| POLYMERS AND POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
| Analysis and Evaluation of Aging Resistance of Organic Bonding Materials Commonly Used in Pottery Cultural Relics |
| SHI Pei1, JIA Weiming1, CHEN Le1, ZHEN Gang2, MA Tao1,2, ZHANG Xin3, WANG Fen1, ZHU Jianfeng1, ZHANG Biao1,*, LI Doudou1
|
1 Key Laboratory of Materials and Technology for Unearthed Cultural Heritage Conservation, Ministry of Education, School of Conservation Science and Technology for Cultural Heritage, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, China
2 Shaanxi Institute of Cultural Relics Protection, Xi’an 710075, China
3 Qianling Mausoleum, Xianyang 713300, Shaanxi, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Pottery cultural relics are an important part of Chinese cultural heritage, possessing rich historical, artistic, and scientific value. Many excavated pottery cultural relics are often found broken and require materials with excellent adhesive properties for their restoration and conservation. This study used soil from the Qin Dongling as a raw material to simulate the preparation of ceramic cultural relics. The samples were bonded using reactive resin (epoxy resin), water-soluble synthetic resin (Primal SF 016), and solvent-based synthetic resin (B72). The samples were then subjected to aging under conditions of dry heat, humid heat, ultraviolet radiation, and low temperature. The microstructure, chemical bonds, and mechanical properties of the samples were tested before and after aging to comprehensively evaluate the aging resistance of the three materials. The results show that epoxy resin has the best comprehensive performance, good heat resistance, moisture resistance and frost resistance, but poor ultraviolet radiation resistance, making it suitable for the restoration of pottery cultural relics in indoor environments. Primal SF 016 has good heat resistance but is easily affected by high humidity, low temperature, and ultraviolet radiation, making it suitable for dry indoor environments. B72 has similar properties to Primal SF 016 but with better overall aging resistance, making it suitable for the restoration of indoor pottery cultural relics.
|
|
Published:
Online: 2025-10-27
|
|
|
|
|
1 Zhao J, Luo H J, Wang L Q, et al. Chinese Science: Technical Science, 2014, 44(4), 398 (in Chinese).
赵静, 罗宏杰, 王丽琴, 等. 中国科学:技术科学, 2014, 44(4), 398.
2 Li X X, Wang L Q, Li W D, et al. Fine Chemicals, 2011, 28(10), 945 (in Chinese).
李晓溪, 王丽琴, 李伟东, 等. 精细化工, 2011, 28(10), 945.
3 Xie L N, Li Y H, Wang S L, et al. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(4), 89 (in Chinese).
谢丽娜, 李玉虎, 王盛霖, 等. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(4), 89.
4 Zhou T, Rong B. Cultural Relics Protection and Archaeological Science, 2008, 20(S1), 68 (in Chinese).
周铁, 容波. 文物保护与考古科学, 2008, 20(S1), 68.
5 Rong B, Lan D S. Wen Bo, 2003(2), 73 (in Chinese).
容波, 兰德省. 文博, 2003(2), 73.
6 Wang H Z, Song D S, Cheng Y B, et al. Wen Bo, 2009(6), 244 (in Chinese).
王惠贞, 宋迪生, 程玉冰, 等. 文博, 2009(6), 244.
7 Wei L. Research on the protection of Han Dynasty painted pottery in Yulin area. Master’s Thesis, Northwest University, China, 2012 (in Chinese).
魏璐. 榆林地区馆藏汉代彩绘陶器的保护研究. 硕士学位论文, 西北大学, 2012.
8 Lan D S. Research on Heritages and Preservation, 2019, 4(1), 117 (in Chinese).
兰德省. 遗产与保护研究, 2019, 4(1), 117.
9 Zhao H Q. Cultural Relics Protection and Archaeological Science, 2020, 32(3), 38 (in Chinese).
赵慧群. 文物保护与考古科学, 2020, 32(3), 38.
10 Zhou L K, Wang C, Yang D Y. New research on cultural relics protection (2), Beijing Cultural Relics Publishing House, China, 2010, pp. 174 (in Chinese).
周理坤, 王春, 杨大用. 文物保护研究新论(二), 北京文物出版社, 2010, pp. 174.
11 Xie Y M, Pan R, Peng B. Engineering and Construction, 2009, 23(1), 55 (in Chinese).
谢业明, 潘荣, 彭勃. 工程与建设, 2009, 23 (1), 55.
12 Wang S J, Fang S Q, Zhang B J. Cultural Relics Protection and Archaeological Science, 2017, 29(2), 15.
王思嘉, 方世强, 张秉坚. 文物保护与考古科学, 2017, 29(2), 15.
13 Cheng Q, Wang Y J, Wen J H, et al. Adhesion, 2022, 49(3), 6 (in Chinese).
程倩, 王艺佳, 温建华, 等. 粘接, 2022, 49(3), 6.
14 Zhu H B, Guo Z F, Han B, et al. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 55(4), 578 (in Chinese).
朱红兵, 郭正发, 韩蓓, 等. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 55(4), 578.
15 Guo Y J, Yan H, Xiao F. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition), 2000(7), 1 (in Chinese).
郭永基, 颜寒, 肖飞. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2000(7), 1.
16 Gong X, Han X N, Chen K L. Cultural Relic Protection and Archaeological Science, 2021, 33(3), 108 (in Chinese).
龚欣, 韩向娜, 陈坤龙. 文物保护与考古科学, 2021, 33(3), 108.
17 Mehrez E N, Sami U, Wageh S, et al. Journal of Rare Earth (English Edition), 2023, 41(3), 397.
18 Gong X, Han X N, Chen K L. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2023, 43(7), 2181 (in Chinese).
龚欣, 韩向娜, 陈坤龙. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2023, 43(7), 2181.
19 Wang L. Study on UV aging mechanism and aging resistance modification of stone cultural relics protection materials. Master’s Thesis, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, China, 2023 (in Chinese).
王莉. 石质文物保护材料紫外光老化机理与耐老化改性研究. 硕士学位论文, 北京化工大学, 2023.
20 Yang J L, Zhou S L. In: Proceedings of the 13th National Symposium on Archaeology and Conservation Chemistry. Bozhou, China, 2014, pp. 342 (in Chinese).
杨景龙, 周双林. 全国第十三届考古与文物保护化学学术研讨会论文集. 亳州, 2014, pp. 342.
21 Pintus V, Schreiner M. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2011, 399, 2961.
22 Lan D S. Cultural Relic Protection and Archaeological Science, 2019, 31(5), 49 (in Chinese).
兰德省. 文物保护与考古科学, 2019, 31(5), 49.
23 Yang Z Z, Yu H. Shanghai Arts and Crafts, 2018(4), 78 (in Chinese).
杨植震, 俞蕙. 上海工艺美术, 2018(4), 78. |
|
|
|
渝公网安备50019002502923号 © Editorial Office of Materials Reports.
2025, Vol. 39 
