| METALS AND METAL MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
| Smart Thermal Control Metamaterials Manipulated by External Fields |
| DU Yijia1, WANG Pan1, XIAO Chengyu1, TANG Daoyuan2, XU Jianming2, ZHOU Han1
|
1 State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2 State Key Laboratory of Space Power-sources Technology, Shanghai Institute of Space Power-sources, Shanghai 200245, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Metamaterials have been extensively investigated due to their strong designability of structure and various excellent physical properties.Thermal metamaterials have attracted worldwide attention because of their ability to design thermal emissivity and reflectance. In recent years, thermal metamaterials have been developing towards the trends of intelligence and multifunction. Therefore, smart metamaterials have become an important way to achieve efficient thermal control.
Traditional smart thermal control materials based on phase change coatings have limitations including low control precision, limited range of regulation and poor designability. Ideal electromagnetic properties can be attained by structural design of metamaterials, and perfect absorption can be achieved by different loss mechanisms such as surface plasmon polaritons. In addition, thermal properties can be quickly and precisely controlled by smart metamaterials combined with phase change materials or reconfigurable surfaces.
Smart thermal control metamaterials can be tuned by various external fields including thermal, electrical and mechanical fields. Absorption amplitude and peak can be tuned simultaneously by metamaterials with designed structures under thermal field. High modulation accuracy and fast response ability can be achieved by smart metamaterials manipulated by the electric field. Biologically inspired mechanically controlled metamate-rials have been expected to be widely used because of their flexibility and fabrication simplicity. Besides, magnetically and optically controlled smart metamaterials have also been investigated.
This review summarizes the research status of smart thermal control metamaterials. First, we introduce basic concepts of perfect absorption and smart thermal control. We then analyze research progress and tuning approaches of smart metamaterials manipulated by different external fields from the perspective of structural design and loss mechanisms. Finally, we summarize the current challenges and prospect future development directions of smart thermal control metamaterials.
|
|
Published: 25 January 2022
Online: 2022-01-26
|
|
|
| Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China (51772191). |
|
|
1 Liu Y, Zhang X. Chemical Society Review, 2011, 40(5), 2494.
2 Kadic M, Buckmann T, Schittny R, et al. Reports of Progress in Physics, 2013, 76(12), 126501.
3 Cummer S A, Christensen J, Alù A. Nature Reviews Materials, 2016, 1(3), 16001.
4 Blees M K, Barnard A W, Rose P A, et al. Nature, 2015, 524, 204.
5 Pendry J B, Schurig D, Smith D R. Science, 2006, 5781(312), 1780.
6 Fan C Z, Gao Y, Huang J P. Applied Physics Letters, 2008, 92(25), 251907.
7 Li T, Zhai Y, He S, et al. Science, 2019, 364(6442), 760.
8 Kim T, Bae J Y, Lee N, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019, 29(10), 1807319.
9 Shaltout A M, Shalaev V M, Brongersma M L. Science, 2019, 364(6441), t3100.
10 Ke Y, Yin Y, Zhang Q, et al. Joule, 2019, 3(3), 858.
11 Sun K, Riedel C A, Wang Y, et al. ACS Photonics, 2017, 5(2), 495.
12 Hossain M M, Jia B, Gu M. Advanced Optical Materials, 2015, 3, 1047.
13 Watts C M, Liu X, Padilla W J. Advanced Materials, 2012, 24, 98.
14 Xiao S, Drachev V P, Kildishev A V, et al. Nature, 2010, 466, 735.
15 Caldwell J D, Lindsay L, Giannini V, et al. Nanophotonics, 2015, 4(1), 44.
16 Dou S, Xu H, Zhao J, et al. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(6), e2000697.
17 Du K, Cai L, Luo H, et al. Nanoscale, 2018, 10(9), 4415.
18 Cao T, Zhang X, Dong W, et al. Advanced Optical Materials, 2018, 6(16), 1800169.
19 Qu Y, Li Q, Cai L, et al. Light: Science & Applications, 2018, 7, 26.
20 Tittl A, Michel A U, Schäferling M, et al. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(31), 4597.
21 Wu S, Lai K, Wang C. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1), 7684.
22 Chandra S, Franklin D, Cozart J, et al. ACS Photonics, 2018, 5, 4513.
23 Huang J, Xuan Y, Li Q. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2011, 112(16), 2592.
24 Fan D, Li Q, Xuan Y, et al. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2016, 144, 331.
25 Yildirim D U, Ghobadi A, Soydan M C, et al. ACS Photonics, 2019, 6(7), 1812.
26 Ke Y, Wen X, Zhao D, et al. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(7), 7542.
27 Long S, Cao X, Huang R, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(25), 22692.
28 Liu X, Padilla W J. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(5), 871.
29 Wen R, Granqvist C G, Niklasson G A. Nature Materials, 2015, 14(10), 996.
30 Li Y, van de Groep J, Talin A A, et al. Nano Letters, 2019, 19, 7988.
31 Park J, Kang J, Liu X, et al. Science Advances, 2018, 4(12), t3163.
32 Li Z, Zhou Y, Qi H, et al. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(41), 9117.
33 Zeng B, Huang Z, Singh A, et al. Light: Science & Applications, 2018, 7(1), 51.
34 Rodrigo D, Limaj O, Janner D, et al. Science, 2015, 349(6244), 165.
35 Ito K, Iizuka H. Journal of Applied Physics, 2016, 120(16), 163105.
36 Kim Y, Wu P C, Sokhoyan R, et al. Nano Letters, 2019, 19(6), 3961.
37 Liang X, Chen M, Guo S, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(46), 40810.
38 Liang X, Guo S, Chen M, et al. Materials Horizons, 2017(5), 878.
39 Ge D, Lee E, Yang L, et al. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(15), 2489.
40 Xu C, Colorado Escobar M, Gorodetsky A A. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(16), 1905717.
41 Leung E M, Colorado Escobar M, Stiubianu G T, et al. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1), 1947.
42 Xu C, Stiubianu G T, Gorodetsky A A. Science, 2018, 359, 1495.
43 Luo Z, Evans B A, Chang C. ACS Nano, 2019, 13(4), 4657.
44 Coppens Z J, Valentine J G. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(39), 1701275. |
|
|
|
渝公网安备50019002502923号 © Editorial Office of Materials Reports.
2022, Vol. 36 
