基于Mohr-Coulomb和Drucker-Prager模型的黄土剪切特性研究

doi:10.11896/cldb.24070047

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (13169KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to investigate the shear characteristics of loess, the Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) model parameters of internal friction angle φ and cohesion c, and the Ducker-Prager (D-P) model parameters of β and d were obtained, and the water content ω was controlled to be 9.5%, 11.5%, 13.5%, 15.5%, and 19.5%, and the static triaxial instrument of GDS(Geotechnical digital systems, GDS) was used to conduct unconsolidated and undrained triaxial shear tests under 100, 200, and 300 kPa pressures, finite element simulations were performed to analyze the error of the model in characterizing the shear properties of loess. The results showed that when ω was 9.5%, the stress-strain curves of soil samples under the 100 kPa and 200 kPa pressures showed "softening" phenomenon, and when ω was in the range of 11.5%—19.5%, the stress-strain curves of soil samples under all pressures showed "hardening" phenomenon. The internal friction angle φ and the cohesion c, β and d of the soil decreased with the increase of water content and increased with the increase of the perimeter pressure; when the water content was greater than the optimum water content, the cohesion c and d would decrease rapidly. Finite element simulation compared the M-C and D-P models and found that the M-C model could better reflect the loess shear characteristics. The mechanical parameters of the M-C and D-P models were finally obtained, and the fitting equations were given to predict the model parameters of soil samples with a compaction degree of 94% and water content in the range of 9.5%—19.5%, which could provide reference for engineering construction.

Key words： loess roadbed triaxial test shear characteristic Mohr-Coulomb Drucker-Prager

Published: 10 October 2025 Online: 2025-09-24

CLC number:

TU411

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YOU Qinglong
	XIONG Mi
	CHEN Shiye
	HUANG Zhiyi
	HUANG Wenxu
	ZHAO Shengqian
	CHENG Ming
	JIANG Yong

Cite this article:

YOU Qinglong,XIONG Mi,CHEN Shiye, et al. Shear Characterization of Loess Based on Mohr-Coulomb and Drucker-Prager Models[J]. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(19): 24070047-6.

URL:

https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.24070047 OR https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2025/V39/I19/24070047

1 Liu D S. Material composition and structure of loess, Science Press, China, 1966, pp. 4 (in Chinese).
刘东升. 黄土的物质成分和结构, 科学出版社, 1966, pp. 4.
2 Feng L, Zhang M S, Hu W, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1), 235 (in Chinese).
冯立, 张茂省, 胡炜, 等. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1), 235.
3 Li X A, Sun J, Ren H, et al. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2022, 81(10), 290.
4 Zhang L K, Ding X S, Fan P P, et al. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(3), 107 (in Chinese).
张凌凯, 丁旭升, 樊培培, 等. 材料导报, 2025, 39(3), 107.
5 Jian T, Kong L, Bai W, et al. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 10, 923358.
6 Liu H, Zhang W Y, Feng Y Z, et al. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2024, 45(5), 1172 (in Chinese).
刘红, 张吾渝, 冯永珍, 等. 地震工程学报, 2024, 45(5), 1172.
7 Wang Y, Yao Y P, Hu Y D, et al. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 54(3), 325 (in Chinese).
王燕, 姚仰平, 胡玉定, 等. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 54(3), 325.
8 Wu X Y, Liang Q G, Niu F J, et al. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2017, 13(6), 1457 (in Chinese).
吴旭阳, 梁庆国, 牛富俊, 等. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(6), 1457.
9 Liu X, Miao X Q, Huang L, et al. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(5), 1499 (in Chinese).
刘鑫, 苗雪青, 黄良, 等. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5), 1499.
10 Mo T F, Guo M X, Lou Z K, et al. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2018(4), 87 (in Chinese).
莫腾飞, 郭敏霞, 娄宗科, 等. 中国农村水利水电, 2018(4), 87.
11 Hu Z Q, Zhang T, Zhu Y Y, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(S2), 1103 (in Chinese).
胡再强, 张腾, 朱轶韵, 等. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(S2), 1103.
12 Abbo A J, Sloan S W. Computers & Structures, 1995, 54(3), 427.
13 Sui C Y, Shen Y S, Wen Y M, et al. Shock and Vibration, 2021, 2021, 1.
14 Jia S P, Chen W Z, Yang J P, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(7), 2051 (in Chinese).
贾善坡, 陈卫忠, 杨建平, 等. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(7), 2051.
15 Feng J X, Pan P. Engineering Mechanics, DOI:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.10.0804 (in Chinese).
冯捷讯, 潘鹏. 工程力学, DOI:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.10.0804.
16 Zhou Y Q, Sheng Q, Liu F X, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(6), 1657 (in Chinese).
周永强, 盛谦, 刘芳欣, 等. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(6), 1657.
17 Ministry of Transportation of the People's Republic of China. Test met-hods of soils for highway engineering,JTG 3430-2020. People's Transportation Press, China, 2020 (in Chinese).
中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路土工试验规程,JTG 3430-2020. 人民交通出版社, 2020.