纳米硅溶胶增强碳酸钠激发矿渣砂浆力学性能及机理研究

doi:10.11896/cldb.24060009

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (49512KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Sodium carbonate activated slag mortar (SCASM) has the advantages of low carbon emissions, high long-term strength and excellent durability, but its disadvantages such as long setting time and low early strength limit its practical application. Nano-silica sol (NSS) is a colloidal solution formed by the stable dispersion of nano-SiO₂ particles in water, exhibiting high activity and dispersibility. In this work, the effect of various NSS contents on the workability and mechanical performance of SCASM was investigated, and its mechanism was explored by hydration heat, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive spectrometer analysis (SEM-EDS). The results show that NSS can effectively improve the setting speed and mechanical properties of SCASM. NSS provides nucleation effect and nano-filling effect to effectively accelerate the hydration rate, increase the polymerization degree of SCASM, and densify the matrix microstructure. Under alkaline action, the Si-O bond of nano-SiO₂ particles in NSS is further opened to form monomer [SiO₄]^4- in the early stage, providing more nucleation sites. This is prior to the reaction of CO₃^2- with Ca²⁺ and Al³⁺ in the slag to form C-(A)-S-H gel, which plays an important role in the early strength. The gel formed has lower Al/Si ratio and denser structure. At the same time, the unreacted SiO₂ particles could fill the pores and further optimize the pore structure. With the increasing of NSS content, the setting time, bleeding rate and fluidity of SCASM gradually decrease, while the mechanical properties and the ratio of flexural to compression firstly increase and then decrease. When the NSS content is 11%, the initial setting time and final setting time of the pastes can be shortened by 96.0% and 93.1%, respectively. When the NSS content is 5%, the mortar sample has the highest flexural strength, compared with mortar sample without NSS, its 7 d and 28 d flexural strength significantly increases by 75.4% and 24.7%, respectively. When the NSS content is 8%, the mortar sample has the highest compressive strength, and its 7 d and 28 d compressive strength significantly improve by 91.7% and 21.6%, respectively. However, when the NSS content is too high, the mechanical properties of SCASM will reduce due to the decreased dispersibility of NSS.

Key words： nano-silica sol sodium carbonate alkali-activated slag mortar working performance mechanical performance microstructure

Published: 15 August 2025 Online: 2025-08-15

CLC number:

TU528

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Huanghai
	JI Tao
	LIU Xinsuo
	HU Zhilong
	ZHENG Qiaofang
	ZHENG Xiaoyan

Cite this article:

LIU Huanghai,JI Tao,LIU Xinsuo, et al. Mechanical Performance and Mechanism of Nano-silica Sol Reinforced Sodium Carbonate Activated Slag Mortar[J]. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(16): 24060009-8.

URL:

https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.24060009 OR https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2025/V39/I16/24060009

1 Shen J Y, Xiao J Z, Wen G X, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 434, 140201.
2 Zheng X Y, Liu H H, You S J, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 131, 104556.
3 He J, Zheng W H, Bai W B, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 271, 121608.
4 Yang K, Zhang Z L, Yang Y, et al. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(14), 2326 (in Chinese).
杨凯, 张之璐, 杨永, 等. 材料导报, 2019, 33(14), 2326.
5 Adesina A. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 2021, 3, 100016.
6 Ling X, Schollbach K, Liu G, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 313, 125494.
7 Kucharczyk S, Pichór W. Materials and Structures, 2023, 56(3), 58.
8 Jiao Z Z, Wang Y, Zheng W Z, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 197, 83.
9 Kiiashko A, Chaouche M, Frouin L. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 119, 103986.
10 You S J. Tensile creep behavior and crack resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete with recycled concrete aggregate. Master's Thesis, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China, 2023 (in Chinese).
游生洁. 碱矿渣再生混凝土拉伸徐变及抗裂性能研究. 硕士学位论文, 福建农林大学, 2023.
11 Wang J X, Lyu X J, Wang L Y, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 171, 622.
12 Xu P, Zhang X H, Ming G L, et al. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(16), 119 (in Chinese).
徐鹏, 张轩翰, 明高林, 等. 材料导报, 2023, 37(16), 119.
13 Matalkah F, Ababneh A, Aqel R. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 336, 127545.
14 Zhang C W, Khorshidi H, Najafi E, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 384, 135390.
15 Wang W J, Wang B M, Zhang S P. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 192, 114215.
16 Miao J X, Lu L Q, Jiang J Y. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2022, 19, 3646.
17 Yin X, Dai Y. Chemical Propellants & Polymeric Materials, 2005, 3(6), 27 (in Chinese).
殷馨, 戴媛静. 化学推进剂与高分子材料, 2005, 3(6), 27.
18 Xie Z Y, Zhou H, Li Q C, et al. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(S2), 1160 (in Chinese).
解志益, 周涵, 李庆超, 等. 材料导报, 2020, 34(S2), 1160.
19 Xu P, Chen T Y, Fan K J, et al. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 80, 108090.
20 Kong D Y, Pan H W, Wang L H, et al. Cement and Concrete Compo-sites, 2019, 98, 137.
21 Zhang X Y, Song X F, Gao R, et al. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2014, 33(3), 589 (in Chinese).
张县云, 宋学锋, 高瑞. 硅酸盐通报, 2014, 33(3), 589.
22 Chen J J, Ng P L, Xu L, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 411, 134582.
23 Zhang X Z, Yang H B, Yang Q, et al. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 11(2), 1.
24 Long W J, Xiao B X, Gu Y C, et al. Materials Characterization, 2018, 136, 111.
25 Kim T, Kim J H, Jun Y. Materials, 2019, 12(9), 1571.
26 Reddy K C, Subramaniam K V L. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 123, 104175.
27 Gao X, Yu Q L, Brouwers H J H. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 98, 397.
28 Xu Z H, Gao J M, Zhao Y S, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 332, 130096.
29 Xie L L, Liu K W. Materials, 2022, 15(5), 1687.
30 zen  C, Oktay D, Aktürk B. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 422, 135844.
31 Song W L, Zhu Z D, Pu S Y, et al. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(22), 22070 (in Chinese).
宋维龙, 朱志铎, 浦少云, 等. 材料导报, 2020, 34(22), 22070.
32 Chen X Y, Cheng Z Y, Zhan X, et al. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(23), 23235 (in Chinese).
陈旭勇, 程子扬, 詹旭, 等. 材料导报, 2021, 35(23), 23235.
33 Zhang S L, Qi X Q, Guo S Y, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 275, 122154.
34 Bernal S A, Provis J L, Myers R J, et al. Materials and Structures, 2015, 48(3), 517.
35 Zhang B B, Chen Y N, Ma Y, et al. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2022, 75(9), 447.
36 Niu F S, Nie Y M, Zhang J R. Concrete, 2009(11), 83(in Chinese).
牛福生, 聂轶苗, 张锦瑞. 混凝土, 2009(11), 83.
37 Ye J Y, Zhang W S. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2020, 48(8), 1263(in Chinese).
叶家元, 张文生. 硅酸盐学报, 2020, 48(8), 1263.