铸余渣固化工程渣土再生路基填料的性能与机制

doi:10.11896/cldb.24020088

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (12802KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to reduce the carbon emissions and costs of stabilizing excavated soil into subgrade fills, and improve the resource recovery of industrial solid waste, ladle furnace slag (single or cooperation with sodium silicate) was selected as the predominant material to stabilize excavated soil to manufacture subgrade fills. The slag could dehydrate the soil more quickly compared to cement, and it was able to transform the soil into fills with a California bearing ratio greater than 8% (a value for the subgrade suffering general hydrological and load situations recommended by standard). Silicate (aluminate) hydrates exhibiting various maturity could be observed within fills, but there were still many residual pores. Consequently, the bearing capacity of compacted fills highly depended on the interlocking effect of slag particles and the compressive hardening of fills. After incorporating sodium silicate, the dehydration of soil was further accelerated. Also, particle-size distribution and stability of the fills were improved. Due to the stimulation of sodium silicate, dicalcium silicate crystal in slag was destructed and then hydrated into silicate (aluminate) hydrates to cement and enclose particles. As a result, the fills exhibited dense microstructure, and the compacted fills demonstrated higher California bearing ratio and the saturated unconfined compressive strength exceeding 1 MPa after 7 days of curing. Sodium silicate was prone to transform into a reactive gel (NaHSi₂O₅·3H₂O) with water uptake and expansibility, thus, excessive addition of sodium silicate resulted in the cracking of compacted fills under high humidity hence reducing strength. Based on the experimental results and the engineering application scenarios of fills, two mix proportions were recommended. When fills were used under general hydrological and load situations, the stabilizer consisted of 4.5%—6% slag, 3% lime, and 3% fly ash of the wet mass of soil. And 0.2%—0.3% sodium silicate was supposed to be added for the fills requiring better water stability and bearing capacity. The presented method for preparing fills, along with the recommended mix design, can facilitate the co-management of excavated soils and industrial solid waste. Furthermore, it can reduce the carbon emissions and costs associated with engineering.

Key words： ladle furnace slag excavated soil subgrade fill soil stabilization silicate sodium

Published: 10 March 2025 Online: 2025-03-18

CLC number:

TU521

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Jingyu
	ZHAN Liangtong
	LIANG Teng
	CHEN Ping

Cite this article:

WANG Jingyu,ZHAN Liangtong,LIANG Teng, et al. Performance and Mechanism of Stabilizing Excavated Soil into Subgrade Fills by Using Ladle Furnace Slag[J]. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(5): 24020088-7.

URL:

https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.24020088 OR https://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2025/V39/I5/24020088

1 Zhan L, Wang J, Liang T, et al. Transportation Geotechnics, 2023, 38, 100914.
2 Zhan L, Wang J, Liang T, et al. Transportation Geotechnics, 2023, 38, 100918.
3 Xu J, Xiao C, Wu H, et al. Sustainability, 2020, 12(3), 1017.
4 Lu Y, Xu C, Baghbani A. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 400, 132879.
5 Wei J, Cen K. Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 653, 200.
6 Shen W, Cao L, Li Q, et al. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50, 1004.
7 Lei Y, Zhang Q, Nielsen C, et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(1), 147.
8 Bullard J W, Jennings H M, Livingston R A, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(12), 1208.
9 Chen K, Wu D, Zhang Z, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 315, 125723.
10 Li W, Yi Y, Puppala A J. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2020, 146(7), 06020008.
11 Wu J, Liu Q, Deng Y, et al. Soils and Foundations, 2019, 59(4), 955.
12 Jiang Y, Ling T C, Shi C, et al. Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 136, 187.
13 Guo J, Bao Y, Wang M. Waste Management, 2018, 78, 318.
14 Wang X, Lu X, Turvey C C, et al. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 186, 106590.
15 Yi Y, Liska M, Jin F, et al. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53(5), 773.
16 Kogbara R B, Yi Y, Al-Tabbaa A. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2011, 18(8), 1286.
17 Mahedi M, Cetin B, Dayioglu A Y. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 253, 109720.
18 Nidzam R M, Kinuthia J M. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials, 2010, 163(3), 157.
19 Larsson M A, Baken S, Smolders E, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 296, 158.
20 Yüksel I A. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2017, 19(2), 369.
21 Brand A S, Singhvi P, Fanijo E O, et al. Materials, 2020, 13(19), 4251.
22 Ortega-López V, Manso J M, Cuesta I I, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 68, 455.
23 Montenegro-Cooper J M, Celemín-Matachana M, Cañizal J, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 203, 201.
24 Manso J M, Ortega-López V, Polanco J A, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 40, 126.
25 Parsaei M, Vakili A H, Salimi M, et al. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021, 80(8), 6303.
26 Xu B, Yi Y. Applied Clay Science, 2019, 178, 105136.
27 Espinosa AB, Revilla-Cuesta V, Skaf, M. et al. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30, 101317.
28 Wu J, Deng Z, Deng Y, et al. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2022, 59(6), 889.
29 Zhang L, Ni X, Fan X, et al. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2024, 20(S1), 77 (in Chinese).
张路, 倪晓逸, 樊恒辉, 等. 地下空间与工程学报, 2024, 20(S1), 77.
30 Bement R A P, Selby A R. Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 1997, 15(2), 121.
31 Rezaeian M, Ferreira P M V, Ekinci A. Soils and Foundations, 2019, 59(3), 687.
32 Zhu F, Huang N, Xue S, et al. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(23), 23867.
33 Asano M, Wagai R. Geoderma, 2014, 216, 62.
34 MOT. Specifications for design of highway subgrades, JTG D30-2015. China Communications Press, China, 2015(in Chinese).
中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路路基设计规范, JTGD 30-2015. 人民交通出版社, 2015.
35 Eissa A, Bassuoni M T, Ghazy A, et al. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2022, 34(4), 04022031.
36 Lopes E C, da Silva T O, Pitanga H N, et al. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2021, 23(14), 5003.
37 Hossain K M A, Lachemi M, Easa S. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2007, 51(4), 711.
38 Sunitsakul J, Sawatparnich A, Sawangsuriya A. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2012, 30, 263.
39 Ma Q, Wang H. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, 2022, 7654781.
40 Vakili M V, Chegenizadeh A, Nikraz H, et al. Applied Clay Science, 2016, 124-125, 243.
41 Haas J, Nonat A. Cement and Concrete Research, 2015, 68, 124.
42 Zhang W, Zhang J, Ye J, et al. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 47(11), 1663 (in Chinese).
张文生, 张江涛, 叶家元, 等. 硅酸盐学报, 2019, 47(11), 1663.
43 Bernard L, Leemann A. Cement and Concrete Research, 2015, 68, 156.
44 Benmore C J, Monteiro P J M. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(6), 892.
45 Nakahira A, Naganuma H, Kubo T, et al. Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 2008, 116(1351), 500.
46 Yazici H, Yardimci M Y, Yiiter H, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2010, 32(8), 639.
47 Danner T, Justnes H, Geiker M, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2016, 79, 333.
48 Chen P, Ma B, Tan H, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 321, 126362.
49 Yang J, Li D, Fang Y. Materials (Basel), 2017, 10(7), 695.
50 Dai D, Peng J, Zhao X, et al. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021, 9170431.