| METALS AND METAL MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
| Size Effects of Honeycomb Matrix Materials and Their Impact on Numerical Prediction Accuracy |
| HUANG Rong1,2,3, MU Rangke1,2,3,*, BAI Chunyu1,2,3, XI Xulong1,2,3, ZHANG Xinyue1,2,3, LIU Xiaochuan1,2,3
|
1 National Key Laboratory of Strength and Structural Integrity, Xi’an 710065, China
2 Key Laboratory of Aviation Science and Technology on Structures Impact Dynamics, Aircraft Strength Research Institute of China, Xi’an 710065, China
3 Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Aircraft Vibration, Impact and Noise, Xi’an 710065, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To investigate the influence of size effects on the mechanical properties of honeycomb matrix materials, aluminum honeycomb matrix materials of varying thicknesses were prepared and subjected to dynamic mechanical testing. Based on the test results, the Johnson-Cook (J-C) principal model parameters of the matrix material were calibrated. Subsequently, dynamic compression simulations of the honeycomb structure were conducted using LS-Dyna to examine how variations in the principal parameters, induced by the size effect of the matrix material, impact the accuracy of compression performance predictions for the honeycomb structure. The results indicate that as the specimen thickness decreases, the failure strain of the matrix material decreases while its strength increases, and the failure mode transitions from shear fracture to horizontal fracture. Additionally, the failure strain of the matrix material increases with higher strain rates. By accounting for the variation in constitutive model parameters due to the size effect of the honeycomb matrix material, the numerical prediction error for the compression performance of the honeycomb structure was significantly reduced from 31.44% to 3.78%.
|
|
Published: 25 December 2025
Online: 2025-12-17
|
|
|
|
|
1 Zhang J, Lu G, You Z. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2020, 201(G4), 108340.
2 Gibson L J, Ashby M F. Cellular solids:structure and properties, 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 81.
3 Chang Q, Feng J, Shu Y. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2021,227, 109393.
4 Liu K P, Miao W P, Wang Y J, et al. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43(10), 215 (in Chinese).
刘坤鹏, 缪维跑, 王瑀琎, 等. 振动与冲击, 2024, 43(10), 215.
5 Shi W H, Yue S, Liu Z, et al. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43(5), 292 (in Chinese).
史文辉, 岳帅, 刘洲, 等. 振动与冲击, 2024, 43(5), 292.
6 Yan S L, Wu J W, Xiong Y, et al. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(19), 248 (in Chinese).
燕山林, 吴锦武, 熊引, 等. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(19), 248.
7 Wen Y Z, Deng Y H, Jia Z. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(5), 556 (in Chinese).
文彦臻, 邓云华, 贾震. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(5), 556.
8 Wu E, Jiang W S. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997, 19(5-6), 439.
9 Chen Q, Lan F C, Chen J Q. Machinery Design and Manufacture, 2017(1), 186 (in Chinese).
陈琪, 兰凤崇, 陈吉清. 机械设计与制造, 2017(1), 186.
10 Wang C, Liu R Q, Deng Z Q, et al. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2008(11), 56 (in Chinese).
王闯, 刘荣强, 邓宗全, 等. 振动与冲击, 2008(11), 56.
11 Kim B J, Lee D G. Composite Structure, 2010, 92(2), 460.
12 Ruan D, Lu G, Wang B, et al. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2003, 28(2),161.
13 Yamashita M, Gotoh M. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2005, 32(1-4), 618.
14 Zhang J J, Lu G X, You, Z. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2020, 201, 108340.
15 Dong Z, Li Y, Zhao T, et al. Materials and Design, 2019, 182, 108036.
16 Lai Y H, Jiang W G, Zou H, et al. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2018, 151(3), 197 (in Chinese).
赖燕辉, 江五贵, 邹航, 等. 应用力学学报, 2018, 151(3), 197.
17 Sun D Q, Zhang Z J. Journal of Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, 2018, 36(2), 137 (in Chinese).
孙德强, 张志娟. 陕西科技大学学报, 2018, 36(2), 137.
18 Tan Sibo, Hou Bing, Li Yulong, et al. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(1), 16 (in Chinese).
谭思博, 侯兵, 李玉龙, 等. 爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(1), 16. |
|
|
|
渝公网安备50019002502923号 © Editorial Office of Materials Reports.
2025, Vol. 39 
