POLYMERS AND POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental Investigation on Tensile and Torsional Properties of GFRP Bar Anchors |
LIU Yihong1, BAI Xiaoyu1,*, SUN Gan1, WANG Zhongsheng2,3, LI Ming4, YAN Nan1
|
1 School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, Shandong, China 2 Key Laboratory of Geological Safety of Coastal Urban Underground Space, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266101, Shandong, China 3 Qingdao Geology and Geotechnical Engineering Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266101, Shandong, China 4 Jiangsu Haichuan New Materials Technology Co., Ltd., Zhenjiang 212416, Jiangsu, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to study the mechanical properties of GFRP bars in tension and torsion, and to clarify the influence of ultimate pull-out capacity and ultimate torque on diameter and gauge length, the pull-out and torsion indoor tests of GFRP bars were carried out respectively, In particular, the pull-out tests of GFRP bars with and without hollow core were carried out, and the mechanical indexes such as ultimate pull-out capacity, maximum torque, elastic modulus and shear modulus were obtained respectively. The results show that:(1) in the pull-out test, the ultimate pull-out capacity of GFRP bars is only related to the diameter, and has nothing to do with the length of anchor bars. With the increase of the diameter of GFRP bars, the growth rate of ultimate pull-out capacity is more significant. In the torsional test, the maximum torque of GFRP bars is also only related to the diameter and has nothing to do with the gauge distance, but the maximum rotation angle is related to the gauge distance and is less affected by the change of diameter. (2) Suitably reduction of working section length will not affect the pull-out test results. (3) The elastic modulus of GFRP bars without and with filling is basically the same, which is about 33% lower than that of solid GFRP bars, but the ultimate pull-out capacity of GFRP bars with filling is about 1.53 times of that of GFRP bars without filling. (4) The tensile strength of GFRP bars is greater than that of steel bars, but its shear modulus is smaller. The research results lay a foundation for the popularization and application of GFRP bars in civil engineering.
|
Published: 15 August 2025
Online: 2025-08-15
|
|
|
|
1 Yu D X, Yu H J, Li H B, et al. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(S2), 660(in Chinese). 于冬雪, 于化杰, 黎红兵, 等. 材料导报, 2021, 35(S2), 660. 2 Bai X Y, Zhang M Y, Kuang Z, et al. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2020, 51(7), 1977(in Chinese). 白晓宇, 张明义, 匡政, 等. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 51(7), 1977. 3 Zhang X L, Ji Z P, Huang K, et al Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 43(2), 510(in Chinese). 张鑫磊, 纪展鹏, 黄凯, 等. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(2), 510. 4 Chen Y, Hu X, Wu Z M, et al. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(18), 83(in Chinese). 陈阳, 胡翔, 吴泽媚, 等. 材料导报, 2023, 37(18), 83. 5 Ren H T, Yao Q F, Hu A N. Journal of Building Materials, 2005, 8(5), 520(in Chinese). 任慧韬, 姚谦峰, 胡安妮. 建筑材料学报, 2005, 8(5), 520. 6 D’Antino, Tommaso, Marco A. Pisani. Composite Structures, 2023, 323, 117424. 7 Li B, Sun X H, Wu J S. Energy Technology and Management, 2024, 49(1), 27(in Chinese). 李斌, 孙小红, 吴建生. 能源技术与管理, 2024, 49(1), 27. 8 Xu K, Lu C H, Xuan G Y, et al. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(4), 4053(in Chinese). 徐可, 陆春华, 宣广宇, 等. 材料导报, 2021, 35(4), 4053. 9 Guan J W, Chen H M, Wei L L, et al. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 38(4), 37(in Chinese). 关纪文, 陈红梅, 韦丽兰, 等. 湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 38(4), 37. 10 Zhu D J, Xu X F, Guo S C, et al. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 48(7), 151(in Chinese). 朱德举, 徐旭锋, 郭帅成, 等. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 48(7), 151. 11 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Test method for basic mechanical pro-perties of fiber reinforced polymer bar:GB/T 30022-2013, Standards Press of China, China, 2013(in Chinese). 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 纤维增强复合材料筋基本力学性能试验方法:GB/T30022-2013, 标准出版社, 2013. 12 Dong Z Q, Wu G. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2019, 52(10), 1(in Chinese). 董志强, 吴刚. 土木工程学报, 2019, 52(10), 1. 13 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Fiber-reinforced plastics composites—The generals for determination of properties:GB/T 1446-2005, Standards Press of China, China, 2005(in Chinese). 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 纤维增强塑料性能试验方法总则:GB/T 1446-2005, 标准出版社, 2005. 14 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Metallic materials—Torsion test at ambient temperature:GB/T 10128-2007, Standards Press of China, China, 2007 (in Chinese). 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 金属材料室温扭转试验方法:GB/T 10128-2007, 标准出版社, 2007. 15 Awad Y A, El-Fiky A M, Hegazy H M, et al. Civil Engineering Journal, 2023, 9(8), 1912. 16 Seo D W, Park K T, You Y J, et al. Engineering, 2013, 5(11), 865. 17 Xu X S, Zheng Y F. Journal of Building Materials, 2007, 10(6), 705(in Chinese). 徐新生, 郑永峰. 建筑材料学报, 2007, 10(6), 705. 18 Zhang X Y, Zou G P, Shen Z Q. In:China SAMPE’ 2008 International Symposium Proceedings. Beijing, China, 2008, pp. 287(in Chinese). 张学义, 邹广平, 沈志强. China SAMPE’ 2008国际学术研讨会论文集. 中国北京, 2008, pp. 287. |
|
|
|