| POLYMERS AND POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
| Effects of Polymer Types on the Performance and Microstructure of Interface Agents for Aged Ceramic Wall Tiles |
| LYU Guanji1,2, JI Tao3, ZHENG Mingxin1,*, MA Yalin3
|
1 College of Transportation Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China 2 Department of Management Engineering, Fujian Business University, Fuzhou 350012, China 3 College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To enhance the interfacial performance of renovation agents for old wall tiles, four polymer-modified formulations (PTB, EVA, VAE, and SAE) were evaluated. Systematic assessments of bond strength (including freeze-thaw and wind vibration), compressive-flexural ratio, water absorption, and microstructural characteristics were conducted through XRD, FTIR, mercury intrusion porosimetry(MIP), SEM, and pore and crack analysis system (PCAS) analyses. Results demonstrated that polymer modification significantly improved interfacial bond strength while reducing compressive-flexural ratio and water absorption. When the volume ratio of polymer to external water is 1∶1, the order of bond strength (including freeze-thaw and wind vibration) is PTBJ (representing PTB interface agent)>VAEJ>SAEJ>EVAJ. The order of compressive-flexural ratio is SAEJ>VAEJ>EVAJ>PTBJ. And the order of water absorption is SAEJ>EVAJ>VAEJ>PTBJ. PTBJ exhibits a more complex and dense, yet incomplete, continuous spatial network structure, resulting in enhanced bond strength and reduced compressive-flexural ratio and water absorption. This study provides a theoretical and experimental foundation for optimizing polymer-modified interface agents in urban renewal projects that involve aged ceramic tile surfaces.
|
|
Published:
Online: 2026-02-13
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
zhengmingxin0317@yeah.net
|
|
|
1 Yang H, Kikuta K, Hayashi M. Energies, 2022, 15(5), 1873. 2 Czarnecki S, Rudner M. Buildings, 2023, 13(7), 1842. 3 Zhao C L, Porzio S, Smith A, et al. JCT Research, 2006, 3, 109. 4 Meng X, Meng L, Wang J. International Journal of Low-Carbon Techno-logies, 2022, 17, 710. 5 Mansur A A P, Nascimento O L, Vasconcelos W L, et al. Materials Research, 2008, 11, 293. 6 Mansur A A P, Santos D B, Mansur H S. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(2), 270. 7 Chen Z F. Building Technology, 2003, 34(9), 658(in Chinese). 陈志锋. 建筑技术, 2003, 34(9), 658. 8 Li Y D, Zhang G, Xu X. Green Building, 2008(5), 11(in Chinese). 李英丁, 张铬, 徐迅. 绿色建筑(原刊名:化学建材), 2008(5), 11. 9 Lyu W S. Wall Innovation and Building Energy Efficiency, 2019(6), 54(in Chinese). 吕文生. 墙体革新与建筑节能, 2019(6), 54. 10 Zhong X R. Research on the bonding performance and interface simulation of polymer modified cement pavement repair mortar. Master’s Thesis, Chongqing Jiaotong University, China, 2023 (in Chinese). 钟秀容. 聚合物改性水泥路面修补砂浆的黏结性能研究及界面模拟. 硕士学位论文, 重庆交通大学, 2023. 11 Zhang N, Sun Q, Zhang P Y, et al. Silicate Bulletin, 2023, 42(8), 2703(in Chinese). 张娜, 孙倩, 张鹏宇, 等. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(8), 2703. 12 Wang K F, Long T Y, Wang J, et al. Concrete and Cement Products, 2023(5), 63(in Chinese). 王克凡, 龙天艳, 王娟, 等. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2023(5), 63. 13 Ma C Y. Research on interface bonding performance of polymer modified OPC-CAC-G repair mortar. Master’s Thesis, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China, 2022 (in Chinese). 马晨媛. 聚合物改性OPC-CAC-G修补砂浆的界面黏结性能研究. 硕士学位论文, 西安建筑科技大学, 2022. 14 Zhang X. Research on polymer modified rapid cementitious repair materials and their mechanisms. Master’s Thesis, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China, 2020 (in Chinese). 张霄. 聚合物改性快速水泥基修补材料及其机理研究. 硕士学位论文, 西安建筑科技大学, 2020. 15 Kim M O. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(3), 1061. 16 Duan P. Research on the evolution law of concrete pore structure in seawater environment. Master’s Thesis, Wuhan University of Technology, China, 2011 (in Chinese). 段平. 海水环境下混凝土孔结构演变规律研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉理工大学, 2011. 17 Zhang C Y, Zhu M, Li X H, et al. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22 (11), 4531(in Chinese). 张春雨, 朱明, 李修浩, 等. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(11), 4531. |
|
|
|