复合外加剂对3D打印砂浆流变与建造性的协同机制及孔结构研究

doi:10.11896/cldb.25030044

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (19619KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract To achieve continuous and uniform extrusion of 3D-printed FA-GGBS-cement composites (3DFGPC) while ensuring shape retention and structural stability during layer-by-layer deposition, calcium sulfoaluminate cement (CSA) was employed as an early-strength agent, and two thixotropic additives, organically modified bentonite (OB) and attapulgite (AT) were investigated. In this study, CSA cement was first investigated as a single admixture to identify the optimal dosage that provides the most suitable workability and mechanical properties for 3D printing extrusion and shape retention. Subsequently, the selected CSA formulation was respectively combined with OB and AT to systematically analyze their effects on the workability, rheological properties, and mechanical performance of 3DFGPC. The evolution of the materia's pore structure was concurrently analyzed using bubble spacing measurements. Key findings demonstrate that a 4% CSA content (by mass) provided suitable printability but insufficient structural build-up. The incorporation of thixotropic additives substantially enhanced performance, with thixotropic values reaching 1 762.2 Pa·s^-1 (4% CSA+1.0% OB) and 2 328.5 Pa·s^-1 (4% CSA+0.8% AT), representing improvements of 7.74% and 42.4% respectively compared to the 4% CSA reference group (C4). Rheological analysis and anisotropy evaluation revealed AT's more pronounced effect on 3DFGPC properties. Pore structure characterization further showed that 0.8% AT addition significantly reduced both bubble quantity and spacing coefficient, markedly improving material density. The synergistic combination of 4% CSA and 0.8% AT yielded optimal enhancement of 3DFGPC's extrudability, structural stability, and microstructural densification, establishing this formulation as particularly suitable for 3D printing applications.

Key words： 3D printing sulphoaluminate cement thixotropic agent rheological property stomatal structure

Published: Online: 2025-08-28

CLC number:	TU528
	TB44

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	MA Yapeng
	ZHAI Wenhui
	ZHANG Dongsheng
	ZHU Tao
	YANG Qiuning
	MAO Mingjie

Cite this article:

MA Yapeng,ZHAI Wenhui,ZHANG Dongsheng, et al. Study on the Synergistic Mechanism and Pore Structure of Composite Admixtures on Rheology and Constructability of 3D Printed Mortar[J]. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(17): 25030044-8.

URL:

https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.25030044 OR https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2025/V39/I17/25030044

1 Yang Q R, Liu Q L, Wang Z P, et al. Building Technology, 2015, 46(12), 1076(in Chinese).
杨钱荣, 刘巧玲, 王中平, 等. 建筑技术, 2015, 46(12), 1076.
2 Hao J J. Mix design and performance study of 3D printed recycled fine aggregate concrete. Master's Thesis, Nanchang University, China, 2020(in Chinese).
郝建军. 3D打印再生细骨料混凝土配合比设计及其性能研究. 硕士学位论文, 南昌大学, 2020.
3 Wang K Q, Ling C W, Li D, et al. Journal of Building Materials, 2024, 27(6), 543(in Chinese).
王开强, 零朝维, 李迪, 等. 建筑材料学报, 2024, 27(6), 543.
4 Han N, Xiao J Z, Lyu Z Y, et al. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52 (12), 1834(in Chinese).
韩女, 肖建庄, 吕振源, 等. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 52(12), 1834.
5 Yao Y M, Zhang J W, Sun Y F, et al. Journal of Building Structures, 2024, 45(9), 29(in Chinese).
姚一鸣, 张珈玮, 孙元锋, 等. 建筑结构学报, 2024, 45(9), 29.
6 Yue J G, Wang J, Wu Y, et al. Journal of Building Structures, 2024, 45(5), 243(in Chinese).
岳健广, 王健, 吴瑶, 等. 建筑结构学报, 2024, 45(5), 243.
7 Chen Y F, Dong W W, Zou D Q, et al. Concrete, 2023(12), 178(in Chinese).
陈亚飞, 董伟伟, 邹道勤, 等. 混凝土, 2023(12), 178.
8 Yang Q R, Zhao Z Z, Xiao J Z, et al. Journal of Building Materials, 2021, 24(2), 412(in Chinese).
杨钱荣, 赵宗志, 肖建庄, 等. 建筑材料学报, 2021, 24(2), 412.
9 Schutter D G, Lesage K, Mechtcherine V, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 112, 25.
10 Luo S, Zhang G, Wang X, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 462, 139923.
11 Jacques K, Anton P D, Gideon Z V. Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 37, 101740.
12 Geng Z, She W, Zuo W, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 138, 106220.
13 Gao N X, Ran Q P, Qiao M. Journal of Building Materials, 2017, 20(2), 234(in Chinese).
高南箫, 冉千平, 乔敏. 建筑材料学报, 2017, 20(2), 234.
14 Lee E C, Chandra S, Leong Y. Powder Technology, 2012, 223, 105.
15 Kawashima S, Chaouche M, Corr J D, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2013, 53, 112.
16 Zhang J, Li G, Ye W, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 186, 1144.
17 Wu M, Zhang Y, Jia Y, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 103, 353.
18 Trauchessec R, Mechling J, Lecomte A, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 56, 106.
19 Quanji Z J, Lomboy G R, Wang K J. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 69, 295.
20 Qian Y, Kawashima S. Cement and Concrete Research, 2016, 90, 73.
21 Teng L, Zhu J, Khayat H K, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 138, 106238.
22 Salazar R R, Muñoz A M, Vargas A, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 445, 137857.
23 Chen M, Li L, Zheng Y, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 189, 601.
24 Tramontin M S, Maia I F, Elisângela M D G, et al. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 32, 101833.
25 Gao H, Jin L, Chen Y, et al. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 91, 109626.
26 Xu J B, Chen M X, Zhao Z H, et al. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 38, 102208.
27 Panda B, Ruan S, Unluer C, et al. Composites Part B, 2019, 165, 75.
28 Gokhan K, Oguzhan B Y, Baris B, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 373, 130850
29 Liu C, Meng Y S, Wu Y W, et al. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(9), 122(in Chinese).
刘超, 蒙毅升, 武怡文, 等. 材料导报, 2024, 38(9), 122.
30 Hu Y, Diao L, Lai Z Y, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 224, 276.
31 Favretto F, Bruschi J G, Secco P M, et al. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2025,1, 283.
32 Yan J, Liu X L, Wang X T, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 134, 104788.