律研究. 博士学位论文, 清华大学, 2010. 24 Yan R. Experimental research on sulfate attack resistance of hybrid polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete with different sizes. Master’s Thesis, Chongqing University, China, 2021 (in Chinese). 严如. 不同尺度聚丙烯纤维混凝土抗硫酸盐侵蚀试验研究. 硕士学位论文, 重庆大学, 2021. 25 Huang B. Study on the technical measures against sulfate erosion of railway tunnel lining concrete. Master’s Thesis, Central South University, China, 2010 (in Chinese). 黄波. 铁路隧道衬砌混凝土抗硫酸盐侵蚀的技术措施研究. 硕士学位论文, 中南大学, 2010. 26 Ma Q L. Mechanism and evaluation method of salt crystallization attack on concrete. Ph. D. Thesis, Central South University, China, 2009 (in Chinese). 马昆林. 混凝土盐结晶侵蚀机理与评价方法. 博士学位论文, 中南大学, 2009. 27 Liao K X, Zhang Y P, Zhang W P, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 260, 119902. 28 Sun C. Diffusion model of sulfate ions in concrete based on evolution of erosion-induced damage. Master’s Thesis, Ningbo University, China, 2012 (in Chinese). 孙超. 基于侵蚀损伤演化的混凝土中硫酸根离子扩散模型. 硕士学位论文, 宁波大学, 2012. 29 Lei M F, Peng L M, Shi C H, et al. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(3), 305. |
|
|
|