基于3D细观模型的混凝土单轴拉压应力应变关系影响因素研究

doi:10.11896/cldb.24060161

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (32000KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract A spatial random convex polyhedron coarse aggregate model was established based on the traditional aggregate generation method, meanwhile, a solid interface transition zone with adjustable thickness was established. The mechanical behavior of three-dimensional mesoscopic concrete under quasi-static uniaxial compression and uniaxial tension was analyzed by finite element method. The simulation results of stress-strain relationship and damage failure mode were compared with the experimental results, which verifies the reliability of the three-dimensional mesoscopic finite element model. Then the influence of aggregate distribution, aggregate geometric change and interface transition zone thickness on the failure mode and stress-strain relationship of concrete were analyzed. The results showed that aggregate distribution has little effect on uniaxial compression damage, but had great influence on uniaxial tensile damage and stress-strain curve under uniaxial tension and compression load. With the increase of aggregate roughness, the damage area increased and the peak stress increased gradually under uniaxial compression. The damage and peak stress were less affected by uniaxial tension, and there was no obvious change rule. With the increase of the thickness of the interfacial transition zone, the peak stress of uniaxial tension and uniaxial compression decreased gradually.

Key words： concrete three-dimensional mesoscopic model interface transition zone thickness uniaxial tension uniaxial compression

Published: 10 August 2025 Online: 2025-08-13

CLC number:

TU528

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	XUE Gang
	LIU Yi
	MOU Yifei

Cite this article:

XUE Gang,LIU Yi,MOU Yifei. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Stress-Strain Curve of Three-dimensional Mesoscopic Concrete Under Uniaxial Tension and Compression Load[J]. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(15): 24060161-8.

URL:

https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.24060161 OR https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2025/V39/I15/24060161

1 Zhao B, Wang J. Powder Technology, 2016, 291, 262.
2 Zhao L, Zhang S, Huang D, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 262, 119986.
3 Yuan Q, Kong X, Zhang J, et al. Powder Technology, 2021, 394, 838.
4 Wu Z, Zhang J, Yu H, et al. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2020, 198, 108025.
5 Thilakarathna P S M, Baduge K S, Mendis P, et al. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 231, 106974
6 Wittmann F H, Roelfstra P E, Sadouki H. Materials Science and Engineering, 1985, 68(2), 239.
7 Wriggers P, Moftah S O. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2006, 42(7), 623.
8 Xu W X, Chen H S, Lv Z. Physica A, Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2011, 390(13), 2452.
9 Wang X, Zhang M, Jivkov A P. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2016, 80, 310.
10 Wu Z, Zhang J, Yu H, et al. Composites Part B, Engineering, 2020, 198, 108025.
11 Zhang H, Sheng P, Zhang J, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 225, 927.
12 Wang Z M. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2000(2), 187 (in Chinese).
王宗敏. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2000(2), 187.
13 Ma H F, Xu W X, Li Y C. Computers & Structures, 2016, 177, 103.
14 Ma H F, Song L Z, Xu W X. Computers & Structures, 2018, 209, 57.
15 Qin X G, Gu C S, Shao C F, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 253, 119184
16 Siiria S, Yliruusi J. Powder Technology, 2007, 174(3), 82.
17 Han K, Feng Y T, Owen D R J. Powder Technology, 2005, 155(1), 33.
18 Zhang Z H, Song X G, Liu Y, et al. Composites Science and Technology, 2017, 149, 235.
19 Chen T, Xiao S. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 277, 122257.
20 Gilbert E G, Johnson D W, Keerthi S S. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, 1987, 4(2), 193.
21 Mondal P, Shah S P, Marks L D, ACI Materials Journal, 2008, 105, 174.
22 Mondal P, Shah S P, Marks L D, In, Conference record of 3rd international symposium on nanotechnology in construction, Prague, 2009, pp. 315.
23 Jin L, Li J, Yu W, et al. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2021, 253, 107870.
24 Wang J M, Jivkov A P, Li Q M, et al. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 109, 102722.
25 Wriggers P, Moftah S O, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2006, 42, 623.
26 Hordijk D A. Local approach to fatigue of concrete. Ph. D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 1991.
27 Zhang Y, Zhang X R, Wu H, et al. Engineering Mechanics, 2024, 41(8), 80(in Chinese).
章毅, 张湘茹, 吴昊, 等. 工程力学, 2024, 41(8), 80.
28 Lowes L N. Finite element modeling of reinforced concrete beam-column bridge connections, Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
29 Song Z, Lu Y. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 46, 41.
30 Li W, Xiao J, Sun Z, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(10), 1149.
31 Naderi, Tu W L, Zhang M Z, Cement and Concrete Research, 2021, 140, 106317.
32 Ren Q W, Yin Y J, Shen L. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2020, 51(10), 1267(in Chinese).
任青文, 殷亚娟, 沈雷. 水利学报, 2020, 51(10), 1267.
33 Kim S M, Abu Al-Rub R K. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(3), 339.